<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hanging a moon at astrology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guthrie Prentice</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-250202</link>
		<dc:creator>Guthrie Prentice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-250202</guid>
		<description>Far be it from me to support dictatorships, but I think despite his being a madman, Stalin may have had the right idea pertaining to priests and other perpetrators of superstition and fraud. The evidence is already clearly in against psychics, religion, etc, we should just arrest priests, psychics and snake oil salesmen en mass for fraud and set an example for the public that way. If they were going to respond to logic, then polls wouldn&#039;t continue to show 60% of the US population believing in creationism and 61% believing that Noah&#039;s Ark really happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far be it from me to support dictatorships, but I think despite his being a madman, Stalin may have had the right idea pertaining to priests and other perpetrators of superstition and fraud. The evidence is already clearly in against psychics, religion, etc, we should just arrest priests, psychics and snake oil salesmen en mass for fraud and set an example for the public that way. If they were going to respond to logic, then polls wouldn&#8217;t continue to show 60% of the US population believing in creationism and 61% believing that Noah&#8217;s Ark really happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofaces Project</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-223085</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofaces Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-223085</guid>
		<description>There is a web site research project investigating astrology. it compares photos of people who share the same sun, moon and ascendants to see if they resemble each other significantly. the theory is that astrology is actually the cosmological model, the shape of space-time, with twelve dimensions, four major &#039;elements&#039; each of which have 3 stages: a starting stage, an ever-present stage and an ending stage which all interact. the abstract there explains more details. take a look at the video at youtube - query &quot;astrofaces&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a web site research project investigating astrology. it compares photos of people who share the same sun, moon and ascendants to see if they resemble each other significantly. the theory is that astrology is actually the cosmological model, the shape of space-time, with twelve dimensions, four major &#8216;elements&#8217; each of which have 3 stages: a starting stage, an ever-present stage and an ending stage which all interact. the abstract there explains more details. take a look at the video at youtube &#8211; query &#8220;astrofaces&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madame Rogue</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-204637</link>
		<dc:creator>Madame Rogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-204637</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read this person off and on for some time, and I think what&#039;s really going on is that she&#039;s a complete New Age Wiccan true-believer, so much so that she views space exploration--any kind of space exploration--as a threat to her religion.  Not kidding.  To her, the moon and the planets are mystical places and thus not to be trifled with, understood (except by the practitioners of Wicca) by mortals, or even to be explored.  The moon especially, as her brand of Wiccan belief&#039;s source of female power and mysticism, is an especially sacred object to her.  For that reason, even the idea of exploring it appears to be sacriledge to her beliefs.  If she could get NASA shut down she would, and hopes that by writing the things she does she can get the rest of the world to agree with her.

But I say... I&#039;d rather spend the money on space exploration than most social programs.  At least then I know where my money has been spent on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read this person off and on for some time, and I think what&#8217;s really going on is that she&#8217;s a complete New Age Wiccan true-believer, so much so that she views space exploration&#8211;any kind of space exploration&#8211;as a threat to her religion.  Not kidding.  To her, the moon and the planets are mystical places and thus not to be trifled with, understood (except by the practitioners of Wicca) by mortals, or even to be explored.  The moon especially, as her brand of Wiccan belief&#8217;s source of female power and mysticism, is an especially sacred object to her.  For that reason, even the idea of exploring it appears to be sacriledge to her beliefs.  If she could get NASA shut down she would, and hopes that by writing the things she does she can get the rest of the world to agree with her.</p>
<p>But I say&#8230; I&#8217;d rather spend the money on space exploration than most social programs.  At least then I know where my money has been spent on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Richard Clarkstone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203528</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Richard Clarkstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203528</guid>
		<description>@Brian (48):
The signs of the (Western) zodiac are not currently in the same place as the constellations they are named after, because the signs are a division of the ecliptic into twelve parts based on the equinoxes, which have drifted relative to the constellations since the naming system was introduced.  The Wikipedia page on the zodiac gives more details.  (I&#039;m just a guy who read a short book on the history of calendars, not an astrologer.)

