<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dwarf merging makes for an explosive combo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tycho&#8217;s Supernova: An Explosive Change in the Universe as We Knew It &#124; Astrofauna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221722</link>
		<dc:creator>Tycho&#8217;s Supernova: An Explosive Change in the Universe as We Knew It &#124; Astrofauna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221722</guid>
		<description>[...] between an accelerating and a decelerating universe, and the data is already pretty close to it. I&#8217;ve read that the energy releases between the two scenarios shouldn&#8217;t be different enough to change [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between an accelerating and a decelerating universe, and the data is already pretty close to it. I&#8217;ve read that the energy releases between the two scenarios shouldn&#8217;t be different enough to change [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did this Supernova Leave Nothing Behind? [Starts With A Bang] &#124; &#124; Dennis FlintDennis Flint</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221721</link>
		<dc:creator>Did this Supernova Leave Nothing Behind? [Starts With A Bang] &#124; &#124; Dennis FlintDennis Flint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221721</guid>
		<description>[...] (Image credit: Phil Plait / Bad Astronomy.) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Image credit: Phil Plait / Bad Astronomy.) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What makes a supernova so super, anyway? [Starts With A Bang] &#124; Digital Brain ; Science and Technology News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221720</link>
		<dc:creator>What makes a supernova so super, anyway? [Starts With A Bang] &#124; Digital Brain ; Science and Technology News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221720</guid>
		<description>[...] (Image credit: Phil Plait.) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Image credit: Phil Plait.) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifemza.com &#187; AstroAlert: Type Ia supernova in M101!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221719</link>
		<dc:creator>lifemza.com &#187; AstroAlert: Type Ia supernova in M101!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 06:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221719</guid>
		<description>[...] an aside, I&#039;ll note that this supernova won&#039;t get bright enough to see naked eye and poses no threat at all to us here on Earth. It may be visible in decent-sized telescopes, though, and as you&#039;ll see this may be a very [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an aside, I&#039;ll note that this supernova won&#039;t get bright enough to see naked eye and poses no threat at all to us here on Earth. It may be visible in decent-sized telescopes, though, and as you&#039;ll see this may be a very [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Stuff: Late February 2010 &#171; The Outer Hoard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221718</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Stuff: Late February 2010 &#171; The Outer Hoard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221718</guid>
		<description>[...] Surprises regarding type Ia supernovae. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Surprises regarding type Ia supernovae. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221717</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221717</guid>
		<description>@ ^ IVAN3MAN AT LARGE : Ah yes. Thanks. That&#039;s cool - first I&#039;d heard of that &amp; yes, sorry, I missed seeing that in your earlier comment. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ^ IVAN3MAN AT LARGE : Ah yes. Thanks. That&#8217;s cool &#8211; first I&#8217;d heard of that &amp; yes, sorry, I missed seeing that in your earlier comment. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN AT LARGE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221716</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN AT LARGE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221716</guid>
		<description>Messier Tidy Upper:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Could there have been some mass transfer between the then Red giant Pup and Sirius A back when the originally B4 star was evolving towards white dwarf-dom?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
As I&#039;ve already mentioned, at the end of the second paragraph of my post (#31) above, Sirius B -- while it passed through the red giant stage -- may have enriched the &lt;b&gt;metallicity&lt;/b&gt; of its companion.
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Could this have effected the “Dogstar” (Sirius A) and could we learn anything of that somehow?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
According to the Wikipedia (Sirius) article, the spectrum of Sirius A shows deep metallic lines, indicating an enhancement in elements heavier than helium, such as iron -- 316% greater proportion of iron to hydrogen in its atmosphere than that in the Sun&#039;s atmosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Messier Tidy Upper:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Could there have been some mass transfer between the then Red giant Pup and Sirius A back when the originally B4 star was evolving towards white dwarf-dom?</i></p></blockquote>
<p>As I&#8217;ve already mentioned, at the end of the second paragraph of my post (#31) above, Sirius B &#8212; while it passed through the red giant stage &#8212; may have enriched the <b>metallicity</b> of its companion.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Could this have effected the “Dogstar” (Sirius A) and could we learn anything of that somehow?</i></p></blockquote>
<p>According to the Wikipedia (Sirius) article, the spectrum of Sirius A shows deep metallic lines, indicating an enhancement in elements heavier than helium, such as iron &#8212; 316% greater proportion of iron to hydrogen in its atmosphere than that in the Sun&#8217;s atmosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221715</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221715</guid>
		<description>Awesome post BA - loved it. :-D
Wish I&#039;d checked in here &amp; read about / posted on this sooner.

Also surprised to hear this as I too thought accretion was the main cause for type Ia Supernovae &amp; not merger.

@ 31. IVAN3MAN AT LARGE :

Could there have been some mass transfer between the then Red giant Pup and Sirius A back when the originally B4 ( ;-) ) star was evolving towards white dwarf-dom? Could this have effected the &quot;Dogstar&quot; (Sirius A)  and could we learn anything of that somehow? Does anyone know?

