<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advisor to the planets^h^h^h stars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuga</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-324043</link>
		<dc:creator>fuga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-324043</guid>
		<description>Brian Schlosser “At least *I* didn’t have to invent 26 dimensions to get the math to work!”
love the referance

with regards to the whole Eureka sherrif always saving the day i think they are trying to point out that sometimes scientists tend to overcomplicate the solution, where as he tends to find a very simple solution.

my personal favorite has to be the stargates, i have always wondered about the scientific accuracy of the show and really haven&#039;t found much about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Schlosser “At least *I* didn’t have to invent 26 dimensions to get the math to work!”<br />
love the referance</p>
<p>with regards to the whole Eureka sherrif always saving the day i think they are trying to point out that sometimes scientists tend to overcomplicate the solution, where as he tends to find a very simple solution.</p>
<p>my personal favorite has to be the stargates, i have always wondered about the scientific accuracy of the show and really haven&#8217;t found much about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Winter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-246473</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-246473</guid>
		<description>ND wrote: &lt;i&gt;&quot;I think blowing up a star using a stargate should have taken longer that depicted in that episode. A lot, lot longer I think.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Well, they say it seems a lot quicker your first time.

&lt;b&gt;THEY&lt;/b&gt; say that...

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ND wrote: <i>&#8220;I think blowing up a star using a stargate should have taken longer that depicted in that episode. A lot, lot longer I think.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Well, they say it seems a lot quicker your first time.</p>
<p><b>THEY</b> say that&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Winter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-246471</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-246471</guid>
		<description>The &lt;i&gt;Eureka&lt;/i&gt; people have a blog? Oh frabjous day! I&#039;m going to... No.

Must. Get. Back. To. Work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <i>Eureka</i> people have a blog? Oh frabjous day! I&#8217;m going to&#8230; No.</p>
<p>Must. Get. Back. To. Work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-246327</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-246327</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Phil.

It&#039;s nice to know that I&#039;m not alone in my suspension of disbelief and enjoyment around Fringe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Phil.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to know that I&#8217;m not alone in my suspension of disbelief and enjoyment around Fringe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaiainc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245737</link>
		<dc:creator>gaiainc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245737</guid>
		<description>My husband and I like to watch Eureka because it&#039;s one science/medicine show I&#039;m less likely to yell at.  It&#039;s also silly.  The plot device of having the sheriff provide the necessary insight so that the rest of the scientists can figure out the plan does get a little old, but it can be a useful reminder that sometimes having fresh eyes can help.  A lot of the medicine they do on the show is wrong, but I engage in a willing suspension of disbelief... 

...unless it&#039;s really egregious in which case, there will be some yellin&#039; at the TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband and I like to watch Eureka because it&#8217;s one science/medicine show I&#8217;m less likely to yell at.  It&#8217;s also silly.  The plot device of having the sheriff provide the necessary insight so that the rest of the scientists can figure out the plan does get a little old, but it can be a useful reminder that sometimes having fresh eyes can help.  A lot of the medicine they do on the show is wrong, but I engage in a willing suspension of disbelief&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230;unless it&#8217;s really egregious in which case, there will be some yellin&#8217; at the TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajjan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245696</link>
		<dc:creator>rajjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245696</guid>
		<description>Any show that brings just a litte Lexa Doig is worth watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any show that brings just a litte Lexa Doig is worth watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melora</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245688</link>
		<dc:creator>Melora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245688</guid>
		<description>Ah I love &quot;Eureka&quot; so much! It is definitely my favorite show. I always wondered about the scientific accuracy in it, but since so many of the stories focus on inventions that don&#039;t exist, I figured they take some artistic liberties.

@!astralProjectile — Unfortunately, the fictional town of Eureka in the TV show is in Oregon (and has less lumber schooners, I&#039;d imagine). That&#039;s not to say that Eureka, CA isn&#039;t worth a visit, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I love &#8220;Eureka&#8221; so much! It is definitely my favorite show. I always wondered about the scientific accuracy in it, but since so many of the stories focus on inventions that don&#8217;t exist, I figured they take some artistic liberties.</p>
<p>@!astralProjectile — Unfortunately, the fictional town of Eureka in the TV show is in Oregon (and has less lumber schooners, I&#8217;d imagine). That&#8217;s not to say that Eureka, CA isn&#8217;t worth a visit, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: !astralProjectile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245675</link>
		<dc:creator>!astralProjectile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245675</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to live there, the description of it  sounded fantastic:


