<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cectic does pareidolia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-281407</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-281407</guid>
		<description>I saw it in terms of landing an ICBM on Mecca in about fifteen minutes.  Does NASA still do those?  (I&#039;ve missed a couple of [Daily Show] numbers, I don&#039;t know who&#039;s said what.)

Or maybe sharing the benefits of better weather forecasting by satellites, and other such things.  Without necessarily letting your neighbour borrow your car.

To get back to the actual topic, the comic strip ends with a &quot; :-) &quot; which is not a face (it could be a cookie), a stylised representation of a face (or of a couple of major features of a face).  Then again, a photograph of a face isn&#039;t a face.  A painting of a face isn&#039;t a face (but facepainting is a face, underneath).  &quot;Ceci n&#039;est pas un face&quot; - wait, that isn&#039;t right.  But in a photograph, there was a face, and in a painting, someone was thinking of a face, unless it&#039;s one of those weird ones where you can&#039;t tell.  When it comes to modern art, Poe&#039;s Law applies, but that isn&#039;t the point I wanted to make, which is that at least there&#039;s -meant- to be a face.  Mostly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it in terms of landing an ICBM on Mecca in about fifteen minutes.  Does NASA still do those?  (I&#8217;ve missed a couple of [Daily Show] numbers, I don&#8217;t know who&#8217;s said what.)</p>
<p>Or maybe sharing the benefits of better weather forecasting by satellites, and other such things.  Without necessarily letting your neighbour borrow your car.</p>
<p>To get back to the actual topic, the comic strip ends with a &#8221; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8221; which is not a face (it could be a cookie), a stylised representation of a face (or of a couple of major features of a face).  Then again, a photograph of a face isn&#8217;t a face.  A painting of a face isn&#8217;t a face (but facepainting is a face, underneath).  &#8220;Ceci n&#8217;est pas un face&#8221; &#8211; wait, that isn&#8217;t right.  But in a photograph, there was a face, and in a painting, someone was thinking of a face, unless it&#8217;s one of those weird ones where you can&#8217;t tell.  When it comes to modern art, Poe&#8217;s Law applies, but that isn&#8217;t the point I wanted to make, which is that at least there&#8217;s -meant- to be a face.  Mostly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daumier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-281375</link>
		<dc:creator>Daumier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-281375</guid>
		<description>Cectic is back and running again? *Does a happy dance*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cectic is back and running again? *Does a happy dance*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-281281</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-281281</guid>
		<description>Denny.. who&#039;s the one wearing blinders?

Did we reach out to the USSR because NASA was directed to reach out to &quot;Atheist&quot; countries?
Did we reach out to Japan because NASA was directed to reach out to Shinto countries?
Did we reach out to India because NASA was directed to reach out to Hindu countries?

Also, did I say that we should exclude people because of their religion?  Not at all.  What I did say, is that we should not be using NASA to reach out to people of a particular faith.  Much less one that if you mock, or question, you are opening yourself up to riots and threats of murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denny.. who&#8217;s the one wearing blinders?</p>
<p>Did we reach out to the USSR because NASA was directed to reach out to &#8220;Atheist&#8221; countries?<br />
Did we reach out to Japan because NASA was directed to reach out to Shinto countries?<br />
Did we reach out to India because NASA was directed to reach out to Hindu countries?</p>
<p>Also, did I say that we should exclude people because of their religion?  Not at all.  What I did say, is that we should not be using NASA to reach out to people of a particular faith.  Much less one that if you mock, or question, you are opening yourself up to riots and threats of murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-281200</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-281200</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We used NASA to build bridges with the Soviet Union&lt;/i&gt;

Soviet Union? Are they still around? ;-) Actually, with talk of spy trades in the news today one wonders. Just as long as we get Sydney and Jack Bristow back.

Whoops! That Russian cargo ship just flew past my office window. :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We used NASA to build bridges with the Soviet Union</i></p>
<p>Soviet Union? Are they still around? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Actually, with talk of spy trades in the news today one wonders. Just as long as we get Sydney and Jack Bristow back.</p>
<p>Whoops! That Russian cargo ship just flew past my office window. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennyMo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-281034</link>
		<dc:creator>DennyMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-281034</guid>
		<description>DS... Sigh... Keep wearing your blinders.

