DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Get your mass handed to you
Anniversary of a cosmic blast »

Santa goes viral

So, what did Santa bring you this year?

santa_mccarthy

Yay! Measles!




Image credit: Ironically, ABC Family.

Share

December 26th, 2009 2:57 PM Tags: antivax, Jenny McCarthy
by Phil Plait in Alt-Med, Antiscience | 50 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

50 Responses to “Santa goes viral”

  1. 1.   quasidog Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Haven’t read your posts in months, come back to read out of curiosity … wow more boring flames of Jenny McCarthy. Obsession man.

  2. 2.   Phil Plait Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    quasidog (#1), that’s a perfect example of non-critical thinking. Were you to look at the several hundred posts you missed you might find, y’know, other stuff I wrote about. But I do appreciate the example of how thinking goes wrong on the internet.

  3. 3.   paoconnell Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    I’d be interested, if she got her shots first.

  4. 4.   James Fisher Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    My wife had the “Santa Baby” movies on when I got home from work on Wednesday. J. McC is really boring with her clothes on and in a bad need a fresh die job to cover her roots. But I digress. I disagree with quaisdog’s “obsession” observation. I am glad Phil is standing up to her anti-vax nonsense. Lives are at risk every time she espouses her unqualified opinions on the matter.

  5. 5.   Carter Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Ever since I got vaccinated, everything’s gone wrong! Oh wait, that’s because I’ve been getting vaccines since before the beginning of my memories.

    I agree with Phil’s previous condemnations of McCarthy’s (as well as other antivaxxers’) ludicrously inaccurate claims. I also agree with Mr Fisher (#4), and further would like to ask the British courts to prosecute these people for libeling vaccine manufacturers. I’m only half-kidding about that last one.

    Also, Phil, nice work as a guest on the last SciFri! That must have been a fun recording.

  6. 6.   Kathy Orlinsky Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I, for one, like the antivax updates. It’s nice to have that kind of information readily available at my neuron tips.

  7. 7.   skeptiksnarf Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    Why does Santa always bring Phil measles and i get some lousy sweater

  8. 8.   Bipedal Tetrapod Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    Or mumps:
    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwR/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5845a5.htm

  9. 9.   Chris Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    There was a notice in this morning’s paper that an unvaccinated adult woman came back from traveling overseas with measles. They listed all the places she had been to, including an acute care clinic.

    I am also disgusted that she blames the MMR vaccine for her son’s seizures when he was at least two years old. The problem is that he had the vaccine over a year before he had the seizures.

  10. 10.   MichaelL Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Ah, so that’s what she looks like… with clothes on… ;)

  11. 11.   Chris Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Oops, I misremembered the news story, I checked the county health department page and they listed “Evergreen Urgent Care”, along with a restaurant, movie theater and a pharmacy.

    Yea, measles.

  12. 12.   new horizons Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    Ho Ho Ho

  13. 13.   Thanny Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    Wow, quasidog, you don’t read a post in months, and just happen to return in time to be the first commenter on one that you don’t like? I’m flabbergasted.

  14. 14.   Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    @Thanny:

    It’s an obsession, man.

  15. 15.   Michelle Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Did you see that horrible game where she tries to get you healthy? Ha.

  16. 16.   Gary Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Is she still married to that talentless hack, Jim Carrey?

  17. 17.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    I emailed the stations carrying that santa baby trash asking them (nay begging them) not to air that hag… She needs to be kicked to the curb like the brainless bimbo she actually is!

  18. 18.   Davidlpf Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    Seeing her all the time pushing her exercise game for the Wii. Yes it is a good thing for people to get exercise but why her.

  19. 19.   jeff Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    I will agree with quasidog. Phil, the majority of your site is interesting and intelligent. This post is not. It is a bit petty. Yes, she is not too smart about vaccines….you have said this multiple times. There is really no reason to say anything more. If there was some story that went along with this fine…but there isn’t.

  20. 20.   Chris Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 11:01 pm

    Gary, she is not, nor has ever been married to Carrey. They are just paramours.

    There are better ways of getting exercise than jumping up and down in your living room using electronics connected to a television. Personally I am fond of walking (usually to places I am going), gardening and swimming laps. Somehow I don’t think the Wii will get me to class, to the store, down to the lake, get the weeding and pruning done, nor let me feel the sensation of water as I swim laps.

  21. 21.   Davidlpf Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    It is better then just sitting there in front of tv, but you are right Chris.

  22. 22.   Phil Plait Says:
    December 26th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    Jeff, not everything has to have a story. The tree, the cookies, the Doctor Who posts… those are for fun in a slow part of the blog season. But this one does have a point: it’s a reminder, and sometimes satire is a most pointed way of reminding.

  23. 23.   Raphael Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 12:40 am

    aaarrrrrghhh! My eyes! Phil mate, that needs a warning

  24. 24.   Dan Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 1:05 am

    Jeff, there is a difference between being “not too smart about vaccines” and actively working to make more kids sick, and even kill a few. The first is a bit understandable. The second is just inexcusable.

