DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Wonders of the solar system
Am I a Geek Dad? »

Lonely galaxy is lonely. But it ate its friends.

Do cannibals have friends? I imagine some must… unless they have them over for dinner.

Just like the giant elliptical galaxy ESO 306-17, which you can see in this gorgeous Hubble picture:

ESO-306-17

[Click to embiggen, or grab the monster 3800 x 3800 pixel version. They have wallpapers, too.]

ESO 306-17 sits about a billion light years from Earth. In this picture it looks like it’s surrounded by other galaxies, but that’s an illusion: all the other galaxies you see here are either much closer to us or much farther away. ESO 306-17 is actually a loner, sitting all by itself in space.[Update: Or almost all alone; Michael West, who led the team that took these images, tells me the little elliptical at the bottom left of ESO 306-17 may be interacting with it. It's difficult to tell; but what is certain is that there are very few galaxies near the big one, far fewer than you'd expect.]

How can a galaxy get this big and yet be sitting in a giant void? Easy. It ate all the neighbors. We know this is how galaxies grow in size, and is even why the Milky Way is a giant among galaxies. Like our galaxy, ESO 306-17 has a lot of globular clusters around it, just as you’d expect if it ate a bunch of other galaxies.

When I downloaded the bigger image, I noticed this weird galaxy on the left:

ESO-306-17_detail

Wow. I’m guessing that long stretched-out junk is a small galaxy that got shredded, maybe after a close pass to that spiral. I thought for a moment the spiral might be active — that is, the black hole in its core was actively eating matter and ejecting long jets of gas and light — but the core itself is not bright, as you’d expect. Plus, the material is lumpy and irregular, more indicative of a cosmic collision in progress. It’s unrelated to the elliptical, but still very cool.

I really urge you to download the big image and take a nice, long look at it. There’s a lot to see, and it’s all really beautiful.

Image credit: NASA, ESA and Michael West (ESO)

Share

March 8th, 2010 7:00 AM Tags: cannibalism, elliptical galaxies, Hubble Space Telescope
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures | 34 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

34 Responses to “Lonely galaxy is lonely. But it ate its friends.”

  1. 1.   Lewis Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 7:37 am

    I’m guessing some of those spiral galaxies are closer? If so, then that is one beastly galaxy. No wonder it has no friends! It’s hogging the camera, sheesh. <3 Hubble.

  2. 2.   Messier Tidy Upper Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 8:11 am

    Awesome image & write-up there – thanks. :-)

    ESO 306-17 doesn’t look lonely to me – it looks satiated. Or, in other words, full. Very full.

    Might I suggest the name : The Hannibal Lecter galaxy for it?

    Or worse, the disgusting obese Gluttony Guy from Seven Galaxy?
    ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_(film) )

    A serious question or three if anyone could enlighten us please :

    1) Is it visible in a medium size telescope (say 10 inch Meade?) – what is its apparent magnitude and position?

    2) Is it an Active Galactic Nucleus type – does it have jets and strong radio, UV, X-ray or Gamma ray emissions showing major activity as you might expect from its “eating” binge?

    3) How is its gravity effecting the nearby clusters – please tell me its not drawing us in! :-O

  3. 3.   Chris Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 8:25 am

    I had friends over! But I eated them… :(

  4. 4.   ND Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 8:36 am

    And what is ceiling galaxy doing?

  5. 5.   Mapnut Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 8:59 am

    I for one am sick of all this talk about galaxies “eating” other galaxies! (It’s ruining my life!) ;) It’s not like it’s digesting them and turning them into stellar poop. All those stars are just moving into a new neighborhood, and life is going on. How about “annexing” instead of eating?

  6. 6.   Cindy Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 9:13 am

    What, no fava beans and Chianti comments? ;-)

  7. 7.   ND Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 9:27 am

    Mapnut,

    How about mergers and acquisitions?

  8. 8.   Pi-needles Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 9:50 am

    5. Mapnut Says:

    I for one am sick of all this talk about galaxies “eating” other galaxies! (It’s ruining my life!)

    Err .. Sorry to hear that but .. *How*?? (Puzzled.)

    @ 4. ND Says:

    And what is ceiling galaxy doing?

    Ceiling galaxy – which one is that? Given that space (& our cosmos) has NO up or down how can you tell “ceiling galaxy” from “floor galaxy?”