Your problem *would* be the same as that of people that say &quot;evolution is just a theory&quot; without understanding the proper meaning of the word &quot;theory&quot; ... except neither of the astrologers pointer out the difference between signs and constellations either!  Your post implies that quite a few more astrologers have failed to correct you either; how many?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian (48):<br />
The signs of the (Western) zodiac are not currently in the same place as the constellations they are named after, because the signs are a division of the ecliptic into twelve parts based on the equinoxes, which have drifted relative to the constellations since the naming system was introduced.  The Wikipedia page on the zodiac gives more details.  (I&#8217;m just a guy who read a short book on the history of calendars, not an astrologer.)</p>
<p>Your problem *would* be the same as that of people that say &#8220;evolution is just a theory&#8221; without understanding the proper meaning of the word &#8220;theory&#8221; &#8230; except neither of the astrologers pointer out the difference between signs and constellations either!  Your post implies that quite a few more astrologers have failed to correct you either; how many?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: !AstralProjectile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203410</link>
		<dc:creator>!AstralProjectile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203410</guid>
		<description>foolfodder et. al.

I was thinking one could use a mirror array to direct the light from a telescope to the spectrometer. Nowadays people drill out holes in a plate and channel it the SM with optical fiber. I concluded it probably wasn&#039;t worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>foolfodder et. al.</p>
<p>I was thinking one could use a mirror array to direct the light from a telescope to the spectrometer. Nowadays people drill out holes in a plate and channel it the SM with optical fiber. I concluded it probably wasn&#8217;t worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnigget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203323</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnigget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203323</guid>
		<description>Deepak sez: 

&lt;i&gt;Its hard to understand why a good astronomer like you does this thing.&lt;/i&gt;

Errrr...because he&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;good astronomer&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deepak sez: </p>
<p><i>Its hard to understand why a good astronomer like you does this thing.</i></p>
<p>Errrr&#8230;because he&#8217;s a <i>good astronomer</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cairnos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203317</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairnos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203317</guid>
		<description>@ Mick 46
Thanks to the link to the cache.

 @ Derek 51
Although some of the astrology stuff almost made me choke (OK I was drinking soup at the same time - I should have seen that coming) she&#039;s not entirely a million miles of base about the water.

Yes, we can technically purify the most pollutd water on the planet, however doing it cost efficiently and getting it to where it is needed is an entirely different matter. Demand for fresh water keeps increasing in almost all societies. There is a serious possibility (sorry, no references to hand so anecsdoteville at the moment) that easy access to water could become a serious matter of contention betwen nations in the not too distant future.

As for the rest of what she says, yeah OK fruitloop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mick 46<br />
Thanks to the link to the cache.</p>
<p> @ Derek 51<br />
Although some of the astrology stuff almost made me choke (OK I was drinking soup at the same time &#8211; I should have seen that coming) she&#8217;s not entirely a million miles of base about the water.</p>
<p>Yes, we can technically purify the most pollutd water on the planet, however doing it cost efficiently and getting it to where it is needed is an entirely different matter. Demand for fresh water keeps increasing in almost all societies. There is a serious possibility (sorry, no references to hand so anecsdoteville at the moment) that easy access to water could become a serious matter of contention betwen nations in the not too distant future.</p>
<p>As for the rest of what she says, yeah OK fruitloop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bahdum (aka Richard)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203280</link>
		<dc:creator>Bahdum (aka Richard)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203280</guid>
		<description>Oh, there&#039;s absolutely nothing wrong with astronomy.

*wait for it*

Except, of course, a willingness to abdicate your will to someone else. And that someone else is charging you up the wazoo (or just to your ankles) with what he/she considers a &quot;science.&quot;

You could probably get the same kind of service from a &quot;mentalist&quot; for much less (well, maybe up to the ankles), or from a therapist for considerably more. At least the mentalist will be entertaining you and giving you a good show.