&quot;
Town of the Week, Eureka, California. This week&#039;s town is a port city located near the extensive preserves of the world&#039;s oldest trees, the Coastal Redwoods. Eureka, on Humboldt Bay, is the county seat and principal city in Humboldt County, California. Eureka is a Greek word meaning &quot;I have found it,&quot; and is the official motto of California. Eureka was a major player in the historic west coast lumber trade, with 140 lumber schooners operating in Humboldt Bay. Eureka is the site of hundreds of Victorian homes including the Carson Mansion. The Carson Mansion on 2nd and M Streets is perhaps the most spectacular Victorian in the nation, is a museum and was built in 1884. Old Town Eureka, the original downtown center of this busy city in the 19th Century, has been restored as a lively arts center. Old Town has been declared an Historic District by the National Register. Eureka&#039;s livelihood has long been tied to salmon fisheries and oyster farming. On January 9th, last month, a Richter magnitude 6.5 earthquake occurred about 33 miles offshore of Eureka. The quake was described as a &quot;jumper&quot;, imposing mostly vertical shocks from the ground, leading to broken windows, overturned shelving, and loss of architectural detail on a number of historic buildings. Injuries were described as minor. Eureka has a population of more than 42,000 people. Major employers include College of the Redwoods, County of Humboldt, and St. Joseph Hospital. Known as the &quot;Queen City of the Ultimate West&quot;, it is our Town of the Week, Eureka, CA. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to live there, the description of it  sounded fantastic:</p>
<p>&#8221;<br />
Town of the Week, Eureka, California. This week&#8217;s town is a port city located near the extensive preserves of the world&#8217;s oldest trees, the Coastal Redwoods. Eureka, on Humboldt Bay, is the county seat and principal city in Humboldt County, California. Eureka is a Greek word meaning &#8220;I have found it,&#8221; and is the official motto of California. Eureka was a major player in the historic west coast lumber trade, with 140 lumber schooners operating in Humboldt Bay. Eureka is the site of hundreds of Victorian homes including the Carson Mansion. The Carson Mansion on 2nd and M Streets is perhaps the most spectacular Victorian in the nation, is a museum and was built in 1884. Old Town Eureka, the original downtown center of this busy city in the 19th Century, has been restored as a lively arts center. Old Town has been declared an Historic District by the National Register. Eureka&#8217;s livelihood has long been tied to salmon fisheries and oyster farming. On January 9th, last month, a Richter magnitude 6.5 earthquake occurred about 33 miles offshore of Eureka. The quake was described as a &#8220;jumper&#8221;, imposing mostly vertical shocks from the ground, leading to broken windows, overturned shelving, and loss of architectural detail on a number of historic buildings. Injuries were described as minor. Eureka has a population of more than 42,000 people. Major employers include College of the Redwoods, County of Humboldt, and St. Joseph Hospital. Known as the &#8220;Queen City of the Ultimate West&#8221;, it is our Town of the Week, Eureka, CA. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Grey Geologist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245674</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Grey Geologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245674</guid>
		<description>@16  I strongly agree with John Paradox - Eleventh Hour was a MUCH better show than Fringe from a science perspective.  Fringe seems to be an attempt to spin the old X-Files series to a more bizarre level.  

@15 Also agree with Jeremy.  I really object to  “The scientists endanger everyone with their recklessness and only the clever non-scientists can save us” seems to be the recurring theme, from what I’ve seen. It doesn’t sit well.  This aspect creeps into many poorly made SF shows, and it doesn&#039;t sit well with me either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@16  I strongly agree with John Paradox &#8211; Eleventh Hour was a MUCH better show than Fringe from a science perspective.  Fringe seems to be an attempt to spin the old X-Files series to a more bizarre level.  </p>
<p>@15 Also agree with Jeremy.  I really object to  “The scientists endanger everyone with their recklessness and only the clever non-scientists can save us” seems to be the recurring theme, from what I’ve seen. It doesn’t sit well.  This aspect creeps into many poorly made SF shows, and it doesn&#8217;t sit well with me either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barber of Civility</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245654</link>
		<dc:creator>Barber of Civility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245654</guid>
		<description>Some of you take things &#039;way too seriously.  

Eureka is fun, AND it makes some people think along lines they might not have in the first place.  Maybe one or more of them (me, for instance) will look up stuff online when a plot device is something I haven&#039;t read about or thought about before then.  I get to learn something new.  

When you watch a show like that, where the science has yet to reach reality (and that&#039;s ALWAYS what happens on that show), you HAVE to suspend belief for it to be fun.

And that show is definitely fun.

