“A. Our Ozonator’s Preamble for Survival (OOPS) … 1. With condolences, the most significant quaking should take place from Italy to Tehran, lower Australia to deepest darkest Africa, and/or from upper Australia to Kamchatka. In other words, Australia should bounce around the southern hemisphere, China should bounce between the Middle East and Hawaii, and the western coast of the Americas should bounce between the Atlas Mountains and East Pacific Rise/Ridges. These titanic harmonics should generate massive solar flares, sunspots, and Red Spot and other weather changes on Jupiter (planet, not parts of Florida or Texas) …

B. With included statistics, the specifics of the Giulaino – Gansu Model (8/30 – 9/5/9) of extreme earthquake warnings among tectonic energy lines with individual predictions for regions (magnitude in Richters) are:

1. Venezuela (6+) -Dominic an Republic (5+) – Mississippi (3+) – New Mexico (5+) – Nevada (4+) – Northern California (5+) – Hawaii (5+);
2. Moon Walk Model:
a. West Chile Rise (5+) – East Pacific Ridge (6+) – Galapagos Triple Junction region (6+) – Costa Rica (6+) and
b. Tonga (6+) – Santa Cruz (7+) – Guam (7+) – Taiwan (7+) – Japan (7+) – Kurils (7+);
3. Azores (6+) – Strait of Gibraltar (4+) – Morocco (4+) – Algeria (6+) – Italy (7+);
4. Ukraine (5+) – Caspian Sea (6+) – Iran (5+) – Pakistan (5+); and
5. FoxNewsSuxs, Australia (6+) – Mid-Indian Ridge (5+) – Tanzania (6+) – Democratic Republic of Congo (5+) – Nigeria (4+)”

(“GBRWE 8/30 – 9/5/9′s Extreme Planetary Warnings for Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Solar/Terrestrial Flares from Human Activities”; Robert Rhodes, Supplemental; GBRWE 8/30 – 9/5/9, 8/29/09).

Taking note of the “enormous swirl” not seen with Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 after a month, “JUPITER UPDATE: A little more than a month after a mystery-object crashed into Jupiter, the debris cloud is still visible in backyard telescopes. Amateur astronomer Brian Combs of Buena Vista, Georgia, took this picture on August 19th: … When Australian astrophotographer Anthony Wesley discovered the debris cloud on July 19th, it was about the size of many other small storms dotting Jupiter’s upper atmosphere. Since then, the compact black mark has expanded into an enormous swirl rivaling the girth of the Great Red Spot itself. Unfortunately, as the cloud has expanded it has also faded, and its pale markings could soon disappear altogether” (“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 8/23/09).

Concerning the new dark spot on Jupiter:
“92.   Ozonator Says: July 20th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
With a total of 32 predicted, the DEQ-ORM-Esso-Kill-the-Planet Model is a nice tool … the new dark spot on Jupiter … would be the 3rd time this model has been associated with Red Spot perturbations. The final test if I am correct is the development of a new storm on Jupiter. If it was a space rock, no storm should develop.”
and
“95.   Ozonator Says: July 20th, 2009 at 10:36 pm … It will be 95% correctly predicted for time period, ecosystem, and specific event if it becomes a spinning hurricane”.

The new dark spot on Jupiter appears to now have taken the 3 previously identified, and separate, plumes and now are combined on the surface into a single cyclonic predation requiring less energy for grater stability. After the earlier embarrassment, I stumbled across some longer term images of parts of Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 for comparison with the longer term image of the new dark spot on Jupiter. After a month, impact from a part of Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 stopped being circular and appeared as more of a linear gash. “Comparisons with Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 … Evolution of D/G Comet Impact Sites on Jupiter … July 18,1994 … July 23, 1994 … JUly 30, 1994 … August 24, 1994 … Hubble Space Telescope… Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 … SL9 Fragments D and G impact site evolution” (planets.ucf.edu/resources/jupiter-impact).

The new dark spot on Jupiter is naturally a big deal to astronomers. However, it is yet another correctly predicted violence to a planetary ecosystem that was exported from RNC’s pure, innocent, and harmless healthcare for the Earth aka global warming. Thus, hurricanes on Jupiter are almost as easy to predict as those on Earth assuming you can google my name(s) with hurricanes and are able to use the date stamp correctly on the bottom of my carbon footprint. Allah (God) didn’t set the Cuyahoga River on fire nor put a fleet of clunker SUVs on Jupiter for Conservitard “LABI” Limbaugh, ExxonMobil’s Rex Tillerson, and Australian Cardinal Pell’s celestial reward.

“Scientists at the Universities of Glasgow, Strathclyde and Central Lancashire have used 21st Century solar observations and image processing to finally solve a sunspot puzzle first noticed in the 18th Century. Professor Alexander Wilson … discovered in 1769 what is now known as the ‘Wilson Depression’ – the slightly ‘dished’ appearance of sunspots, which is most visible when spots are at the edges of the Sun. Wilson theorised that sunspots were depressions in the Sun’s surface, and we now know that the dished appearance is because the radiation emitted from the cooler sunspot comes from a slightly deeper layer in the solar atmosphere than the radiation emitted by the warmer surface that surrounds it. But how much deeper? … crucial in understanding the internal structure of sunspots and their magnetic fields. … Dr Lyndsay Fletcher, Physics and Astronomy Reader explains: ‘Sunspots can only be detected if they are large enough, and the visible size of a sunspot to an observer on Earth depends on many factors all working together. The depth of the Wilson depression is one of these factors. … Fraser Watson, the PhD student who led the analysis, said: ‘… large dataset available from SOHO meant that it was possible to study sunspot visibilities at all solar longitudes and allowed us to construct a model of sunspot shape and formation that produced the same statistical patterns as those seen in the data. In comparing our sunspot model with thousands of solar images we could pin down the depth of the base of sunspots to be around 1500 km below the surrounding solar surface.’ … it can be used as a ‘ground truth’ in complex models of sunspot density, temperature and magnetic field” (“Long-standing sunspot puzzle solve”; Science Centric; Source: University of Glasgow; sciencecentric.com, 8/19/09).