As had been previously stated, there is no known mechanism by which the planets or stars can influence one&#039;s life. More so, why the stars and planets would pick only the day you were born to exert their influence is beyond, well, reality. (&quot;Birth&quot; just seems too arbitrary for one to be given such a celestial influence. Does a C-section still count? What about twins?)

By all rights, astrology should&#039;ve gone in the Great Circular File of History when it was discovered by scientists that giant crystal spheres embedded with stars and planets (oh, and the moon and the sun) that encircled the earth did not exist. Instead, as it turns out, the earth and planets orbit the sun, the moon circles the earth, and the stars are at varying astronomical lengths away from our solar system.

Despite this newly discovered information (and by &quot;newly,&quot; I mean &quot;hundreds-of-years old), Cunningham wants a national astrologer? What the frak! If astrology is a religion, then no frakking way should that happen.

Astrology still speaks volumes on the lack of critical thinking in society. Makes you want to facepalm most every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there&#8217;s absolutely nothing wrong with astronomy.</p>
<p>*wait for it*</p>
<p>Except, of course, a willingness to abdicate your will to someone else. And that someone else is charging you up the wazoo (or just to your ankles) with what he/she considers a &#8220;science.&#8221;</p>
<p>You could probably get the same kind of service from a &#8220;mentalist&#8221; for much less (well, maybe up to the ankles), or from a therapist for considerably more. At least the mentalist will be entertaining you and giving you a good show.</p>
<p>As had been previously stated, there is no known mechanism by which the planets or stars can influence one&#8217;s life. More so, why the stars and planets would pick only the day you were born to exert their influence is beyond, well, reality. (&#8220;Birth&#8221; just seems too arbitrary for one to be given such a celestial influence. Does a C-section still count? What about twins?)</p>
<p>By all rights, astrology should&#8217;ve gone in the Great Circular File of History when it was discovered by scientists that giant crystal spheres embedded with stars and planets (oh, and the moon and the sun) that encircled the earth did not exist. Instead, as it turns out, the earth and planets orbit the sun, the moon circles the earth, and the stars are at varying astronomical lengths away from our solar system.</p>
<p>Despite this newly discovered information (and by &#8220;newly,&#8221; I mean &#8220;hundreds-of-years old), Cunningham wants a national astrologer? What the frak! If astrology is a religion, then no frakking way should that happen.</p>
<p>Astrology still speaks volumes on the lack of critical thinking in society. Makes you want to facepalm most every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203276</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203276</guid>
		<description>Oogh, JestrBob:

I remember 2000 well (actually, 1999, when we did all the work.)  Checked millions of lines of code, discovered a handful of bugs, none serious, missed one (a report that printed the date as January 1, 19100 because it appended a 2-digit year to &quot;19&quot;, and the 2 digits suddenly became 3 digits...)  Like all the bugs, it could be easily fixed with a pencil.  Oh, well.

Anyway, are we going to have to go through that all again in 2012?  Check for things like assuming the day after Dec 31, 2012 is ...  Oops, it doesn&#039;t exist!  The program will break!  Arghhh!!!  Run for your lives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oogh, JestrBob:</p>
<p>I remember 2000 well (actually, 1999, when we did all the work.)  Checked millions of lines of code, discovered a handful of bugs, none serious, missed one (a report that printed the date as January 1, 19100 because it appended a 2-digit year to &#8220;19&#8243;, and the 2 digits suddenly became 3 digits&#8230;)  Like all the bugs, it could be easily fixed with a pencil.  Oh, well.</p>
<p>Anyway, are we going to have to go through that all again in 2012?  Check for things like assuming the day after Dec 31, 2012 is &#8230;  Oops, it doesn&#8217;t exist!  The program will break!  Arghhh!!!  Run for your lives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JestrBob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203256</link>
		<dc:creator>JestrBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203256</guid>
		<description>Richard Drumm Said in the 32 comment:
&quot;I told her that Astrology is the pre-scientific attempt by primitive people to explain the cosmos and that we have no more need of it.&quot;

Actually,  Richard, Astrology was originally the calendar, and astrologers were the 1st keepers of calendars for primitve societies. These calendar keeprs counted lunations and kept the  times,  This allowed them to predict the times to plant and harvest foods. Even nomatic people needed to live lives in keeping with a calendar. 

