DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Cold guessing
Falcon 1 launch a success! »

Skeptic love



The public perception of a skeptic, I think it’s fair to say, is of a cold person who tries to deny their emotions, a party-pooper whose existence is simply to rain on everyone else’s parade, someone who categorizes everything into tightly constrained boxes with rigid definitions.

I can think of over 1000 people who attended TAM 7 last week who might disagree.

And I can think of two in particular: my friends and colleagues Rebecca Watson and Sid Rodrigues, who got married right there at TAM!

They had planned this out in advance, and set it up carefully. Rebecca is one of the Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe podcasters, and they record a show live in front of the TAM audience every year before the regular TAM session starts. This year, during the Q&A part, Sid stood up… and, well, watch for yourself.


Awe. Some.

[Update: the JREF released footage of the wedding as well, taken from a different angle.]

Pay attention to people’s reactions in the video, too. Note the laughter, the smiles, the surprise, the support, the love.

Yeah, skeptics are a cold bunch.

Also note how giving of their time they are. There might even be an appearance of My Close Personal Friend™ during the wedding, too.

For more on this, including a video taken from another angle, check out Bug Girl’s skepchick post. I imagine more video will be popping up soon, too.

My sincere and whole-hearted congrats to the happy couple. It was a perfect wedding: funny, warm, silly, and the two betrothed surrounded by friends and family… with the line between the two very much blurred. Sometimes, that’s just the way we skeptics like it.

Share

July 15th, 2009 10:30 AM by Phil Plait in Cool stuff, Skepticism | 52 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

52 Responses to “Skeptic love”

  1. 1.   William Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 10:41 am

    Aww, that’s so sweet, and it’ll be the talk of Skeptown for the next couple of months.

  2. 2.   William Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 10:43 am

    You said it. Awesome. Love long and Prosper you two!

  3. 3.   Joseph Smidt Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 10:49 am

    I’m still a little skeptical that you guys have emotions. I’d feel inclined to believe you, but on the other hands I don’t want reality to be clouded by my own personal feelings.

  4. 4.   Mike Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 10:52 am

    “Awesome” indeed!

  5. 5.   CW Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 10:57 am

    Congrats! I’m a big fan of the SGU podcast and I wish Rebecca and Sid best wishes.

  6. 6.   Calamity Janeway Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Awww, I got teary eyed! Congrats to the happy couple.

  7. 7.   PsyberDave Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    Congratulations to Mrs. and Mr. Skepchick!

  8. 8.   ZERO Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    *tongue sticking out*

  9. 9.   TSFrost Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Yeah, my wife’s first exposure to skeptics was last Dragon*con. After one of the “tracks” she said,”Those guys are hilarious. Skeptics aren’t supposed to be funny!” If only everyone could realize that we see all the wonder and awe and humor and love in the world, even without any belief in magic.

    I said as much on the Skepchick site, but it bears repeating: Congratulations Rebecca and Sid.

  10. 10.   JHGRedekop Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:47 am

    That was definitely a fun surprise. A nice bonus to my first TAM!

  11. 11.   Scott Belyea Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    “The public perception of a skeptic, I think it’s fair to say, is of a cold person who tries to deny their emotions, a party-pooper whose existence is simply to rain on everyone else’s parade, someone who categorizes everything into tightly constrained boxes with rigid definitions.”

    I don’t think I’ve seen a bigger straw man in the last year at least.

    No, I don’t think it’s fair to say that at all. Do you have any evidence to support this assertion, or are you simply making it up to support your argument?

  12. 12.   Jeff Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    To the young in the audience don’t get old.

  13. 13.   josh Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    REBECCA’S WEDDING WAS AN INSIDE JOB WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!111

  14. 14.   Daniel Poeira Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    Words fail me. Thanks for the good tears.

  15. 15.   Sili Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    Wait? So Rebecca knew about it beforehand too? Boooo! Humbug!

  16. 16.   ben goldacre Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    haha love long and prosper, totally x

  17. 17.   Scott Sigler Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    But Phil Plait IS devoid of emotion. He is a cold, calculating, killing machine. He makes the Terminator look like a romance novel junkie.

  18. 18.   Yossarian Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Josh @13:

    LOL!

