Turns out, it was really the uterus, fallopian tubes and overies.

Silly me.

Too bad I strongly disagree with her artist’s statement. Chemistry (and science in general) is always revealing new questions! Just last year I was lucky enough to hear both Roald Hoffmann (nobel laureate) and Richard F.W. Bader debate the nature of chemical bonds. You’d think such a thing would be settled and clearly defined, but since atoms are always vibrating and electron orbitals are modeled as mathematical “clouds” of probability, the question “what is a bond?” is as hard as ever!

If she wants sublime, powerful concepts or “inquisition (sic) and discovery” in chemistry, she just needs to look a little deeper. But at least she’s finding good inspiration in anatomy.

I always marvel at how Mr. Gray comes back from the dead every now and then to produce a newer edition.