<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving Thanks [repost]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill H</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228496</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;To give thanks, there has to be something to receive it.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Like a commenter before me, I would question this premise, but if one wants to hold to it one could replace &lt;i&gt;&quot;give thanks&quot;&lt;/i&gt; with &lt;i&gt;&quot;be thankful.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

It is the inward act which is of value in any case, just as with forgiveness. The person that benefits from thanks is the person who is thankful and the person who benefits from forgiveness is the person who forgives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;To give thanks, there has to be something to receive it.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Like a commenter before me, I would question this premise, but if one wants to hold to it one could replace <i>&#8220;give thanks&#8221;</i> with <i>&#8220;be thankful.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>It is the inward act which is of value in any case, just as with forgiveness. The person that benefits from thanks is the person who is thankful and the person who benefits from forgiveness is the person who forgives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228355</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228355</guid>
		<description>30.   EmaNymton Says: 
&quot;Spectroscope is really dumb, isn’t he?&quot;

No, he isn&#039;t dumb. His command of language would suggest he&#039;s intelligent but has a different POV.

27.   Spectroscope:

Typical interglacial periods last about 8-10 thousand years. In the &#039;70s, climatologists WERE concerned that we were PROBABLY at the end of an interglacial and should be preparing for another ice age. They didn&#039;t have good data to suggest that was in fact the case, but it was something to think about. When they began to look at GLOBAL temps in earnest, they found data that indicated the exact opposite of their previous assumption, (which really disappointed me, because I&#039;m a down hill skier and was looking forward to more snow. Oh well.) 

Over the last 30 some years, average world wide temps HAVE shown an upward inclination of about 1 degree(Centigrade, I believe). This made no sense, because glacial/warming cycles were assumed to be massive changes, so what could be going on that would mitigate another ice age? How could it be so subtle we hadn&#039;t noticed it?  Analyses of prehistoric CO2 levels in ice cores in the Antarctic indicated an increase in CO2 since humans became industrialized. Granted, volcanos liberate a lot more CO2 than we do, but that is an infrequent pollutant, whereas our industrial contribution is continuous and constantly increasing, more or less in line with what the ice cores showed. Thus we have a causal connection. 

As far as there being little to no increase in temps over the last decade, all I can say is that here in Georgia, the plants and animals all seem to think it&#039;s time to move north. Animal migration from Florida has been about 5 miles/year, for the last 40 years. It&#039;s Nov 28 and we have yet to experience a single day of freezing temps. Historically, that&#039;s quite unusual, at least as far as the folk who have lived here all their lives contend. Personally, I can only consider the last five years.
Granted, a local perturbation says nothing for what&#039;s happening elsewhere in the world, so I guess I&#039;ll just have to trust people much more knowledgeable than myself. I can do that, because I&#039;m a firm believer in the efficacy of the Method to detect and allow us to rectify human error. Besides, I am anything BUT paranoid. 

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30.   EmaNymton Says:<br />
&#8220;Spectroscope is really dumb, isn’t he?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, he isn&#8217;t dumb. His command of language would suggest he&#8217;s intelligent but has a different POV.</p>
<p>27.   Spectroscope:</p>
<p>Typical interglacial periods last about 8-10 thousand years. In the &#8217;70s, climatologists WERE concerned that we were PROBABLY at the end of an interglacial and should be preparing for another ice age. They didn&#8217;t have good data to suggest that was in fact the case, but it was something to think about. When they began to look at GLOBAL temps in earnest, they found data that indicated the exact opposite of their previous assumption, (which really disappointed me, because I&#8217;m a down hill skier and was looking forward to more snow. Oh well.) </p>
<p>Over the last 30 some years, average world wide temps HAVE shown an upward inclination of about 1 degree(Centigrade, I believe). This made no sense, because glacial/warming cycles were assumed to be massive changes, so what could be going on that would mitigate another ice age? How could it be so subtle we hadn&#8217;t noticed it?  Analyses of prehistoric CO2 levels in ice cores in the Antarctic indicated an increase in CO2 since humans became industrialized. Granted, volcanos liberate a lot more CO2 than we do, but that is an infrequent pollutant, whereas our industrial contribution is continuous and constantly increasing, more or less in line with what the ice cores showed. Thus we have a causal connection. </p>
<p>As far as there being little to no increase in temps over the last decade, all I can say is that here in Georgia, the plants and animals all seem to think it&#8217;s time to move north. Animal migration from Florida has been about 5 miles/year, for the last 40 years. It&#8217;s Nov 28 and we have yet to experience a single day of freezing temps. Historically, that&#8217;s quite unusual, at least as far as the folk who have lived here all their lives contend. Personally, I can only consider the last five years.<br />
Granted, a local perturbation says nothing for what&#8217;s happening elsewhere in the world, so I guess I&#8217;ll just have to trust people much more knowledgeable than myself. I can do that, because I&#8217;m a firm believer in the efficacy of the Method to detect and allow us to rectify human error. Besides, I am anything BUT paranoid. </p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228301</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228301</guid>
		<description>Well, now you&#039;ve really bent my brain with your &quot;who are we thanking during Thanksgiving&quot; notion.  D&#039;oh!  How about I just thank &quot;the Universe&quot; for my good fortune.

