DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Space Gizmo
Dramatic reading OF DEATH »

Hidden circles illusion

Richard Wiseman has another fantastic illusion on his site:


Hidden circles illusion


I’m pretty good with these things, and it took me a while to see the circles… and even when I did, they kept popping in and out of existence. Shading is critical in this particular illusion!

This illusion’s been around awhile; I found a reference to it from 2007, and I imagine it’s a lot older than that, too. Mnd man, it’s one of the more maddening ones I’ve ever seen! The one above it on Richard’s page made me a little woozy, too. I know men tend to be somewhat more prone to red/orange color blindness than women (I have a touch of it myself, but it’s not bad), so I wonder how the genders break down in seeing that particular illusion. Go take a look and leave a comment on Richard’s blog!

Share

September 16th, 2009 5:08 AM by Phil Plait in Cool stuff | 69 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

69 Responses to “Hidden circles illusion”

  1. 1.   Chris Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 5:14 am

    This is one of those strange illusions. I saw 16 circles immediately, and it’s only with great effort that I can see any of the square elements.

  2. 2.   Peter Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 5:27 am

    Err.. maybe it’s my glasses, but I see 0, zero, circles.

  3. 3.   Milhaud Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 5:35 am

    It took me a while, but fist I see 4 of them, and inmediatly 12 more. Really interesting illusion seeing 16 circles in one picture that only have paralel lines.

  4. 4.   TexasOdysseyCoach (Gene) Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 5:36 am

    I agree with Chris, once you see the circles it’s hard to see anything else in the picture.

  5. 5.   Carey Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 5:38 am

    Once you see the circles, it’s hard to turn them back off.

  6. 6.   Johnny Vector Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 5:38 am

    Wow, nice. I totally didn’t see them at first. For those who need a spoiler, look at the areas of horizontal lines.

  7. 7.   MadScientist Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:02 am

    Hmm … yet another illusion to turn into a PostScript file … if I ever find the time. I have notes on 2 illusions, will add this one to the list, but I’ve only implemented the circles and spirals one.

  8. 8.   Gunnar Rues Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:28 am

    thats pretty cool!

  9. 9.   Klas Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:41 am

    I saw 4 at once (the row to the right) and it took me a long time to see the rest. Now I can only turn them of for a short while and it’s really unstable.

  10. 10.   eta c Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:43 am

    I don’t know how difficult it is to “turn off” the circles. I initially saw only the squares (they seem to be my default) and eventually got the circles. Eventually, however, I found a trigger and am able to switch back and forth between the two. I had half as circles and half as squares and for a brief time managed to see both at once. Of course I’ve now ruined my eyes for life.

  11. 11.   Lewis Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:45 am

    Interesting to note that if you turn the circles 90 degrees clockwise, the lines will match the vertical line pattern, thus blending in!

    edit: turn each circle 90 degrees individually, that is.

  12. 12.   mike Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:45 am

    I don’t see any circles.

    I’m starting to feel like that guy in Mall Rats…
    “You know what? There is NO Easter Bunny! Over there, that’s just a guy in a suit! “

  13. 13.   Dan I. Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:45 am

    I see nothing…NOTHING!!

    I don’t see any circles.

    Therefore I conclude there are no circles and that this is simply a massive government coverup!

    But could someone tell me the secret? This isn’t like one of those “Magic Eye” things is it?

  14. 14.   JefFlyingV Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:51 am

    Nice trick. I didn’t see the circles until I stared at the x at the center of the page and the circles showed up on the the outside columns first.

  15. 15.   Romeo Vitelli Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 6:53 am

    “There are four lights!”

  16. 16.   Jack Mitcham Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 7:06 am

    Ok, it took me forever, but I can eventually make circles appear. However, as soon as I direct my vision to the circle, they turn right back into squares.

    I can only see circles if I’m staring at the X in the center. There really needs to be instructions on this illusion to stare at the X.

  17. 17.   Gadfly Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 7:09 am

    Anyone who can’t see the circles…I couldn’t either at first. The trick for me was to stare at the x in the middle and let peripheral vision eye fatigue do the rest. After fixating for about a minute they just popped out. Once I saw them it was no problem retreiving them.

