<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SDO opens its eyes and sees our star like never before</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#62;A HUGE looping prominence on the Sun! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine &#124; Blake&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-383302</link>
		<dc:creator>&#62;A HUGE looping prominence on the Sun! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine &#124; Blake&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-383302</guid>
		<description>[...] First, there is very little danger to Earth from this event. Prominences like this tend to be local to the Sun, and collapse after a few hours. As far as I can tell, there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, there is very little danger to Earth from this event. Prominences like this tend to be local to the Sun, and collapse after a few hours. As far as I can tell, there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILD: A HUGE looping prominence on the Sun! LOOK! &#124; The Hive Daily &#8211; Raw. Unfiltered. Fearless</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-342845</link>
		<dc:creator>WILD: A HUGE looping prominence on the Sun! LOOK! &#124; The Hive Daily &#8211; Raw. Unfiltered. Fearless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-342845</guid>
		<description>[...] First, there is very little danger to Earth from this event. Prominences like this tend to be local to the Sun, and collapse after a few hours. As far as I can tell, there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, there is very little danger to Earth from this event. Prominences like this tend to be local to the Sun, and collapse after a few hours. As far as I can tell, there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The boiling, erupting sun! &#124; Th3 Collection</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-326372</link>
		<dc:creator>The boiling, erupting sun! &#124; Th3 Collection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-326372</guid>
		<description>[...] loops piercing the Sun’s surface. When we see them against the Sun’s surface they’re called filaments, and when they arc against the background sky on the edge of the Sun’s disk they’re called [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] loops piercing the Sun’s surface. When we see them against the Sun’s surface they’re called filaments, and when they arc against the background sky on the edge of the Sun’s disk they’re called [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkage #7: Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back &#124; r3dux.org</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-279686</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkage #7: Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back &#124; r3dux.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-279686</guid>
		<description>[...] NASA&#8217;s new toy &#8211; the SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) has opened its eyes and started staring at the sun: and it&#8217;s beautiful&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NASA&#8217;s new toy &#8211; the SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) has opened its eyes and started staring at the sun: and it&#8217;s beautiful&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-263064</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 07:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-263064</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dmu5WVtiXPI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dmu5WVtiXPI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dmu5WVtiXPI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262594</link>
		<dc:creator>Just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262594</guid>
		<description>@ IVAN3MAN (#32)

Heh. I guess if I&#039;d learned to use &lt;em&gt;teh internets&lt;/em&gt; properly, I could have looked that up myself. ;-) But thanks for the clarification, IVAN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ IVAN3MAN (#32)</p>
<p>Heh. I guess if I&#8217;d learned to use <em>teh internets</em> properly, I could have looked that up myself. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  But thanks for the clarification, IVAN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beautiful space image &#8212; the sun &#171; David Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262576</link>
		<dc:creator>Beautiful space image &#8212; the sun &#171; David Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 06:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262576</guid>
		<description>[...] read the Bad Astronomer (see blogroll) in while and happened to yesterday only to find a post with this image and more explanation, plus another very cool image from the SDO.)    Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read the Bad Astronomer (see blogroll) in while and happened to yesterday only to find a post with this image and more explanation, plus another very cool image from the SDO.)    Leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262567</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 03:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262567</guid>
		<description>All I see is a Quicktime logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I see is a Quicktime logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JGH-4774</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262516</link>
		<dc:creator>JGH-4774</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262516</guid>
		<description>Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN AT LARGE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262471</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN AT LARGE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 13:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262471</guid>
		<description>@ Just me (#31),