I recently saw an ABC News article about pilgrims on the Haij and Swine Flu concerns.  The pilgrims all responded &quot;It is Allah&#039;s will &lt;if I get the flu&gt;&quot;.  IE, Fate and Destiny.  That&#039;s not something Americans generally believe in (seeing as &quot;the land of opportunity&quot; sort of implies you can create your own destiny) but a sizeable fraction of the World&#039;s population does believe in Fate.  Hard for me to understand but I don&#039;t need to... it&#039;s what they believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now you&#8217;ve really bent my brain with your &#8220;who are we thanking during Thanksgiving&#8221; notion.  D&#8217;oh!  How about I just thank &#8220;the Universe&#8221; for my good fortune.</p>
<p>I recently saw an ABC News article about pilgrims on the Haij and Swine Flu concerns.  The pilgrims all responded &#8220;It is Allah&#8217;s will <if I get the flu>&#8220;.  IE, Fate and Destiny.  That&#8217;s not something Americans generally believe in (seeing as &#8220;the land of opportunity&#8221; sort of implies you can create your own destiny) but a sizeable fraction of the World&#8217;s population does believe in Fate.  Hard for me to understand but I don&#8217;t need to&#8230; it&#8217;s what they believe.</if></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calli Arcale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228273</link>
		<dc:creator>Calli Arcale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228273</guid>
		<description>Chet -- I believe you mean &quot;Small Gods&quot;.  That&#039;s one of the best of the Discworld books, and one I often recommend people read.

Comparative religion is one of the most fascinating topics around, in my opinion.  It&#039;s interesting to see how the different religions influenced one another through the millenia.  Due to personal family history, I tend to be more interested (or at least more informed) about the path of Christianity into Scandinavia.  A very interesting story indeed, and definitely one which involved a lot of blood.  (And how many Scandinavian Christians still put out a bowl of porridge for the &lt;i&gt;julenisse&lt;/i&gt;?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chet &#8212; I believe you mean &#8220;Small Gods&#8221;.  That&#8217;s one of the best of the Discworld books, and one I often recommend people read.</p>
<p>Comparative religion is one of the most fascinating topics around, in my opinion.  It&#8217;s interesting to see how the different religions influenced one another through the millenia.  Due to personal family history, I tend to be more interested (or at least more informed) about the path of Christianity into Scandinavia.  A very interesting story indeed, and definitely one which involved a lot of blood.  (And how many Scandinavian Christians still put out a bowl of porridge for the <i>julenisse</i>?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228257</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228257</guid>
		<description>Ismael: If those things hadn&#039;t happened, we probably wouldn&#039;t be where we are now - however distasteful they are to us now. So, yes, you should be &quot;thankful&quot; for history as it is, because that&#039;s what got us here. It has shaped our civilisations, and is probably precisely why you now find it distasteful...It doesn&#039;t stop you from looking forward and using that hard-won background to steer us away from doing those sorts of things in the future (or indeed the present?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ismael: If those things hadn&#8217;t happened, we probably wouldn&#8217;t be where we are now &#8211; however distasteful they are to us now. So, yes, you should be &#8220;thankful&#8221; for history as it is, because that&#8217;s what got us here. It has shaped our civilisations, and is probably precisely why you now find it distasteful&#8230;It doesn&#8217;t stop you from looking forward and using that hard-won background to steer us away from doing those sorts of things in the future (or indeed the present?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet Twarog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228241</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet Twarog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228241</guid>
		<description>And, Calli, I would recommend some comparative religious studies, esp, the pagan religions of Saturnalia, Mithraism, and Sol Invictus with the later Christianity that not only incorporated much from them but generally replaced them by the sword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, Calli, I would recommend some comparative religious studies, esp, the pagan religions of Saturnalia, Mithraism, and Sol Invictus with the later Christianity that not only incorporated much from them but generally replaced them by the sword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet Twarog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228237</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet Twarog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228237</guid>
		<description># 34 Calli  Thanks. I did see Terry&#039;s &quot;Hogfather&quot; on Eon TV thoroughly enjoying it and bought the dvd. I also read the novel. I met Terry at Boskone, Boston, MA.  
  I would also recommend his novel &quot;Little Gods&quot;, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 34 Calli  Thanks. I did see Terry&#8217;s &#8220;Hogfather&#8221; on Eon TV thoroughly enjoying it and bought the dvd. I also read the novel. I met Terry at Boskone, Boston, MA.<br />
  I would also recommend his novel &#8220;Little Gods&#8221;, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228228</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228228</guid>
		<description>Phil,  A succinct reply to Spectroscope was nice.  That reply (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/11/24/the-climategate-burden-of-proof/) notes the &quot;consilience of studies from multiple studies and fields that we accept that climate change is human caused...&quot;  Great summary.