We&#039;ve already used NASA to reach out to Christian, Hebrew, Atheist, Shinto, Buddhist, and Hindu nations.  We used NASA to build bridges with the Soviet Union (a government which had been numerically far more bloody than &quot;modern Islam&quot;) and foster cooperation with other countries around the world, this is another side of the same coin.  As others have stated, the parts of the world that are largely Muslim have, both historically and currently, made non-trivial contributions to math, science, and technology.  Does it makes sense to exclude their possible contributions in the arena of space, simply because some of their kin are homicidal maniacs?  

Is there cause for concern?  Certainly, we don&#039;t want to &quot;give&quot; technology to a nation that would end up being used against us (though we seem to do that all the time with non-Muslims).  But thoughtful caution is not the same as wholesale exclusion of an entire ethnic/religious group.

(BTW, &quot;Who&#039;s Bolden?&quot;  Really?  You don&#039;t know who Bolden is?  You started this sidebar, and don&#039;t even know who made the statements you&#039;re all tizzied about?  Wow.  Just, wow.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DS&#8230; Sigh&#8230; Keep wearing your blinders.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve already used NASA to reach out to Christian, Hebrew, Atheist, Shinto, Buddhist, and Hindu nations.  We used NASA to build bridges with the Soviet Union (a government which had been numerically far more bloody than &#8220;modern Islam&#8221;) and foster cooperation with other countries around the world, this is another side of the same coin.  As others have stated, the parts of the world that are largely Muslim have, both historically and currently, made non-trivial contributions to math, science, and technology.  Does it makes sense to exclude their possible contributions in the arena of space, simply because some of their kin are homicidal maniacs?  </p>
<p>Is there cause for concern?  Certainly, we don&#8217;t want to &#8220;give&#8221; technology to a nation that would end up being used against us (though we seem to do that all the time with non-Muslims).  But thoughtful caution is not the same as wholesale exclusion of an entire ethnic/religious group.</p>
<p>(BTW, &#8220;Who&#8217;s Bolden?&#8221;  Really?  You don&#8217;t know who Bolden is?  You started this sidebar, and don&#8217;t even know who made the statements you&#8217;re all tizzied about?  Wow.  Just, wow.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toothygrin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-281032</link>
		<dc:creator>Toothygrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-281032</guid>
		<description>The roof!
The roof!
The roof is a spier!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The roof!<br />
The roof!<br />
The roof is a spier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-281021</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-281021</guid>
		<description>Good lordy lordy! This is my 3rd time checking this thread and I only just realized it&#039;s &quot;Cectic&quot; and not &quot;Celtic&quot;!

The brain is an amazing device. o_O

Anyway: FACE!

The walls have ears... and the roof has eyes.

&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.traselcristal.es/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/NewPareidolia3.jpg&#039;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lordy lordy! This is my 3rd time checking this thread and I only just realized it&#8217;s &#8220;Cectic&#8221; and not &#8220;Celtic&#8221;!</p>
<p>The brain is an amazing device. o_O</p>
<p>Anyway: FACE!</p>
<p>The walls have ears&#8230; and the roof has eyes.</p>
<p><img src='http://www.traselcristal.es/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/NewPareidolia3.jpg'/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280993</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280993</guid>
		<description>Denny... Sigh.. keep sticking your head in the sand.  Yes, we should be cautious of ALL militistic groups. But there&#039;s only one religion that people stand behind when they call for the death for someone because of book they wrote, because of a name given to a stuffed bear, or when acid is thrown in the face of a young girl who dared to become educated.

And in countries that are ran based on that religion, either a blind eye is turned to acts of violence, or they are state sanctioned.

Last time I checked, it was in a muslim country where &quot;religious police&quot; forced girls to stay in a burning building.  It was considered better that the girls died, lest they were seen in public without the proper clothing.

But I could be wrong.

