DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« The mainstreaming of crazy
Discovery to return home on Thursday evening »

365 Days wins a Parsec!

I know that title may take a moment to parse, but what it means is that the podcast 365 Days of Astronomy just won the Parsec, an annual award for podcasts! My congrats to everyone involved: Nancy Atkinson (who wrote about this at Universe Today), Pamela Gay, George Hrab (who did the musical theme and accepted the award at Dragon*Con) and everyone else who contributed.

365 Days is a user-driven ‘cast: people signed up for different days of the year, recorded a podcast about astronomy, and then uploaded it to the site. So the content is totally by the audience, which is very cool, and a great way to build a dedicated community to support astronomy. I’m really glad this unique venture — a project of the International Year of Astronomy — got the recognition it deserves!

And 365 Days still has quite a few days to go, so you should put it in your iTunes subscriptions or your RSS feed or whatever it takes so that you can listen in every diurnal rotation of the Earth.

Share

September 8th, 2009 4:41 PM by Phil Plait in Astronomy | 12 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

12 Responses to “365 Days wins a Parsec!”

  1. 1.   Jeremy Henderson Says:
    September 8th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    So it has nothing to do with the Kessel Run, then?

  2. 2.   Fritriac Says:
    September 8th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    J.H.: HA! I came just for this! :-)

  3. 3.   Terry Whelan Says:
    September 8th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    super luminal !!!!

    1 Parsec = 3.26163626 light years, i.e. 1,191 days.

  4. 4.   George Brickner Says:
    September 8th, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    Huzzah!

  5. 5.   Crux Australis Says:
    September 8th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    maybe I missed your sarcasm, Terry Whelan, but how is a parsec measured in days?

  6. 6.   Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum Says:
    September 8th, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    I was delighted to hold that very Parsec in my own trembling hands at D*C. I handed it over to Ms. Information, though, lest I get too attached. She gave it to Pamela when she got to the Skeptrack room. I’ve produced 3 episodes so far, and have 2 more to come (in December). It’s been a great honor to lend a hand to the effort.

    BTW, Kestrels don’t run, they fly! ;^)

  7. 7.   Derek Colanduno Says:
    September 9th, 2009 at 2:48 am

    I was so glad when I heard that 365 won a Parsec! I only wish I could have been there…. me and my darn being a Director and running other things at the same time! :|

  8. 8.   Lidnsay Graham Says:
    September 9th, 2009 at 8:11 am

    Arg! You missed the better pun: “I know that title will take a sec’ to parse.”

  9. 9.   Doug Says:
    September 9th, 2009 at 8:29 am

    Since a parsec is defined by the earth’s orbit, I think 365 days is a rather fitting winner.

  10. 10.   Papa Surf Says:
    September 9th, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    Oh I am so honored!

    I’d like to thank the flying spaghetti monster, my family, and the wonderful crew behind the IYA 365 days of astronomy podcast – without whom none of this would have been possible.

    Thank you all so much!

    …I guess my trophy is coming in the mail then?

  11. 11.   Buzz Parsec Says:
    September 10th, 2009 at 7:22 am

    I feel compelled to post something here, though I don’t know what to say except “congratulations!”

    BTW, @Crux, distance is proportional to time, the proportionality factor being the speed of light. The time it takes for light to travel 1 parsec is 1,191 days, as Terry said. (Disclaimer: I haven’t actually checked the math, but it sounds right.)

  12. 12.   Buzz Parsec Says:
    September 10th, 2009 at 7:54 am

    P.S. tried to edit my comment after checking the math, but I guess I took too long…

    Anyway, using the definition of the parsec (648000/pi AU) and the speed of light from Allen’s Astrophysical Constants (4th edition) , I get 1191.2948 days, verifying Terry’s calculation.

    Translating to light years is problematical since there are several definitions of the year (sidereal, Julian, tropical, anomalistic, etc.), each with a corresponding light year.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us