Can you explain the past decade or so with no warming--even conceded by the leading non-denying climate scientists, where they further concede they cannot explain why this is occurring (which excludes the &quot;climate&quot; versus &quot;weather&quot; distinction)--why this is happening?  

I&#039;ve been following this for sometime &amp; it seems to be conundrum (much like the 20 percont or so of annual carbon output that disappears unaccounted, per NOAA). CERN&#039;s CLOUD experiment seems to show some hope for an explanation, or not; given the high calibre of those researchers, whatever they find will be significant given the uncertainties &amp; unknowns with cloud dynamics.  

Also, I&#039;ve been watching &amp; hearing so many people (like that actor on a recent Fox News interview) parroting the need to focus on &quot;peer reviewed&quot; scientific literature.  But I cannot find any substantial (with objective quantitative data) to rebut the Wegman Report&#039;s findings of a) how limited the climate science community is, and b) how much this allegedly tiny community base their research &amp; findings on each others work--repeating to a significant degree rather than adding to the overall body of knowledge.  

SO tosummarize:

-  What physical phenomena explain the past decade or so of no warming--what fundamental physics/dynamics are the climate scientists missing?

-  Given the emphasis on peer reviewed literature and the observations made in the Wegman Report (which anybody can verify, if anecdotally, via on-line searches &amp; reviews of author references) can you explain how the &quot;vast body of climate science work out there&quot; is really a) that vast and b) not incestuous as implied by bibliographic references... I.E. that this typical for a significant research area.  

Those are two areas that either don&#039;t seem to have an answer, or, what readily available evidence is there seems to undermine the assertions made.  

Any objective response, supported by equally objecive data, is greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,  A succinct reply to Spectroscope was nice.  That reply (<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/11/24/the-climategate-burden-of-proof/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/11/24/the-climategate-burden-of-proof/</a>) notes the &#8220;consilience of studies from multiple studies and fields that we accept that climate change is human caused&#8230;&#8221;  Great summary.</p>
<p>Can you explain the past decade or so with no warming&#8211;even conceded by the leading non-denying climate scientists, where they further concede they cannot explain why this is occurring (which excludes the &#8220;climate&#8221; versus &#8220;weather&#8221; distinction)&#8211;why this is happening?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been following this for sometime &#038; it seems to be conundrum (much like the 20 percont or so of annual carbon output that disappears unaccounted, per NOAA). CERN&#8217;s CLOUD experiment seems to show some hope for an explanation, or not; given the high calibre of those researchers, whatever they find will be significant given the uncertainties &#038; unknowns with cloud dynamics.  </p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve been watching &#038; hearing so many people (like that actor on a recent Fox News interview) parroting the need to focus on &#8220;peer reviewed&#8221; scientific literature.  But I cannot find any substantial (with objective quantitative data) to rebut the Wegman Report&#8217;s findings of a) how limited the climate science community is, and b) how much this allegedly tiny community base their research &#038; findings on each others work&#8211;repeating to a significant degree rather than adding to the overall body of knowledge.  </p>
<p>SO tosummarize:</p>
<p>-  What physical phenomena explain the past decade or so of no warming&#8211;what fundamental physics/dynamics are the climate scientists missing?</p>
<p>-  Given the emphasis on peer reviewed literature and the observations made in the Wegman Report (which anybody can verify, if anecdotally, via on-line searches &#038; reviews of author references) can you explain how the &#8220;vast body of climate science work out there&#8221; is really a) that vast and b) not incestuous as implied by bibliographic references&#8230; I.E. that this typical for a significant research area.  </p>
<p>Those are two areas that either don&#8217;t seem to have an answer, or, what readily available evidence is there seems to undermine the assertions made.  </p>
<p>Any objective response, supported by equally objecive data, is greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228226</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228226</guid>
		<description>&quot;or maybe it’s because it’s not a major story, it’s a manufactured one by global warming deniers&quot;

