<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big big Mars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paisajes de&#8230; ¡Marte! &#171; Pistachio Brainstorming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204119</link>
		<dc:creator>Paisajes de&#8230; ¡Marte! &#171; Pistachio Brainstorming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204119</guid>
		<description>[...] al crack de astronomía Phil Plait [discovermagazine.com] me entero de que en The Big Picture [boston.com] han hecho un reportaje [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] al crack de astronomía Phil Plait [discovermagazine.com] me entero de que en The Big Picture [boston.com] han hecho un reportaje [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB of Brisbane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204118</link>
		<dc:creator>JB of Brisbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204118</guid>
		<description>Wow! At this resolution it really does look like a dunescape, rather than someone&#039;s abs with a radical henna tattoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! At this resolution it really does look like a dunescape, rather than someone&#8217;s abs with a radical henna tattoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying sardines</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204117</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying sardines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204117</guid>
		<description>@ Just me :

&lt;i&gt;I just saw a bit of a craptacular sci-fi movie on tv the other night, involving the peril Earth faces after the moon is struck by—get this—a brown dwarf!! That premise and everything that follows deserves Phil’s famous “The stupid, it burns!!” award. &lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m pretty sure I recall the BA blogging on that here too - incl. giving it the &quot;teh stoopid it burns&quot; signs. Maybe even a few posts on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Just me :</p>
<p><i>I just saw a bit of a craptacular sci-fi movie on tv the other night, involving the peril Earth faces after the moon is struck by—get this—a brown dwarf!! That premise and everything that follows deserves Phil’s famous “The stupid, it burns!!” award. </i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure I recall the BA blogging on that here too &#8211; incl. giving it the &#8220;teh stoopid it burns&#8221; signs. Maybe even a few posts on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204116</link>
		<dc:creator>tracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204116</guid>
		<description>I would make a lousy planetary geologist.

Every time I look at a picture of a crater, it at first looks not like a depression lit from one direction, but like a BUMP lit from the opposite direction.  I have to stare and stare and stare in hope that the picture will &quot;pop in&quot; and look like the dent in the surface it really is.

It took me 15 minutes to see that picture of Victoria Crater as a CRATER instead of a raised area of the landscape.  And then after it finally popped into view, I lost it again.

I swear, I need 3-D glasses for these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would make a lousy planetary geologist.</p>
<p>Every time I look at a picture of a crater, it at first looks not like a depression lit from one direction, but like a BUMP lit from the opposite direction.  I have to stare and stare and stare in hope that the picture will &#8220;pop in&#8221; and look like the dent in the surface it really is.</p>
<p>It took me 15 minutes to see that picture of Victoria Crater as a CRATER instead of a raised area of the landscape.  And then after it finally popped into view, I lost it again.</p>
<p>I swear, I need 3-D glasses for these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204115</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204115</guid>
		<description>Holy heck, that was just incredible! I&#039;m just sitting here with my jaw on the floor. Thanks for that Phil. And I was so happy until I made the mistake of starting to read the comments on that page. I really should know better.

But all I could think while looking at the photos was how desperately much I&#039;d like to walk across one of those landscapes. Seeing Opportunities tracks in the sand in that one photo? That didn&#039;t ruin the landscape, it connected me. Gave me a sense that I/we in one small way have &lt;i&gt;been&lt;/i&gt; there. Amazing stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy heck, that was just incredible! I&#8217;m just sitting here with my jaw on the floor. Thanks for that Phil. And I was so happy until I made the mistake of starting to read the comments on that page. I really should know better.</p>
<p>But all I could think while looking at the photos was how desperately much I&#8217;d like to walk across one of those landscapes. Seeing Opportunities tracks in the sand in that one photo? That didn&#8217;t ruin the landscape, it connected me. Gave me a sense that I/we in one small way have <i>been</i> there. Amazing stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Mars Pictures &#171; IBY&#8217;s Island Universe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204114</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Mars Pictures &#171; IBY&#8217;s Island Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204114</guid>
		<description>[...] hat tip: badastronomer [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hat tip: badastronomer [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204113</link>
		<dc:creator>Just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204113</guid>
		<description>@ 17

Hey, the comment numbers got changed around! So, I need to adjust my #17 comment to the &lt;em&gt;adjusted&lt;/em&gt; numbers, in which case, my &lt;em&gt;@12&lt;/em&gt; reference should read &quot;@15&quot;, although, I imagine anyone paying attention would have figured that out without my little explanation here. There are some pretty bright BABlogees here!

