Comments on: New black spot on Jupiter

By: Stephen

Stephen — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:33:54 +0000

Has to be a piece of SL-9 that went into some resonance orbit with Jupiter that brought it back 15 years later. Jupiter does stuff we are only starting to understand. SL-9 also hit in the lower southern hemisphere of the planet. This rock had to pass through a keyhole.

By: Ozonator

Ozonator — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:41:40 +0000

Possibly related to the initial topic and this being one of the few public forums for this Jupiter+ prediction:

“A. Our Ozonator’s Preamble for Survival (OOPS) … 1. With condolences, the most significant quaking should take place from Italy to Tehran, lower Australia to deepest darkest Africa, and/or from upper Australia to Kamchatka. In other words, Australia should bounce around the southern hemisphere, China should bounce between the Middle East and Hawaii, and the western coast of the Americas should bounce between the Atlas Mountains and East Pacific Rise/Ridges. These titanic harmonics should generate massive solar flares, sunspots, and Red Spot and other weather changes on Jupiter (planet, not parts of Florida or Texas) …

B. With included statistics, the specifics of the Giulaino – Gansu Model (8/30 – 9/5/9) of extreme earthquake warnings among tectonic energy lines with individual predictions for regions (magnitude in Richters) are:

1. Venezuela (6+) -Dominic an Republic (5+) – Mississippi (3+) – New Mexico (5+) – Nevada (4+) – Northern California (5+) – Hawaii (5+);
2. Moon Walk Model:
a. West Chile Rise (5+) – East Pacific Ridge (6+) – Galapagos Triple Junction region (6+) – Costa Rica (6+) and
b. Tonga (6+) – Santa Cruz (7+) – Guam (7+) – Taiwan (7+) – Japan (7+) – Kurils (7+);
3. Azores (6+) – Strait of Gibraltar (4+) – Morocco (4+) – Algeria (6+) – Italy (7+);
4. Ukraine (5+) – Caspian Sea (6+) – Iran (5+) – Pakistan (5+); and
5. FoxNewsSuxs, Australia (6+) – Mid-Indian Ridge (5+) – Tanzania (6+) – Democratic Republic of Congo (5+) – Nigeria (4+)”

(“GBRWE 8/30 – 9/5/9’s Extreme Planetary Warnings for Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Solar/Terrestrial Flares from Human Activities”; Robert Rhodes, Supplemental; GBRWE 8/30 – 9/5/9, 8/29/09).

By: Ozonator

Ozonator — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:37:28 +0000

Exploring space with a bigger hammer (model) and $10 calculator -

Taking note of the “enormous swirl” not seen with Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 after a month, “JUPITER UPDATE: A little more than a month after a mystery-object crashed into Jupiter, the debris cloud is still visible in backyard telescopes. Amateur astronomer Brian Combs of Buena Vista, Georgia, took this picture on August 19th: … When Australian astrophotographer Anthony Wesley discovered the debris cloud on July 19th, it was about the size of many other small storms dotting Jupiter’s upper atmosphere. Since then, the compact black mark has expanded into an enormous swirl rivaling the girth of the Great Red Spot itself. Unfortunately, as the cloud has expanded it has also faded, and its pale markings could soon disappear altogether” (“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 8/23/09).

Concerning the new dark spot on Jupiter:
“92. Ozonator Says: July 20th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
With a total of 32 predicted, the DEQ-ORM-Esso-Kill-the-Planet Model is a nice tool … the new dark spot on Jupiter … would be the 3rd time this model has been associated with Red Spot perturbations. The final test if I am correct is the development of a new storm on Jupiter. If it was a space rock, no storm should develop.”
and
“95. Ozonator Says: July 20th, 2009 at 10:36 pm … It will be 95% correctly predicted for time period, ecosystem, and specific event if it becomes a spinning hurricane”.

The new dark spot on Jupiter appears to now have taken the 3 previously identified, and separate, plumes and now are combined on the surface into a single cyclonic predation requiring less energy for grater stability. After the earlier embarrassment, I stumbled across some longer term images of parts of Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 for comparison with the longer term image of the new dark spot on Jupiter. After a month, impact from a part of Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 stopped being circular and appeared as more of a linear gash. “Comparisons with Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 … Evolution of D/G Comet Impact Sites on Jupiter … July 18,1994 … July 23, 1994 … JUly 30, 1994 … August 24, 1994 … Hubble Space Telescope… Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 … SL9 Fragments D and G impact site evolution” (planets.ucf.edu/resources/jupiter-impact).