  19. 19.   Gozza Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Euh.. skeptics cold people?

    I think you believe in your own stereotype too much :)

  20. 20.   Sir Eccles Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    OH EM GEE my Galileoscope just arrived!!!!!!!! :-)

    Order number in the mid six thousands if people want to guesstimate when theirs might arrive.

    Of course the problem is I am about to move house so have to pack it away and wait until the movers ship it cross country :-(

    p.s. sorry if this is off topic, just very excited

  21. 21.   Rebecca Watson Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Aw, thanks Phil! It was so much fun, we might do it again next year. ;) xoxo

  22. 22.   The Science Pundit Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Sili

    Wait? So Rebecca knew about it beforehand too?

    I would have thought that was patently obvious to anyone with a skeptical mind. ;-)

    Congrats Rebecca! :-)

  23. 23.   Bill Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Huge cheers to Rebecca and Sid! What a fun way to have pulled this off!

  24. 24.   Jason Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Marriage between skeptics threatens my heterosexual Christian ordained marriage. I demand it be stopped lest we destroy American culture.

    /sarcasm

    Way to go, best of luck to you both!

  25. 25.   Caleb Jones Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Somewhat related, I recently saw Charlie Chaplin’s famous monologue from “The Great Dictator” (his first “talkie” film). From the monologue (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IvPIWzQcUY):

    “The way of life can be free and beautiful. But we have lost the way. Greed has poisoned men’s souls – has barricaded the world with hate; has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed.

    …Our knowledge has made us cynical, our cleverness hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little: More than machinery we need humanity; More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost.

    …In the seventeenth chapter of Saint Luke it is written ” the kingdom of God is within man ” – not one man, nor a group of men – but in all men – in you, the people.

    …You the people have the power, the power to create machines, the power to create happiness. You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure.

    …Let us fight to free the world, to do away with national barriers, do away with greed, with hate and intolerance. Let us fight for a world of reason, a world where science and progress will lead to all men’s happiness.”

    The reasons I loved this speech (can’t believe I hadn’t seen it before) are:
    1) It speaks to the universality of human nature.
    2) God is defined as also being universal (with “God” very loosely defined). Interesting to note that you have a Jewish character, played by an agnostic(?) actor, citing Christian text, but interpreting it in a way that is applicable to all.
    3) Science and reason are cited as being equally as important as religion or humanity in order to realize freedom and peace.
    4) It points out that the merit/potential of science or religion is based first on its ability to bring about peace and freedom and that, as always, it’s how we apply them that often determines whether we’ll realize their potential.

    So does being skeptic mean you must be cold, unfeeling, or inhumane? No, but people can use skepticism to become or remain such.

    Likewise, does being religious or spiritual mean you must be gullible, uncritical, or otherwise less intelligent? No, but people can use religion or spirituality to become or remain such.

    A balance of both is needed.

    PS: That’s why in my mind I have written the 11th commandment: Thou shalt use thine head.

  26. 26.   John Paradox Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    That’s so (sniff) sweet.

    (is it true what they say about women at weddings?)

    ;)

    J/P=?

  27. 27.   Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    Congratulations to you 2 crazy kids! TAM will never be the same! (It’ll be better!)

  28. 28.   Joey Joe Joe Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    I don’t think it’s very fair to the people who paid good money to attend TAM and have no interest in seeing a wedding. If you want to get married, good for you, but do it in your own time, please. I, for one, have no interest in other peoples private lives.

    Seeing things like this just reinforces by opinion of TAM as a giant group masturbatory session.

  29. 29.   Rebecca Watson Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    Group hug!

  30. 30.   Jewel Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    I hate even more that I wasn’t able to go to TAM this year. I think it’s wonderful! A very big congratz to Rebecca and Sid!

  31. 31.   davidlpf Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    congrats.

  32. 32.   Improbable Research » Blog Archive » A skeptical (not cynical!) marriage Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    [...] to Phil Plait for bringing this to everyone’s attention, and of course to the Amazing Randi for giving birth, so to speak, to the [...]

  33. 33.   Ben Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    It was a hoax. The shadows are all wrong.