    Or am I missing something here?

  9. 9.   Pieter Kok Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 9:57 am

    Mapnut and ND, if you look at the mice galaxy, clearly the partners are being stripped of their assets.

  10. 10.   Protological nazi Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 10:02 am

    No wonder that bloated, gluttonous, cannibal galaxy, ESO 306-17, is lonely and shunned by all the other galaxies – it is sitting in the centre of its own massive (post-digestive process) Void! Ewww! ;-)

    (Disgusting, I know but sorry I couldn’t resist.)

  11. 11.   Vernon Balbert Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 10:03 am

    Ceiling Galaxy is a reference to Ceiling Cat. Ceiling Cat is the cat above who watches you do bad things:

    http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/ceilingcat9xd.jpg

    Correspondingly there’s Basement Cat who makes you do bad things:

    http://icanhascheezburger.com/2008/03/23/funny-pictures-bad-solz-go-to-basement/

    So it figures that there’s a Basement Galaxy that made this galaxy eat up his neighbors.

  12. 12.   Chip Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 10:16 am

    What accounts for the evenness, apparent dustless overall smooth and diffuse appearance of the zillions of stars in ESO 306-17 (aside from the bright core)? It appears gigantic yet devoid of obvious clusters, dust, nebulae.

    And yes, the many galaxies behind and in front of it are beautiful.

  13. 13.   Lewis Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 11:16 am

    I don’t know about Ceiling Galaxy but…

    CEILING CAT AHHH!!!

    :-o

  14. 14.   Navneeth Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 11:17 am

    Chip, this one is an elliptical galaxy — it’s more or less an “Old Age Home” sort of place. Here, you won’t see much activity like star formation (which gives rise to dust clouds and bright reflection nebulae and such).

  15. 15.   kevlar Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 11:22 am

    The “haze” of a billion stars makes me wonder if any planet there even knows what night is.

  16. 16.   Ad Hominid Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 11:45 am

    “Might I suggest the name : The Hannibal Lecter galaxy for it?”

    Nah, the Alferd Packer Galaxy. Alferd was a real person after all and his, er, dinner guests had been his traveling companions if not exactly friends.

    Packer is a legend in popular culture of course. My favorite line from the whole story was the alleged statement by the judge upon pronouncing sentence, “”Stand up, Alferd Packer, you voracious, man-eating, (deleted). There were seven Democrats in Hinsdale County, and you ate five of them.”
    These days, the introduction of this political angle would almost certainly be grounds for appeal.

  17. 17.   Johnny Vector Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 12:03 pm

    From the press release: “In this image, taken by the Advanced Camera for Surveys aboard Hubble in November 2008…” And I have to say this is the first image I’ve seen (other than the “first light” one) taken with the repaired Advanced Camera for Surveys. Yee-haw! Shore is purty!

    It looks like a very low surface brightness, which means you need a very low background to get a good image. Hubble being above the glow of the sky helps a lot, but you still need a really low-noise camera to get a clean picture. And ACS is even lower noise after the repair than it was when brand new!

  18. 18.   Josh Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    Phil:

    I agree with you that the smaller “shredding event” you noticed is just that: the result of a galaxy merger. More evidence can be seen in the the lower lefthand quadrant of the spiral galaxy itself, perhaps more noticeable without “embiggenation”. It is possible to trace the tidal tail back to a second galactic bulge that appears to be passing through the plane of the other galaxy at that location. The tidal tail appears connected in much the same way as the tadpole galaxy:

    http://www.stsci.edu/~inr/thisweek1/thisweek/tadpole_hst.jpg

  19. 19.   GT Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    Two cannibal galaxies were eating a clown galaxy. One turns to the other and asks, “Does this galaxy taste funny to you?” Ba-da-bump!

  20. 20.   ND Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    Ceiling cat iz whuching ovr ur galakseez.

  21. 21.   DMD Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Johnny Vector, the data can’t be taken in November 2008. ACS broken down in January 2007, and it was fixed in May 2009. There should be a typo on the press release text.

  22. 22.   Meng Bomin Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    @kevlar:
    Sure they would. The difference between night and day is a matter of degree. Most of these deep space images require long exposures precisely because relative to the amount of light that our star gives us during the day time, other celestial objects appear quite dim. If you look up at the night sky and see the band of the Milky Way, you know that it is filled with stars beyond human comprehension and yet it would be foolish to suggest that they produce the illusion of day.