    Also, there is a story that does with this. She has still not been stopped. She is still out there, telling lies and being proud about it. I happened upon a youtube video of her giving some talk, describing an encounter with the CDC like she was some kind of hero. She actually said to the CDC, “I am not anti-vaccine, I’m anti-toxins” and that she wants to talk to someone important to create policy to get rid of the toxins. The best part is that at the end she makes a call back to someone at the CDC on her fancy phone and is both unable to get it on speaker phone and remember that the speaker part of the phone is at the top. Yet she is still somehow qualified to make policy about medicine?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WTciw_vXrY

  25. 25.   David Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 2:08 am

    I never thought that credulity could be such an unattractive quality…until I learned about Jenny McCarthy and then saw this post

  26. 26.   Nomen Publicus Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 2:55 am

    Who’da thunk that evil would come in pretty packaging.

  27. 27.   Lugosi Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 3:34 am

    Personally I get ALL my medical advice from women who pose naked in Playboy.

  28. 28.   Sarcin Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 6:12 am

    i thought that any post with her would require a ‘The stupid, It burns” tag =(

  29. 29.   Plutonium being from Pluto Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    24. David Says:

    I never thought that credulity could be such an unattractive quality…until I learned about Jenny McCarthy and then saw this post

    Nice wrapper, dumb present inside.

    Oh, I’m sure she looks better when her clothes are off – and her vaccines are in! ;-)

    Still a McCarthy Xmas? Think I’ll pass in favour of a Skepchick one! ;-)

    @26. Lugosi Says:

    Personally I get ALL my medical advice from women who pose naked in Playboy.

    Aren’t you lucky? ;-)

    Or, … wait … are you?

    Playing “doctors & nurses” with ‘em would be one thing – actually *using* Playboy “bunnies” as your medically (un?)qualified Drs & nurses, I suspect, would quite another & likely quite bad for your health. ;-)

    *****

    PS. I don’t come here for the anti-vax updates or satire personally … But I sure don’t mind getting them when the BA chooses to post them either. You go ahead & post what you want Dr Phil Plait – not that you wouldn’t anyhow! ;-)

  30. 30.   StevoR Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 7:39 am

    Yay! Measles!

    Hey, how do *you* know what’s in the present there – its still wrapped up ain’t it? ;-)

    Unless, somebody’s been a naughty boy and taken a peek there when they’re not supposed to haven’t they? ;-)

  31. 31.   Plutonium being from Pluto Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 8:03 am

    @22. Phil Plait Says:

    Jeff, not everything has to have a story. The tree, the cookies, the Doctor Who posts… those are for fun in a slow part of the blog season.

    For sure, even on Pluto, sometimes you’ve just gotta have *fun*! :-D

    @16. Gary Says:

    Is she still married to that talentless hack, Jim Carrey?

    Well, I gotta admit I don’t think Jim Carrey is all that bad! Come on, he’s actually pretty clever & a lot more talented as a comedian and probably an overall human being that Ms McCartney yeah? ;-)

  32. 32.   Keith Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    That is the lamest sexy Mrs. Santa outfit ever.

  33. 33.   tommy Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    A link that explained what this is about would have helped those of us who only know Jenny for being a pretty blonde.

    She’s got the measles? Hope she gets better soon!

    (Lazy blogger, making me use Google on a Sunday. :P )

  34. 34.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 9:53 am

    As a Dutch friend once pointed out about Einstein “He can’t be too smart. He’s not even rich.”
    So, by that criteria, she must be REALLY smart???

    Then of course, there’s PAt Robertson,,,

    Equating wealth with smarts is just bad but while it seems to ring true for a great many people in our society I doubt Jesus would agree.(Hey, the Dude hung out with hookers, thieves and murderers. My kinda man,,,).

    GAry 7

  35. 35.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    I just HAVE to point out: during the next great wave of famines, she won’t survive for ten fraking minutes.

    I loves me women with a three month supply of food on their bones. Twiggys are for stirring my coffee,,,

    GAry 7

  36. 36.   Kenny Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    As a parent of a child with autism, I have had my fair share of run-ins with the anti-vaxxers. Every time they mention Jenny McCarthy, I ask just what about taking her clothes off for Playboy and being a less than mediocre actress qualifies her to tell me not to get vaccinations for my child. I always get a strange look, then they shut up and go away.

    As for those griping about the post, the best blogs always cover many topics. As with most blogs I read, I came for the main topic, but stayed for the “off-topic” posts. As a science related blog, I think its very on-topic to point out the dangers of pseudoscience as much as possible, and this certainly falls in that category.

  37. 37.   BMcP Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    Well I got Death from the Skies for Christmas, so it all works out. :)

  38. 38.   Chris Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Kenny:

    Every time they mention Jenny McCarthy, I ask just what about taking her clothes off for Playboy and being a less than mediocre actress qualifies her to tell me not to get vaccinations for my child.

