<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apollo 11: The Big Picture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:26:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Remembering Apollo 11 &#8211; The Big Picture &#8211; Boston.com &#171; Pasco Phronesis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-200126</link>
		<dc:creator>Remembering Apollo 11 &#8211; The Big Picture &#8211; Boston.com &#171; Pasco Phronesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/#comment-200126</guid>
		<description>[...] (H/T Bad Astronomy) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (H/T Bad Astronomy) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Link Love 7/17 &#124; Brad&#8217;s Reader</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-199624</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Link Love 7/17 &#124; Brad&#8217;s Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/#comment-199624</guid>
		<description>[...] Apollo 11: The Big Picture (some really cool photos from the Apollo 11 moon mission!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apollo 11: The Big Picture (some really cool photos from the Apollo 11 moon mission!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ones for the Road &#171; The Way Things Break</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-199477</link>
		<dc:creator>Ones for the Road &#171; The Way Things Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/#comment-199477</guid>
		<description>[...] Remembering Apollo 11 [via BA] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remembering Apollo 11 [via BA] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasOdysseyCoach (Gene)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-199476</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasOdysseyCoach (Gene)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/#comment-199476</guid>
		<description>Thanx for the link Phil!

@ Charles Boyer
I was 13 when they landed, I was already into photography.  The cameras were modified (tho&#039; not much, no finder, no leather... they left the aluminum alone, and a special HUGE shutter release, they had to be able to fire the thing.) Hassie 500 ELMs with a superwide lens and 70mm film backs.  They only brought the backs home, left the camera bodies there.

At the time Hasselblad had a nice glossy brochure out touting that NASA took their cameras to the moon, and left them there.... free for the taking !!!   HAAAA !!!!  I might still have the brochure packed away with my 500EL or 500ELM, i&#039;ll have to look for it, if I find it, I&#039;ll send a link to Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for the link Phil!</p>
<p>@ Charles Boyer<br />
I was 13 when they landed, I was already into photography.  The cameras were modified (tho&#8217; not much, no finder, no leather&#8230; they left the aluminum alone, and a special HUGE shutter release, they had to be able to fire the thing.) Hassie 500 ELMs with a superwide lens and 70mm film backs.  They only brought the backs home, left the camera bodies there.</p>
<p>At the time Hasselblad had a nice glossy brochure out touting that NASA took their cameras to the moon, and left them there&#8230;. free for the taking !!!   HAAAA !!!!  I might still have the brochure packed away with my 500EL or 500ELM, i&#8217;ll have to look for it, if I find it, I&#8217;ll send a link to Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Boyer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-199445</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Boyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/#comment-199445</guid>
		<description>&quot;The astronauts used Hasselblad cameras, which were “medium format.” The resolution is much better than a standard “35mm” format. Plus, Hasselblad was the cadillac of cameras at the time.&quot;

True, however, my post was to illustrate the base film to MP equivalent for a well-known format.  I would simply do the math from there, it&#039;s fairly easy.

I do wish that the astronauts had been able to haul up and use a Wisner 11x14 view camera, the resultant shots would have been even more stunning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The astronauts used Hasselblad cameras, which were “medium format.” The resolution is much better than a standard “35mm” format. Plus, Hasselblad was the cadillac of cameras at the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>True, however, my post was to illustrate the base film to MP equivalent for a well-known format.  I would simply do the math from there, it&#8217;s fairly easy.</p>
<p>I do wish that the astronauts had been able to haul up and use a Wisner 11&#215;14 view camera, the resultant shots would have been even more stunning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan I.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-199432</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/#comment-199432</guid>
		<description>And that&#039;s getting shared on Facebook for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s getting shared on Facebook for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naked Bunny with a Whip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-199426</link>
		<dc:creator>Naked Bunny with a Whip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/16/apollo-11-the-big-picture/#comment-199426</guid>
		<description>@Chris A: Unless they know something we don&#039;t.  *music sting*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris A: Unless they know something we don&#8217;t.  *music sting*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