These &quot;scientists&quot; want to be at the forefront of the reordering of our entire way of life and they&#039;ve one again been caught playing fast and loose with the data and it&#039;s not a major story?

Thank You for one of the best laughs I&#039;ve had all week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or maybe it’s because it’s not a major story, it’s a manufactured one by global warming deniers&#8221;</p>
<p>These &#8220;scientists&#8221; want to be at the forefront of the reordering of our entire way of life and they&#8217;ve one again been caught playing fast and loose with the data and it&#8217;s not a major story?</p>
<p>Thank You for one of the best laughs I&#8217;ve had all week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Chan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228224</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228224</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m glad for the opportunities, but I’m thankful to the people.&quot;

I&#039;m going to have to borrow that line, it&#039;s perfect =p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m glad for the opportunities, but I’m thankful to the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to have to borrow that line, it&#8217;s perfect =p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calli Arcale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228223</link>
		<dc:creator>Calli Arcale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228223</guid>
		<description>You should give thanks, Phil, and try not to see this deliberately secular holiday as a religious intrusion on your life.  It isn&#039;t, and it shouldn&#039;t be.

Why?

Because I strongly feel that the most important entities to give thanks to on this holiday are your family, your friends, and other associates.  But mostly your family.  Giving thanks to God; well, for those of us who are religious, that can be useful too, but though I&#039;m a Christian, I never considered Thanksgiving a religious holiday.  Sure, churches have tried to celebrate it, but attendance is generally dismal.  That&#039;s because this holiday isn&#039;t about religion.  It&#039;s about *family*.  Whatever family you have, which certainly may include people who are not blood relations.  (The astronauts in space right now celebrated with their astronaut families, one might say.)  And you should give thanks to them.  We get caught up in life, and it&#039;s too easy to forget to let them know how much you appreciate what they do in your life.  Thanksgiving gives us a chance to do that.

It&#039;s also my favorite time for charitable giving; I see it as thanking my fellow man.  People, some of them strangers, were there for me when I needed help.  I can&#039;t thank them personally.  But I can express my gratitude by giving to those who need it, even if they may never know me.

So give thanks!  Mostly, give it to the people who are important to you.

Chet:
&lt;b&gt;Please, don’t wish “Peace on Earth”! It won’t happen. Make it happen.&lt;/b&gt;

The Discworld book &quot;Hogfather&quot; (by Terry Pratchett, an author whom I cannot recommend enough) has a wonderful bit towards the end.  It also appears in the film adaptation.  Susan is discussing belief with her grandfather (Death), and why it is important that children believe in the Hogfather (the equivalent of Santa Claus).  He says that people have to start out believing in the little lies as practice so they can believe in the big lies: things like justice, duty, and mercy.  She protests that that&#039;s different, but he points out that if you grind the universe down into dust, you will not find a single atom of any of those things.  They only exist because people believe in them.  The actual line is something like:

YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IN THEM, OR ELSE HOW CAN THEY &lt;i&gt;BECOME&lt;/i&gt;?

