DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« The AVN is reaping what they sowed
Amazing Super Powers! »

Galaxy SMASH!



30 years ago, astronomers started playing around with making simulations of colliding galaxies. Computers were slow, so they could only keep track of a few hundred or thousand stars, which limited the models severely. The software had to keep track of every star, its location, velocity, and mass… the number of calculations is forbidding.

Things have come a long way. Now astronomers can track millions of stars using hydrodynamics codes, and then graphically display them giving them color, adding in dust, the effects of cloud collisions, supernovae… and the results are stunning.

Have a look. This is not just some animation; this is an actual result using complicated math and physics. It’s also lovely.


You can read more about this here.

Tip o’ the spiral arm to Pamela Gay, aka StarStryder, who is reporting from the IAU meeting in Rio.

Share

August 7th, 2009 12:00 PM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Science | 48 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

48 Responses to “Galaxy SMASH!”

  1. 1.   Logan Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Seems a big violent.

  2. 2.   Molly Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    The one time that violence is beautiful. At least when you’re far,far away.

  3. 3.   William Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    Smeagol likes.

  4. 4.   Todd W. Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    The explosion of stars in the first pass is amazing!

  5. 5.   Darren Landrum Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    Here’s an astronomy question for you: could a galactic collision like the one in the simulation result in “rogue stars”, stars that get flung away from either galaxy and into deep space?

  6. 6.   Charlie (Colorado) Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    Phil, I bow to no one in my liking for the video or in my belief in simulation, but an “actual result” in simulation is what you get when your simulation makes predictions of unexpected behavior which are then confirmed by the real physical process. This is a lovely simulation, with lovely and fascinating results, but it has no more information content than it started with.

  7. 7.   Fritriac Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    Nicely done video. I’d choosed some other background music.

    Ok, I’m in some grunge phase right now… :/

  8. 8.   IBY Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Very cool video, with a nice background music. Although the collisions themselves are beautiful, it sacrifices the beauty of the spirals, turning the joined galaxies into a red elliptical galaxy. That is the fate of Milkomeda, I guess.

  9. 9.   dhtroy Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    [to the tune of Monster Mash]

    They did the Mash.
    They did the Galaxy Smash.
    The Galaxy Smash!
    It was a Universal Clash!
    They did they Mash!
    It blew up in a flash.
    They did the Smash!
    It was the Galaxy Smash.

  10. 10.   Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    Time for me to head to my galactic collision shelter in the back yard.

  11. 11.   NewEnglandBob Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Awesome and lovely.

  12. 12.   Chris Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Overall a very impressive piece. It expresses my dreams from 20+ years ago when I once swam among the astro-fishes. Of course, I also did radio back then. I can’t help but think what the film would look like with the individual star version choreographed to the tune of “The Flight of the Bumble Bee” and the gas version with an acid rock background.

  13. 13.   Brando Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    Ah, the things you can do with a PhD in Computational Physics.

  14. 14.   Carey Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    So, so awesome

  15. 15.   nawitus Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    Darren, yes it’s possible, and we even know one of such: a star named SDSS J090745.0+024507.

  16. 16.   Vagueofgodalming Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    It seems that page was last modified June 2008. The internet’s a funny place.

  17. 17.   Brock Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    That’s awesome. I’ll have to watch the high-quality version, because even the HQ Youtube vid looked heavily artifacted (is that a word) on my nice monitor.

    It reminds me of my favorite screensaver (which I’ve been using for like 10 years), galaxies.scr. There’s a better version bundled in some KDE distros for Linux I think.

  18. 18.   arensb Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Every time I see a simulation like this, I can’t help thinking of the inhabitants of the stars that get flung out into space.

    Imagine a technological civilization arising on a planet with a double milky way in the sky, and then figuring out that they’ll never get to visit their neighbors because two billion years ago their sun got ejected in a collision.

    Has anyone written a filk song about this yet?

  19. 19.   Harold Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    I read in a book somewhere that these galactic collisions will be the death of us all! Death!!!! DEATH FROM THE SKIES!!!

    Lovely background music. Reminds me a lot of the original Vangelis score from Cosmos – not the jangly stuff that was tacked on for the DVD release.

  20. 20.   StevoR Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    Awesome! Thanks for posting this BA. 8)

    These sort of animations have indeed come along way quickly – as, not-so co-incidentally, have improvements in our computers.