  18. 18.   Peter Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 7:13 am

    Hack, it took me a while.. now I can see them. (With the same glasses). Nice! Give me an viewing-stereoscopic-pair-with-naked-eyes headache, though. Still, nice.

  19. 19.   Annalee Flower Horne Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 7:43 am

    I saw sixteen circles straight away, and only once I started staring to try to find the “hidden” ones did I see the rectangles.

    Now I can see them both simultaneously, which apparently makes me weird.

  20. 20.   Ken B Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 7:47 am

    I initially saw a couple of the circles while reading the text, and then they disappeared when I moved my eyes to look for more. Now, I can see them at will, at least temporarily, by staring at a fixed point on the screen. However, as with Phil, they can disappear at any time. (Perhaps my eyes moved imperceptibly to me, but enough to throw off the illusion?)

    I definitely agree — “cool”.

  21. 21.   Big Al Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 8:21 am

    That design would make a killer pair of doors if a skilled carpenter could render it in wood.

  22. 22.   alfaniner Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 8:30 am

    I love stuff like this, and this is one of the best I’ve ever seen!

  23. 23.   Alex Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 8:31 am

    I saw the circles and the squares instantly, maybe I’m just special :p

    The floating square one is cool though, but it seems to be loosing.

  24. 24.   Peter Eldergill Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 8:51 am

    Heh, I *finally* saw the circles! (But not ’till the second time ’round)

    Pete

  25. 25.   Quiet Desperation Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 8:55 am

    I saw zero. I felt left out. :-( Then I zoomed out the image and saw them. Zooming in kills the effect.

  26. 26.   TheBlackCat Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    I didn’t have much trouble at all. I saw rectangles at first, but it just took me a fraction of a second looking at the x to get the circles, and could switch back and forth easily.

  27. 27.   The Chemist Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:15 am

    Oh wow, what a tricky tattoo Phil… oh wait never mind. :P

    Kidding of course, I know about the NDA. I’m not sure I see everything yet, but I have to run, so I’ll have to take a closer look later.

  28. 28.   Darth Curt Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    I can’t unsee them now!

  29. 29.   TheMagician Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Here’s some cool ones, http://www.womansday.com/Content/Family-Lifestyle/8-Mind-Boggling-Optical-Illusions

  30. 30.   Andy Beaton Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    I can see the circles in the right column without effort. The others, they pop in and out depending on where I’m looking and how much I focus.

  31. 31.   ViciousChicken Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:43 am

    Strange, I seem to have had an experience opposite to a lot of the people here. I stared and stared at the X and saw nothing but the squares, but when I read Johnny Vector’s tip to look at the horizontal lines, I immediately saw them. So my peripheral vision did nothing; they only appeared (at first) when I looked directly at them. Maybe it’s because I was sort of expecting the squares themselves to somehow look like circles, not for the circles to appear between the squares.

  32. 32.   Haruspex Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:50 am

    I like this illusion not only because of its effectiveness, but also it’s simplicity of recreation in Photoshop.

    New 400×400 image.
    Filter > Render > Clouds.
    Filter > Render > Difference Clouds (repeat Difference Clouds 5 times or until you’re happy).
    Filter > Blur > Motion Blur (Angle 90, Distance 999).
    Use the Elliptical Marquee tool to select, copy, and paste to a new layer 16 evenly spaced circles, direct copies of the background you just made above. You can use Guides from the View menu to help space them by creating a grid with intersections at the points where you want the circles. Set the Elliptical Marquee tool to Fixed Size and hold down the Alt key (option on Mac) to place the selection by center instead of upper-left corner. Rotate each circle individually 90 degrees counter-clockwise (anti-clockwise in RP).

    You’re done.

  33. 33.   Haruspex Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    Gah, now that I’ve deconstructed the image and understand it’s creation, I can’t see the squares anymore. Once you know the component parts, I easily see the 90 degree circular twists in the background creating the circles. Since nothing other than your own mind is creating the squares (At least, that’s how my brain is accepting the image. You don’t create the squares in Photoshop. You create the circles from a cleverly created background of stripes.) my mind just doesn’t want to see the squares anymore. Rawr.