These calender keepers later in some societies became the parasitic priest class that lived in temples and required as much  &quot;mystery&quot; as they could generate to remain parasites, living off the work of others in the community.

The very elaborate calenders which were horoscope birth charts were just complicated calenders. 

Too much emphasis is put on the horoscope aspects. Some of the Mayan and Aztec Calender wheels are works of art. 

Wait until 2012 and the Woo will flow. Too many of the gullible people do not understand the the Mayan and Aztecs understood the concept of the number zero and carrying over numbers to the next column.  I fear the next few years will be just like the magical fear of the year 2000. 

It too will two pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Drumm Said in the 32 comment:<br />
&#8220;I told her that Astrology is the pre-scientific attempt by primitive people to explain the cosmos and that we have no more need of it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually,  Richard, Astrology was originally the calendar, and astrologers were the 1st keepers of calendars for primitve societies. These calendar keeprs counted lunations and kept the  times,  This allowed them to predict the times to plant and harvest foods. Even nomatic people needed to live lives in keeping with a calendar. </p>
<p>These calender keepers later in some societies became the parasitic priest class that lived in temples and required as much  &#8220;mystery&#8221; as they could generate to remain parasites, living off the work of others in the community.</p>
<p>The very elaborate calenders which were horoscope birth charts were just complicated calenders. </p>
<p>Too much emphasis is put on the horoscope aspects. Some of the Mayan and Aztec Calender wheels are works of art. </p>
<p>Wait until 2012 and the Woo will flow. Too many of the gullible people do not understand the the Mayan and Aztecs understood the concept of the number zero and carrying over numbers to the next column.  I fear the next few years will be just like the magical fear of the year 2000. </p>
<p>It too will two pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203199</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203199</guid>
		<description>@Deepak: If you click my name, the link will take you to a site called &quot;What&#039;s the harm?&quot;

I think it will provide the answers to your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deepak: If you click my name, the link will take you to a site called &#8220;What&#8217;s the harm?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it will provide the answers to your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What's the harm in astrology?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203198</link>
		<dc:creator>What's the harm in astrology?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203198</guid>
		<description>@Deepak: Here&#039;s a link for you.

- Lars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deepak: Here&#8217;s a link for you.</p>
<p>- Lars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203188</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203188</guid>
		<description>Dear Phil,

What is your problem with someone believing in Astrology? Its a religion and people will believe and follow it whether you like it or not. Does it really matter whether Astrology is Bull or Not? We have so much to do and discover in science. Then why this tirade against astrology? Why cant we focus on science.

Its hard to understand why a good astronomer like you does this thing.

regards
Deepak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Phil,</p>
<p>What is your problem with someone believing in Astrology? Its a religion and people will believe and follow it whether you like it or not. Does it really matter whether Astrology is Bull or Not? We have so much to do and discover in science. Then why this tirade against astrology? Why cant we focus on science.</p>
<p>Its hard to understand why a good astronomer like you does this thing.</p>
<p>regards<br />
Deepak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linking Dumping for today: All over the place &#171; Skepoet At Crossroads of Critical Thinking and the Humanities.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203121</link>
		<dc:creator>Linking Dumping for today: All over the place &#171; Skepoet At Crossroads of Critical Thinking and the Humanities.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203121</guid>
		<description>[...] August 2, 2009 in endorsements and reviews    Phil Plait on the how Astrology is bull.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 2, 2009 in endorsements and reviews    Phil Plait on the how Astrology is bull.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnigget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203083</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnigget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203083</guid>
		<description>@ Derek Colanduno:

To be fair, I think she was making a comparison with a stated LRO mission objective of finding water on the moon.  

