<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roger Ebert speaks truth!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-230379</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-230379</guid>
		<description>Ebert&#039;s the man! My very favorite reviewer. While many naysayers believe he&#039;s become too &quot;soft&quot; since his cancer struggles began, you can&#039;t deny that he always has an interesting, well-informed point of view underlining his reviews. I for one appreciate that he borrows from his personal beliefs and education when judging a film; if you&#039;ve got it, use it. It&#039;s just good criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ebert&#8217;s the man! My very favorite reviewer. While many naysayers believe he&#8217;s become too &#8220;soft&#8221; since his cancer struggles began, you can&#8217;t deny that he always has an interesting, well-informed point of view underlining his reviews. I for one appreciate that he borrows from his personal beliefs and education when judging a film; if you&#8217;ve got it, use it. It&#8217;s just good criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in Dublin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229989</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in Dublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229989</guid>
		<description>Heh heh. I was just reading those comments over at Ebert&#039;s article and found this little gem:

&lt;i&gt;The real problem with the creationists is that they believe The Flintstones was a documentary.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve seen that somewhere before, but it bears repeating. Kind of sums up creationism very nicely in a single sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh heh. I was just reading those comments over at Ebert&#8217;s article and found this little gem:</p>
<p><i>The real problem with the creationists is that they believe The Flintstones was a documentary.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve seen that somewhere before, but it bears repeating. Kind of sums up creationism very nicely in a single sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229953</link>
		<dc:creator>James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229953</guid>
		<description>The comments section on that article made fascinating reading. It made me thankful for the comment community we have here at BA, because I don&#039;t think I would survive, having to compete with such lunacy.

In fact, what would probably happen is, I&#039;d spend my entire work days hammering out posts in the futile fight against nonsense, aaaaand lose my job. Maybe I would chip at the surface of the hundreds of millions of nutcases, but talk about a pyrrhic victory!

I had no idea Roger Ebert was as enlightened as he has shown. I join Phil in a humble offering of thumbs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments section on that article made fascinating reading. It made me thankful for the comment community we have here at BA, because I don&#8217;t think I would survive, having to compete with such lunacy.</p>
<p>In fact, what would probably happen is, I&#8217;d spend my entire work days hammering out posts in the futile fight against nonsense, aaaaand lose my job. Maybe I would chip at the surface of the hundreds of millions of nutcases, but talk about a pyrrhic victory!</p>
<p>I had no idea Roger Ebert was as enlightened as he has shown. I join Phil in a humble offering of thumbs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoonShark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229950</link>
		<dc:creator>MoonShark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229950</guid>
		<description>That... looks like a cross between an alien grenade an some sort of bee larva.  I think I&#039;d rather be stung to death by hornets than have hands that look like that.

I mean... thanks for trying! (honestly I&#039;m no artist and couldn&#039;t even come close to that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8230; looks like a cross between an alien grenade an some sort of bee larva.  I think I&#8217;d rather be stung to death by hornets than have hands that look like that.</p>
<p>I mean&#8230; thanks for trying! (honestly I&#8217;m no artist and couldn&#8217;t even come close to that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnigget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229940</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnigget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229940</guid>
		<description>.           /0
.         / /     
 (___0)  
(____0) 
(____0) 
 (____o)
.    /   /   

Well, it worked in textedit.... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.           /0<br />
.         / /<br />
 (___0)<br />
(____0)<br />
(____0)<br />
 (____o)<br />
.    /   /   </p>
<p>Well, it worked in textedit&#8230;. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoonShark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229931</link>
		<dc:creator>MoonShark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229931</guid>
		<description>Yep, Phil&#039;s comment is perfectly concise.  How do I make ASCII art for opposable digits oriented toward zenith?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Phil&#8217;s comment is perfectly concise.  How do I make ASCII art for opposable digits oriented toward zenith?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnigget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229917</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnigget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229917</guid>
		<description>@ BlackCat:

Mikey keeps his reference material right next to his dictionary. Oh, wait...

@ Beryl:

I agree wholeheartedly. I&#039;ve never understood why religion gets handed a get-out-of-rationality free card. The number of people who believe something has nothing to do with whether or not it&#039;s a fair representation of reality.