  34. 34.   Randy A Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 10:06 am

    Phil, I think you meant “red green color blind”. People do have varying sensitivity to color, but if you’re color blind you are missing the gene for a light sensitive pigment in the cones of your eye. The gene is found on the X chromosome — since guys have only one of these, males are much more likely to be color blind.

    I find it fascinating that some people saw the circles right away, while others did not, even with hints. This indicates that we have differences in our eye-brain system that are much more subtle and complex than color blindness. How many disagreements are due to individuals literally seeing things differently?

  35. 35.   JulieBD Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    I saw the circles right away and so clearly I was wondering what the illusion was! In fact, I had to read the comments to realise there could also be squares (now I see them too). I guess my brain works the opposite way from most people here (I’m a girl – does that explain anything?!?)

  36. 36.   Sinyet Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    I also see the right column of circles. I can focus on the X to get the others, but when I blink, they’re gone! Maddening and fascinating, in equal measure.

  37. 37.   Rebecca Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Ok, I must be really strange. After a lot of effort I discovered I can only see the circles if I am looking directly at the center of one of them, then they all show up. When I kept looking at the x in the center I saw nothing, and if I look away from one of the circles I am back to seeing only rectangles.

  38. 38.   Jeremy Henderson Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 11:11 am

    Whoa! It took me quite awhile, but then all of a sudden they just appeared on the left side of the picture. Still can’t make myself see them on the right though.

  39. 39.   Deepsix Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    16 circles, of course. It’s just the varying line lengths within each circle that create the circle appearance. With the longest line in the middle and getting shorter as they move out from the center. Once you know what to look for, you can see the circles instantly, even without focusing on the center of the pic for several seconds.

  40. 40.   Mike Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 11:16 am

    At first all I saw was the rectangles, but then it hit me and BAM! Circles. But now my mind is stuck in a state toggling between the two and it doesn’t seem to want to decide which it prefers.. >.< I can even get stuck in a state where the area of the image I'm focusing on looks like squares while the circles emerged toward the edge of the image.

  41. 41.   Eddie Janssen Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    This is a wonderfull site:
    Try this one: http://www.planetperplex.com/nl/item2
    Just click on A or B

  42. 42.   Damon Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    AMAZING! Undeniable PROOF that aliens aren’t visiting Earth!

  43. 43.   Gail Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    I see 16 circles.

  44. 44.   Brandon Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    I know where the square elements are supposed to be, but I can ONLY see circles. Like Julie, I had no idea what the illusion was supposed to be until I started reading the comments.

  45. 45.   alfaniner Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    Maybe that’s how all those crop circles were discovered — they aren’t actually even there!

  46. 46.   Charles Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Gee, Phil, you and Richard Wiseman look an awful lot alike. Are you sure you’re not both the same person?

  47. 47.   mariana Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    Saw 16 right away and wasn’t sure what the illusion was. I recounted them in case that the illusion made you think there were only 16, and a row of them just disappeared. Then came back. Then while I was staring trying to figure out what had happened they all disappeared. Pretty cool illusion.

  48. 48.   Chanelle Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    I saw the ones on the right column immediately, and my first answer was “4″, but after looking for just a few seconds, I saw columns 1 & 2, and then column 3 a few seconds later. Column 3 is the most difficult for me to see. Column 4 is very difficult for me to see the squares, the circles are so clear.

    I don’t really get the floating square illusion though. If I scroll the page up and down while looking at the illusion, it does some really cool wavy effects, but just to look at it, I see a square, but it doesn’t float at all.

  49. 49.   Travis Says:
    September 16th, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    If you relax your focus you can count a total of 36 circles of various sizes. At least I did.

  50. 50.   Compartidos en Reader 16/09/2009 Says:
    September 17th, 2009 at 1:47 am

    [...] Hidden circles illusion [...]