The added benefit of shows like that is that there are kids out there watching and enjoying the show and getting turned on by science.  In the U.S., that&#039;s a great thing, because our society doesn&#039;t promote science and math education enough.  Shows like Eureka, just like Star Trek (and tell me how much of the science Kirk and his crew used was doable or even believable), bring new people to science who might have never considered it as a career or even a hobby.

If science FICTION did not exist, I don&#039;t know what I&#039;d be doing today, but I can tell you, I would have had a very boring and frustrating childhood.  Maybe even adulthood.

@Jeremy - The idea behind that particular plot device is that, just because someone is smart (or brilliant or whatever), doesn&#039;t mean they have common sense, and sometimes common sense is important to solving a problem.  It&#039;s the whole idea of, &quot;it takes a team to make things work&quot;, that one person can&#039;t think of all possible outcomes because their life perspective limits each and every one of us.

While Eureka strains the concept, it&#039;s a good lesson for us all to learn.  Drink a beer and relax.  Enjoy the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you take things &#8216;way too seriously.  </p>
<p>Eureka is fun, AND it makes some people think along lines they might not have in the first place.  Maybe one or more of them (me, for instance) will look up stuff online when a plot device is something I haven&#8217;t read about or thought about before then.  I get to learn something new.  </p>
<p>When you watch a show like that, where the science has yet to reach reality (and that&#8217;s ALWAYS what happens on that show), you HAVE to suspend belief for it to be fun.</p>
<p>And that show is definitely fun.</p>
<p>The added benefit of shows like that is that there are kids out there watching and enjoying the show and getting turned on by science.  In the U.S., that&#8217;s a great thing, because our society doesn&#8217;t promote science and math education enough.  Shows like Eureka, just like Star Trek (and tell me how much of the science Kirk and his crew used was doable or even believable), bring new people to science who might have never considered it as a career or even a hobby.</p>
<p>If science FICTION did not exist, I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;d be doing today, but I can tell you, I would have had a very boring and frustrating childhood.  Maybe even adulthood.</p>
<p>@Jeremy &#8211; The idea behind that particular plot device is that, just because someone is smart (or brilliant or whatever), doesn&#8217;t mean they have common sense, and sometimes common sense is important to solving a problem.  It&#8217;s the whole idea of, &#8220;it takes a team to make things work&#8221;, that one person can&#8217;t think of all possible outcomes because their life perspective limits each and every one of us.</p>
<p>While Eureka strains the concept, it&#8217;s a good lesson for us all to learn.  Drink a beer and relax.  Enjoy the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svlad Cjelli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245641</link>
		<dc:creator>Svlad Cjelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245641</guid>
		<description>I can handle silly shows, but the revelation that they are actually trying hard makes me kind of sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can handle silly shows, but the revelation that they are actually trying hard makes me kind of sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catbunny</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245612</link>
		<dc:creator>Catbunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245612</guid>
		<description>The way I remember it, working on a VT terminal (er.. Virtual Terminal.  *gah!*) in college in the early &#039;90s, if you hit the &quot;backspace&quot; key, a ^H appeared on the screen (the &quot;delete&quot; key was the proper key to use to backspace...?).
So, yeah.  Plan stars.  *heh*
No clue on the pseudo-Riemannian 11-dimensional manifold, though.
__/^-^\__</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I remember it, working on a VT terminal (er.. Virtual Terminal.  *gah!*) in college in the early &#8217;90s, if you hit the &#8220;backspace&#8221; key, a ^H appeared on the screen (the &#8220;delete&#8221; key was the proper key to use to backspace&#8230;?).<br />
So, yeah.  Plan stars.  *heh*<br />
No clue on the pseudo-Riemannian 11-dimensional manifold, though.<br />
__/^-^\__</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245607</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245607</guid>
		<description>Speaking (as you did briefly) of Doctor Who, did you hear that Neil Gaiman is going to be writing an episode? http://gallifreynewsbase.blogspot.com/2010/02/gaiman-confirms-he-is-writing-for.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking (as you did briefly) of Doctor Who, did you hear that Neil Gaiman is going to be writing an episode? <a href="http://gallifreynewsbase.blogspot.com/2010/02/gaiman-confirms-he-is-writing-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://gallifreynewsbase.blogspot.com/2010/02/gaiman-confirms-he-is-writing-for.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Fite</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245590</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Fite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245590</guid>
		<description>I think I get it...

Taking the ^h to mean &#039;backspace,&#039; thereby changing the title of the post to &quot;Advisor to the plan stars&quot; refers to Kevin Grazier being a science advisor on Battlestar Galactica.  Y&#039;know, where they had a plan.