That being said, so you are a-ok with one of NASA&#039;s prime directives to be to reach out to a specific religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denny&#8230; Sigh.. keep sticking your head in the sand.  Yes, we should be cautious of ALL militistic groups. But there&#8217;s only one religion that people stand behind when they call for the death for someone because of book they wrote, because of a name given to a stuffed bear, or when acid is thrown in the face of a young girl who dared to become educated.</p>
<p>And in countries that are ran based on that religion, either a blind eye is turned to acts of violence, or they are state sanctioned.</p>
<p>Last time I checked, it was in a muslim country where &#8220;religious police&#8221; forced girls to stay in a burning building.  It was considered better that the girls died, lest they were seen in public without the proper clothing.</p>
<p>But I could be wrong.</p>
<p>That being said, so you are a-ok with one of NASA&#8217;s prime directives to be to reach out to a specific religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennyMo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280991</link>
		<dc:creator>DennyMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280991</guid>
		<description>DS, by &quot;quite a while ago&quot;, you mean about 10 years, right?  (Think &quot;Irish Troubles&quot;.)  Or maybe about 10 weeks?  (Think &quot;Hutaree&quot;.)  It&#039;s really a shame that we so easily lump people together into a monolithic block and presume &quot;they&#039;re all the same&quot;.  I know several Muslims who are not happy with the militants who have committed acts in their name, and I know several folks who think Christians aren&#039;t being militant enough.  Is militancy by an extreme few sufficient to pillory the entire body?  If so, then Al Gore, the National Wildlife Federation, the Audobon Society and anybody who works at the EPA should be considered a terrorist, since they obviously support ELF.

(QD, thanks for the &quot;happychair&quot; pics, I&#039;d not heard of that site before.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DS, by &#8220;quite a while ago&#8221;, you mean about 10 years, right?  (Think &#8220;Irish Troubles&#8221;.)  Or maybe about 10 weeks?  (Think &#8220;Hutaree&#8221;.)  It&#8217;s really a shame that we so easily lump people together into a monolithic block and presume &#8220;they&#8217;re all the same&#8221;.  I know several Muslims who are not happy with the militants who have committed acts in their name, and I know several folks who think Christians aren&#8217;t being militant enough.  Is militancy by an extreme few sufficient to pillory the entire body?  If so, then Al Gore, the National Wildlife Federation, the Audobon Society and anybody who works at the EPA should be considered a terrorist, since they obviously support ELF.</p>
<p>(QD, thanks for the &#8220;happychair&#8221; pics, I&#8217;d not heard of that site before.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280971</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280971</guid>
		<description>Drsky... I just asked if there was going to be a post, without throwing any of my personal thoughts on it.  My initial post, read as is, was not an invitation to start a lengthy conversation.  If you wish to complain about the amount of off topic posts, why not start by calling out Lucas, or Larian LeQuella, who turned it into an off topic debate, and not a simple inquiry to the author of a blog on a topic (NASA) that he should know a thing or two about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drsky&#8230; I just asked if there was going to be a post, without throwing any of my personal thoughts on it.  My initial post, read as is, was not an invitation to start a lengthy conversation.  If you wish to complain about the amount of off topic posts, why not start by calling out Lucas, or Larian LeQuella, who turned it into an off topic debate, and not a simple inquiry to the author of a blog on a topic (NASA) that he should know a thing or two about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadmere</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280963</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadmere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280963</guid>
		<description>In DS&#039;s defense, he started in this thread by asking Phil to comment about something.  So while it&#039;s not really on topic, using a comment page to say something to the author isn&#039;t completely crazy.

Then people started responding and talking to him about his post.  It&#039;s not just DS here; there&#039;s a whole conversation going on.  

He&#039;s also not really throwing around anything mean, like I generally see trolls do.  Even if he&#039;s wrong, he hasn&#039;t made any absolutely bizarre statements.  So while definitely off topic, and might be better suited somewhere else, I wouldn&#039;t call him a troll.