(Death speaks in all caps.)  So yes.  Don&#039;t just wish peace on Earth.  It won&#039;t happen unless we make it happen.  Wishing it is the first step; it acknowledges that we believe it is possible.  But we can&#039;t stop there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should give thanks, Phil, and try not to see this deliberately secular holiday as a religious intrusion on your life.  It isn&#8217;t, and it shouldn&#8217;t be.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because I strongly feel that the most important entities to give thanks to on this holiday are your family, your friends, and other associates.  But mostly your family.  Giving thanks to God; well, for those of us who are religious, that can be useful too, but though I&#8217;m a Christian, I never considered Thanksgiving a religious holiday.  Sure, churches have tried to celebrate it, but attendance is generally dismal.  That&#8217;s because this holiday isn&#8217;t about religion.  It&#8217;s about *family*.  Whatever family you have, which certainly may include people who are not blood relations.  (The astronauts in space right now celebrated with their astronaut families, one might say.)  And you should give thanks to them.  We get caught up in life, and it&#8217;s too easy to forget to let them know how much you appreciate what they do in your life.  Thanksgiving gives us a chance to do that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also my favorite time for charitable giving; I see it as thanking my fellow man.  People, some of them strangers, were there for me when I needed help.  I can&#8217;t thank them personally.  But I can express my gratitude by giving to those who need it, even if they may never know me.</p>
<p>So give thanks!  Mostly, give it to the people who are important to you.</p>
<p>Chet:<br />
<b>Please, don’t wish “Peace on Earth”! It won’t happen. Make it happen.</b></p>
<p>The Discworld book &#8220;Hogfather&#8221; (by Terry Pratchett, an author whom I cannot recommend enough) has a wonderful bit towards the end.  It also appears in the film adaptation.  Susan is discussing belief with her grandfather (Death), and why it is important that children believe in the Hogfather (the equivalent of Santa Claus).  He says that people have to start out believing in the little lies as practice so they can believe in the big lies: things like justice, duty, and mercy.  She protests that that&#8217;s different, but he points out that if you grind the universe down into dust, you will not find a single atom of any of those things.  They only exist because people believe in them.  The actual line is something like:</p>
<p>YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IN THEM, OR ELSE HOW CAN THEY <i>BECOME</i>?</p>
<p>(Death speaks in all caps.)  So yes.  Don&#8217;t just wish peace on Earth.  It won&#8217;t happen unless we make it happen.  Wishing it is the first step; it acknowledges that we believe it is possible.  But we can&#8217;t stop there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228215</guid>
		<description>You sure taught them Geeves..  You sure taught them well..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sure taught them Geeves..  You sure taught them well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scibuff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228208</link>
		<dc:creator>scibuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228208</guid>
		<description>Thank you Phil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Phil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet Twarog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228206</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet Twarog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228206</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phil and to all postees!
  Wee, you better get ready, you&#039;d better think twice, there&#039;s another Saturnalia - A Winter Solstice Ritual misplaced holiday (holy day) a&#039;coming and the &quot;Christmas songs&quot; are already 24/7 on some radio stations.
 Please, don&#039;t wish &quot;Peace on Earth&quot;! It won&#039;t happen. Make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phil and to all postees!<br />
  Wee, you better get ready, you&#8217;d better think twice, there&#8217;s another Saturnalia &#8211; A Winter Solstice Ritual misplaced holiday (holy day) a&#8217;coming and the &#8220;Christmas songs&#8221; are already 24/7 on some radio stations.<br />
 Please, don&#8217;t wish &#8220;Peace on Earth&#8221;! It won&#8217;t happen. Make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffersonian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffersonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228204</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always felt that &quot;giving thanks&quot; was a Hallmark-induced way to take the word Thanksgiving with excessive literal intent and that this causes people to act smarmy. The holiday was Anglo-xtian in origin and even though it was secularized by FDR, it seems kind of thin and pointless to me.  You can equally give thanks any day of the year. Of course, it&#039; s known as a foods holiday today, which is fine; acknowledging the harvest and all that. My family doesn&#039;t observe it but it&#039;s cool to have a federal holiday in November. I&#039;m all for new traditions like MLK but Thanksgiving...meh. Look up what George Washington said about it.
(Is there a bah humbug equivalent? ;) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always felt that &#8220;giving thanks&#8221; was a Hallmark-induced way to take the word Thanksgiving with excessive literal intent and that this causes people to act smarmy. The holiday was Anglo-xtian in origin and even though it was secularized by FDR, it seems kind of thin and pointless to me.  You can equally give thanks any day of the year. Of course, it&#8217; s known as a foods holiday today, which is fine; acknowledging the harvest and all that. My family doesn&#8217;t observe it but it&#8217;s cool to have a federal holiday in November. I&#8217;m all for new traditions like MLK but Thanksgiving&#8230;meh. Look up what George Washington said about it.<br />
(Is there a bah humbug equivalent? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmaNymton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228199</link>
		<dc:creator>EmaNymton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228199</guid>
		<description>Wow.