What&#039;s my prize?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I get it&#8230;</p>
<p>Taking the ^h to mean &#8216;backspace,&#8217; thereby changing the title of the post to &#8220;Advisor to the plan stars&#8221; refers to Kevin Grazier being a science advisor on Battlestar Galactica.  Y&#8217;know, where they had a plan.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s my prize?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ND</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245585</link>
		<dc:creator>ND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245585</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually old enough to have seen a ^H characters appears on VT terminals. Does this still happen to people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually old enough to have seen a ^H characters appears on VT terminals. Does this still happen to people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike burkhart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245581</link>
		<dc:creator>mike burkhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245581</guid>
		<description>I find a lot of science flaws in science fiction but I still enjoy it for the entertainment value if I want to know science facts I&#039;ll read a book or look it up online</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find a lot of science flaws in science fiction but I still enjoy it for the entertainment value if I want to know science facts I&#8217;ll read a book or look it up online</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245574</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245574</guid>
		<description>Planets^h would be planets to the h power. So the post title would be planets to the h power, to the h power, to the h power again. 
I don&#039;t have cable, so I don&#039;t get the reference.

I must not be a geek, then...

I&#039;ve started watching Fringe because the wife &amp; girls like it (because of the Dr. Walter Bishop character), but I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m able to suspend my disbelief. I&#039;ll keep viewing it for now and withhold judgement for now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Planets^h would be planets to the h power. So the post title would be planets to the h power, to the h power, to the h power again.<br />
I don&#8217;t have cable, so I don&#8217;t get the reference.</p>
<p>I must not be a geek, then&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve started watching Fringe because the wife &#038; girls like it (because of the Dr. Walter Bishop character), but I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m able to suspend my disbelief. I&#8217;ll keep viewing it for now and withhold judgement for now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asimov fan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245548</link>
		<dc:creator>Asimov fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245548</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Eureka&lt;/i&gt; is generally a really funny, clever &amp; great show but one scene in one episode - where they dissolved a living, breathing, loving human woman who was created by this spaceship as a super-computer in acid to transform her into data on the ships journey -  really gave me the creeps. 

*shudder*

It was one of the strangest &amp; (emotionally) saddest things that I have ever seen in many years of watching TV SF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Eureka</i> is generally a really funny, clever &#038; great show but one scene in one episode &#8211; where they dissolved a living, breathing, loving human woman who was created by this spaceship as a super-computer in acid to transform her into data on the ships journey &#8211;  really gave me the creeps. </p>
<p>*shudder*</p>
<p>It was one of the strangest &#038; (emotionally) saddest things that I have ever seen in many years of watching TV SF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245547</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245547</guid>
		<description>RE: Fringe.  Before it premiered, I was thinking it was a variation on Eleventh Hour (with Rufus Sewell, derived from the UK miniseries with Patrick Stewart).  When both premiered, I watched about a half-dozen of each, then dropped Fringe because of the wilder ideas.  I kept watching Eleventh Hour (also like Sewell, see Dark City for IMO a great movie), and when they introduced the &#039;sidekick&#039; (the big black guy who knew some of what was being talked about), I could see a lot of potential.  However, it got cancelled, and I kept hearing about how &#039;great&#039; Fringe was.  I may go back to catching it, but I have really dropped a lot of TV SF... though some are simply not currently on-air. (&quot;V&quot;, &quot;FlashForward&quot;, &quot;Warehouse 13*&quot;, etc.)

*Warehouse 13 is basically a &#039;let&#039;s get weird for comedy&#039; show, so the &#039;realism&#039; is more &#039;open&#039; with techno-babble, though I am a Nikola Tesla fan, so can accept &quot;Sanctuary&quot; as well.

