Fine autotuning the Universe

submit to reddit

This is surprisingly cool and pleasant to listen to.


I wonder what Sagan would’ve thought of this?

Tip o’ the elbow-patched corduroy jacket to the dozens of people who tweeted and emailed this, though BABloggee Ryan Romo was first.

September 25th, 2009 10:00 AM Tags: , , , ,
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff | 58 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

58 Responses to “Fine autotuning the Universe”

  1. 1.   TBRP Says:

    I don’t know what Sagan would have thought, but I think this is made of win.

  2. 2.   Christina Viering Says:

    Pretty cool.

  3. 3.   Cindy Says:

    That’s cool. I think he would have liked it.

    I wish he lived long enough to see all the cool results coming from Galileo, Cassini, all the Mars explorers, and the recent results about water on the Moon.

  4. 4.   Procyan Says:

    Like a dream when an old friend shows up for a few moments. Damn I miss him. Thanks

  5. 5.   wright Says:

    Lovely. I think Sagan would have been amused and flattered.

  6. 6.   BigBadSis Says:

    Does anyone else hear Kermit the Frog in there too? Ingenious audio.

  7. 7.   Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum Says:

    Now -THAT- is a proper use for Auto-Tune!
    Very nice! He’d love it.

  8. 8.   toasterhead Says:

    Isn’t it a little dangerous remixing the universe with so much autotune? Any minute now, I’m expecting Kanye West to jump up onstage and start ranting about how the Andromeda Galaxy has the best globular cluster of all time.

  9. 9.   Jardmonkey Says:

    Man. I teared up a little. Of course he would have loved it.

  10. 10.   DrFlimmer Says:

    Some passages remind me of the song about the universe from Monty Python’s “The meaning of life”:

    youtube.com/watch?gl=DE&hl=de&v=buqtdpuZxvk

  11. 11.   cameron Says:

    Beauty.

  12. 12.   Rob G. Says:

    Sorry, but I’m going to have to go against the grain on this one…

    Carl Sagan may have indeed enjoyed this. I, on the other hand, feel a need to go put a kitty in a blender to get this completely awful “song” out of my head.

  13. 13.   Brian Says:

    Wow…I wonder if it’s possible to get this as an mp3. I thought it was great!

  14. 14.   Pillownaut Says:

    that was awesome. very cool. i sent it to a bunch of people. Sagan would have embraced that and then gotten Feynman for a follow-up duet ;)

  15. 15.   tacitus Says:

    It does an excellent job of demonstrating the poetry of Sagan’s words, that’s for sure.

  16. 16.   BGC Says:

    I like this.
    Tho, I must admit that the change in pitch makes Sagan sound very much like a cross of Jim Henson’s voicings for Kermit the Frog and Ernie from Sesame Street.
    “Bert! Bert! Look at this Bert!”

  17. 17.   llewelly Says:

    I wonder what Sagan would’ve thought of this?

    He would’ve thought: “I hope I didn’t come across that confused and scattered.”

    It sounds cool, but the lyrics make no sense whatever unless you remember Cosmos.

  18. 18.   Dan Says:

    Wow, that was a lot better than it had to be… the creator put some work into it.

    You can get the mp3 here. http://www.colorpulsemusic.com/youtube.html

    EDIT: The video, that is, not the universe.

  19. 19.   Nicole Says:

    @Brian, check out the “More details” link on the side of the YouTube page. There’s a link to download both the mp3 and the video.

    That is my new favorite song!

  20. 20.   TexasOdysseyCoach (Gene) Says:

    Ausgezeichnet !!! (in my best voice impression of Mr. Burns)

  21. 21.   ioresult Says:

    “No – No words. No words to describe it. [...] So beautiful, So beautiful… I had no idea.”
    That song brings tears to my eyes!

  22. 22.   thatchereffect Says:

    Absolutely beautiful

  23. 23.   Mike Sperry Says:

    I love the beatboxing whale sounds.

  24. 24.   Arkonbey Says:

    That is utterly beautiful. I wonder if he’d have liked it?

    I respect, perhaps even revere Dr. Sagan. His early death was a great loss to all of us; we are much poorer without him.

    However, I did notice one thing I did notice I’d forgotten: At times, when you don’t see his face, he sounds a bit like Kermit the Frog.

  25. 25.   mariana Says:

    Half the time I mistake Sagan for Dawkins and vice-versa. I need to pay more attention to faces. Voices I can do; faces require work.

  26. 26.   padawanpooh Says:

    Thanks to you, Phil, I joined Carolyn Porco’s Twitter a few days ago and she had linked to this as well. I think it’s a wonderful, trippy tribute to a true science hero. Great stuff.

  27. 27.   Tom B Says:

    Kudos to the author too, to be able to find a beat, verse, and the right sequences. Not to mention the Piano part, an amazing work in and of itself.

    I would have thought that Carl would have loved it.

  28. 28.   Stan9FOS Says:

    Carl Sagan thru a vocoder? My capacity for awesomeness just expanded exponentially!

  29. 29.   Wayne Says:

    That…was…awesome!

  30. 30.   Cosmos remixed: Carl Sagan ft. Stephen Hawking | Astroblogs Says:

    [...] Geweldig in elkaar gezet, die mix, nietwaar? Bron: Bad Astronomy. [...]