    If you are close enough to a star, it can easily outshine the billions or trillions of companions that comprise the rest of the galaxy.

  23. 23.   John Paradox Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    ‘it ate its friends’ reminds me of an old joke:

    all flesh is grass
    smoke a friend!

    J/P=?

  24. 24.   Harold Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    GT @ 18, if there IS a clown galaxy, I hope it gets eaten.

    The galaxy in the second image is clearly firing a barrage of missiles at its neighbors. When will they ever learn?

  25. 25.   Chip Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    Thanks for the explanation Navneeth.

    I also like the cool rotating video with eerie SciFi music (Krel musicians) on the space telescope website Phil links too above. Great stuff.

  26. 26.   Pi-needles Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 8:33 pm

    @ 11. Vernon Balbert Says:

    Ceiling Galaxy is a reference to Ceiling Cat. Ceiling Cat is the cat above who watches you do bad things:

    &
    13. Lewis Says:

    I don’t know about Ceiling Galaxy but… Ceiling cat is still watching you.

    Thanks! That’s cool – and Lewis that’s one big cat there! Great juxtaposition & image. :-)

  27. 27.   kuhnigget Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 8:52 pm

    Waiter: “Perhaps Mssr (Messier?) would be interested in a thin Milky Wafer?”

    -

    Late to the party. Python references, anyone?

  28. 28.   Doug Watts Says:
    March 8th, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    The extremo pix you can download now from Hubble let anyone explore as if they had camera time on Hubble. This is why, in my opinion, Hubble is the best investment NASA has ever made. Getting out of the atmosphere trap is the key.

  29. 29.   Johnny Vector Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 6:58 am

    DMD: D’oh, you’re right. Somehow it seems like it’s been a lot more than a year since the mission. I guess that’s because I really stopped working on it in October 2008, when it was supposed to launch (before the SIC&DH failed), and just took a short return to HST-land in May of last year for the launch and mission. Or maybe it’s because time passes differently when you’re not working for Frank Cepollina!

    I see the caption now says it was taken in 2005. So still pre-failure. So imagine what this would look like with 20% less video noise!

  30. 30.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 10:00 am

    13. Lewis:

    Cats and galaxies have (at least) one thing in common(besides both being composed of star dust); if something is moving in their vicinity, it’ll get trapped and eaten,,,

    Snark!!!

    Gary 7

  31. 31.   Andrew Says:
    March 9th, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    The first picture is absolutely gorgeous. The central object almost reminds me of viewing a globular cluster through a backyard telescope. Nice article Phil.

  32. 32.   Claire C Smith Says:
    March 12th, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    That 1st picture is one of the best Astronomy pics I’ve seen for a long time. The definition seems too good some how and it looks three dimensional.

    “Lonely galaxy is lonely. But it ate its friends.”

    Great title!

    Claire

  33. 33.   Alan Says:
    March 12th, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    I wonder how many billions or trillions of sentient beings (if any – depends on unknown Drake equation factors) lost their lives in that event.

    Similary when our galaxy meets its fate with Andromeda distant observers will not know of or hear our cries of anquish. Well if not our cries, then perhaps the cries of some future civilization that is today represented by some simply multicelluar creature somewhere in our galaxy or in Andromeda.

    I’m not seriously suggesting that we should mourn that which we do not even know exists or would even be capable of identifying with. But I’m just saying….

  34. 34.   Troythulu’s Nu’z « The Call of Troythulu Says:
    March 15th, 2010 at 6:46 pm

    [...] Lonely galaxy is lonely, but it ate its friends — The Bad Astronomer posts on a giant elliptical galaxy, ESO 306-17, that grew to its present size by devouring all of its neighbors. It’s just sitting out in deep space all by itself, with no more dwarf galaxies to help keep it company. of course, it did pull a Hannibal Lecter on them, so this is no surprise to my Troythuluness. This galaxy being about a billion light years from Earth, Phil provides some cool pics of it for embiggening, showing other galaxies, most a bit smaller, a lot further away or a lot closer to us than they seem, and in any even too far from it to be eaten… [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse
      • Volcano in taupe
      • I’m giving a talk at Eastern Michigan University Feb. 15
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
      • Science Getaways: Update | Bad Astronomy
      • Exoplanet in a triple star system smack dab in the habitable zone | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us