Spectroscope is really dumb, isn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>Spectroscope is really dumb, isn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228195</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228195</guid>
		<description>After you&#039;ve all given thanks for eating those precious delicious Turkeys, maybe watch this video.  It will most certainly give you something to think about!  (It was made by Seth Shostak and a group of astronomers in 1969)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyV5d-aZMbM&amp;feature=player_embedded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After you&#8217;ve all given thanks for eating those precious delicious Turkeys, maybe watch this video.  It will most certainly give you something to think about!  (It was made by Seth Shostak and a group of astronomers in 1969)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyV5d-aZMbM&#038;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyV5d-aZMbM&#038;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Plait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228194</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Plait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228194</guid>
		<description>Spectroscope: ... or maybe it&#039;s because it&#039;s not a major story, it&#039;s a manufactured one by global warming deniers, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/11/24/the-climategate-burden-of-proof/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it&#039;s covered extensively by others&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spectroscope: &#8230; or maybe it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s not a major story, it&#8217;s a manufactured one by global warming deniers, and <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/11/24/the-climategate-burden-of-proof/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">it&#8217;s covered extensively by others</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectroscope</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228185</link>
		<dc:creator>Spectroscope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228185</guid>
		<description>@ 23.   Gary Ansorge Says: 

&lt;i&gt;So nice to see the AGWers are still with us. I was beginning to think they’d given up(and what would we do if we had no one to wrestle with?). &lt;/i&gt;

Glad you appreciate us! It&#039;s always nice to debate big issues with folks &amp; hopefully enlighten some of them. ;-)

&lt;i&gt;Greenland ice cap is melting.
East antarctic is melting
Artic is melting,,, But I guess that’s just because we’re entering an ice age??? &lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s a reasonably good guess. 

In fact,  &lt;b&gt;we&#039;re *already* living in a Ice Age - only we&#039;re currently in a warmer &lt;large&gt;interglacial&lt;/large&gt; period within this broader ice Age.&lt;/b&gt;

As these folks: 

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html 

put it: 

&lt;quote&gt;&lt;i&gt;“From a geological perspective, global warming is the normal state of our accustomed natural world. Technically, we are in an “interglacial phase,” or between ice ages. The question is not really if an ice age will return, but when. 

&lt;i&gt;Don’t panic when you hear global alarmists warning the earth may have warmed almost 1 degree in the last 200 years. Although this still hasn’t yet been proven, it is in fact exactly what should be happening if everything is normal. 

If Global Warming stops, then you can start worrying! It means our warm interglacial phase is over and we may be heading into another Ice Age!” &lt;i&gt;  &lt;/quote&gt; 

So far from messing ourselves as the &quot;Gorebull Warmer&quot; Hysterics would have us do, we should welcome this natural climatic warm spell &amp;  enjoy it while it lasts. 8)
 
Sadly, the planetary warming trend has already passed its peak which happened back in 1998 and the world is now cooling down again just as it was back in the 1970&#039;s. 

So I predict its not too long now before the somewhat more-justified hysteria over an ice age starts and people reccomend we desperately *add* as much Co2 and other greenhouse gases as possible to our atmosphere to try to forestall the coming nasty return to Ice Age conditions as our interglacial repreive ends. ;-)

Not that it will work - natural processes still massively outweigh any human impact. For instance, 95% of Co2 emissions come from sources such as volcanoes and so forth. In fact, the world’s natural wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all human sources combined. 

The drivers of global climate change are natural variation cycles in the Sun (eg. sunspot and esp. maunder and other sunspot minima), the Earth esp. its orbital eccentricity Milankovitch cycle, and other astronomical and geological cycles. Humans did and can sqaut against these over-rising natural phenomena &amp; anyone saying otherwise is either  misled or simply dishonest. 

The dishonesty of such Climate &quot;Scientists&quot; has &lt;i&gt;(as noted on past threads here)&lt;/i&gt; been exposed via the leaked CRU emails which among other things contain the damming admission by the leading Climate Alarmist &amp; IPCC lead author, Kevin Trenberth who  privately confessed to his Alarmist colleagues that the data simply doesn’t show what their climate models predicted:

 “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. ”

Sadly, rather than admit the Greenhouse Effect scare is nonsense, the Alarmists have tried all sorts of tricks to &quot;hide the decline&quot;  and have resorted to outright censorship to continue to hype up the  &quot;Gorebull Warmer&quot; scare. 

