DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Mile High Caturday
Immunization FAQs, and some nice stories »

Eagle eye’s view

This is phenomenal footage, showing what an eagle sees as it flies courtesy a very small and light camera attached to the bird.


Wow. I have to find a copy of that whole show. That’s really amazing footage!

Tip o’ the flight feathers to Fark.

Share

January 16th, 2010 12:00 PM by Phil Plait in Cool stuff, Science | 40 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

40 Responses to “Eagle eye’s view”

  1. 1.   Martin Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    It was a good series, not just the golden eagle but other creatures as well.

  2. 2.   wright Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:05 pm

    Wow. Just… wow. Thanks, Phil.

  3. 3.   bigjohn756 Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    Anyone know if we in the US can watch this series online?

  4. 4.   Drivethruscientist Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    Wow, I’d love to see the peregrin falcon clip. Just from the few seconds they show you can tell that it was going pretty fast.

  5. 5.   Vagueofgodalming Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    Nice, pity the editor suffers from ADD.

  6. 6.   Romeo Vitelli Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    How do they get the camera off the bird afterward?

  7. 7.   Jewel Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    Very nice! Thanks Phil!

  8. 8.   Martin Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    The series was made in 2004.

    See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3479595.stm

  9. 9.   JohnDoe Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    Some of this has been on PBS, if I’m not mistaken, I think the program was called “raptor force”. At least the peregrine falcon was shown there.

  10. 10.   Steve Ulven Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    That is truly impressive! However, this is one example where editing is a bad thing. It would’ve been nice to just have one nice long shot uninterrupted.

  11. 11.   Neeneko Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    That ground hugging one reminds me of ‘evil cam’ from various movies.

  12. 12.   André Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 2:54 pm

    That’s an onbird camera!

  13. 13.   davem Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    It’s from a series shown in 2004, called ‘Animal Camera’ as far as I can tell. There doesn’t seem to be a torrent for it, that I can find, and too long ago to be available on iPlayer.

  14. 14.   cmflyer Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    I thought about the editing like Steve #9 above, but I was wondering if they were using short segments where the video is more smooth and less jerky. Next they need a bird steady-cam. (But it is fascinating to see how the birds make flight adjustments.)

  15. 15.   Tom K. Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    That close to that beak I’d be wearing my safety glasses.

  16. 16.   Mike Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    I saw this program on tv a little while ago.. awesome footage! Glad to see it again. :D

  17. 17.   I'd rather be fishin' Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    WOW! Beautiful birds and stunning camera work, their video is much better than mine.

  18. 18.   featheredfrog Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    The peregrine and goshawk segment is here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-_RHRAzUHM&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=E49D1D846F767A07

  19. 19.   Andy Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    I too was bothered by the editing. In fact, I was surprised just how much it bothered me!

  20. 20.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    Cool! I wonder if anyone has thought of bugging a wolf in Yellow Stone? That could provide some really interesting insight into the behavior of the pack.

    GAry 7

  21. 21.   Alec Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    Wow, that’s so cool. I’ve always wanted to be a bird for the flight, haha. Although it was awesome, I agree with Steve that there should’ve been a long uninterrupted shot.

    I love evolution.

  22. 22.   TechyDad Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    Amazing, but I’ve got to agree about the editing. I’d love to see the raw video of that front camera through the entire flight. Depending on the quality of the footage, perhaps you could project it on an IMAX type screen and maybe blow some wind at people to enhance the realism…. Sorry, was just having a Disney World Soarin’ flashback.

  23. 23.   Inside the Asylum :: Eagles Eye View :: January :: 2010 Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 11:44 pm

    [...] Via Bad Astronomy. [...]

  24. 24.   Jack Hagerty Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 12:07 am

    It seems like those cameras can steer, either that or they combined footage from multiple flights changing the camera aim between them. Sometimes we were looking over its head, sometimes at its head from the left, sometimes out along the wing and once, very briefly, over the tail. Of all the viewpoints, this last one intrigued me the most, followed closely by the wing shot. I wanted to see how it moved its tail and wingtip feathers to perform the different maneuvers. I’ve seen lots of video from RC gliders like this and comparing them would be fascinating.

    - Jack

  25. 25.   Lars Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 2:06 am

    Awesome pictures!

    @Jack: My impression was that they had multiple cameras “on board”.

  26. 26.   Nomad Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 3:25 am

    Too bad they didn’t bring the cams closer together and aim at a stereoscopic view. Still great idea and great footage.