The new dark spot on Jupiter is naturally a big deal to astronomers. However, it is yet another correctly predicted violence to a planetary ecosystem that was exported from RNC’s pure, innocent, and harmless healthcare for the Earth aka global warming. Thus, hurricanes on Jupiter are almost as easy to predict as those on Earth assuming you can google my name(s) with hurricanes and are able to use the date stamp correctly on the bottom of my carbon footprint. Allah (God) didn’t set the Cuyahoga River on fire nor put a fleet of clunker SUVs on Jupiter for Conservitard “LABI” Limbaugh, ExxonMobil’s Rex Tillerson, and Australian Cardinal Pell’s celestial reward.

By: Ozonator

Ozonator — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:41:18 +0000

Possibly related to the recent dark spot formation on Jupiter through high energy dimpling

“Scientists at the Universities of Glasgow, Strathclyde and Central Lancashire have used 21st Century solar observations and image processing to finally solve a sunspot puzzle first noticed in the 18th Century. Professor Alexander Wilson … discovered in 1769 what is now known as the ‘Wilson Depression’ – the slightly ‘dished’ appearance of sunspots, which is most visible when spots are at the edges of the Sun. Wilson theorised that sunspots were depressions in the Sun’s surface, and we now know that the dished appearance is because the radiation emitted from the cooler sunspot comes from a slightly deeper layer in the solar atmosphere than the radiation emitted by the warmer surface that surrounds it. But how much deeper? … crucial in understanding the internal structure of sunspots and their magnetic fields. … Dr Lyndsay Fletcher, Physics and Astronomy Reader explains: ‘Sunspots can only be detected if they are large enough, and the visible size of a sunspot to an observer on Earth depends on many factors all working together. The depth of the Wilson depression is one of these factors. … Fraser Watson, the PhD student who led the analysis, said: ‘… large dataset available from SOHO meant that it was possible to study sunspot visibilities at all solar longitudes and allowed us to construct a model of sunspot shape and formation that produced the same statistical patterns as those seen in the data. In comparing our sunspot model with thousands of solar images we could pin down the depth of the base of sunspots to be around 1500 km below the surrounding solar surface.’ … it can be used as a ‘ground truth’ in complex models of sunspot density, temperature and magnetic field” (“Long-standing sunspot puzzle solve”; Science Centric; Source: University of Glasgow; sciencecentric.com, 8/19/09).