Many fundies -- and well-meaning progressives -- would force western society to treat &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; religions as sacrosanct. Witness the silliness over the political cartoons depicting Mohammed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ BlackCat:</p>
<p>Mikey keeps his reference material right next to his dictionary. Oh, wait&#8230;</p>
<p>@ Beryl:</p>
<p>I agree wholeheartedly. I&#8217;ve never understood why religion gets handed a get-out-of-rationality free card. The number of people who believe something has nothing to do with whether or not it&#8217;s a fair representation of reality.</p>
<p>Many fundies &#8212; and well-meaning progressives &#8212; would force western society to treat <i>all</i> religions as sacrosanct. Witness the silliness over the political cartoons depicting Mohammed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229916</link>
		<dc:creator>Just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229916</guid>
		<description>Thank God for Roger Ebert! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God for Roger Ebert! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beryl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229884</link>
		<dc:creator>Beryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229884</guid>
		<description>Ebert seems to be harder on what he thinks of as &quot;New Age&quot; beliefs than on conventional Abrahamic beliefs.  Why is belief in reincarnation (something essentially every traditional Buddhist or Hindu subscribes to) at the level of belief in Young Earth Creationism?  If belief in reincarnation is disqualifying--and this can be a really vague belief, nothing more than that karma (=causation in a very broad sense) can pass from one being to another--why isn&#039;t the belief in intercessory prayer also disqualifying?  If you want to say that only atheists or agnostics are rational enough to lead, go ahead.  But I can&#039;t see why New Age fuzziness is worse than fuzzy mainstream beliefs.  Do the mainstream beliefs, when fuzzy enough, get a pass because they are traditional?  What&#039;s traditional varies from subculture to subculture.  I grew up in a family eccentric enough that some of us are rebelling against early 20th-century New Age (or spiritualist beliefs) from earlier generations.  Woo is woo, sure, but why is knowing what you spirit animal is (without giving it any practical significance) worse that being willing to say grace at the table?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ebert seems to be harder on what he thinks of as &#8220;New Age&#8221; beliefs than on conventional Abrahamic beliefs.  Why is belief in reincarnation (something essentially every traditional Buddhist or Hindu subscribes to) at the level of belief in Young Earth Creationism?  If belief in reincarnation is disqualifying&#8211;and this can be a really vague belief, nothing more than that karma (=causation in a very broad sense) can pass from one being to another&#8211;why isn&#8217;t the belief in intercessory prayer also disqualifying?  If you want to say that only atheists or agnostics are rational enough to lead, go ahead.  But I can&#8217;t see why New Age fuzziness is worse than fuzzy mainstream beliefs.  Do the mainstream beliefs, when fuzzy enough, get a pass because they are traditional?  What&#8217;s traditional varies from subculture to subculture.  I grew up in a family eccentric enough that some of us are rebelling against early 20th-century New Age (or spiritualist beliefs) from earlier generations.  Woo is woo, sure, but why is knowing what you spirit animal is (without giving it any practical significance) worse that being willing to say grace at the table?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229877</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229877</guid>
		<description>I believe the story that Oscar was murdered (apparently a dented bed pan was found near his body) is a spoof. Onionesque style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the story that Oscar was murdered (apparently a dented bed pan was found near his body) is a spoof. Onionesque style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229872</link>
		<dc:creator>pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229872</guid>
		<description>Sadly, someone actually killed Oscar the &quot;Death Kitty&quot; shortly after the story made the news.  These kind of stories may be quaint or funny to us, but unfortunately they have real consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, someone actually killed Oscar the &#8220;Death Kitty&#8221; shortly after the story made the news.  These kind of stories may be quaint or funny to us, but unfortunately they have real consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229868</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229868</guid>
		<description>I love the story about Oscar the death kitteh. But seriously. Apparently if Oscar curls up to next to a patient not about to kark no one panics, but if Oscar curls up next to someone not long for this mortal coil the staff go in to panic mode and call the family. Hmmm. It is unusual after all for sick old people to die in a hospice... What? Really?

I&#039;m leaning towards the kitteh serial killer theory myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the story about Oscar the death kitteh. But seriously. Apparently if Oscar curls up to next to a patient not about to kark no one panics, but if Oscar curls up next to someone not long for this mortal coil the staff go in to panic mode and call the family. Hmmm. It is unusual after all for sick old people to die in a hospice&#8230; What? Really?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m leaning towards the kitteh serial killer theory myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in Dublin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229747</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in Dublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229747</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that &lt;i&gt;Expelled&lt;/i&gt; review of Roger&#039;s is powerful stuff. It doesn&#039;t appear to be archived on his own site as he wrote it as a blog piece for the Chicago Sun-Times. Linky here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/12/win_ben_steins_mind.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Roger Ebert &#039;review&#039; of &lt;i&gt;Expelled&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

