<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A hex on Saturn (again)!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hakko</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-2/#comment-240062</link>
		<dc:creator>Hakko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-240062</guid>
		<description>A stop sign is an octagon...not a hexagon... -_-;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A stop sign is an octagon&#8230;not a hexagon&#8230; -_-;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pongsun Anurat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-2/#comment-238742</link>
		<dc:creator>Pongsun Anurat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-238742</guid>
		<description>Long time ago, it was a Alien military base which has six giant walls. 

And the aliens think like bee because &quot;Hexagons are the stablest structures that use the least material and have the most space. That is why bees build their hives with hexagonal cells out of bees wax.&quot; (Dannon Oneironaut, http://www.dreamviews.com). 

If some life forms built it, they possibly do know some mathematical proof 55.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time ago, it was a Alien military base which has six giant walls. </p>
<p>And the aliens think like bee because &#8220;Hexagons are the stablest structures that use the least material and have the most space. That is why bees build their hives with hexagonal cells out of bees wax.&#8221; (Dannon Oneironaut, <a href="http://www.dreamviews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dreamviews.com</a>). </p>
<p>If some life forms built it, they possibly do know some mathematical proof 55.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rorschach</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-2/#comment-232957</link>
		<dc:creator>rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-232957</guid>
		<description>@41: Yeah, and he also said that the surface of the entire (spherical) planet was covered in a network consisting only of hexagons. You would need /some/ pentagons or triangles. Non-Euclidean geometry fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@41: Yeah, and he also said that the surface of the entire (spherical) planet was covered in a network consisting only of hexagons. You would need /some/ pentagons or triangles. Non-Euclidean geometry fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-2/#comment-232577</link>
		<dc:creator>kk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-232577</guid>
		<description>i read somewhere that cassini mission have a backdoor in software and hardware and this might be product of a group of hackers.

the images are well photoshoped to look more dramatic.

they would call this the joke of the millenium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read somewhere that cassini mission have a backdoor in software and hardware and this might be product of a group of hackers.</p>
<p>the images are well photoshoped to look more dramatic.</p>
<p>they would call this the joke of the millenium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Treczoks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-232318</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Treczoks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-232318</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too dark and too far away, I can&#039;t see the monolith in the center!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too dark and too far away, I can&#8217;t see the monolith in the center!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-232130</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-232130</guid>
		<description>^ Thanks for that Cubist. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Thanks for that Cubist. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cubist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-232077</link>
		<dc:creator>Cubist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-232077</guid>
		<description>huh? sez: 
&gt;0. Todd W. Says: 
&gt;&gt;Saturn’s core is actually a truncated rhombic dodecahedron.
&gt;Rhombus or dodecahedron?
&gt;Maybe I’m making a geometry FAIL here* but aren’t they two 
&gt;separate shapes? Can you have something that is both a rhombic 
&gt;and a dodecahedron?
 huh?, there&#039;s a difference between  &quot;RhomBUS&quot; (noun) and &quot;rhomBIC&quot; (adjective)...
Wikipedia page on &#039;rhombic dodecahedron&#039;: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_dodecahedron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh? sez:<br />
>0. Todd W. Says:<br />
>>Saturn’s core is actually a truncated rhombic dodecahedron.<br />
>Rhombus or dodecahedron?<br />
>Maybe I’m making a geometry FAIL here* but aren’t they two<br />
>separate shapes? Can you have something that is both a rhombic<br />
>and a dodecahedron?<br />
 huh?, there&#8217;s a difference between  &#8220;RhomBUS&#8221; (noun) and &#8220;rhomBIC&#8221; (adjective)&#8230;<br />
Wikipedia page on &#8216;rhombic dodecahedron&#8217;: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_dodecahedron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-232039</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-232039</guid>
		<description>If I had to venture a guess I&#039;d say there&#039;s something &quot;off&quot; about Saturn&#039;s electromagnetic field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to venture a guess I&#8217;d say there&#8217;s something &#8220;off&#8221; about Saturn&#8217;s electromagnetic field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231941</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231941</guid>
		<description>shawmutt asked if anyone else saw hands around the hex. Nope, I don&#039;t see any hands. But if they ARE there, I wonder if a banana would fit perfectly into the shape? (Ha, ha! ;) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shawmutt asked if anyone else saw hands around the hex. Nope, I don&#8217;t see any hands. But if they ARE there, I wonder if a banana would fit perfectly into the shape? (Ha, ha! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231929</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231929</guid>
		<description>Of course permanent observation of all planets is to be desired, but we don&#039;t have the resources for this. If I had to make a choice between a continual observation of only Mars, or a sporadic observation of each of the planets/moons I think I&#039;d choose the latter option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course permanent observation of all planets is to be desired, but we don&#8217;t have the resources for this. If I had to make a choice between a continual observation of only Mars, or a sporadic observation of each of the planets/moons I think I&#8217;d choose the latter option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sili</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231922</link>
		<dc:creator>Sili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231922</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;and who knows how long it existed before that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And this is exactly why the current inch-by-inch exploration of the Solar system has to end.

