DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Outfoxing H1N1
Titanic fog! »

Lunar boreal halo


OMFSM. I love this picture. Love love love.

Love.


LRO images Erlanger crater at the Moon’s north pole


[Click to embiggen.]

Is it a ring of fire on Mercury? A look into the gateway of hell? A promo for Halo 3?

Nope. It’s far cooler: it’s the rim of the lunar crater Erlanger poking into the sunlight.

Erlanger sits almost at the Moon’s pole, lying at a latitude of 87° north. At that latitude, the Sun is forever near the horizon, only getting a little above or below the limb depending on the Moon’s orbit around the Earth. In this case most of the crater is not lit by the Sun, but the raised rim gets up just high enough to see some sunlight, illuminating it in this wonderful way. Note the small patch of lunar surface to the lower left of the picture that’s in sunlight as well. That’s another indicator that how much sunlight you get at the Moon’s poles depends a whole lot on the local topography of the terrain. Um. Selain? Lunain? Whatever.

Anyway, in this shot by the fantabulous Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, you can see that the rim of the crater has seen its share of action; it’s dotted with smaller craters from later, smaller impacts. That part of the Moon is lousy with craters; it’s an old region, meaning that the pelting it got from cosmic debris billions of years ago is still visible. On other areas of the Moon, like the dark patches you can see with your unaided eye, giant impacts flooded vast regions of the surface with lava, filling up and smoothing over any craters, wiping them off the face of the Moon. That never happened near the pole, so Erlanger still stands high and proud.

But it also runs deep: the bottom of the crater is low enough to rarely get sunlight. Scientists think that ice from comet impacts over the eons may accumulate in such deep craters, so Erlanger is a prime target for LRO’s bistatic radar, which can penetrate into the lunar surface and reflect back to the probe. The type of reflection can indicate what materials lie beneath… including frozen water. LRO and the Indian probe Chandrayaan-1 just targeted Erlanger last week for such an observation.

Will they find water? We don’t know yet. But we’re still looking, and in fact the other half of the LRO mission is LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite; follow it on Twitter!), which will impact the lunar surface near the pole on October 9th of this year. The hope is that any water will be flung up into space where it will be more easily detectable. This has been tried before, but so far we’ve seen no water on the Moon.

But maybe this next time we’ll strike transparent gold. And if we do, I wonder… is there a child already alive on Earth today who may one day drink Erlanger water as they sit on Armstrong Base, admiring the view of the lunar landscape out the mess hall window?

Share

August 27th, 2009 11:56 AM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures | 33 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

33 Responses to “Lunar boreal halo”

  1. 1.   Joe Bogus Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    THANK YOU!

  2. 2.   Christine P. Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Hey, I thought this blog was about skepticism, not astronomy.
    ;-)

  3. 3.   Scott Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    :win:

  4. 4.   Zyggy Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    Very Cool.

    ….and I love “OMFSM” ;-) At first I tried to put a bad word into it, then realized it doesn’t even need one.

  5. 5.   Bill Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    Dear Mr. Plait -

    Please find enclosed an invoice in the amount of $243.56, intended to cover half of the cost of the re-calibration of the upper end of my Cool Meter ™. While I would normally absorb the cost of this calibration myself, I find that the pictures such as the one above that you regularly post on your blog are the primary reason that I must have the service performed. It therefore seems only fair to me to share the expense. Please note that I’m only charging you half of the total cost. Since I decide whether to look at the image you post or not, I’m perfectly willing to accept my share of the responsibility, and thus the expense.

    - Bill

    P.S. Now who do I talk to about sharing the medical cost of a sprained tongue, from jabbing it so firmly into my cheek?

  6. 6.   treelobsters Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    Christine P. (#2) : Yeah, I don’t see what any of this has to do with vaccinating creationists against Fox News.

  7. 7.   Keith Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    You’re spoiling us Phil. Two awesome astronomy pics in one day.

  8. 8.   Cheyenne Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    I hope that Astrologer from the San Francisco Examiner speaks out against LCROSS. Her article criticizing the Kaguya impactor generated the funniest blog comments in the history of the internet.

    And wow that photo is cool. Kind of eerie though. It’s like looking into the abyss.

  9. 9.   Chip Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Imagine walking along the sunlit very top rim of that crater, then stepping a bit down the slope into the jet black shade, pausing and lifting the mirror part of your visor and glimpsing up at the Milky Way – then returning up into the narrow sunlit path. On your way to the little lunar research station and (maybe) water treatment plant.

  10. 10.   Timothy from Boulder Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    “Erlanger Water.” That’s a nice catchy name for a brand of bottled water.

    Regarding LCROSS: If you’re up for a laugh, crackpot-style, go visit the self-styled “researcher” at Mars Anomaly Research (Google It) for his “Don’t Bomb The Moon Activism” campaign.

  11. 11.   TechyDad Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Cheyenne,

    Did you read her article “What is Life?” where she tries to respond to the “The Moon isn’t alive” commenters? She goes from “things that are breathing are alive” (not true, of course) to matter vibrates and since vibrating is sort of like breathing, the Moon is alive!

    It just occurred to me that my cup of tea is alive by her definition. I guess I should ask for its permission before I drink out of it any more.

    But just to appease her, and to paraphrase Homer Simpson: “Moon, If you want us to continue smashing things into you, please give us no sign whatsoever… thy bidding will be done *KER-SMASH!*”

  12. 12.   Simon Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    A bistatic radar uses a receiver antenna physically separated from the transmitter antenna, unlike a “normal” radar which uses the same antenna for both.