Still a nutjob, though. Maybe she should take up dowsing to help her find water here at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Derek Colanduno:</p>
<p>To be fair, I think she was making a comparison with a stated LRO mission objective of finding water on the moon.  </p>
<p>Still a nutjob, though. Maybe she should take up dowsing to help her find water here at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203069</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203069</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;51.   Derek Colanduno Says:

Why do we need to spend any money on “conserve and purify water here on earth” research.

We can ALREADY do that, with even the most contaminated water we can find. So, what in blazes hell is the women talking about?

Does she have a hard time finding water or something?
&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s all that &#039;homepathic water&#039;, after all, how do you purify water when the more you dilute it, the more &#039;effective&#039; it becomes?

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>51.   Derek Colanduno Says:</p>
<p>Why do we need to spend any money on “conserve and purify water here on earth” research.</p>
<p>We can ALREADY do that, with even the most contaminated water we can find. So, what in blazes hell is the women talking about?</p>
<p>Does she have a hard time finding water or something?<br />
</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s all that &#8216;homepathic water&#8217;, after all, how do you purify water when the more you dilute it, the more &#8216;effective&#8217; it becomes?</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Colanduno</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-2/#comment-203067</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Colanduno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203067</guid>
		<description>Why do we need to spend any money on &quot;conserve and purify water here on earth&quot; research. 

We can ALREADY do that, with even the most contaminated water we can find. So, what in blazes hell is the women talking about? 

Does she have a hard time finding water or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we need to spend any money on &#8220;conserve and purify water here on earth&#8221; research. </p>
<p>We can ALREADY do that, with even the most contaminated water we can find. So, what in blazes hell is the women talking about? </p>
<p>Does she have a hard time finding water or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-203052</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203052</guid>
		<description>Jean-Denis: RE: &#039;disposable/spam&#039; emails

Here&#039;s the trick: create a webmail account for questionable sites that request one, I have johnparadox@lycos.com as a filter account.  I get 5-10 hits per day (lower numbers on weekends, as many as 20 - in the inbox, with another 50? already filtered during the week)
When the new stuff comes in, use checkboxes to &#039;create filter/mark as spam&#039; to have any future mail from the same address automatically sent to the spam folder.  
I also check through the spam for the really imaginative &#039;nigerian money&#039; scams, and put them into a &#039;favorite scams&#039; folder... and occasionally use the same account for &#039;real&#039; email, but not often.

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean-Denis: RE: &#8216;disposable/spam&#8217; emails</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the trick: create a webmail account for questionable sites that request one, I have <a href="mailto:johnparadox@lycos.com">johnparadox@lycos.com</a> as a filter account.  I get 5-10 hits per day (lower numbers on weekends, as many as 20 &#8211; in the inbox, with another 50? already filtered during the week)<br />
When the new stuff comes in, use checkboxes to &#8216;create filter/mark as spam&#8217; to have any future mail from the same address automatically sent to the spam folder.<br />
I also check through the spam for the really imaginative &#8216;nigerian money&#8217; scams, and put them into a &#8216;favorite scams&#8217; folder&#8230; and occasionally use the same account for &#8216;real&#8217; email, but not often.</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Denis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-203043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203043</guid>
		<description>Well, I wanted to leave a comment too, but as often, you need to leave an email address to do that. I really didn&#039;t want to disclose my email address to an astrologer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wanted to leave a comment too, but as often, you need to leave an email address to do that. I really didn&#8217;t want to disclose my email address to an astrologer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-203016</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203016</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s un-frakkin&#039;-believable what some people believe in, and astrologers are among the worst. I had a run in with the president and vice-president of out local astrological group years back. I was doing a star party in our downtown area and was approached by these two gentlemen. They came to see the Jupiter through our scopes. Jupiter (they said) was in Virgo and was having a major influence in some going-ons of theirs. They wanted to see it up close and personal. At the time Leo was overhead and Virgo was still in the much of the haze and light pollution in the city skies. But I could still show them Jupiter, because it was &quot;in&quot; Leo. Well I though I stuck a bomb up their arse and set it off! I was SO wrong. How could Juptier be in Leo? Their calculation, based on their venereable Rosecrusian tables, clearly showed Juptier to be in Virgo. Then I pointed to Jupiter, then only a couple of degrees from Regulus, right were the heart of the lion would be. I slewed the scope to show them. Though they were astounded by the view Jupiter, they were clearly confused. How could I possibly be right? How could the evidence before them-visually being able to see Jupiter smack-dab in the center of the constellation of Leo-possibly be correct? What had I and the whole astronomical community done to Jupiter that caused it to slip a whole house? I was loudly accused of fabricating Jupiter&#039;s presense in Leo in an effort to undermine the astrological association&#039;s reputation. Our group was publically chastized for altering the universe for our own propaganda needs. Damn astronomers! Luckily we have an intelligent and forgiving public that likes what we do, and their rantings had little imapct on our audience (and it was good for a laugh or three!).