  51. 51.   Charles J. Slavis Jr. Says:
    September 17th, 2009 at 6:44 am

    There is a sidewalk artist who is so good in perspective, that he draws holes, swimming pools with people in them and all sorts of illusions in 3-D on a sidewalk. Some have to be viewed from one direction only to maintain the effect. Move to another angle and it looks distorted. He has photos taken of himself interacting with the illusion.

  52. 52.   Charles J. Slavis Jr. Says:
    September 17th, 2009 at 6:53 am

    I was happy to see 16.

  53. 53.   Charles J. Slavis Jr. Says:
    September 17th, 2009 at 7:24 am

    Look up 3-D side walk artist to see fantastic illusions…great artwork.

  54. 54.   Something to keep you occupied: hidden circles illusion « The Art of Science Says:
    September 17th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    [...] Bad Astronomy, who apparently stole it from Richard Wiseman’s [...]

  55. 55.   Hidden circles illusion « What happens next? Says:
    September 17th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    [...] circles illusion By sparkorama via [...]

  56. 56.   Paul A. Says:
    September 17th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    There are NO circles. There are broken lines that suggest circles, but there are no continuous lines that outline circles.

  57. 57.   Jeff Says:
    September 18th, 2009 at 9:40 am

    My shop has a old tin ceiling with a similar patern. I saw the circles straight away.

  58. 58.   Illustratie van verborgen cirkels in een deur | Astroblogs Says:
    September 20th, 2009 at 11:30 am

    [...] het zijn er geen nul. Via Bad Astronomy kwam deze illusie bij Richard Wiseman vandaan. Hoeveel cirkels zijn er nou precies? S.v.p. voor het [...]

  59. 59.   Hanny Says:
    September 21st, 2009 at 1:47 am

    The first few seconds I saw it, I was annoyed about the question as I didn’t see any. But when I read there should be 16 and had another look, I could see them. There really are 16 ‘circles’. I love these things. :D

  60. 60.   Desiree Says:
    October 17th, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    I don’t get this illusion, I saw 16 circles right away and thought I should be seeing something else.
    Then I read the comments and I’m extremely confused as to how anyone has difficulty seeing them.
    I can’t seem to not see them :(

  61. 61.   helen Says:
    October 18th, 2009 at 4:35 am

    I saw all of the circles straight away, i hadn’t read the text yet and it took me a moment to be able to see the squares and even then i had to really concentrate. I don’t get how people aren’t seeing the circles it’s the most dominant part of the image :s
    To be honest i just thought the people commenting were being sarcastic or something.

  62. 62.   spiral Says:
    November 21st, 2010 at 2:03 am

    There are 20 circles if you look more clearly not the fore mentioned 16.

  63. 63.   Elliot Says:
    November 26th, 2010 at 10:39 pm

    this was wierd for me because when i first saw this all i saw was circles. i didn’t understand people. i read the comments and i thought everyone was being sarcastic because to me nothing special was going on. but then i asked others i was with what they saw and everyone saw squares so i looked real hard and soon i managed to see all the squares and not the circles. i was just opposite of other people.

  64. 64.   Danny Says:
    December 17th, 2010 at 12:14 am

    i dont get it, i didnt even know this was meant to be an illusion cause i saw all the circles immediately and they dont go away, i have to focus to see the squares :(

  65. 65.   Jose Says:
    December 22nd, 2010 at 10:29 am

    Very cool illusion!

  66. 66.   Phil E. Drifter Says:
    January 4th, 2011 at 5:56 am

    How many circles do i see?

    All of them.

  67. 67.   Spuffler Says:
    January 8th, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    At first I was like, ok, sarcasm, I might be able to get some of the joke….

    But then I read comment 6, and that was it, I can really see the circles which I couldn’t see before.

  68. 68.   Kyle Says:
    January 9th, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    Same with Chris, I saw the circles first then I saw the squares.

  69. 69.   Joc Says:
    November 21st, 2011 at 11:02 pm

    I can’t figure out why everyone thinks it’s hard to see the circles. Must be my new Mac.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • The hearts of space
      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • The hearts of space | Bad Astronomy
      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us