/meta-off-topic

I saw Cectic a year or two ago and read the entire thing.  Then I staretd going back weekly.  A week later, he stopped updating.  :p  I&#039;m glad he&#039;s decided to write more, now!  I get sad when all my favorite webcomics fade away.  (PBF, Truckbearingkibble, Simulated Comic Product.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In DS&#8217;s defense, he started in this thread by asking Phil to comment about something.  So while it&#8217;s not really on topic, using a comment page to say something to the author isn&#8217;t completely crazy.</p>
<p>Then people started responding and talking to him about his post.  It&#8217;s not just DS here; there&#8217;s a whole conversation going on.  </p>
<p>He&#8217;s also not really throwing around anything mean, like I generally see trolls do.  Even if he&#8217;s wrong, he hasn&#8217;t made any absolutely bizarre statements.  So while definitely off topic, and might be better suited somewhere else, I wouldn&#8217;t call him a troll.</p>
<p>/meta-off-topic</p>
<p>I saw Cectic a year or two ago and read the entire thing.  Then I staretd going back weekly.  A week later, he stopped updating.  :p  I&#8217;m glad he&#8217;s decided to write more, now!  I get sad when all my favorite webcomics fade away.  (PBF, Truckbearingkibble, Simulated Comic Product.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drksky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280954</link>
		<dc:creator>drksky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280954</guid>
		<description>DS, why are you making these comments in a thread about pareidolia?  Instead of making a public spectacle of yourself, why don&#039;t you email Phil and ask for his comments instead of derailing a completely unrelated thread.  I hate to use he &quot;T&quot; word, but in this case, you&#039;re being a troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DS, why are you making these comments in a thread about pareidolia?  Instead of making a public spectacle of yourself, why don&#8217;t you email Phil and ask for his comments instead of derailing a completely unrelated thread.  I hate to use he &#8220;T&#8221; word, but in this case, you&#8217;re being a troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280949</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280949</guid>
		<description>The one that&#039;s currently doing it, not the one that stopped it quite a while ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one that&#8217;s currently doing it, not the one that stopped it quite a while ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennyMo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280943</link>
		<dc:creator>DennyMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280943</guid>
		<description>&quot;you mean a world was a state ran by a religion, one who does not believe in the rights of women, frequently has people committing violent acts under the banner of their religion, standing behind death threats, and wanting the rest of the world to believe the same as they do, then yes, there would be.&quot;  

I&#039;ve lost track of which religion we&#039;re talking about here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;you mean a world was a state ran by a religion, one who does not believe in the rights of women, frequently has people committing violent acts under the banner of their religion, standing behind death threats, and wanting the rest of the world to believe the same as they do, then yes, there would be.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve lost track of which religion we&#8217;re talking about here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280930</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280930</guid>
		<description>&quot;- Bolden is correct; no nation can do a mission to Mars solo (with the possible exception of the Chinese, but even so, would it be a mission or one way trip?).&quot;

Who&#039;s Bolden?  Second, it&#039;s not so much about a mission to Mars, but really?  We have no ability to do anything but LEO now?

&quot;- Why on earth shouldn’t President Obama reach out to the Muslim world when he SAID he was going to reach out to the Muslim world? Did you miss his speech in Cairo, or just forgotten? And there are nations in the middle east that actually do have some organizations that embrace science and research. Qartar, UAE, Oman, Bahrain, and Kuwait are ones whose science institutes I have personally visited, and they were a damn sight better than many that I have visited here in the US.&quot;

Sigh.  Obama can do whatever he wants to.  But NASA is not a diplomatic organization.   Nor should he be directing NASA to reach out to a specific religion.  Would you be defending this as much if he said that NASA needed to reach out to Scientologists, or Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses?

&quot;- Why shouldn’t we? Or is it just that they are scary “ragheads” or whatever phobic paranoia you can spin into it that gets people’s panties in a bunch? Is the accident of being born in one region of the world an excuse to discount them as humans? Oh yeah, sorry, that’s a GOP plank, isn’t it… nevermind [/snark]&quot;

So, if you don&#039;t agree with it, you are a racist, a member of the GOP, and we all know that everyone who&#039;s a Republican is Racist?  If you don&#039;t see the hypocrisy of such a statement, I don&#039;t know how anyone can hold a conversation with you.

&quot;- Would the blogosphere be in such a tizzy if he had said he was going to reach out to the Scandinavian world (I mean, come on, they are former raiders and pillagers, right?)?&quot;

If by &quot;Scandinavian&quot;, you mean a world was a state ran by a religion, one who does not believe in the rights of women, frequently has people committing violent acts under the banner of their religion, standing behind death threats, and wanting the rest of the world to believe the same as they do, then yes, there would be.