By: Ozonator

Ozonator — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:36:41 +0000

“A. Our Ozonator’s Preamble for Survival … 3. The bravery of Mr. Anthony Wesley to put his good name on the line with international attention to a new spot on Jupiter has allowed me to make and confirm following global warming (ecological) predictions associated with the spot, resulting cloud formations, and the dynamism seen in the resulting animation given the level of GBRWE modeling. A new spot on Jupiter as part of a storm from a volcanic plume has occurred at least twice before in association with DEQ-ORM-Esso-Kill-the-Planet Models. All others suggested that this spot was formed by an unknown and unseen impact. Only a plume of great length would account for the initial “V” and resulting 3 linear spots and not an impactor. Full viewing of the animation allowed for the more complete understanding of the evidence with previous GBRWE modeling of volcanoes and hurricanes on Jupiter. The animation of the spot confirmed such a plume(s) was making the observed “V” wave until growing energy was not maintained and the “V” degenerated into 3 potential hurricanes from the established plume remnants. The 1st step was the initial dark spot. Based on the animation only, the dark spot was a depression that formed as the growing base of the volcano pulled down the gases in the column above it. Expansion of the base stopped after failing to mix with neighboring bands of differing gases and encountering pressure and magnetic bands with the increased energy inputs. This could be the same mechanism by which a coronal hole forms in a ball of gas that succeeded as a star. The 2nd step of the formation of a 3-sided “V” cloud formation was necessary to explain how a growing volcano of gas under great pressure grew up instead of out and was able to punch through to the surface of Jupiter. The 3rd step was the conversion of the triangularly shaped base volcano and magnetic plume into 3 smaller, sustainable cyclonic vents to maintain the opening to the surface. Such magnetic and gas plumes are usually seen at polar regions on Saturn, Neptune, and Venus. The more power and magnetic fields produces more sides to the plume with planet size determining whether the plume is on the inside (hurricanes) of the 3 dimensional polygon or on the outside (polar regions). The least amount of energy would be seen as a dipole “plume”, much more energy with triangle, and even more with hexagonal (“Why doesn’t Venus have a magnetic field ?”; image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/venus/V3.html). …“A. Our Ozonator’s preamble for Survival … 3. Polar hurricanes are not surprising … The hurricane eye differences between the hexagonal and the ephemeral structure can only be explained through the lack of such on our star. The shifting nature of Venus’s eye looks to be a function of sporadic energy and material imputes. The hexagon eye of Saturn’s hurricane appears to be a function of too much energy inputs for available resources. Thus, the hexagon shape appears to be a window into titanic energies from our star, dark energy interface, or even a worm hole. “ … cyclone is surrounded by an odd, honeycombed-shaped hexagon, which itself does not seem to move while the clouds within it whip around at high speeds … Oddly, neither the fast-moving clouds inside the hexagon nor this new cyclone seem to disrupt the six-sided hexagon … ““ (“Giant Cyclones at Saturn’s Poles Create a Swirl of Mystery”; Jet Propulsion Laboratory; PRESS RELEASE; spaceref.com, 10/13/08). “Venus Express … observing the south pole of Venus … An enormous structure with a central part that looks like the eye of a hurricane, morphs and changes shape within a matter of days, leaving scientists puzzled … a 2000 km-wide vortex. … There is a similar structure on the planet’s north pole… the core of the vortex … creates a depression at the cloud-tops, making the region hotter … changes its shape within a matter of days, from orbit to orbit … ‘classic’ dipole shape at the centre of the vortex … 24 hours earlier shows the centre of the vortex to be almost circular … other times, it is typically oval” (“The puzzling ‘eye of a hurricane’ on Venus”; esa.int, 3/13/08)“ (“GBRWE 10/19 – 25/08’s Extreme Planetary Warnings for Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Solar/Terrestrial Flares from Human Activities”; Robert Rhodes, Supplemental; GBRWE 10/19 – 25/08, 10/18/08)“ (“GBRWE 8/16 – 22/09’s Extreme Planetary Warnings for Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Solar/Terrestrial Flares from Human Activities”; Robert Rhodes, Supplemental; GBRWE 8/16 – 22/09, 8/15/09).

By: Ozonator

Ozonator — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:51:44 +0000

Neato torpedo!

With thanks to Anthony Wesley, Hans Joerg Mettig, Theo Ramakers, and Dr. Tony Phillips, my blogged predictions and theories fit much better than an impact, black obelisk, and RC Hoagland’s stack of unsold coloring books on “Nth-Dimensional Energy Cooking” for “How to Serve Man”.

“EVOLUTION OF AN IMPACT: Since July 19th, when Anthony Wesley of Australia discovered the scattered remains of a mystery impactor in the high clouds of Jupiter, amateur astronomers around the world have been photographing the planet every night. “German astronomer Hans Joerg Mettig has converted some of the best images into polar projections,” says Theo Ramakers, “and I have stitched them together to make a movie.” Click on the image to set the scene in motion: … Animations: large, small, zoom … The 3-week animation, which begins with Wesley’s discovery image and ends yesterday, shows the cindery cloud expanding, swirling, and ultimately being torn into three pieces by turbulent south polar winds. “The spot has really progressed dramatically,” says Ramakers” (“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 8/9/09).

It will takes several days for me to put it into and nice little paper.

By: Ozonator

Ozonator — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:42:42 +0000

“Ozonator Says: August 1st, 2009 at 4:00 am … Finally, some hard evidence to support my modeling – … the following description looks more like 1 or 2 plumes of upwelling material were needed to create the “V” wave in the atmosphere of Jupiter … Jovian hurricanes have the potential to form at all 3 points of the “V” and 1 inside.”

Tada – it appears the plume(s) have lost energy to maintain the “V” wave form. But at least 1 plume exists to sufficiently feed 3 “hurricanes” and not 1 wimpy grease spot that could have theoretically formed inside the “V”.

“JUPITER IMPACT CLOUD: Debris from the July 19th mystery-impact on Jupiter has split into three clouds. The trifurcation is evident in this August 7th image taken by Rick Schrantz using a 10-inch telescope at his backyard observatory in Nicholasville, Kentucky … Other observers have noticed the same thing” (“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 8/8/09).