    @ 20 Harold :

    I read in a book somewhere that these galactic collisions will be the death of us all! Death!!!! DEATH FROM THE SKIES!!!

    Well death could come from the skies but it won’t be in the form of Galactic collisions. Too long term a threat and our only risk here is the Milky Way – Andromeda Galaxy “fender bender ” in many aeons time hence.

    Unless a (possible?) merger with the Large or Small Magellanic Cloud ends up being much more destructive than currently considered – but even then it will be many millions of years away after we’re all dead and quite likely Humanity will already be extinct. As the book says.

    Good ref though! ;-)

  21. 21.   T.E.L. Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    Very nice. Now compare to the treatment of colliding galaxies (at about 24:30) in this classic documentary film: http://www.nfb.ca/film/Universe/

  22. 22.   bradley547 Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    If this were real, I’d have to envy the inhabitants of the outlying clusters for their night skies.

  23. 23.   HWRmaupin Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    On the ‘read more’ page it mentions 2Myr per frame. For a laymans info, does that indicate that the merger would take many millions of years?

  24. 24.   T.E.L. Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    HWRmaupin Said:

    “On the ‘read more’ page it mentions 2Myr per frame. For a laymans info, does that indicate that the merger would take many millions of years?”

    Oh yes. One revolution of a spiral galaxy out in our neck of the woods is on the order of 1/4 billion years. Collisions take even longer. These things are exercises in patience. :)

    Incidentally, our galaxy, the Milky Way, is destined to collide with the Andromeda galaxy several billion years from today.

  25. 25.   fatherdaddy Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    Nice, but, I’d like to see how that simulation compares to reality. Show me the pictures of galaxies in some stage of this type of collision. They don’t look like what they’re showing me on Galaxy Zoo.

  26. 26.   Kevin F. Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    It was very pretty but a little dull after the first pass.

  27. 27.   IBY Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    @TEL
    Yeah, scientists call the hypothetical unified future galaxy “Milkomeda,” a bit corny, but appropriate enough.

  28. 28.   kuhnigget Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    Okay, totally off topic, but is anyone else getting really sick of accidentally rolling over that Pfizer ad?

  29. 29.   Arkonbey Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    Wow. astounding. I remember a much simpler bit like this from Cosmos. I remember being slightly horrified at the perceived destruction. I mean, an event like that would cause incalculable damage to millions of worlds.

    Wait, I’m still slightly horrified.

  30. 30.   marianna Says:
    August 7th, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    fatherdaddy….type in “colliding galaxies” into Google, click the Images tab, then Enter. That will provide you with what you seek. :-)

  31. 31.   Buzz Lightyear Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 8:24 am

    Gravity Rules!!!

  32. 32.   Torbjörn Larsson, OM Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 9:07 am

    Re Logan, I think these mergers are emviolinated enough. Are all galaxy neighborhoods this rough-and-tumble?

    an “actual result” in simulation is what you get when your simulation makes predictions of unexpected behavior

    Um, why?

    To confirm the simulations are correct, which for all practical purposes must be considered a result (that we reasonably understand the physics, say), wouldn’t all we need for them to match some other predictions (or observations)? Say, some distribution of merger times, if such a distribution exist in some meaningful way.

    If OTOH only unexpected behavior would be tested against not many simulations could be considered good models. That doesn’t seem to be the case.

    Incidentally, our galaxy, the Milky Way, is destined to collide with the Andromeda galaxy several billion years from today.

    IIRC some claimed somewhere that it will be one of the last observable major mergers.

    Is that so, and does that take the accelerating expansion into consideration to inflate [sic?] the rareness of the event? (I.e., the observable universe will then be less rich in galaxies, mergers or not, as they drop out of sight.)

    If it’s true, I don’t know if our descendants are to be congratulated for the long last act of the local volume, or not.

  33. 33.   Muzz Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    Some of you folks might know Gravity 3D already;

    http://www.mars3d.com/PWGravity3D.htm

    It’s a bit old now but you can do similar looking stuff with that, although not as physically/light accurate. Fun though.

  34. 34.   Andy Diamos Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    Anyone know what song is played in the background? I’d be interested in getting it.

  35. 35.   quantum_flux Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    Beautiful program there.