We need permanent observations of all the planets. The next orbiter needs to be in place before the first one conks out. Just look at how much more effective our exploration of Mars has become after we established a permanent presence.

Make Science! Not war!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and who knows how long it existed before that.</p></blockquote>
<p>And this is exactly why the current inch-by-inch exploration of the Solar system has to end.</p>
<p>We need permanent observations of all the planets. The next orbiter needs to be in place before the first one conks out. Just look at how much more effective our exploration of Mars has become after we established a permanent presence.</p>
<p>Make Science! Not war!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawmutt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231868</link>
		<dc:creator>shawmutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231868</guid>
		<description>OK...am I the only one who can make out hands on either side of that vortex?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230;am I the only one who can make out hands on either side of that vortex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plyr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231852</link>
		<dc:creator>plyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231852</guid>
		<description>Not that related, but this saturn pattern reminds me about this.

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/5241/padraone5.gif

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/7954/padraoeasyjq6.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that related, but this saturn pattern reminds me about this.</p>
<p><a href="http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/5241/padraone5.gif" rel="nofollow">http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/5241/padraone5.gif</a></p>
<p><a href="http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/7954/padraoeasyjq6.gif" rel="nofollow">http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/7954/padraoeasyjq6.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231851</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231851</guid>
		<description>Kinda reminded me of the &quot;Well of Souls&quot; series by Jack L Chalker.  The Markovians were nutty on the number six, and made everything in hexagonal shapes - including their teleport gates.  I think we just found the Sol gate....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda reminded me of the &#8220;Well of Souls&#8221; series by Jack L Chalker.  The Markovians were nutty on the number six, and made everything in hexagonal shapes &#8211; including their teleport gates.  I think we just found the Sol gate&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZERO</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231847</link>
		<dc:creator>ZERO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231847</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt; Those storms are quite beautiful indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> Those storms are quite beautiful indeed!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231843</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231843</guid>
		<description>Looks like broth to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like broth to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231839</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231839</guid>
		<description>The BA said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The heat source for these storms is different than on Earth, too: it comes partly from the Sun, but also from the interior of the planets themselves, and that plays a role.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think also that the Kelvin-Heimholtz mechanism is relevant, which is an atmospheric phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BA said:</p>
<blockquote><p>The heat source for these storms is different than on Earth, too: it comes partly from the Sun, but also from the interior of the planets themselves, and that plays a role.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think also that the Kelvin-Heimholtz mechanism is relevant, which is an atmospheric phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankZA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231831</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankZA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231831</guid>
		<description>This paper applies to this story: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511251

Jansson &lt;i&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt;, 2007, Polygons on a rotating surface

