<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A pro-science article&#8230; on HuffPo???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214280</guid>
		<description>HuffPro is anti-science?  I don&#039;t buy it at all.  They&#039;re so liberal and anti-Republican over there… and anti-Creationist, anti-Intelligent Design, etc… I find it very, very hard to believe that they&#039;d be anti-science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HuffPro is anti-science?  I don&#8217;t buy it at all.  They&#8217;re so liberal and anti-Republican over there… and anti-Creationist, anti-Intelligent Design, etc… I find it very, very hard to believe that they&#8217;d be anti-science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214279</guid>
		<description>@8, It was not my intention to infer all skeptics are scientists. The point I was trying to make is that as a scientist Phil is in search of the truth, so why state that you are a skeptic on top of that. Surely that&#039;s just creating a group of skeptic scientists as opposed to scientists who are good at their job, follow the scientific method and so on - no need for the &#039;skeptic&#039; label. It&#039;s a clique, surely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@8, It was not my intention to infer all skeptics are scientists. The point I was trying to make is that as a scientist Phil is in search of the truth, so why state that you are a skeptic on top of that. Surely that&#8217;s just creating a group of skeptic scientists as opposed to scientists who are good at their job, follow the scientific method and so on &#8211; no need for the &#8216;skeptic&#8217; label. It&#8217;s a clique, surely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214278</guid>
		<description>@14, No - wasn&#039;t confusing cynic with skeptic. My point was that we are all in search of truth - even those you disagree with. I disagree with lots of people, and they disagree with me - but I don&#039;t go round saying &#039;hey folks I&#039;m a skeptic&#039;, because they could claim the same - skeptical of my position and beliefs.

Actions speak louder than words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@14, No &#8211; wasn&#8217;t confusing cynic with skeptic. My point was that we are all in search of truth &#8211; even those you disagree with. I disagree with lots of people, and they disagree with me &#8211; but I don&#8217;t go round saying &#8216;hey folks I&#8217;m a skeptic&#8217;, because they could claim the same &#8211; skeptical of my position and beliefs.</p>
<p>Actions speak louder than words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214277</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214277</guid>
		<description>31.   StevoR

You assume incorrectly. Perhaps my entry was not as clear as it could have been.

&quot;I’ve seen enough evidence of AGW to convince me, we have a problem, Houston,,,&quot; means, human civilization has a problem, not that there is any problem with the interpretation of GW as human caused.

Sheesh! I REALLY should have more than a measly 3 cups of coffee before posting.

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>31.   StevoR</p>
<p>You assume incorrectly. Perhaps my entry was not as clear as it could have been.</p>
<p>&#8220;I’ve seen enough evidence of AGW to convince me, we have a problem, Houston,,,&#8221; means, human civilization has a problem, not that there is any problem with the interpretation of GW as human caused.</p>
<p>Sheesh! I REALLY should have more than a measly 3 cups of coffee before posting.</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred edison</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214276</link>
		<dc:creator>fred edison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214276</guid>
		<description>Do it, Phil.  If you have the time and they&#039;ll let your reality cooties through the gates of HuffPo, I&#039;d love to read the reactions from the anti-reality crowd in the comments section.  More realistic and science oriented articles on HuffPo would be a welcome counterbalance to the preponderant nonsense that passes for helpful information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do it, Phil.  If you have the time and they&#8217;ll let your reality cooties through the gates of HuffPo, I&#8217;d love to read the reactions from the anti-reality crowd in the comments section.  More realistic and science oriented articles on HuffPo would be a welcome counterbalance to the preponderant nonsense that passes for helpful information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214275</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214275</guid>
		<description>@ 28. Gary Ansorge :

&lt;i&gt;Skeptic: Definition of:One who withholds judgement until after they have seen the evidence. I’ve seen enough evidence of AGW to convince me, we have a problem, Houston,,,&lt;/i&gt;

Agreed entirely. Assuming, as I take it,. that you mean the Anthropogenic Global Warming idea is at best dubious and not scientifically supported &amp; that the Global warming skeptics are right to question it.

I wish the BA was more willing to question the AGW  political orthodoxy &amp; I hope the genuine skeptics who rightly question the AGW are not considered as &quot;deniers /denialists&quot; in this book. :-(

On the contrary, it seems to me it is the AGW mob who are the ones in denial over what the evidence - &amp; the Climategate scandal - is actually saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 28. Gary Ansorge :</p>
<p><i>Skeptic: Definition of:One who withholds judgement until after they have seen the evidence. I’ve seen enough evidence of AGW to convince me, we have a problem, Houston,,,</i></p>
<p>Agreed entirely. Assuming, as I take it,. that you mean the Anthropogenic Global Warming idea is at best dubious and not scientifically supported &amp; that the Global warming skeptics are right to question it.</p>
<p>I wish the BA was more willing to question the AGW  political orthodoxy &amp; I hope the genuine skeptics who rightly question the AGW are not considered as &#8220;deniers /denialists&#8221; in this book. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On the contrary, it seems to me it is the AGW mob who are the ones in denial over what the evidence &#8211; &amp; the Climategate scandal &#8211; is actually saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214274</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214274</guid>
		<description>I live by HuffPo. I pay little heed to the feel-good new agey content, but I love watching creationists and conservative cretins raked over the coals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live by HuffPo. I pay little heed to the feel-good new agey content, but I love watching creationists and conservative cretins raked over the coals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214273</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214273</guid>
		<description>you need to read &quot;How We Know What Isn&#039;t So&quot; by Thomas Gilovich, still a feel good read, but gives a lot of data about how we believe what we want to and are too accepting of any &quot;evidence&quot; to support our view while remaining exceedingly skeptical of contrarian views, also we remember events easier than non-events, don&#039;t intuitively grasp statistical concepts like the regression effect, and so on... lots of great examples, and while a little jargony in spots, it is easily understandable to a lay audience</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you need to read &#8220;How We Know What Isn&#8217;t So&#8221; by Thomas Gilovich, still a feel good read, but gives a lot of data about how we believe what we want to and are too accepting of any &#8220;evidence&#8221; to support our view while remaining exceedingly skeptical of contrarian views, also we remember events easier than non-events, don&#8217;t intuitively grasp statistical concepts like the regression effect, and so on&#8230; lots of great examples, and while a little jargony in spots, it is easily understandable to a lay audience</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214272</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214272</guid>
		<description>5.   Ian

MAth has Proofs:

Science has EVIDENCE.

Skeptic: Definition of:

One who withholds judgement until after they have seen the evidence.

I&#039;ve seen enough evidence of AGW to convince me, we have a problem, Houston,,,

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.   Ian</p>
<p>MAth has Proofs:</p>
<p>Science has EVIDENCE.</p>
<p>Skeptic: Definition of:</p>
<p>One who withholds judgement until after they have seen the evidence.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen enough evidence of AGW to convince me, we have a problem, Houston,,,</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/08/a-pro-science-article-on-huffpo/#comment-214271</link>
		<dc:creator>Klem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=9917#comment-214271</guid>
		<description>&quot; who was it that said “I reject your reality and replace it with my own”?

One of the guys from Mythbusters said that. He also said &quot;Science plus beer equals Good.&quot; These are two of my favourite sayings. All that I have learned about life I learned from Mythbusters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; who was it that said “I reject your reality and replace it with my own”?</p>
<p>One of the guys from Mythbusters said that. He also said &#8220;Science plus beer equals Good.&#8221; These are two of my favourite sayings. All that I have learned about life I learned from Mythbusters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-21 10:12:13 -->