With thanks to Anthony Wesley, Hans Joerg Mettig, Theo Ramakers, and Dr. Tony Phillips, my blogged predictions and theories fit much better than an impact, black obelisk, and RC Hoagland’s stack of unsold coloring books on “Nth-Dimensional Energy Cooking” for “How to Serve Man”.

“EVOLUTION OF AN IMPACT: Since July 19th, when Anthony Wesley of Australia discovered the scattered remains of a mystery impactor in the high clouds of Jupiter, amateur astronomers around the world have been photographing the planet every night. “German astronomer Hans Joerg Mettig has converted some of the best images into polar projections,” says Theo Ramakers, “and I have stitched them together to make a movie.” Click on the image to set the scene in motion: … Animations: large, small, zoom … The 3-week animation, which begins with Wesley’s discovery image and ends yesterday, shows the cindery cloud expanding, swirling, and ultimately being torn into three pieces by turbulent south polar winds. “The spot has really progressed dramatically,” says Ramakers” (“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 8/9/09).

It will takes several days for me to put it into and nice little paper.

Tada – it appears the plume(s) have lost energy to maintain the “V” wave form. But at least 1 plume exists to sufficiently feed 3 “hurricanes” and not 1 wimpy grease spot that could have theoretically formed inside the “V”.

“JUPITER IMPACT CLOUD: Debris from the July 19th mystery-impact on Jupiter has split into three clouds. The trifurcation is evident in this August 7th image taken by Rick Schrantz using a 10-inch telescope at his backyard observatory in Nicholasville, Kentucky … Other observers have noticed the same thing” (“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 8/8/09).

At the very least, job security for some as I have been unable to find any comparable long term post-impact pictures of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 that hit Jupiter in 1994. However, the following description looks more like 1 or 2 plumes of upwelling material were needed to create the “V” wave in the atmosphere of Jupiter and not atmosphere flowing around a tumbling impactor going with the flow at ambient density. Imagine a stick stuck into a flowing creek bottom so the top is above the water. Jovian hurricanes have the potential to form at all 3 points of the “V” and 1 inside. “JUPITER’S DEBRIS CLOUD: It’s getting bigger…. “The debris cloud has enlarged and faded somewhat. It now appears as a backward letter L near Jupiter’s south pole,” reports Mike Hood who sends this picture from his backyard observatory in Kathleen, Georgia … no one knows exactly what hit Jupiter. … What happens next is anyone’s guess” (“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 8/1/09).

What I failed to add in the following is that the perimeter of an upwelling splotch should remain the same length with the dynamics of the plume. However, a perimeter of the a splotch generated by asteroid, comet (or Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, or RMS Titanic) should max out with the impactor then rapidly diminish as all foreign material is sucked down with the parent impactor. Current images of the great, Anthony Wesley’s discovery support the maintenance of the perimeter length with all the developing convolutions as the plume keeps contact with the surface. “A. Our Ozonator’s Preamble for Survival … 3. Behold, Mr. Anthony Wesley is officially a “big time astronomer” (aka ‘da Man’) … It is incorrect to say that the new dark feature on Jupiter is an impact site especially when compared to duration and pattern of the Shoemaker-Levy 9’s impact. When you hear hooves, think horses and not zebras. When you see dark splotches on Jupiter, think a vertical stack of connected soap bubbles and not a string of Armageddon asteroids. After about 5 days, the concentric rings of Shoemaker-Levy 9 were all but gone even with titanic mixing that would finally prove global cooling on Earth. “Evolution of the G Impact Site … This mosaic of Hubble images shows the evolution of the G impact site on Jupiter. … impact plume at 07/18/94 … further evolution of the G and L sites due to winds and an additional impact (S) in the G vicinity, taken on 07/23/94 at 08:08 UT (5 days after the G impact). (Credit: R. Evans, J. Trauger, H. Hammel and the HST Comet Science Team and NASA) “ (“Shoemaker-Levy 9 / Jupiter Impact”; solarviews.com/eng/impact.htm). After 5 days in July 2009, the new feature is still doing very well and never had the reported symmetry. “JUPITER UPDATE: Five days after it was discovered, the dark mark in Jupiter’s cloudtops where an asteroid or comet hit the giant planet is still easy to see through backyard telescopes. Browse these links for recent images: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6”(“What’s up in Space”; Dr. Tony Phillips; spaceweather.com, 7/25/09). The density (specific gravity) of the potential compounds and ash products generating the new feature would strongly argue against a comet or asteroid since the dark material is still bobbing around on the surface. For example, Shoemaker-Levy 9 vast mixing power was no match for the higher density of the components compared to natural materials wafting around Jupiter. The density of the potential compounds and ash products can occur with a supporting a plum of material from one or more lower layers. (Earth sees this kind of stuff with salt domes.) This plume would breaking the surface with chemically reactive material from the various layers as a membrane over a solid core of cooler material to support the dark splotch well past the time of the disturbance caused by a comet or asteroid mixing layers. With enough reactive material and energy in the plume, the core can develop into a Red Spot type hurricane” “ (“GBRWE 7/26 – 8/1/09′s Extreme Planetary Warnings for Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Solar/Terrestrial Flares from Human Activities”; Robert Rhodes, Supplemental; GBRWE 7/26 – 8/1/09, 7/25/09).