@ 23 (unless the numbers change again):
&lt;em&gt;2) never shining directly by nuclear fusing thus not a star or brown dwarf&lt;/em&gt;

I just saw a bit of a craptacular sci-fi movie on tv the other night, involving the peril Earth faces after the moon is struck by—get this—a &lt;em&gt;brown dwarf&lt;/em&gt;!! That premise and everything that follows deserves Phil&#039;s famous &lt;em&gt;&quot;The stupid, it burns!!&quot;&lt;/em&gt; award.

Sorry, also off-topic, but I had to say it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 17</p>
<p>Hey, the comment numbers got changed around! So, I need to adjust my #17 comment to the <em>adjusted</em> numbers, in which case, my <em>@12</em> reference should read &#8220;@15&#8243;, although, I imagine anyone paying attention would have figured that out without my little explanation here. There are some pretty bright BABlogees here!</p>
<p>@ 23 (unless the numbers change again):<br />
<em>2) never shining directly by nuclear fusing thus not a star or brown dwarf</em></p>
<p>I just saw a bit of a craptacular sci-fi movie on tv the other night, involving the peril Earth faces after the moon is struck by—get this—a <em>brown dwarf</em>!! That premise and everything that follows deserves Phil&#8217;s famous <em>&#8220;The stupid, it burns!!&#8221;</em> award.</p>
<p>Sorry, also off-topic, but I had to say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo Vitelli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204112</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo Vitelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204112</guid>
		<description>Pareidolia Central

Not only have I spotted Jesus, Elvis, and God, I think I see four of the Seven Dwarfs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pareidolia Central</p>
<p>Not only have I spotted Jesus, Elvis, and God, I think I see four of the Seven Dwarfs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paisajes de&#8230; ¡Marte! : Coherencia Parcial</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204111</link>
		<dc:creator>Paisajes de&#8230; ¡Marte! : Coherencia Parcial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204111</guid>
		<description>[...] al crack de astronomía Phil Plait [discovermagazine.com] me entero de que en The Big Picture [boston.com] han hecho un reportaje [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] al crack de astronomía Phil Plait [discovermagazine.com] me entero de que en The Big Picture [boston.com] han hecho un reportaje [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying sardines</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/08/big-big-mars/#comment-204110</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying sardines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7250#comment-204110</guid>
		<description>@ 8.   Dr. Morbius Says:

&lt;i&gt;@Flying sardines Mercury is the smallest terrestrial planet. &lt;/i&gt;

D&#039;oh!  Of course it is! Mea culpa, I forgot all about Mercury. What a brainfade. I meant Mars is the second smallest. After Mercury and not counting Eris, Pluto, Makemake, Haumea, Sedna and Ceres. (Which BTW. are all arguably &quot;planets&quot; by the saner non-IAU definition.*)

Unless the IAU has just decided to kick Mercury off the planets list now too? ;-)

Or unless the Sun&#039;s transition to orange giant &lt;i&gt;(swelling out large enough to devour Mercury and extend halfway to Venus)&lt;/i&gt; has taken place wa-aay ahead of schedule! Yikes! ;-)

_______________

* This saner non-IAU definition being simply that a &quot;planet&quot; is

1) rounded through its own gravity thus not an asteroid or comet,
2) never shining directly by nuclear fusing thus not a star or brown dwarf
&amp;
3) not directly orbiting another planet thus not a moon.

Off topic &amp; all but just thought I&#039;d mention it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 8.   Dr. Morbius Says:</p>
<p><i>@Flying sardines Mercury is the smallest terrestrial planet. </i></p>
<p>D&#8217;oh!  Of course it is! Mea culpa, I forgot all about Mercury. What a brainfade. I meant Mars is the second smallest. After Mercury and not counting Eris, Pluto, Makemake, Haumea, Sedna and Ceres. (Which BTW. are all arguably &#8220;planets&#8221; by the saner non-IAU definition.*)</p>
<p>Unless the IAU has just decided to kick Mercury off the planets list now too? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Or unless the Sun&#8217;s transition to orange giant <i>(swelling out large enough to devour Mercury and extend halfway to Venus)</i> has taken place wa-aay ahead of schedule! Yikes! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>_______________</p>
<p>* This saner non-IAU definition being simply that a &#8220;planet&#8221; is</p>
<p>1) rounded through its own gravity thus not an asteroid or comet,<br />
2) never shining directly by nuclear fusing thus not a star or brown dwarf<br />
&amp;<br />
3) not directly orbiting another planet thus not a moon.</p>
<p>Off topic &amp; all but just thought I&#8217;d mention it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-06-19 03:52:29 -->