  31. 31.   Carl Sagan – ‘A Glorious Dawn’ ft Stephen Hawking (Cosmos Remixed) « Physics and cake Says:

    [...] (Via Bad Astronomy) [...]

  32. 32.   fluffy Says:

    That’s actually a vocoder, not autotune. They are different technologies, which can be used to similar effect but are quite different, especially to people who work with both.

  33. 33.   mymatedave Says:

    Entirely awesome and made of win. thanks Phil!

  34. 34.   cameron Says:

    Carl Sagan is the Rod Serling of science.

  35. 35.   Sili Says:

    Won’t our merger with Andromeda not actually look all the amazing? I seem to recall from the Astronomycast, that the density of stars is such that we’ll never see the galaxy as a galaxy when it gets near?

    That said, I loved this and I hope somebody will remix Feynmann and Dawkins in the same manner. (Are there any recordings of Dirac?)

  36. 36.   claschx Says:

    Ay Caramba!, that was totally awesome

  37. 37.   Jack Hagerty Says:

    32. fluffy Says: “That’s actually a vocoder, not autotune. They are different technologies, which can be used to similar effect but are quite different, especially to people who work with both.”

    Could you (or someone else familiar) perhaps give us a little tutorial on how it’s done?

    - Jack

  38. 38.   fred edison Says:

    It’s been immensely enjoyable to read the comments on YouTube, as it is here. Anything that gets people excited and appreciative of science gets huge kudos and applause from me. Next to always awesome Phil, Carl and Stephen are two super cool cats who have immensely contributed to our learning and knowledge of the universe. I sincerely hope Stephen Hawking and Ann Druyan love the honorable tribute as much as everyone else has.

  39. 39.   Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum Says:

    Fluffy & Jack H.:
    This Vocoder/Auto-Tune debate sounds like a job for Slau! I’ll suggest he tackle it on an upcoming podcast.

  40. 40.   BA Blog: Fine autotuning the Universe (Sagan and Hawking Music Video) - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum Says:

    [...] Blog: Fine autotuning the Universe (Sagan and Hawking Music Video) BA Blog: Fine autotuning the Universe [...]

  41. 41.   NelC Says:

    Kermit? Strange, I hear someone else entirely.

  42. 42.   Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum Says:

    I have it on my iPod Touch now. So cool.
    The sky calls to us.
    Wow.
    I put the bug in Slau’s ear about the Vocoder -vs- Auto-Tune issue. Keep an ear on his “Sessions With Slau” podcast to hear the results!

  43. 43.   Keith Says:

    I think Dr. Sagan would have fallen back on that old expression, “Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” :)

  44. 44.   Nemo Says:

    MC Hawking in the hizzouse y’all!

  45. 45.   Richard Rost Says:

    WIN

  46. 46.   Keith (the first one) Says:

    I thought Sagan sounded like Kermit too! Hawking’s got a good singing voice though. They should add the ability to change voice pitch to his voice computer thing.

  47. 47.   Pieter Kok Says:

    “Sagan would have embraced that and then gotten Feynman for a follow-up duet”

    Feynman would have gone Beastie Boys style (no sleep ’til Brooklyn!).

  48. 48.   Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum Says:

    This came in from Slau as I slept:
    “SlauBeSharp@RichardDrumm Not enough to fill an episode: it’s a vocoder :D
    Oh well.

  49. 49.   Mark I. Says:

    On a related note Cosmos is currently available on Hulu and Netflix’s streaming service.

  50. 50.   Wrye Says:

    Sili@35,

    I’m not sure if this is what you meant, but Sagan isn’t talking (in Cosmos) about our merger with Andromeda. He’s imagining what the sky would look like from a hypothetical planet in one of the globular clusters orbiting the Milky Way.

    I believe that at the time of Cosmos, science hadn’t yet predicted the merger with Andromeda, or the unlikelihood of planets around the old metal-poor population I and II stars that mainly comprise the globular clusters.

    Damn, I wish Carl was still around. I’d love to hear what he would have made of the new theories and advances in cosmology, planetary systems, and so on. He’s sorely missed.

  51. 51.   Sili Says:

    Thanks, Wrye. It shows that I have never seen Cosmos (that I recall).

    Should do as Blake Stacey said and get it from Itunes.

  52. 52.   skylyre Says:

    Yeah I just read through the comments and don’t have much else more to add… other than I love to fall asleep listening to Cosmos. This is just made of awesome.

    @tacitus #15 – very nicely said! He spoke so eloquently and with compassion.

    I could just ramble on right now but I won’t :)

  53. 53.   SkepDoc Says:

    *Does a dance*

  54. 54.   A Still More Glorious Dawn — The Gaytheists Says:

    [...] of you have already seen this on Bad Astronomy, Skepchick and Pharyngula, but I had to post it here anyway. I can’t get it out of my [...]

  55. 55.   calx Says:

    fluffy, no it is clearly autotuned.

  56. 56.   Mike Says:

    Thanks to this video, my weekend was spent watching Cosmos and Contact. =)
    Through efforts like this, Carl Sagan lives on.

  57. 57.   Markle Says:

    Full of whoa. Fantastic job.

  58. 58.   We await a galaxy-rise – a morning filled with 400 billion suns - Sky’s Blog Says:

    [...] where it might be going. {the photo is Phil Plaitt, the “Bad Astronomer” — thanks, Phil, for pointing me to the video which you can play [...]

Leave a Reply