<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ares I-X to launch 8:00 EDT Tuesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:01:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-222904</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=6489#comment-222904</guid>
		<description>I thought this site was all about debunking false beliefs.  One of the biggest false beliefs out there is the belief in the original published launch date.  (:
Here we go again!
I hope she goes today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this site was all about debunking false beliefs.  One of the biggest false beliefs out there is the belief in the original published launch date.  (:<br />
Here we go again!<br />
I hope she goes today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hutajulu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-222711</link>
		<dc:creator>hutajulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=6489#comment-222711</guid>
		<description>its one of biggest moment to watch launch of aries I - x on NASA aerospace ....its incredible... i hope succesfuly to nasa team.....search and monitoring the out of space.... and find something new....and use for human development in the world.... may God Bless U....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its one of biggest moment to watch launch of aries I &#8211; x on NASA aerospace &#8230;.its incredible&#8230; i hope succesfuly to nasa team&#8230;..search and monitoring the out of space&#8230;. and find something new&#8230;.and use for human development in the world&#8230;. may God Bless U&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-222647</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=6489#comment-222647</guid>
		<description>Wake up BA!
T-40 minutes and counting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up BA!<br />
T-40 minutes and counting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-222447</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=6489#comment-222447</guid>
		<description>From #29:  &quot;The Ares system (as planned) is modularised – different rockets for different jobs. The Shuttle is, by contrast, an expensive do-everything system.&quot;

If memory serves, an earlier conception of the shuttle program included two configurations:  one (smaller) to launch people, one (larger) for cargo.  It mutated into the one-size-fits-all, money sucking design.

This current fight is about a change in contractors.  It&#039;s going to leave us with nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From #29:  &#8220;The Ares system (as planned) is modularised – different rockets for different jobs. The Shuttle is, by contrast, an expensive do-everything system.&#8221;</p>
<p>If memory serves, an earlier conception of the shuttle program included two configurations:  one (smaller) to launch people, one (larger) for cargo.  It mutated into the one-size-fits-all, money sucking design.</p>
<p>This current fight is about a change in contractors.  It&#8217;s going to leave us with nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asimov Fan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-222337</link>
		<dc:creator>Asimov Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=6489#comment-222337</guid>
		<description>@ 29 Peter B : Good analysis with which I entirely agree. :-) 

Mind you, having a reuseable orbiter, a spaceplane component is cool too. I love the shuttle too - I just wish it was more like what was originally hoped for and expected rather than what we got. 

Grew up reading SF and imagining things like the shuttle or like spaceships such as &lt;i&gt;Enterprise&lt;/i&gt;. Perhaps unrealistic but any and all steps towards those sort of craft fill me with hope and longing. 

&lt;i&gt;Ares&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Orion&lt;/i&gt; the whole Apollo redux idea is great -I just want to see progress being made once again because for the past three or four decades since &lt;i&gt;Apollo 17&lt;/i&gt; Human spaceflight has been going nowhere boldly. Yes, the space stations like &lt;i&gt;Skylab&lt;/i&gt; and the ISS, the space shuttles and perhaps the start of some some private space programs eg. &lt;i&gt;Spaceship Two&lt;/i&gt; are something, yes they&#039;ve achieved a lot such as launching &lt;i&gt;Hubble&lt;/i&gt; and more people than ever into orbit. 

But somehow its not quite enough. We&#039;re missing the &quot;going further&quot; and &quot;seeing people on new worlds&quot; factors. 

Returning the Moon - especally for long durations with a base being built there - is worthwhile and I&#039;d love to see it happen but I was really hoping to see Humanity land on Mars and on some near Earth asteroids in my lifetime. I really thought we&#039;d be achieving that within twenty or thirty years after &lt;i&gt;Apollo&lt;/i&gt;. I thought we&#039;d have gone so much further. 

Its not just one administration or side of politics or NASA leadership group that&#039;s failed to do this these past few years. Its all of them &amp; both sides of politics. Its time, overdue in fact, that we revived some momentum
when it comes to space exploration. 

&lt;i&gt;Ares,&lt;/i&gt;is a good start - or restart really. I&#039;d like to see plans for more beginning to get taken seriously. I&#039;d love to see the &quot;beyond&quot; part take shape and for us to pick up the pace and ambition as far as sending Humans to new places within our solar system. 

So good luck and best wishes to them all - but, please sirs, can we have some more and soon! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 29 Peter B : Good analysis with which I entirely agree. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Mind you, having a reuseable orbiter, a spaceplane component is cool too. I love the shuttle too &#8211; I just wish it was more like what was originally hoped for and expected rather than what we got. </p>
<p>Grew up reading SF and imagining things like the shuttle or like spaceships such as <i>Enterprise</i>. Perhaps unrealistic but any and all steps towards those sort of craft fill me with hope and longing. </p>
<p><i>Ares</i> and <i>Orion</i> the whole Apollo redux idea is great -I just want to see progress being made once again because for the past three or four decades since <i>Apollo 17</i> Human spaceflight has been going nowhere boldly. Yes, the space stations like <i>Skylab</i> and the ISS, the space shuttles and perhaps the start of some some private space programs eg. <i>Spaceship Two</i> are something, yes they&#8217;ve achieved a lot such as launching <i>Hubble</i> and more people than ever into orbit. </p>
<p>But somehow its not quite enough. We&#8217;re missing the &#8220;going further&#8221; and &#8220;seeing people on new worlds&#8221; factors. </p>
<p>Returning the Moon &#8211; especally for long durations with a base being built there &#8211; is worthwhile and I&#8217;d love to see it happen but I was really hoping to see Humanity land on Mars and on some near Earth asteroids in my lifetime. I really thought we&#8217;d be achieving that within twenty or thirty years after <i>Apollo</i>. I thought we&#8217;d have gone so much further. </p>
<p>Its not just one administration or side of politics or NASA leadership group that&#8217;s failed to do this these past few years. Its all of them &#038; both sides of politics. Its time, overdue in fact, that we revived some momentum<br />
when it comes to space exploration. </p>
<p><i>Ares,</i>is a good start &#8211; or restart really. I&#8217;d like to see plans for more beginning to get taken seriously. I&#8217;d love to see the &#8220;beyond&#8221; part take shape and for us to pick up the pace and ambition as far as sending Humans to new places within our solar system. </p>
<p>So good luck and best wishes to them all &#8211; but, please sirs, can we have some more and soon! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrQhuest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-222286</link>
		<dc:creator>MrQhuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=6489#comment-222286</guid>
		<description>I was wondering, how far to the north would a launch from Kennedy be visible, assuming perfect weather conditions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering, how far to the north would a launch from Kennedy be visible, assuming perfect weather conditions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/23/ares-i-x-to-launch-800-edt-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-222161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=6489#comment-222161</guid>
		<description>@ Garfield

In regards to the free iPhone app you are talking about, you can see a timer for the STS 129 mission by going down the list to the space shuttle option on the front page. So both countdowns are available at the present =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Garfield</p>
<p>In regards to the free iPhone app you are talking about, you can see a timer for the STS 129 mission by going down the list to the space shuttle option on the front page. So both countdowns are available at the present =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