Abstract:
&lt;blockquote&gt;We report a novel and spectacular instability of a fluid surface in a rotating system.  In a flow driven by rotating the bottom plate of a partially filled, stationary cylindrical container, the shape of the free surface can spontaneously break the axial symmetry and assume the form of a polygon rotating rigidly with a speed different from that of the plate. With water we have observed polygons with up to 6 corners. It has been known for many years that such flows are prone to symmetry breaking, but apparently the polygonal surface shapes have never been observed. The creation of rotating internal waves in a similar setup was observed for much lower rotation rates, where the free surface remains essentially flat [1]-[3]. We speculate that the instability is caused by the strong azimuthal shear due to the stationary walls and that it is triggered by minute wobbling of the rotating plate. The slight asymmetry induces a tendency for mode-locking between the plate and the polygon, where the polygon rotates by one corner for each complete rotation of the plate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paper applies to this story: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511251" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511251</a></p>
<p>Jansson <i>et al.</i>, 2007, Polygons on a rotating surface</p>
<p>Abstract:</p>
<blockquote><p>We report a novel and spectacular instability of a fluid surface in a rotating system.  In a flow driven by rotating the bottom plate of a partially filled, stationary cylindrical container, the shape of the free surface can spontaneously break the axial symmetry and assume the form of a polygon rotating rigidly with a speed different from that of the plate. With water we have observed polygons with up to 6 corners. It has been known for many years that such flows are prone to symmetry breaking, but apparently the polygonal surface shapes have never been observed. The creation of rotating internal waves in a similar setup was observed for much lower rotation rates, where the free surface remains essentially flat [1]-[3]. We speculate that the instability is caused by the strong azimuthal shear due to the stationary walls and that it is triggered by minute wobbling of the rotating plate. The slight asymmetry induces a tendency for mode-locking between the plate and the polygon, where the polygon rotates by one corner for each complete rotation of the plate.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231793</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231793</guid>
		<description>Having asked : &lt;i&gt;How massive is Saturn btw? Anyone know? &lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve now just checked &amp; answered -  answer is that Wikipedia makes Saturn 95 earth masses.

See :  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn 

&lt;i&gt;Saturn is only 95 Earth masses, compared to Jupiter, which is 318 times the mass of the Earth but only about 20% larger than Saturn.&lt;/i&gt; 

They&#039;ve also got an animation of the hexagon storm here : 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rotatingsaturnhexagon.gif  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having asked : <i>How massive is Saturn btw? Anyone know? </i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve now just checked &#038; answered &#8211;  answer is that Wikipedia makes Saturn 95 earth masses.</p>
<p>See :  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn</a> </p>
<p><i>Saturn is only 95 Earth masses, compared to Jupiter, which is 318 times the mass of the Earth but only about 20% larger than Saturn.</i> </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve also got an animation of the hexagon storm here : </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rotatingsaturnhexagon.gif" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rotatingsaturnhexagon.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231785</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231785</guid>
		<description>@ 10.   Todd W. Says: 

&lt;i&gt;Saturn’s core is actually a truncated rhombic dodecahedron. The atmosphere just makes it look roundish. &lt;/i&gt;

Wouldn&#039;t gravity compress Saturn&#039;s core into a sphere? Assuming its massive &lt;i&gt;(Ceres- size  upwards)&lt;/i&gt; which seems a safe assumption to make.

I&#039;m not sure whether Todd W. is joking there or not - think he probably is posting in jest but you never quite know. 

Could Saturn&#039;s core crystalise at the immense pressures and temperatures  at the bottom of the planet? Could Saturn&#039;s core be like a giant diamond as was famously suggested for some gas giants? (Originally Ouranos and Neptune but Arthur C. Clarke was inspired to use that idea for Jupiter in fictional form in his &lt;i&gt;Space Odyssey&lt;/i&gt; novels.) 

How massive is Saturn btw? Anyone know? 

I think Jupiter is 318 Earth-masses &amp; I remember from reading one of Patrick Moore&#039;s books (&lt;i&gt;The Sky at Night&lt;/i&gt; Norton, 1985.) that Ouranos has 14 earth mases and Neptune 17 earth masses but I&#039;m really not sure how Saturn compares. I think its significantly less massive than Jupiter - its definitely a lot less dense as its the least dense planet in the solar systemand would float on a big enough ocean. So my guess is maybe 30-50 earth mass for Saturn? Alas, I&#039;ve no idea if that&#039;s anything even close to the right number. Still that&#039;s a lot of mass and thus internal gravity and pressure. 

I have read something somewhere about possible core erosian in the gas giants and gather that their cores are still very  mysterious. I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s any chance Todd W&#039;s idea is right but I think it very unlikely. 