    Where is the receiver antenna on LRO? The info on NASA’s site about the Mini-RF (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/Mini-RF/main/index.html) doesn’t really say.

    Is it perhaps on LCROSS or Chandrayaan-1? If so, that would be an impressive technical feat, using two separate spacecraft in different orbits as the two halves of a bistatic radar.

    I suspect it’s rather more mundane – just two different antennae on board LRO. Someone tell me I’m wrong!!

  13. 13.   BILL7718 Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    Are all of us that looked at that pic going to get a phone call that we will die in 7 days and then have some slimy young ghost girl crawl out of our computer screen and…

    /FLEEEE

  14. 14.   I'd rather be fishin' Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    An amazing photo. I don’t have time to search for all the neat stuff on the web. I’m glad you’re doing it for me.

  15. 15.   Julia (Jules) Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    DUDE!

    I will never tire of looking at such photographs. Technology is crazy! And the amazing things we get to see thanks to leaps in technology advancement (thanks largely to NASA and people foolishly want to cut NASA!)

  16. 16.   Chgowiz Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    For you Space 1999 fans – squint your eyes and shake your head back and forth and up and down real hard and it kinda looks like the Meta Signal. Don’t operate heavy machinery for a few minutes if you do this.

    Serious questions – are they banking on the Sun having not hit the ice in those craters? Have they found any evidence of ongoing sublimination on the Moon? Or could there be another process at work that might be leading to the negative results of previous tests?

  17. 17.   Brock Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    I like “selain”. Selene just doesn’t get enough love these days. Plus I prefer Greek over Latin.

  18. 18.   PJE Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    Wouldn’t any water ice at the bottom of a crater sublimate away? Especially after a long time?

    Pete

  19. 19.   Chris Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    @Simon (and @BA): Check out: http://www.universetoday.com/2009/08/19/lro-chandrayaan-1-team-up-for-unique-search-for-water-ice/

    Apparently LRO and Chandrayaan-1 can, in fact, operate as a bistatic radar, however, it might be slightly inaccurate to refer to either one of them as _having_ a bistatic radar.

  20. 20.   Simon Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    @Chris – ah-hah, that’s it!

    Then it is indeed an impressive feat! Thanks :-)

  21. 21.   Halo sobre un cráter lunar « [Px] Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    [...] imagen pertenece al cráter lunar Erlanger, ubicada al norte del satélite, fue captado por la LRO [Lunar Reconnaissance [...]

  22. 22.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    18. PJE:

    As long as the temp the bottom of the crater experiences stays below 152 Kelvins, it won’t sublimate. See below:

    “The sublimation temperature of water ice is 198 K under Martian atmospheric conditions.
    The sublimation temperature of ice in a vacuum is 152 K (seems too small)” and here is the url for that quote:

    http://hypertextbook.com/physics/thermal/pressure-temperature/

    Gary 7

  23. 23.   kuhnigget Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    See that little hillock just to the left there, below the tiny crater inside the rim? That is the official location for the (future) Kuhnigget Moon Base and Spa.

    Reservations now being accepted. Equal opportunity employer, tho we give preferential treatment to those with purple hair, go-go boots and skin tight clothing.

  24. 24.   KC Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    That is teh Cool!

  25. 25.   Brock Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    That image is *strikingly beautiful*, BTW. Somebody give those astonomers a prize!

  26. 26.   John Paradox Says:
    August 28th, 2009 at 4:29 am

    23. kuhnigget Says:
    Kuhnigget Moon Base and Spa.

    Reservations now being accepted. Equal opportunity employer, tho we give preferential treatment to those with purple hair, go-go boots and skin tight clothing.

    I would assume that’s the females. How about males with pure white hair?

    J/P=?

  27. 27.   Jay Lake: [links] Link salad flies back to Oregon Says:
    August 28th, 2009 at 4:57 am

    [...] Lunar boreal halo — Bad Astronomy with a gorgeous lunar photo. [...]

  28. 28.   kuhnigget Says:
    August 28th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    That depends, J/P=?….how do you look in muscle shirts?

  29. 29.   Bill Nettles Says:
    August 28th, 2009 at 11:49 am

    Is Riddick living in the basin of that crater?

    But, really, Phil, this is not a picture of the moon. It’s a CT cross section of an eyeball.

  30. 30.   John Paradox Says:
    August 28th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    27. kuhnigget Says:

    That depends, J/P=?….how do you look in muscle shirts?

    Oh, welll………. :(

    ;)

    J/P=?

    (Actually, I have relatively few white hairs, considering I just (June) passed ‘double nickel’ in age.. and still have only a ‘high forehead’… should find my 8th grade class photo and compare to current appearance)

  31. 31.   Stephen Says:
    August 29th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    LPOD says “terrain”.

    http://lpod.wikispaces.com/August+28%2C+2009

    Then you can blame your use of English on someone else!

  32. 32.   Charles J. Slavis, Jr. Says:
    August 30th, 2009 at 10:49 am

    Of course there is life on the moon. How else did we find those petrified wood rocks?

  33. 33.   Bi-static radar search for lunar water fails | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine Says:
    September 13th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    [...] I wrote about this observation a little while ago: using radar, NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and the Indian probe Chandrayaan-1 were going to sweep the crater Erlanger to look for a signal reflection indication the presence of ice. However, Chandrayaan-1 was already well on its way to its final malfunction, and the observations didn’t work. Go to UT for the details. [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse
      • Volcano in taupe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
      • Science Getaways: Update | Bad Astronomy
      • Exoplanet in a triple star system smack dab in the habitable zone | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us