    I think it would be best to stay away from poisoning the well with her past Playboy feats, and ask them why you should listen to her on a more factual basis: her son had his seizures when he was at least two years old (something like 2 and a half), more than a year after his MMR vaccine (given about age 15 months). You might get an even more baffled look.

    Then ask why one should take medical advice whose only qualification seems to be that she is a “mommy”, versus someone who actually went to medical school (including many of those who are also mommies).

    (I read about the history of her son’s seizures on the Leftbrainrightbrain blog, you’ll have to do a search for it)

  39. 39.   JB of Brisbane Says:
    December 27th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    Gee, I thought this was a pretty Christmas package, until I read that it was Jenny McCarthy. Boy, talk about being pwned!

  40. 40.   quasidog Says:
    December 28th, 2009 at 2:46 am

    Um no Phil. Actually its a good example of critical thinking. Actually I have read many of your posts regarding the anti-vax issue, and most of which I tend to agree with. However, this particualr post with its sarcastic overtone and lack of any real meaning other than to … flame .. well .. its boring. It has nothing to do with critical thinking. Its just a flame. Other well thought out articles you have written regarding her stance on immunisation ( of which I am on your side ) have not been boring. 2 different things.

  41. 41.   Dan Says:
    December 28th, 2009 at 8:48 am

    Jenny – Mouth shut, legs slightly spread..perfect.

  42. 42.   Ubermoogle Says:
    December 28th, 2009 at 9:33 am

    Man, Santa is such a bitch.

  43. 43.   Tom Says:
    December 28th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Mumps may be survivable, but the damages to the body can be truly devastating. I have a good friend who survived a bout of mumps at age ~19. He is now a very healthy adult, but is sterile.

    Just heartbreaking when you think that a moment’s pain of a pin prick could have prevented this.

  44. 44.   holastefan Says:
    December 28th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @quasidog #40: After admitting you haven’t read any articles here for months, you instantly declared Phil to be “obsessed” with a particular topic. Invalid deduction?

    Basically, if her position on immunization and anti-science has not changed, then Phil’s post/sarcasm/flame is warranted.

    (Sorry to everyone if I’m feeding a troll, not sure if quasidog is or not.)

  45. 45.   Todd W. Says:
    December 29th, 2009 at 6:18 am

    She’s smiling, but it’s not a warm smile. Must be all that botulinum toxin she’s injected into her face. Gives the lie to her “anti-toxin” mantra.

  46. 46.   quasidog Says:
    December 30th, 2009 at 2:49 am

    lol … sorry I forgot .. its suck up , or be declared a troll. Forums are funny that way.

  47. 47.   Todd W. Says:
    December 30th, 2009 at 6:14 am

    @quasidog

    You’re not a troll, but you were wrong. You said:

    Haven’t read your posts in months, come back to read out of curiosity … wow more boring flames of Jenny McCarthy. Obsession man.

    First, this has been the only mention of Jenny McCarthy in the past month. So, if anything it would be a flame. I wouldn’t call it obsession at all. Obsession would be if he posted repeatedly about her in a short time span. I also don’t recall seeing you complaining about him being obsessed when he posts about pareidolia or Dr. Who.

    Second, Jenny McCarthy has not changed a bit. She still is quite actively promoting her anti-vaccine stance. That makes her fair game for criticism and, in this case, satire. It is not merely flaming, as you contend, unless you think that all satire is nothing more than flaming. It does serve a purpose: to shine a light on her irrational and dangerous ideas.

    If you have something substantive to say about why he should not post anything about Ms. McCarthy, say it. If you feel that Phil should not be sarcastic or satirical, then elaborate your reasoning.

  48. 48.   Phil Plait Says:
    December 30th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    quasidog, as others have pointed out, you’re wrong. What I said initially is still correct. You left for a long time, come back, don’t go through any of the intervening posts, and then declare I have flamed her — which I did not — and that I am obsessed — which I am not.

  49. 49.   David Says:
    January 1st, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    Tom, it is a myth that mumps causes sterility, mumps can cause a swelling of the testicles, however this does not mean sterility. Did your friend have a sperm count done before the mumps to determine his fertility? If not how can you claim it was mumps that made him sterile? It is most likely that you are making this story about a sterile friend up to support your pro mmr views.

  50. 50.   Chris Says:
    January 2nd, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    David, it is not a myth. It can happen in a small number of those with mumps orchitis. Here is an article:
    dub dub dub dot ncbi.nlm.nih dot gov/pmc/articles/PMC1633545/?tool=pubmed that says:

    Mumps orchitis rarely leads to sterility but it may contribute to subfertility. It can also can lead to oligospermia, azoospermia, and asthenospermia (defects in sperm movement). Unilateral disease can significantly, but only transiently, diminish the sperm count, mobility, and morphology. Impairment of fertility is estimated to occur in about 13% of patients,2 while 30%-87% of patients with bilateral mumps orchitis experience infertility.8

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
      • Science Getaways: Update | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us