Also the &quot;Little Dogstar&quot; Procyon is coincidentally quite a similiar system &amp; situation only with stars that are lower in spectral type &lt;i&gt;(F5 V-IV &amp; white dwarf)&lt;/i&gt; &amp; thus slightly dimmer and slightly further away. &lt;i&gt;(11 ly vs 9.)&lt;/i&gt; The two Procyonese stars are closer together &lt;i&gt;(15 AU vs 19 AU)&lt;/i&gt; and thus harder to split too. See Kaler&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Stars&lt;/i&gt; site&#039;s Procyon page :

http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/procyon.html

Wonder if this finding means that these two &lt;i&gt;(very remotely concievably)&lt;/i&gt; potentially dangerous supernova candidates

HR 8210 : http://jumk.de/astronomie/special-stars/hr-8210.shtml

&amp; T Pyxidis : http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/07/no-a-nearby-supernova-wont-wipe-us-out/

are safer &amp; less dangerous than thought then? :-)





</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post BA &#8211; loved it. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Wish I&#8217;d checked in here &amp; read about / posted on this sooner.</p>
<p>Also surprised to hear this as I too thought accretion was the main cause for type Ia Supernovae &amp; not merger.</p>
<p>@ 31. IVAN3MAN AT LARGE :</p>
<p>Could there have been some mass transfer between the then Red giant Pup and Sirius A back when the originally B4 ( <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) star was evolving towards white dwarf-dom? Could this have effected the &#8220;Dogstar&#8221; (Sirius A)  and could we learn anything of that somehow? Does anyone know?</p>
<p>Also the &#8220;Little Dogstar&#8221; Procyon is coincidentally quite a similiar system &amp; situation only with stars that are lower in spectral type <i>(F5 V-IV &amp; white dwarf)</i> &amp; thus slightly dimmer and slightly further away. <i>(11 ly vs 9.)</i> The two Procyonese stars are closer together <i>(15 AU vs 19 AU)</i> and thus harder to split too. See Kaler&#8217;s <i>Stars</i> site&#8217;s Procyon page :</p>
<p><a href="http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/procyon.html" rel="nofollow">http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/procyon.html</a></p>
<p>Wonder if this finding means that these two <i>(very remotely concievably)</i> potentially dangerous supernova candidates</p>
<p>HR 8210 : <a href="http://jumk.de/astronomie/special-stars/hr-8210.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://jumk.de/astronomie/special-stars/hr-8210.shtml</a></p>
<p>&amp; T Pyxidis : <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/07/no-a-nearby-supernova-wont-wipe-us-out/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/07/no-a-nearby-supernova-wont-wipe-us-out/</a></p>
<p>are safer &amp; less dangerous than thought then? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN AT LARGE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221714</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN AT LARGE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221714</guid>
		<description>@ Cindy, and AliCali,

Reviewing the (brief) answer I gave in my post above, I now realize that I should have been more specific, but I was in a rush. I had based my answer on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius#System&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;blue&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Sirius binary system&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, in which the two stars orbit around their common centre of gravity at a distance of about 20 astronomical units (approximately the distance between the Sun and Uranus) from each other over a period of 49.9 years. Sirius A, the brighter component, is a main sequence star of spectral type A1V, with a mass of about &lt;b&gt;2.1 times that of the Sun&lt;/b&gt;; whereas Sirius B, a white dwarf, is &lt;b&gt;0.98 solar masses&lt;/b&gt;, which is nearly double the average of 0.5 to 0.6 solar masses for white dwarfs, but packs that mass into &lt;i&gt; a volume approximately the size of the Earth!&lt;/i&gt;

The age of the Sirius binary system has been estimated at around 230 million years. Since a white dwarf only forms after the star has evolved from the main sequence and then passed through a red giant stage, it is estimated that when Sirius B was less than half its current age, approximately 120 million years ago, the original star had a mass of about &lt;b&gt;5 solar masses&lt;/b&gt; and was a type B4-5 star when it still was on the main sequence before eventually shedding most of its mass after passing through the red giant stage; it may also have enriched the metallicity of its companion as a result.

It is predicted that Sirius A will have completely exhausted the store of hydrogen at its core within a billion years of its formation. At this point, it will also pass through a red giant stage, then eventually shed its outer layers and settle down to become a white dwarf; however, I do &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; think that  this &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_star#Binary_star_evolution&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;blue&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;binary star&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; pair are close enough for mass transfer to occur resulting in a nova or Type Ia supernova. (Just as well; otherwise, it might be curtains for all of us!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Cindy, and AliCali,</p>
<p>Reviewing the (brief) answer I gave in my post above, I now realize that I should have been more specific, but I was in a rush. I had based my answer on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius#System" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font color="blue"><u>Sirius binary system</u></font></a>, in which the two stars orbit around their common centre of gravity at a distance of about 20 astronomical units (approximately the distance between the Sun and Uranus) from each other over a period of 49.9 years. Sirius A, the brighter component, is a main sequence star of spectral type A1V, with a mass of about <b>2.1 times that of the Sun</b>; whereas Sirius B, a white dwarf, is <b>0.98 solar masses</b>, which is nearly double the average of 0.5 to 0.6 solar masses for white dwarfs, but packs that mass into <i> a volume approximately the size of the Earth!</i></p>
<p>The age of the Sirius binary system has been estimated at around 230 million years. Since a white dwarf only forms after the star has evolved from the main sequence and then passed through a red giant stage, it is estimated that when Sirius B was less than half its current age, approximately 120 million years ago, the original star had a mass of about <b>5 solar masses</b> and was a type B4-5 star when it still was on the main sequence before eventually shedding most of its mass after passing through the red giant stage; it may also have enriched the metallicity of its companion as a result.</p>
<p>It is predicted that Sirius A will have completely exhausted the store of hydrogen at its core within a billion years of its formation. At this point, it will also pass through a red giant stage, then eventually shed its outer layers and settle down to become a white dwarf; however, I do <b>not</b> think that  this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_star#Binary_star_evolution" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font color="blue"><u>binary star</u></font></a> pair are close enough for mass transfer to occur resulting in a nova or Type Ia supernova. (Just as well; otherwise, it might be curtains for all of us!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/18/dwarf-merging-makes-for-an-explosive-combo/#comment-221713</link>
		<dc:creator>Murff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=11821#comment-221713</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take this time to thank Phil for his blog.  I love this stuff, and he always makes it a good read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take this time to thank Phil for his blog.  I love this stuff, and he always makes it a good read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-19 14:22:07 -->