Just like the creationists-IDiots, these pretenders to being &quot;scientists&quot; have tried to change the evidence to suit their pre-judged conclusions rather than change their conclusions in light of the factual evidence which contradicts their politicised, cash-raising quasi-religion. 

All this is now on the record for everyone to see. Hopefully those who have most seriously violated scientific ethics and even committed outright fraud will soon face the consequences.

---- 

PS. I&#039;m  not sure why the BA has, so far, been disappointingly reluctant to blog about this major story and development - are you listening Phil Plait? 

&lt;b&gt; Why no  blog post here on the CRU email revelations yet?&lt;/b&gt;

I know that&#039;s its your blog and your choice &amp; I&#039;m cool with that but we are asking if it is also your ideology getting in the way on posting on this? Its looking somewhat that way to me, I&#039;m afraid. You&#039;ve said you&#039;ll take on bad science on the political Left as well as the Right. Well, here&#039;s your chance to prove it.  :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 23.   Gary Ansorge Says: </p>
<p><i>So nice to see the AGWers are still with us. I was beginning to think they’d given up(and what would we do if we had no one to wrestle with?). </i></p>
<p>Glad you appreciate us! It&#8217;s always nice to debate big issues with folks &#038; hopefully enlighten some of them. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i>Greenland ice cap is melting.<br />
East antarctic is melting<br />
Artic is melting,,, But I guess that’s just because we’re entering an ice age??? </i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s a reasonably good guess. </p>
<p>In fact,  <b>we&#8217;re *already* living in a Ice Age &#8211; only we&#8217;re currently in a warmer <large>interglacial</large> period within this broader ice Age.</b></p>
<p>As these folks: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html</a> </p>
<p>put it: </p>
<p><quote><i>“From a geological perspective, global warming is the normal state of our accustomed natural world. Technically, we are in an “interglacial phase,” or between ice ages. The question is not really if an ice age will return, but when. </p>
<p></i><i>Don’t panic when you hear global alarmists warning the earth may have warmed almost 1 degree in the last 200 years. Although this still hasn’t yet been proven, it is in fact exactly what should be happening if everything is normal. </p>
<p>If Global Warming stops, then you can start worrying! It means our warm interglacial phase is over and we may be heading into another Ice Age!” </i><i>  </i></quote> </p>
<p>So far from messing ourselves as the &#8220;Gorebull Warmer&#8221; Hysterics would have us do, we should welcome this natural climatic warm spell &#038;  enjoy it while it lasts. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sadly, the planetary warming trend has already passed its peak which happened back in 1998 and the world is now cooling down again just as it was back in the 1970&#8242;s. </p>
<p>So I predict its not too long now before the somewhat more-justified hysteria over an ice age starts and people reccomend we desperately *add* as much Co2 and other greenhouse gases as possible to our atmosphere to try to forestall the coming nasty return to Ice Age conditions as our interglacial repreive ends. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Not that it will work &#8211; natural processes still massively outweigh any human impact. For instance, 95% of Co2 emissions come from sources such as volcanoes and so forth. In fact, the world’s natural wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all human sources combined. </p>
<p>The drivers of global climate change are natural variation cycles in the Sun (eg. sunspot and esp. maunder and other sunspot minima), the Earth esp. its orbital eccentricity Milankovitch cycle, and other astronomical and geological cycles. Humans did and can sqaut against these over-rising natural phenomena &#038; anyone saying otherwise is either  misled or simply dishonest. </p>
<p>The dishonesty of such Climate &#8220;Scientists&#8221; has <i>(as noted on past threads here)</i> been exposed via the leaked CRU emails which among other things contain the damming admission by the leading Climate Alarmist &#038; IPCC lead author, Kevin Trenberth who  privately confessed to his Alarmist colleagues that the data simply doesn’t show what their climate models predicted:</p>
<p> “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. ”</p>
<p>Sadly, rather than admit the Greenhouse Effect scare is nonsense, the Alarmists have tried all sorts of tricks to &#8220;hide the decline&#8221;  and have resorted to outright censorship to continue to hype up the  &#8220;Gorebull Warmer&#8221; scare. </p>
<p>Just like the creationists-IDiots, these pretenders to being &#8220;scientists&#8221; have tried to change the evidence to suit their pre-judged conclusions rather than change their conclusions in light of the factual evidence which contradicts their politicised, cash-raising quasi-religion. </p>
<p>All this is now on the record for everyone to see. Hopefully those who have most seriously violated scientific ethics and even committed outright fraud will soon face the consequences.</p>
<p>&#8212;- </p>
<p>PS. I&#8217;m  not sure why the BA has, so far, been disappointingly reluctant to blog about this major story and development &#8211; are you listening Phil Plait? </p>
<p><b> Why no  blog post here on the CRU email revelations yet?</b></p>
<p>I know that&#8217;s its your blog and your choice &#038; I&#8217;m cool with that but we are asking if it is also your ideology getting in the way on posting on this? Its looking somewhat that way to me, I&#8217;m afraid. You&#8217;ve said you&#8217;ll take on bad science on the political Left as well as the Right. Well, here&#8217;s your chance to prove it.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228183</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228183</guid>
		<description>The Back to the Future quote at the end really sells it :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Back to the Future quote at the end really sells it <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying sardines</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228180</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying sardines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228180</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; To give thanks, there has to be something to receive it. &lt;/i&gt; 

