<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why oh Wyoming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:54:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/comment-page-2/#comment-202119</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/#comment-202119</guid>
		<description>In case after case where geochronolgists have used the hapsburg/dothan method and tested residual helium nutrons using a subatomic chronology deconstructionator, it has been found that these rocks are over 14 sextillion years old, or 8,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years older than the &quot;Big Bang&quot; or maybe I just pulled some scientific jargon and a big number out of my.... which is what most &quot;scientists&quot; do when they date rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case after case where geochronolgists have used the hapsburg/dothan method and tested residual helium nutrons using a subatomic chronology deconstructionator, it has been found that these rocks are over 14 sextillion years old, or 8,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years older than the &#8220;Big Bang&#8221; or maybe I just pulled some scientific jargon and a big number out of my&#8230;. which is what most &#8220;scientists&#8221; do when they date rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectacular Launch Pad Starlinks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/comment-page-2/#comment-201750</link>
		<dc:creator>Spectacular Launch Pad Starlinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/#comment-201750</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil Plait on visiting Wyoming for Launch Pad.  Also Ed Lerner. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil Plait on visiting Wyoming for Launch Pad.  Also Ed Lerner. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/comment-page-2/#comment-201047</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/#comment-201047</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well, if the words of those posting here doesn’t express it… what does?&quot;

Try actually reading the words of those posting here. They aren&#039;t saying what your prejudiced mind imagines them saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well, if the words of those posting here doesn’t express it… what does?&#8221;</p>
<p>Try actually reading the words of those posting here. They aren&#8217;t saying what your prejudiced mind imagines them saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/comment-page-2/#comment-200946</link>
		<dc:creator>GregB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/#comment-200946</guid>
		<description>There are many spots in Joshua Tree National Park in Southern California that look exactly like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many spots in Joshua Tree National Park in Southern California that look exactly like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prowler67</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/comment-page-2/#comment-200822</link>
		<dc:creator>Prowler67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/#comment-200822</guid>
		<description>That place looks familiar.  I live not too far from there.  I remember years ago when you could climb around on those rocks.  It is a site of a Native American battle.  Very cool place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That place looks familiar.  I live not too far from there.  I remember years ago when you could climb around on those rocks.  It is a site of a Native American battle.  Very cool place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGKnipfer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/comment-page-2/#comment-200681</link>
		<dc:creator>DGKnipfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/#comment-200681</guid>
		<description>Man I loved visiting Vedauwoo on family trips as a kid.  That place is great.  Almost makes Cheyenne worth living in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man I loved visiting Vedauwoo on family trips as a kid.  That place is great.  Almost makes Cheyenne worth living in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/comment-page-2/#comment-200660</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/18/why-oh-wyoming/#comment-200660</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s hard to believe some of these rock formations are almost 6000 years old!&quot;

Impossible to believe, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s hard to believe some of these rock formations are almost 6000 years old!&#8221;</p>
<p>Impossible to believe, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