  27. 27.   Robin D. Nelson Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 5:56 am

    Well, it’s not exactly what the eagle sees, because the eagle’s eyesight is so much better than ours. But it’s beautiful.

  28. 28.   Michael Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 8:57 am

    Wow! Thanks for posting this Phil.

  29. 29.   wright Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    @ #15: that was my thought too. I’d heard that even highly-trained raptor birds have this regrettable tendency to go for the eyes if held too close. Oh well, I understand functional optical replacements are coming along nicely…

  30. 30.   alfaniner Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    ILM would have had a field day with this had the mini-tech existed around 1982…

  31. 31.   FreeSpeaker Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    Reminds me of the time I tried to teach my wife how to drive…

  32. 32.   Messier Tidy Upper Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 9:34 pm

    @ 27. Robin D. Nelson Says:

    Well, it’s not exactly what the eagle sees, because the eagle’s eyesight is so much better than ours. But it’s beautiful.

    You beat me to it. That’s what I was going to say. That & the Oliver Twist line : “Please sir, can I have some more!” ;-)

    Yes, I too wish the narrator /editor there would just shut up and show us the bird-cam footage. That was just a very small taste of something very cool. :-)

    @ 18. featheredfrog Says:

    The peregrine and goshawk segment is here: …

    Thanks! :-)

    Sadly, while good that still seems kinda short. I would *love* a lot more just from the bird-cam.

    Talk about having a bird’s eye view! ;-)

    @ 22. TechyDad Says:

    Amazing, but I’ve got to agree about the editing. I’d love to see the raw video of that front camera through the entire flight. Depending on the quality of the footage, perhaps you could project it on an IMAX type screen and maybe blow some wind at people to enhance the realism…. Sorry, was just having a Disney World Soarin’ flashback.

    Don’t be sorry. That’s a durned good idea & I’d love to see that too. :-)

  33. 33.   Petrolonfire Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    @ 6. Romeo Vitelli Says:

    How do they get the camera off the bird afterward?

    They pluck it? ;-)

    Cool footage though. If there’s anything to the idea of reincarnation (I know, there’s probably not but still..) coming back as a bird of prey does have a certain strong appeal to it. 8)

  34. 34.   another mike Says:
    January 17th, 2010 at 10:22 pm

    @alfaniner, I was just thinking that goshawk sequence looked a lot like the speeder-bike chase.
    Spy on the Wild is another great series to watch. They were stuck with larger cameras but camouflaged them to not weird out the critters too much. And by critter I mean elephant, tiger, pride of lions, etc. Nothing cuter than watching a lion cub nom on bouldercam.

  35. 35.   David Vanderschel Says:
    January 18th, 2010 at 2:08 am

    I did find a torrent for BBC’s Animal Camera 2. The tracker is working, but nobody is seeding it. Very few peers looking.

  36. 36.   Justus Says:
    January 18th, 2010 at 5:01 am

    I’m sure the cameras must feel like a backpack full of bricks to the bird. They completely destroy the aerodynamic shape of its body. I bet getting used to them took some time.

  37. 37.   Cheyenne Says:
    January 18th, 2010 at 7:50 am

    Go to the Google and type in “you tube golden eagle wolf hunting”. Then do it but change out “wolf” with “reindeer”.

    OK so yeah, you can friggin train one of those to hunt a wolf on the Mongolian Steppe or head up north of the Arctic circle and have it take down a Caribou. Absolutely amazing.

  38. 38.   Jason Says:
    January 18th, 2010 at 8:32 am

    Jeff Corwin met up with these guys for one of his segments in the 1st season of Corwins Quest on Animal Planet (one of my 6yr old’s favorite shows) – he even used that same Golden Eagle (Tilly). That show is worth watching as well.

    http://animal.discovery.com/fansites/jeffcorwin/episode/episode04_09/sight.html

  39. 39.   What happens when you put a camera on an eagle? « Virginia Hughes Says:
    January 18th, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    [...] (Hat tip: Bad Astronomy) [...]

  40. 40.   See Scotland from an Eagle's Point of View | Surprising Science Says:
    January 20th, 2010 at 8:18 am

    [...] tip: Bad Astronomy) Posted By: Sarah Zielinski — Wildlife | Link | Comments (0) Share/Save  |  [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse
      • Volcano in taupe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
      • Science Getaways: Update | Bad Astronomy
      • Exoplanet in a triple star system smack dab in the habitable zone | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us