Also...
&quot;And sorry for being so opinionated on this. It just makes me angry to see people react so predictably and in such a provincial manner.&quot;

Predictable?  Yes, because when someone says something stupid, yes, they are going to be called out on it.  Also, &quot;provincial manner&quot;, as per your above comments, you are as &quot;provincial&quot;  (if not more so) then the people you are decrying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- Bolden is correct; no nation can do a mission to Mars solo (with the possible exception of the Chinese, but even so, would it be a mission or one way trip?).&#8221;</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s Bolden?  Second, it&#8217;s not so much about a mission to Mars, but really?  We have no ability to do anything but LEO now?</p>
<p>&#8220;- Why on earth shouldn’t President Obama reach out to the Muslim world when he SAID he was going to reach out to the Muslim world? Did you miss his speech in Cairo, or just forgotten? And there are nations in the middle east that actually do have some organizations that embrace science and research. Qartar, UAE, Oman, Bahrain, and Kuwait are ones whose science institutes I have personally visited, and they were a damn sight better than many that I have visited here in the US.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sigh.  Obama can do whatever he wants to.  But NASA is not a diplomatic organization.   Nor should he be directing NASA to reach out to a specific religion.  Would you be defending this as much if he said that NASA needed to reach out to Scientologists, or Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses?</p>
<p>&#8220;- Why shouldn’t we? Or is it just that they are scary “ragheads” or whatever phobic paranoia you can spin into it that gets people’s panties in a bunch? Is the accident of being born in one region of the world an excuse to discount them as humans? Oh yeah, sorry, that’s a GOP plank, isn’t it… nevermind [/snark]&#8221;</p>
<p>So, if you don&#8217;t agree with it, you are a racist, a member of the GOP, and we all know that everyone who&#8217;s a Republican is Racist?  If you don&#8217;t see the hypocrisy of such a statement, I don&#8217;t know how anyone can hold a conversation with you.</p>
<p>&#8220;- Would the blogosphere be in such a tizzy if he had said he was going to reach out to the Scandinavian world (I mean, come on, they are former raiders and pillagers, right?)?&#8221;</p>
<p>If by &#8220;Scandinavian&#8221;, you mean a world was a state ran by a religion, one who does not believe in the rights of women, frequently has people committing violent acts under the banner of their religion, standing behind death threats, and wanting the rest of the world to believe the same as they do, then yes, there would be.</p>
<p>Also&#8230;<br />
&#8220;And sorry for being so opinionated on this. It just makes me angry to see people react so predictably and in such a provincial manner.&#8221;</p>
<p>Predictable?  Yes, because when someone says something stupid, yes, they are going to be called out on it.  Also, &#8220;provincial manner&#8221;, as per your above comments, you are as &#8220;provincial&#8221;  (if not more so) then the people you are decrying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen N</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280928</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280928</guid>
		<description>Lucas:
Way to derail a thread.

Wil:
You may have heard some unsettling news about the economy and political reality. It&#039;s true.

Subject at hand - Pareidolia
With the ease of image manipulation, it&#039;s interesting that there are almost never cries of &quot;Photoshopped&quot; when one of these makes the &#039;news&#039;. &quot;A man hears what he wants to hear...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas:<br />
Way to derail a thread.</p>
<p>Wil:<br />
You may have heard some unsettling news about the economy and political reality. It&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Subject at hand &#8211; Pareidolia<br />
With the ease of image manipulation, it&#8217;s interesting that there are almost never cries of &#8220;Photoshopped&#8221; when one of these makes the &#8216;news&#8217;. &#8220;A man hears what he wants to hear&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280926</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280926</guid>
		<description>Another good one, probably NSFW: http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1930#comic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good one, probably NSFW: <a href="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&#038;id=1930#comic" rel="nofollow">http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&#038;id=1930#comic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280908</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280908</guid>
		<description>It will certainly take a group of nations working together to put a man on Mars, but not because of technology, religion, culture or geography. The only reason that no country can do it alone, is that they can&#039;t afford it. The enormous cost would need to be shared.

According to reports, Obama&#039;s recent directive to NASA was fairly specific. He was ordering NASA to spend money and personnel to reach out to Muslims, to try to make them feel better about their historical contributions to science. Only now, after the public fury, is this being falsely and dishonestly spun to mean that the U.S. needs Muslims to help NASA explore space.