Which brings me to this...one of the quickest ways to debunk astrologers is to call their calculations into question. Donna Cunningham, for instance, claims Uranus was in Gemini, Neptune in Virgo, and Pluto in Leo, when she was born, and of course these influenced her path in life. Well, she got one in three correct, as Uranus was in Taurus and Pluto was in Cancer. Call this to their attention and let the hellfire rain!

Hehehehehe.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s un-frakkin&#8217;-believable what some people believe in, and astrologers are among the worst. I had a run in with the president and vice-president of out local astrological group years back. I was doing a star party in our downtown area and was approached by these two gentlemen. They came to see the Jupiter through our scopes. Jupiter (they said) was in Virgo and was having a major influence in some going-ons of theirs. They wanted to see it up close and personal. At the time Leo was overhead and Virgo was still in the much of the haze and light pollution in the city skies. But I could still show them Jupiter, because it was &#8220;in&#8221; Leo. Well I though I stuck a bomb up their arse and set it off! I was SO wrong. How could Juptier be in Leo? Their calculation, based on their venereable Rosecrusian tables, clearly showed Juptier to be in Virgo. Then I pointed to Jupiter, then only a couple of degrees from Regulus, right were the heart of the lion would be. I slewed the scope to show them. Though they were astounded by the view Jupiter, they were clearly confused. How could I possibly be right? How could the evidence before them-visually being able to see Jupiter smack-dab in the center of the constellation of Leo-possibly be correct? What had I and the whole astronomical community done to Jupiter that caused it to slip a whole house? I was loudly accused of fabricating Jupiter&#8217;s presense in Leo in an effort to undermine the astrological association&#8217;s reputation. Our group was publically chastized for altering the universe for our own propaganda needs. Damn astronomers! Luckily we have an intelligent and forgiving public that likes what we do, and their rantings had little imapct on our audience (and it was good for a laugh or three!).</p>
<p>Which brings me to this&#8230;one of the quickest ways to debunk astrologers is to call their calculations into question. Donna Cunningham, for instance, claims Uranus was in Gemini, Neptune in Virgo, and Pluto in Leo, when she was born, and of course these influenced her path in life. Well, she got one in three correct, as Uranus was in Taurus and Pluto was in Cancer. Call this to their attention and let the hellfire rain!</p>
<p>Hehehehehe&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-203010</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203010</guid>
		<description>@43    http://www.neptunecafe.com/asteroids.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@43    <a href="http://www.neptunecafe.com/asteroids.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.neptunecafe.com/asteroids.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-203008</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203008</guid>
		<description>You can access the page still via Google Cache (clicky my name), the only comments showing tho are some of the woo believers... alas ;( Funny to read tho...