Great image though BA although a colour shot would be even better. Looks cool &amp; fascinating! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 10.   Todd W. Says: </p>
<p><i>Saturn’s core is actually a truncated rhombic dodecahedron. The atmosphere just makes it look roundish. </i></p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t gravity compress Saturn&#8217;s core into a sphere? Assuming its massive <i>(Ceres- size  upwards)</i> which seems a safe assumption to make.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether Todd W. is joking there or not &#8211; think he probably is posting in jest but you never quite know. </p>
<p>Could Saturn&#8217;s core crystalise at the immense pressures and temperatures  at the bottom of the planet? Could Saturn&#8217;s core be like a giant diamond as was famously suggested for some gas giants? (Originally Ouranos and Neptune but Arthur C. Clarke was inspired to use that idea for Jupiter in fictional form in his <i>Space Odyssey</i> novels.) </p>
<p>How massive is Saturn btw? Anyone know? </p>
<p>I think Jupiter is 318 Earth-masses &#038; I remember from reading one of Patrick Moore&#8217;s books (<i>The Sky at Night</i> Norton, 1985.) that Ouranos has 14 earth mases and Neptune 17 earth masses but I&#8217;m really not sure how Saturn compares. I think its significantly less massive than Jupiter &#8211; its definitely a lot less dense as its the least dense planet in the solar systemand would float on a big enough ocean. So my guess is maybe 30-50 earth mass for Saturn? Alas, I&#8217;ve no idea if that&#8217;s anything even close to the right number. Still that&#8217;s a lot of mass and thus internal gravity and pressure. </p>
<p>I have read something somewhere about possible core erosian in the gas giants and gather that their cores are still very  mysterious. I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s any chance Todd W&#8217;s idea is right but I think it very unlikely. </p>
<p>Great image though BA although a colour shot would be even better. Looks cool &#038; fascinating! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Charbonneau</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231784</link>
		<dc:creator>James Charbonneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231784</guid>
		<description>As mentioned, these kind of polygons are known to form when you stir water in a bucket using a rotating bottom plate. It&#039;s cool to see them on such a large scale. The link below has some details and a link to videos. 

http://www.physorg.com/news66924222.html

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned, these kind of polygons are known to form when you stir water in a bucket using a rotating bottom plate. It&#8217;s cool to see them on such a large scale. The link below has some details and a link to videos. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.physorg.com/news66924222.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news66924222.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proctological Nazi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231774</link>
		<dc:creator>Proctological Nazi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231774</guid>
		<description>30.   Jeremy Henderson Says: 

&lt;i&gt;It looks like a photo of Saturn’s colonoscopy… &lt;/i&gt;

Ewww! That&#039;s a planet-load of s***t! ;-) 

I guess that explains why Saturn is within the rings. ;-)

Could be worse though.  Could be giving Uranus an enema .. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30.   Jeremy Henderson Says: </p>
<p><i>It looks like a photo of Saturn’s colonoscopy… </i></p>
<p>Ewww! That&#8217;s a planet-load of s***t! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I guess that explains why Saturn is within the rings. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Could be worse though.  Could be giving Uranus an enema .. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231773</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231773</guid>
		<description>10.   Todd W. Says:  &lt;i&gt;&quot;Saturn’s core is actually a truncated rhombic dodecahedron.&lt;/i&gt; 

Rhombus or dodecahedron? 

Maybe I&#039;m making a geometry FAIL here* but aren&#039;t they two separate shapes? Can you have something that is both a rhombic and a dodecahedron? (Puzzled.)

* Been a very long time since I studied any geometry (way back in high school?) and I was rubbish at it even then. So forgive me please if what I&#039;ve just said is utterly dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10.   Todd W. Says:  <i>&#8220;Saturn’s core is actually a truncated rhombic dodecahedron.</i> </p>
<p>Rhombus or dodecahedron? </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m making a geometry FAIL here* but aren&#8217;t they two separate shapes? Can you have something that is both a rhombic and a dodecahedron? (Puzzled.)</p>
<p>* Been a very long time since I studied any geometry (way back in high school?) and I was rubbish at it even then. So forgive me please if what I&#8217;ve just said is utterly dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231762</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231762</guid>
		<description>Regner and ruidh are right. We have the same pattern on earth. Look at the isobars on a north polar projection. You&#039;ll see a similar pattern. I noticed it some years ago doing flight planning for a polar route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regner and ruidh are right. We have the same pattern on earth. Look at the isobars on a north polar projection. You&#8217;ll see a similar pattern. I noticed it some years ago doing flight planning for a polar route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Henderson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/09/a-hex-on-saturn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-231752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=8563#comment-231752</guid>
		<description>It looks like a photo of Saturn&#039;s colonoscopy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a photo of Saturn&#8217;s colonoscopy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 16:07:29 -->