  36. 36.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 7:24 pm

    31. Buzz Lightyear;

    Naw! Earth Rules,,,gravity sucks.

    Great imagery. Hydrodynamic codes? Hmmm, yes, I guess I see how that would apply.

    GAry 7

  37. 37.   marianna Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    @Andy Diamos….the composer of the music is Nancy Ellen Abrams. She has a website of her music. You may be able to find that song there at expandinguniverse_dot_org. The credits of the simulation do not list the name of the song.

    If the song isn’t already on the website, there is an email address there that should eventually get to her.

    I downloaded the high definition version of this simulation from the original website Phil has linked. It is extraordinarily beautiful with each star seeming to be a separate point. If you like this low resolution youtube version, you really should download the HD version. Put it on full screen and sit in a darkened room. I would love to see this displayed in a planetarium. I think the beauty of the model, and the immensity of time and forces I can’t comprehend would make me weep.

  38. 38.   Patrik Says:
    August 8th, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    Hi and thanks for all the nice comments. It’s always fun when your work is appreciated.

    HWRmaupin: Yes, the total time shown in the movie is about 3 billion years.

    Marianna: I believe the name of the song is “All’s well that ends well”, and it’s on Nancy’s website. Unfortunately you can’t listen to it, though. And about planetariums, we have a project underway to bring realistic movies of simulations to planetariums, which should be pretty awesome.

  39. 39.   meneame.net Says:
    August 9th, 2009 at 4:36 am

    Galaxias espirales colisionando

    Hace 30 años, los astrónomos comenzaban a realizar simulaciones de galaxias espirales colisionando, pero los ordenadores eran lentos y sólo podían seguir el rastro de unos pocos cientos de estrellas, lo que limitaba los modelos. El software debía …

  40. 40.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    August 9th, 2009 at 6:58 am

    38. Patrik:

    Thanks Patrik, for all your hard work. It is beautiful.

    Gary 7

  41. 41.   Colisión de galaxias « Pasa la vida Says:
    August 9th, 2009 at 9:12 am

    [...] Vía Bad Astronomy [...]

  42. 42.   marianna Says:
    August 9th, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    That is totally exciting about bringing these type of things to a planetarium, Patrik. Good luck with that. Please let Phil know the details when this comes about so he can notify us.

    This colliding galaxies animation is a wonderful blending of art and science. As one of Phil’s posts said, Science is Imagination, and you’ve certainly demonstrated that.

  43. 43.   Galaxy Collision Modelling « The National Space Society of Phoenix Says:
    August 9th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    [...] by drdave on August 9, 2009 Found on Phil Plait’s Bad Astronomy. This is really [...]

  44. 44.   Apocalypse Cow Says:
    August 10th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    I’m fascinated with this video, especially the completely(to me) random element that forms on the upper left around 1:10, and collides with the main body around 1:25.

  45. 45.   Mike Torr Says:
    August 14th, 2009 at 1:17 am

    Beautiful.

    I would really like to see this shown from the point of view of one of the stars that survive – like, and animation of what would be seen in the night sky of one of its planets, adjusted to point in the same direction every night, then speeded up (a LOT!)

  46. 46.   Nancy Says:
    August 16th, 2009 at 10:21 pm

    To Marianna and Andy Diamos — glad you liked the music. The scientists (collaborator Joel Primack is my husband) borrowed it from a song on my album, ALIEN WISDOM. And yes, Patrik’s right: the song is “All’s Well That Ends Well,” and it has words. ALIEN WISDOM is for sale at the wonderful independent artist website, cdbaby.com

  47. 47.   Interesting Stuff: Late August 2009 « The Outer Hoard Says:
    August 22nd, 2009 at 7:20 am

    [...] Lovely video simulation of galaxies colliding. [...]

  48. 48.   The Ghost of August Past « The Outer Hoard Says:
    August 29th, 2010 at 6:28 am

    [...] Computer-generated animation of colliding galaxies. [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse
      • Volcano in taupe
      • I’m giving a talk at Eastern Michigan University Feb. 15
      • Funhouse galaxy
      • Science Getaways: Update
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
      • Science Getaways: Update | Bad Astronomy
      • Exoplanet in a triple star system smack dab in the habitable zone | Bad Astronomy
      • Holy aurora | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us