RE: Astrology/Religion - what has really made my shake my head in the past is how a person can chuckle and shake their head at the concept of astrology, then head to church and worship a flying spaghetti monster... So astrology is whacky because planets and stars can&#039;t really influence our moods or outcomes, but if I pray to that imaginary being in the sky enough, he can really change things! Wawaweewah! Religious people are so confused... &quot;That other religion/belief is sooo silly, but mine is for reals because I&#039;m sure of it!&quot; /sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can access the page still via Google Cache (clicky my name), the only comments showing tho are some of the woo believers&#8230; alas ;( Funny to read tho&#8230;</p>
<p>RE: Astrology/Religion &#8211; what has really made my shake my head in the past is how a person can chuckle and shake their head at the concept of astrology, then head to church and worship a flying spaghetti monster&#8230; So astrology is whacky because planets and stars can&#8217;t really influence our moods or outcomes, but if I pray to that imaginary being in the sky enough, he can really change things! Wawaweewah! Religious people are so confused&#8230; &#8220;That other religion/belief is sooo silly, but mine is for reals because I&#8217;m sure of it!&#8221; /sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-203007</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-203007</guid>
		<description>Sometimes you get the BULL.

Sometimes the BULL gets you.

In astrology, it&#039;s either one or the other. Every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you get the BULL.</p>
<p>Sometimes the BULL gets you.</p>
<p>In astrology, it&#8217;s either one or the other. Every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-202996</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-202996</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d put more credence in The Onion&#039;s horoscopes.

What gets me about astrologers is when they say certain planets (they list the Sun as a &quot;planet&quot;) and constellations have an influence on our lives.  If the constellation Virgo can influence us, why don&#039;t they also talk about Carina, or Ophiuchus, or Draco doing the same?

Pluto is also described as having an influence, despite its size.  Yet they don&#039;t factor in Eris having more of an influence, since it&#039;s larger than Pluto.  And if the Sun is, astrologically speaking, a planet, then why don&#039;t they mention the &quot;planets&quot; Alpha Centauri A, Sirius, or Procyon affecting us?  By astrology&#039;s definition they should, since they&#039;re larger and more luminous than the Sun.

And what of the 300-plus extrasolar planets that have been discovered?  Where is their influence, Mr. or Ms. Astrologer?  Hmmmm?

Astrologers produce more hockey than the Stanley Cup playoffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d put more credence in The Onion&#8217;s horoscopes.</p>
<p>What gets me about astrologers is when they say certain planets (they list the Sun as a &#8220;planet&#8221;) and constellations have an influence on our lives.  If the constellation Virgo can influence us, why don&#8217;t they also talk about Carina, or Ophiuchus, or Draco doing the same?</p>
<p>Pluto is also described as having an influence, despite its size.  Yet they don&#8217;t factor in Eris having more of an influence, since it&#8217;s larger than Pluto.  And if the Sun is, astrologically speaking, a planet, then why don&#8217;t they mention the &#8220;planets&#8221; Alpha Centauri A, Sirius, or Procyon affecting us?  By astrology&#8217;s definition they should, since they&#8217;re larger and more luminous than the Sun.</p>
<p>And what of the 300-plus extrasolar planets that have been discovered?  Where is their influence, Mr. or Ms. Astrologer?  Hmmmm?</p>
<p>Astrologers produce more hockey than the Stanley Cup playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/comment-page-1/#comment-202995</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/31/hanging-a-moon-at-astrology/#comment-202995</guid>
		<description>Astrologers can&#039;t even tell the present.  The pictures were exciting and the mission was a great success.  Of course anything in Lunar orbit will eventually crash on the moon, stable lunar orbits aren&#039;t really possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astrologers can&#8217;t even tell the present.  The pictures were exciting and the mission was a great success.  Of course anything in Lunar orbit will eventually crash on the moon, stable lunar orbits aren&#8217;t really possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 17:36:38 -->