It&#039;s more a complete tearing-to-shreds decimation rather than a review, which might explain why it&#039;s presented as a blog piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that <i>Expelled</i> review of Roger&#8217;s is powerful stuff. It doesn&#8217;t appear to be archived on his own site as he wrote it as a blog piece for the Chicago Sun-Times. Linky here:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/12/win_ben_steins_mind.html" rel="nofollow">Roger Ebert &#8216;review&#8217; of <i>Expelled</i></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s more a complete tearing-to-shreds decimation rather than a review, which might explain why it&#8217;s presented as a blog piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229735</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229735</guid>
		<description>Re: the psychic cat

There was actually an episode of House recently with the same phenomena.  Here&#039;s the link: http://www.housemd-guide.com/season5/518herekitty.php

Basically, House deduces that psychic kitty is actually just cold kitty.  Kitty is attracted to patients who are running a fever (thus near death) or are being kept warm with warming blankets or heating pads (because they are near death).  So kitty takes a nap, and then the patient later dies.  Kitty&#039;s presence is later attributed to woo.  I don&#039;t know how scientifically plausible House&#039;s logic is, but it actually makes a lot of sense to me as my cats like to curl up on my stomach on cold nights because I&#039;m warmer than the couch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the psychic cat</p>
<p>There was actually an episode of House recently with the same phenomena.  Here&#8217;s the link: <a href="http://www.housemd-guide.com/season5/518herekitty.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.housemd-guide.com/season5/518herekitty.php</a></p>
<p>Basically, House deduces that psychic kitty is actually just cold kitty.  Kitty is attracted to patients who are running a fever (thus near death) or are being kept warm with warming blankets or heating pads (because they are near death).  So kitty takes a nap, and then the patient later dies.  Kitty&#8217;s presence is later attributed to woo.  I don&#8217;t know how scientifically plausible House&#8217;s logic is, but it actually makes a lot of sense to me as my cats like to curl up on my stomach on cold nights because I&#8217;m warmer than the couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacitus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229734</link>
		<dc:creator>tacitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229734</guid>
		<description>@20: Mike is simply repeating the Christian fundamentalist party line that atheists are unfulfilled and unsatisfied with their lives without religion.  It&#039;s a load of garbage, but that doesn&#039;t stop them from repeating it (and worse) ad nauseum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20: Mike is simply repeating the Christian fundamentalist party line that atheists are unfulfilled and unsatisfied with their lives without religion.  It&#8217;s a load of garbage, but that doesn&#8217;t stop them from repeating it (and worse) ad nauseum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229732</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229732</guid>
		<description>Ebert&#039;s article on Expelled was pretty good too. I recommend looking it up.



Also, re post #8, are you saying atheists will inevitably join the occult and then go back to &quot;mainstream religion?&quot; That doesn&#039;t sound right on either point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ebert&#8217;s article on Expelled was pretty good too. I recommend looking it up.</p>
<p>Also, re post #8, are you saying atheists will inevitably join the occult and then go back to &#8220;mainstream religion?&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t sound right on either point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacitus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229728</link>
		<dc:creator>tacitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229728</guid>
		<description>Ebert&#039;s observation about people having a wide variety of nutty supernatural beliefs is the reason I believe that imaging a world without religion is a rather fruitless exercise.  There is no lack of irrational belief in countries that no longer have a dominate belief system, like the UK and some other European nations where the non-religious are in the majority.

As a species we are driven by the desire to find explanations and connections for what are often just isolated random events, and even if you remove God from the equation, that desire doesn&#039;t go away.  Thus if you happened to read in your horoscope that you would be going on a trip and two hours later your boss stops by and tells you that she wants you to go to a convention in Sydney, Australia next week, you can&#039;t help but wonder if the two were connected. 

I was playing a game of backgammon with a colleague during my lunch break one time, and just for a laugh I called out what I wanted my roll of the dice to be.  I called the first roll right, then the second, and when the third one fell exactly as I called it, my colleague just about fell off his chair.   It was pure chance (I wasn&#039;t cheating) but his first reaction was that there must be something spooky going on.