  34. 34.   John B. Sandlin Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    That was awesome.

    jbs

  35. 35.   John Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    I dont think i can watch this again. Still devastated that my gorgeous skepchick rebecca is off the market. How can I go on :(

  36. 36.   Christina Viering Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    Beautiful!

  37. 37.   Kyle Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    Aww my dreams have been shattered I wanted to marry a hot skeptical chic…well Rebecca :-)

    I wish the married couple a long and fulfilling marriage and all the little skeptical children they could wish for. Congrats you two and have a long and loving marriage.

    Congrats.

  38. 38.   Blake Stacey Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    I am greatly amused by the suggestion that the TAM audience was forced to witness the wedding, as if the doors were barred and armed security guards posted at all the exits. Everybody knows they only do that when Michael Shermer brings out his PowerPoint slides.

    Again, as I have said in person and elsewhere on the Intertubes, best wishes to the happy couple.

  39. 39.   Robin Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    The wedding was awesome! Congrats to Rebecca and Sid.

    @38: I want a copy of Shermer’s slides of the US from his presentation this year. Those were great.

  40. 40.   SionH Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 3:35 am

    It was the highlight of TAM for me. Next year I want to see Phil Plait and Richard Wiseman tie the knot.

  41. 41.   LaoTzu Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 4:47 am

    Oh no… Now that skeptics have finally learned to fake emotions, there is no limit to what they can do next. Someone will have to stand up and expose their true lizard faces…

  42. 42.   Michael Meadon Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 5:15 am

    That’s awesome! Can’t wait to hear the relevant SGU episode! :-)

    Btw. I met — and fell in love with — my girlfriend at a Skeptics in the Pub in Johannesburg. We met, indirectly, through SGU… we both started blogs because of the skeptics movement (and specifically because of SGU), and thus became involved in skeptical activism and thence attended a Skeptics in the Pub…

  43. 43.   Matt Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 7:38 am

    So, did Adam make the rings? That would be frakking awesome. I lost my wedding ring. Maybe he would make one for me! LOL!

    Oh, and Congrats Rebecca and Sid!

  44. 44.   teacherninja Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    sniff snifff

    Just bee-yutiful, really.

    Was Phil in the room?

    An AMAZING meeting to be sure.

  45. 45.   PhilB Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    I’d be careful. If Brian Dunning and his Illuminati find out that you’re leaking footage of Skeptics being loving and showing emotion……well, there’s no telling what could happen.

    Rebecca & Sid, awwwwwwww congratz you guys.

  46. 46.   Stone Age Scientist Says:
    July 17th, 2009 at 5:52 am

    Phil, this also :D :

    http://gmy.news.yahoo.com/vid/14547285

  47. 47.   Chris Says:
    July 17th, 2009 at 10:52 am

    Congrats, Rebbecca and Sid!

  48. 48.   Skeptic love | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine « Himanchals Organization Says:
    July 17th, 2009 at 11:13 am

    [...] Cool stuff | The public perception of a skeptic, I think it’s fair to say, is of a cold person who tries to deny their emotions, a party-pooper whose existence is simply to. Original post: Skeptic love | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine [...]

  49. 49.   Felipe Figueiredo (philsf) 's status on Saturday, 18-Jul-09 00:56:40 UTC - Identi.ca Says:
    July 17th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    [...] http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/15/skeptic-love/ [...]

  50. 50.   A Skeptics’ Wedding « The Kewl Doodz ‘n’ Chyx Says:
    July 18th, 2009 at 6:02 am

    [...] Posted by Martin Poulter on 18 July 2009 Last week Sid Rodriguez (whom I’ve met) married his transatlantic love Rebecca Watson (whom I’ve not met, but she’s a skepchick- how cool is that?!) at James Randi’s Amazing Meeting in Las Vegas. Panel sessions at conferences aren’t normally like this. [...]

  51. 51.   Brendan Says:
    July 18th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    Bah … humbug … that sham ceremony was obviously a big pharma conspiracy supported by big oil and big coal and big nuclear who want us all to spend more time on our computers using electricity to run up their profits …

    (congrats Rebecca and Sid! – awesome)

  52. 52.   Sili Says:
    July 19th, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    Oh, yeah, totally forgot:

    CONGRATS!

    Still disappointed that she was in on it.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us