Really? That premise strikes me as dubious. 

Why can we not be thankful in general without needing anything or one to be thankful to?

Good post BA - I agree with everything else you&#039;ve said there - although as an agnostic rather an an atheist,  I wouldn&#039;t entirely rule out at least the *possibility* that God exists. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> To give thanks, there has to be something to receive it. </i> </p>
<p>Really? That premise strikes me as dubious. </p>
<p>Why can we not be thankful in general without needing anything or one to be thankful to?</p>
<p>Good post BA &#8211; I agree with everything else you&#8217;ve said there &#8211; although as an agnostic rather an an atheist,  I wouldn&#8217;t entirely rule out at least the *possibility* that God exists. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228179</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228179</guid>
		<description>Ismael is right guys. We decimated a culture, all they wanted to do was smoke peace pipes! They didn&#039;t brutally rape and scalp women and children (something they had been doing for the past 1000 years during inter-tribal conflicts)

freaking lulz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ismael is right guys. We decimated a culture, all they wanted to do was smoke peace pipes! They didn&#8217;t brutally rape and scalp women and children (something they had been doing for the past 1000 years during inter-tribal conflicts)</p>
<p>freaking lulz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228176</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228176</guid>
		<description>Rub-a-dub-dub.
Three cheers for the grub.

Dig in!

So nice to see the AGWers are still with us. I was beginning to think they&#039;d given up(and what would we do if we had no one to wrestle with?).

Greenland ice cap is melting.
East antarctic is melting
Artic is melting,,,

But I guess that&#039;s just because we&#039;re entering an ice age???

1)earth will survive
2) human civilization will survive
3) but a lot of people will be dispossessed (and you just know some of them will want to move somewhere more amenable).

Peace, Y&#039;All,

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rub-a-dub-dub.<br />
Three cheers for the grub.</p>
<p>Dig in!</p>
<p>So nice to see the AGWers are still with us. I was beginning to think they&#8217;d given up(and what would we do if we had no one to wrestle with?).</p>
<p>Greenland ice cap is melting.<br />
East antarctic is melting<br />
Artic is melting,,,</p>
<p>But I guess that&#8217;s just because we&#8217;re entering an ice age???</p>
<p>1)earth will survive<br />
2) human civilization will survive<br />
3) but a lot of people will be dispossessed (and you just know some of them will want to move somewhere more amenable).</p>
<p>Peace, Y&#8217;All,</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228172</guid>
		<description>Should you thank your forefathers for decimating peoples, cultures, and then destroying their land?  Or should you be thankful for never creating one holocaust museum for that?

Selective memory and traditions:  THANKS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should you thank your forefathers for decimating peoples, cultures, and then destroying their land?  Or should you be thankful for never creating one holocaust museum for that?</p>
<p>Selective memory and traditions:  THANKS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Morgan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/26/giving-thanks-repost/comment-page-1/#comment-228166</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=7949#comment-228166</guid>
		<description>I believe the word you&#039;re looking for is  &lt;i&gt;appreciative&lt;/i&gt;. It&#039;s the same as thankful, minus the implication of an agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the word you&#8217;re looking for is  <i>appreciative</i>. It&#8217;s the same as thankful, minus the implication of an agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 16:25:23 -->