From Wikipedia -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin#Usage_conventions&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;blue&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Kelvin (Usage conventions)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Until the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) in 1967–1968, the unit kelvin was called a &quot;degree&quot;, the same as with the other temperature scales at the time. It was distinguished from the other scales with either the adjective suffix &quot;Kelvin&quot; (&quot;degree Kelvin&quot;) or with &quot;absolute&quot; (&quot;degree absolute&quot;) and its symbol was °K. The latter (degree absolute), which was the unit’s official name from 1948 until 1954, was rather ambiguous since it could also be interpreted as referring to the Rankine scale. Before the 13th CGPM, the plural form was &quot;degrees absolute&quot;. &lt;b&gt;The 13th CGPM changed the name to simply &quot;kelvin&quot; (symbol K).&lt;/b&gt; The omission of &quot;degree&quot; indicates that it is not relative to an arbitrary reference point like the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales, but rather an absolute unit of measure which can be manipulated algebraically (e.g., multiplied by two to indicate twice the amount of &quot;mean energy&quot; available among elementary degrees of freedom of the system).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;hr width=&quot;50%&quot; align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;
(My emphasis.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Just me (#31),</p>
<p>From Wikipedia &#8212; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin#Usage_conventions" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font color="blue"><u>Kelvin (Usage conventions)</u></font></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Until the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) in 1967–1968, the unit kelvin was called a &#8220;degree&#8221;, the same as with the other temperature scales at the time. It was distinguished from the other scales with either the adjective suffix &#8220;Kelvin&#8221; (&#8220;degree Kelvin&#8221;) or with &#8220;absolute&#8221; (&#8220;degree absolute&#8221;) and its symbol was °K. The latter (degree absolute), which was the unit’s official name from 1948 until 1954, was rather ambiguous since it could also be interpreted as referring to the Rankine scale. Before the 13th CGPM, the plural form was &#8220;degrees absolute&#8221;. <b>The 13th CGPM changed the name to simply &#8220;kelvin&#8221; (symbol K).</b> The omission of &#8220;degree&#8221; indicates that it is not relative to an arbitrary reference point like the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales, but rather an absolute unit of measure which can be manipulated algebraically (e.g., multiplied by two to indicate twice the amount of &#8220;mean energy&#8221; available among elementary degrees of freedom of the system).</p></blockquote>
<hr width="50%" align="left"/>
(My emphasis.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262457</link>
		<dc:creator>Just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 10:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262457</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious. So, is it 60,000 Kelvin, or 60,000 degrees Kelvin? I&#039;ve heard it both ways—and I&#039;ve always heard it &quot;corrected&quot; as 60,000 Kelvin (sans &quot;degrees&quot;). Science is confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious. So, is it 60,000 Kelvin, or 60,000 degrees Kelvin? I&#8217;ve heard it both ways—and I&#8217;ve always heard it &#8220;corrected&#8221; as 60,000 Kelvin (sans &#8220;degrees&#8221;). Science is confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Major</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262379</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262379</guid>
		<description>I was also &quot;away from my computer&quot; when these were released and had to wait to see them! But yeah.....crazy cool stuff. Love how the prominence twists as it tears away from the Sun!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also &#8220;away from my computer&#8221; when these were released and had to wait to see them! But yeah&#8230;..crazy cool stuff. Love how the prominence twists as it tears away from the Sun!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262370</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 15:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262370</guid>
		<description>&quot;Science is like a tapestry with no edge, and with holes located here and there in the fabric. We can fill those holes ever more, and explore the edges, pushing them back with each new discovery. Along with many other observatories like it, SDO is our loom that helps us create and follow that weave.&quot;

Ah, THERE&#039;s the poetry. I knew it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Science is like a tapestry with no edge, and with holes located here and there in the fabric. We can fill those holes ever more, and explore the edges, pushing them back with each new discovery. Along with many other observatories like it, SDO is our loom that helps us create and follow that weave.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, THERE&#8217;s the poetry. I knew it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mitcham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mitcham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 10:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262342</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the new desktop wallpaper, Phil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the new desktop wallpaper, Phil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262323</guid>
		<description>17.   Bob Woolley Asks: &quot;You mention the “surface” of the sun eight times. My understanding has long been that the sun has no surface. Rather, there is a continuous gradient of gaseous density. Can you explain what you mean by “surface” in this post?&quot;

Generally, the &quot;surface&quot; of the sun is the part called the photosphere, the layer that emits the light that we see. This is the first opaque layer, so we can&#039;t see below it and the ones above it are (obviously) transparent, at least in visible light.

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>17.   Bob Woolley Asks: &#8220;You mention the “surface” of the sun eight times. My understanding has long been that the sun has no surface. Rather, there is a continuous gradient of gaseous density. Can you explain what you mean by “surface” in this post?&#8221;</p>
<p>Generally, the &#8220;surface&#8221; of the sun is the part called the photosphere, the layer that emits the light that we see. This is the first opaque layer, so we can&#8217;t see below it and the ones above it are (obviously) transparent, at least in visible light.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zincink</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262322</link>
		<dc:creator>zincink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 06:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262322</guid>
		<description>that is hawt with a W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is hawt with a W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262316</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 05:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262316</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Please answer the question in #12.

Thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Please answer the question in #12.</p>
<p>Thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Abbatiello</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262307</link>
		<dc:creator>James Abbatiello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262307</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t be the only person to be reminded of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX9FU8bmxQs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t be the only person to be reminded of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX9FU8bmxQs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX9FU8bmxQs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma McKay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262300</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 02:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262300</guid>
		<description>Absolutely gorgeous stuff. I&#039;m seriously jumping in my seat waiting for news on the magnetic field. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely gorgeous stuff. I&#8217;m seriously jumping in my seat waiting for news on the magnetic field. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Plait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262297</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Plait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262297</guid>
		<description>Mke (#21): Oh, real scientists know what a gas and plasma are. What you Electric Universe proponents don&#039;t seem to understand is that you need charge separation to get a current. The magnetic field of most plasma discharges from the Sun have their magnetic field embedded in them, but they are overall electrically neutral. 

The very fact that you think highly-trained scientists don&#039;t understand high school physics should give you a tiny clue that maybe your supposition is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mke (#21): Oh, real scientists know what a gas and plasma are. What you Electric Universe proponents don&#8217;t seem to understand is that you need charge separation to get a current. The magnetic field of most plasma discharges from the Sun have their magnetic field embedded in them, but they are overall electrically neutral. </p>
<p>The very fact that you think highly-trained scientists don&#8217;t understand high school physics should give you a tiny clue that maybe your supposition is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 00:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262291</guid>
		<description>it is not &#039;gas&#039; it is electrically charged plasma.. and the reason it seems to follow magnetic vectors is because moving charged particles in a plasma constitute an electric current, and electric currents are always accompanied by a magnetic field at right angles (Amperes Law). It is not complex at all, it is basic high school physics.. The mystery is how astronomers routinely forget these basic physical principles and pretend the 4th state of matter equals the 3rd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is not &#8216;gas&#8217; it is electrically charged plasma.. and the reason it seems to follow magnetic vectors is because moving charged particles in a plasma constitute an electric current, and electric currents are always accompanied by a magnetic field at right angles (Amperes Law). It is not complex at all, it is basic high school physics.. The mystery is how astronomers routinely forget these basic physical principles and pretend the 4th state of matter equals the 3rd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262283</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262283</guid>
		<description>@estarian
It was originally borrowed into English as &quot;physic&quot;. I think the -s came about through it being seen as a body of sciences rather than just one, but that&#039;s just a guess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@estarian<br />
It was originally borrowed into English as &#8220;physic&#8221;. I think the -s came about through it being seen as a body of sciences rather than just one, but that&#8217;s just a guess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain swoop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262277</link>
		<dc:creator>captain swoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262277</guid>
		<description>&#039;emprominate&#039;?

is that a cromulent word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;emprominate&#8217;?</p>
<p>is that a cromulent word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262276</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262276</guid>
		<description>Ooooo - purdy! I was looking at the top pic thinking &quot;so what could be new about this? We could get images like that from the ground 50 years ago.&quot;  I love that loop prominence - someone put a string through and hang that bauble on the christmas tree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooo &#8211; purdy! I was looking at the top pic thinking &#8220;so what could be new about this? We could get images like that from the ground 50 years ago.&#8221;  I love that loop prominence &#8211; someone put a string through and hang that bauble on the christmas tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Woolley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/30/sdo-opens-its-eyes-and-sees-our-star-like-never-before/comment-page-1/#comment-262261</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Woolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=14705#comment-262261</guid>
		<description>You mention the &quot;surface&quot; of the sun eight times. My understanding has long been that the sun has no surface. Rather, there is a continuous gradient of gaseous density. Can you explain what you mean by &quot;surface&quot; in this post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention the &#8220;surface&#8221; of the sun eight times. My understanding has long been that the sun has no surface. Rather, there is a continuous gradient of gaseous density. Can you explain what you mean by &#8220;surface&#8221; in this post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 21:51:31 -->