And exactly what does NASA need help with? Obama has already refused to extend the Shuttle program. He cancelled the moon-base program. He cancelled the Orion and Constellation programs. And he cancelled research programs for a Mars mission. Perhaps, with very few active space programs left to work on, Obama plans to keep NASA scientists and engineers busy keeping Muslims cheerful and feeling good about themselves, all over the world.  I am just so glad we might be spending billions of scarce science dollars on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will certainly take a group of nations working together to put a man on Mars, but not because of technology, religion, culture or geography. The only reason that no country can do it alone, is that they can&#8217;t afford it. The enormous cost would need to be shared.</p>
<p>According to reports, Obama&#8217;s recent directive to NASA was fairly specific. He was ordering NASA to spend money and personnel to reach out to Muslims, to try to make them feel better about their historical contributions to science. Only now, after the public fury, is this being falsely and dishonestly spun to mean that the U.S. needs Muslims to help NASA explore space.</p>
<p>And exactly what does NASA need help with? Obama has already refused to extend the Shuttle program. He cancelled the moon-base program. He cancelled the Orion and Constellation programs. And he cancelled research programs for a Mars mission. Perhaps, with very few active space programs left to work on, Obama plans to keep NASA scientists and engineers busy keeping Muslims cheerful and feeling good about themselves, all over the world.  I am just so glad we might be spending billions of scarce science dollars on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280894</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280894</guid>
		<description>Not pareidolia, but it shows a distinct lack of physical understanding can lead to an almost religious reaction:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not pareidolia, but it shows a distinct lack of physical understanding can lead to an almost religious reaction:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI</a></p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280869</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 05:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280869</guid>
		<description>Ooh look!  Cectic is back.  I loved that comic. But then it went away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh look!  Cectic is back.  I loved that comic. But then it went away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280868</link>
		<dc:creator>jcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 05:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280868</guid>
		<description>Of course it will be nice  if people realize that what they perceive as face(s) in random data/noise is just their brain fooling them. Also, that reminds me of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gestalt psychology&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;hr /&gt;
BTW, Symphony of Science has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fPJCEHumvE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new tune/song&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it will be nice  if people realize that what they perceive as face(s) in random data/noise is just their brain fooling them. Also, that reminds me of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology" rel="nofollow">Gestalt psychology</a>.</p>
<hr />
BTW, Symphony of Science has a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fPJCEHumvE" rel="nofollow">new tune/song</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pi-needles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280864</link>
		<dc:creator>Pi-needles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 05:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280864</guid>
		<description>I think that first guys &quot;dotted line around face&quot; tattoo is awful! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that first guys &#8220;dotted line around face&#8221; tattoo is awful! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohio Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohio Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 04:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280858</guid>
		<description>OMFSM! &#039;Sweet baby Jesus&#039; scatological pareidolia...Classic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMFSM! &#8216;Sweet baby Jesus&#8217; scatological pareidolia&#8230;Classic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larian LeQuella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280851</link>
		<dc:creator>Larian LeQuella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 03:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280851</guid>
		<description>And sorry for being so opinionated on this.  It just makes me angry to see people react so predictably and in such a provincial manner.

And maybe your post wasn&#039;t intended to be that way, but that&#039;s how it came across to me.  Sorry for jumping your chili on that. Peace.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And sorry for being so opinionated on this.  It just makes me angry to see people react so predictably and in such a provincial manner.</p>
<p>And maybe your post wasn&#8217;t intended to be that way, but that&#8217;s how it came across to me.  Sorry for jumping your chili on that. Peace.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/06/cectic-does-pareidolia/comment-page-1/#comment-280850</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18521#comment-280850</guid>
		<description>I love how you accuse me of being narrow minded when you&#039;re the guy throwing out straw mans left and right. Share technology with other nations? Fine with me. Share the costs of a mars mission with other countries? I approve! I think you need a nap, good sir, before you embarrass yourself further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how you accuse me of being narrow minded when you&#8217;re the guy throwing out straw mans left and right. Share technology with other nations? Fine with me. Share the costs of a mars mission with other countries? I approve! I think you need a nap, good sir, before you embarrass yourself further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 22:34:59 -->