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Fringe.  Before it premiered, I was thinking it was a variation on Eleventh Hour (with Rufus Sewell, derived from the UK miniseries with Patrick Stewart).  When both premiered, I watched about a half-dozen of each, then dropped Fringe because of the wilder ideas.  I kept watching Eleventh Hour (also like Sewell, see Dark City for IMO a great movie), and when they introduced the &#8216;sidekick&#8217; (the big black guy who knew some of what was being talked about), I could see a lot of potential.  However, it got cancelled, and I kept hearing about how &#8216;great&#8217; Fringe was.  I may go back to catching it, but I have really dropped a lot of TV SF&#8230; though some are simply not currently on-air. (&#8220;V&#8221;, &#8220;FlashForward&#8221;, &#8220;Warehouse 13*&#8221;, etc.)</p>
<p>*Warehouse 13 is basically a &#8216;let&#8217;s get weird for comedy&#8217; show, so the &#8216;realism&#8217; is more &#8216;open&#8217; with techno-babble, though I am a Nikola Tesla fan, so can accept &#8220;Sanctuary&#8221; as well.</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245545</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m frankly stunned to discover Eureka HAS science advisors, they certainly don&#039;t seem to pay them any mind. In and of itself that can be ok, soft sci-fi and outright sci-fantasy can be fun if done well, but Eureka seems to take an actively antiscience bent in some respects. &quot;The scientists endanger everyone with their recklessness and only the clever non-scientists can save us&quot; seems to be the recurring theme, from what I&#039;ve seen. It doesn&#039;t sit well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m frankly stunned to discover Eureka HAS science advisors, they certainly don&#8217;t seem to pay them any mind. In and of itself that can be ok, soft sci-fi and outright sci-fantasy can be fun if done well, but Eureka seems to take an actively antiscience bent in some respects. &#8220;The scientists endanger everyone with their recklessness and only the clever non-scientists can save us&#8221; seems to be the recurring theme, from what I&#8217;ve seen. It doesn&#8217;t sit well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lagomorph</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245542</link>
		<dc:creator>lagomorph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245542</guid>
		<description>^h is CTRL-h or an ASCII backspace but it makes no sense as a geeky reference unless you use the right number of them.  I&#039;ve pointed it out here to Phil before consarnit.  &quot;Advisor to the plan stars&quot; indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^h is CTRL-h or an ASCII backspace but it makes no sense as a geeky reference unless you use the right number of them.  I&#8217;ve pointed it out here to Phil before consarnit.  &#8220;Advisor to the plan stars&#8221; indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Morbius</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245541</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Morbius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245541</guid>
		<description>I used to watch Fringe but I stopped because I got tired of episodes ending with no explanation of what happened. Also, the episodes seemed to consist of random scenes and dialog that didn&#039;t seem to have any connection to each other. And finally, the manbaby episode pissed me off because they never explained how a baby could grow that fast without eating anything. Did it absorb matter through osmosis?

 At least Star Trek and Stargate tried to be scientifically accurate. Fringe doesn&#039;t even bother. It reminds me a lot of the recent Star Trek movie, which I liked. They needed red matter as a plot device for the story to work but they didn&#039;t even bother explaining what it was. J.J. Abrams seems to have a lazy streak when it comes to plot development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to watch Fringe but I stopped because I got tired of episodes ending with no explanation of what happened. Also, the episodes seemed to consist of random scenes and dialog that didn&#8217;t seem to have any connection to each other. And finally, the manbaby episode pissed me off because they never explained how a baby could grow that fast without eating anything. Did it absorb matter through osmosis?</p>
<p> At least Star Trek and Stargate tried to be scientifically accurate. Fringe doesn&#8217;t even bother. It reminds me a lot of the recent Star Trek movie, which I liked. They needed red matter as a plot device for the story to work but they didn&#8217;t even bother explaining what it was. J.J. Abrams seems to have a lazy streak when it comes to plot development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam H.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245540</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245540</guid>
		<description>I think you out-dorked yourself this time, Phil! I&#039;m afraid I didn&#039;t really get ANY of the references you made: ^h? All I can think is &quot;carrot&quot; or &quot;ctrl&quot; ... which makes me think of Ctrl-H and browser history... hmm...

And, I can only think of integrals when you say Riemann...
Manifold would be a surface (closed surface, perhaps?)...
11-dimensions would be string theory...

Therefore? I guess KCS probably had it right with &quot;knot.&quot; My dork credentials must be short today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you out-dorked yourself this time, Phil! I&#8217;m afraid I didn&#8217;t really get ANY of the references you made: ^h? All I can think is &#8220;carrot&#8221; or &#8220;ctrl&#8221; &#8230; which makes me think of Ctrl-H and browser history&#8230; hmm&#8230;</p>
<p>And, I can only think of integrals when you say Riemann&#8230;<br />
Manifold would be a surface (closed surface, perhaps?)&#8230;<br />
11-dimensions would be string theory&#8230;</p>
<p>Therefore? I guess KCS probably had it right with &#8220;knot.&#8221; My dork credentials must be short today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245538</link>
		<dc:creator>John Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245538</guid>
		<description>@Woof: I was going to ask the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Woof: I was going to ask the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woof</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/08/advisor-to-the-planetshhh-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-245537</link>
		<dc:creator>Woof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11277#comment-245537</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s &quot;plan stars&quot;?  ;-)

And how many of your readers know what a ^h is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s &#8220;plan stars&#8221;?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And how many of your readers know what a ^h is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 20:04:07 -->