Still, there is one good thing you can say about New Age beliefs over fundamentalist religion.  They don&#039;t usually organize themselves into well funded crusades.  There are some excepts, like the alt-med movement (though much of that is supported by religious fundies too) but on the whole they tend to do less damage in society than the fundamentalist wing of organized religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ebert&#8217;s observation about people having a wide variety of nutty supernatural beliefs is the reason I believe that imaging a world without religion is a rather fruitless exercise.  There is no lack of irrational belief in countries that no longer have a dominate belief system, like the UK and some other European nations where the non-religious are in the majority.</p>
<p>As a species we are driven by the desire to find explanations and connections for what are often just isolated random events, and even if you remove God from the equation, that desire doesn&#8217;t go away.  Thus if you happened to read in your horoscope that you would be going on a trip and two hours later your boss stops by and tells you that she wants you to go to a convention in Sydney, Australia next week, you can&#8217;t help but wonder if the two were connected. </p>
<p>I was playing a game of backgammon with a colleague during my lunch break one time, and just for a laugh I called out what I wanted my roll of the dice to be.  I called the first roll right, then the second, and when the third one fell exactly as I called it, my colleague just about fell off his chair.   It was pure chance (I wasn&#8217;t cheating) but his first reaction was that there must be something spooky going on.</p>
<p>Still, there is one good thing you can say about New Age beliefs over fundamentalist religion.  They don&#8217;t usually organize themselves into well funded crusades.  There are some excepts, like the alt-med movement (though much of that is supported by religious fundies too) but on the whole they tend to do less damage in society than the fundamentalist wing of organized religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229720</link>
		<dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229720</guid>
		<description>My guess on his watermelon reference is its similarity in size to a newborn, and how the banana analogy fails to hold up in that context.

(keepitcleankeepitcleankeepitclean)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess on his watermelon reference is its similarity in size to a newborn, and how the banana analogy fails to hold up in that context.</p>
<p>(keepitcleankeepitcleankeepitclean)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacitus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229715</link>
		<dc:creator>tacitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229715</guid>
		<description>@13: The question to ask is, which is the most likely answer to the &quot;psychic cat&quot; condundrum?

a) Selection bias
b) Physiological changes in those near death
c) The cat really does have psychic powers 

(c) makes a cute story, but either (a) or (b) is by far the most likely answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@13: The question to ask is, which is the most likely answer to the &#8220;psychic cat&#8221; condundrum?</p>
<p>a) Selection bias<br />
b) Physiological changes in those near death<br />
c) The cat really does have psychic powers </p>
<p>(c) makes a cute story, but either (a) or (b) is by far the most likely answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geosci</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229712</link>
		<dc:creator>geosci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229712</guid>
		<description>That is a great article.  One thing though,  I rather have to deal with an new age type.   While I have had a new ager yell at me for hurting the crystals when I was taking a rock sample at a road cut I have never had one stick a gun in my face for being a &quot;damn scientist&quot; while doing field work.  Last time that happened it was a self-professed &quot;good&quot; christan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a great article.  One thing though,  I rather have to deal with an new age type.   While I have had a new ager yell at me for hurting the crystals when I was taking a rock sample at a road cut I have never had one stick a gun in my face for being a &#8220;damn scientist&#8221; while doing field work.  Last time that happened it was a self-professed &#8220;good&#8221; christan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wagner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229709</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229709</guid>
		<description>@mike burkhart

You&#039;re full of it. Your unsubstantiated claims are no better than religious frippery.
So sayeth the atheist, who doesn&#039;t believe in the occult, homeopathy, or any other nonsense that isn&#039;t supported by reason.

That&#039;s not to say that some atheists don&#039;t believe in nonsense, but not believing in an imaginary god doesn&#039;t mean you have to flock to other imaginary garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike burkhart</p>
<p>You&#8217;re full of it. Your unsubstantiated claims are no better than religious frippery.<br />
So sayeth the atheist, who doesn&#8217;t believe in the occult, homeopathy, or any other nonsense that isn&#8217;t supported by reason.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that some atheists don&#8217;t believe in nonsense, but not believing in an imaginary god doesn&#8217;t mean you have to flock to other imaginary garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229707</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229707</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m only up to season 3 of House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m only up to season 3 of House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229705</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229705</guid>
		<description>@Quiet Desperation: There was an episode of House (I think) about this very subject.  I think they found the patients who were about to die would have their body temps go up a little bit, and the cat liked to be next to the warmer patients.  I have no idea if this is what could be happening in real life but it seems way more plausible than a psychic cat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Quiet Desperation: There was an episode of House (I think) about this very subject.  I think they found the patients who were about to die would have their body temps go up a little bit, and the cat liked to be next to the warmer patients.  I have no idea if this is what could be happening in real life but it seems way more plausible than a psychic cat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229702</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229702</guid>
		<description>@ mike: have a source for this or is it just wishful thinking on your part?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ mike: have a source for this or is it just wishful thinking on your part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/03/roger-ebert-speaks-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-229701</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8326#comment-229701</guid>
		<description>Impressive. Never though I would like what Ebert wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive. Never though I would like what Ebert wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:55:02 -->
