DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Evolution: that’s a rap
Hubble sees ancient galaxies rejuvenating themselves »

The Doctor and the supernova

If I had a TARDIS, you know the first thing I would do is go see what a supernova looks like up close. I’ve even tossed around the idea of a little fanfic… but Megan Argo beat me to it. She’s a radio astronomer at the Curtin University of Technology in Australia, and she wrote up a cute and engaging account of The Doctor and Martha witnessing an unusual exploding star (an audio version of the tale is available too)

The cool thing is, the story she wrote is actually part of a real event: the explosion of supernova SN2007gr, the death of a massive star. 2007gr was a Type Ic supernova, which is a star much more massive than the Sun, but has lost the majority of its outer layers over time due to a super-stellar wind. The core is basically all that’s left, and when it runs out of fuel it collapses and then explodes.

TARDIS_SN

2007gr was seen to have gas screaming away from it at almost half the speed of light, far faster than is typical for an exploding star. That means that the gas was focused into twin beams, probably shaped that way by the material swirling around the newly-formed black hole at its heart that formed in milliseconds after the collapse. It wasn’t strong enough to be a monumentally violent gamma-ray burst, but it instead a sort-of hybrid object, one part normal supernova and one part GRB. We’ve known for some time that there is a connection between the two objects, but the actual events are difficult to study because they’re uncommon. Supernova 2007gr is a rare opportunity to study one in detail.

But not as much detail as we could see if we had a time machine. Oh Doctor, there are some many things you could show us. But, I suppose, most of the fun is in figuring it out for ourselves.

Related posts:
New Burst Vaproizes Cosmic Distance Record
GORT bags a burst
Earth was in the crosshairs

Image: SN: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss; TARDIS: BBC; composition: Megan Argo

Share

February 18th, 2010 2:05 PM Tags: Doctor Who, GRB, SN2007gr, supernova
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Geekery, SciFi, TV/Movies | 15 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

15 Responses to “The Doctor and the supernova”

  1. 1.   Keith Harwood Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    I think you mean Curtin University, not Curtain.

  2. 2.   Dan Wallace Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    The first thing I’d do is check out some dinosaurs. Why has no companion ever demanded that the Doctor take them to the Cretaceous? What is wrong with these people?

  3. 3.   Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    @Dan Wallace: Just don’t go sightseeing on the same day Adric shows up.

  4. 4.   Jim Seymour Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    Dan, even if the companion asked, it’s possible the Doctor wouldn’t oblige. After all, he was there when the anti-matter from a space freighter killed all the dinosaurs – and he lost one of his companions in the process! It’s probably kind of a sore point with him.

    I know it was a shock to me… http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Earthshock

  5. 5.   Arthur Taylor Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    Didn’t he use energy from a supernova to have his hologram moment with Rose? I doubt he gets that excited about them though, since his people invented black holes…

    Oh gods I’m such a geek. :/

  6. 6.   Jamey Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Um… Just how close do you call “up close”? I think at 40-50 AUs, it might be a little unhealthy. In fact, a parsec might be a bit unhealthy.

  7. 7.   IMForeman Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    Hooray! You posted it! I was hoping you would.

  8. 8.   Megan Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 7:00 pm

    Haha, fantastic! Cheers Phil :-)

    @Keith you’re right, it is Curtin rather than Curtain… don’t you love spell check?!

  9. 9.   jcm Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Unfortunately my cable provider does include BBC in the basic package, so I can’t watch this show.

  10. 10.   jcm Says:
    February 18th, 2010 at 11:45 pm

    Edit: I found this clip on YouTbe, but I does not do justice, I think, to a supernova explosion. Fast forward to about 2:00

  11. 11.   Phillip Helbig Says:
    February 19th, 2010 at 5:30 am

    I think that you should have a persistent topic for random suggestions, perhaps something you want to elabourate on, as opposed to followups to particular posts. Since you don’t, I’ll post a non-relevant comment here, since you might be interested in expanding it into a post. The text is in German, but the video is self-explanatory.

    http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/gadgets/0,1518,678817-3,00.html

    Not only does the machine solve Rubik’s cube, but the machine is built out of Legos!

  12. 12.   The Science Pundit Says:
    February 19th, 2010 at 6:27 am

    Hm, in the audio version they changed Martha to Emma.

    I doubt he gets that excited about them though, since his people invented black holes…

    I don’t know about that. He gets excited over all sorts of things that he shouldn’t get excited about.

  13. 13.   Megan Says:
    February 19th, 2010 at 7:31 am

    @jcm That’s when the Sun turns into a red giant: neat, but not quite as violent as a supernova ;-)

    @TheSciencePundit Yes, they did that because the Darker Projects team produce their own fan fiction version of Doctor Who. They modified the story I wrote for their existing characters to fit in with that series.

  14. 14.   Navneeth Says:
    February 19th, 2010 at 11:48 am

    Oh, so this Doctor Who character isn’t actually human? Hm, didn’t know that.

    And to Megan Argo, that was very nice piece of work. Kids should be made to read stuff like this.

  15. 15.   Megan Says:
    March 1st, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    @Navneeth Thanks! But I would hope that kids might read stuff like this because it’s fun, education by stealth ;-)

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse
      • Volcano in taupe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
      • Science Getaways: Update | Bad Astronomy
      • Exoplanet in a triple star system smack dab in the habitable zone | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us