<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosetta sends back gorgeous asteroid closeups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282836</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282836</guid>
		<description>@ ^  Charles J. Slavis, Jr. : Apt. ;-)

Wonder what they&#039;ll name some of the craters and features on Lutetia assuming that happens?

One other thing I meant to note earlier - does anyone else think Lutetia looks almost rounded by its own gravity - more in some shots than others? 

It makes me think it could be like a quarter of a sphere - perhaps a proto-planetary world that was split in four fragments just as it was almost formed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ^  Charles J. Slavis, Jr. : Apt. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Wonder what they&#8217;ll name some of the craters and features on Lutetia assuming that happens?</p>
<p>One other thing I meant to note earlier &#8211; does anyone else think Lutetia looks almost rounded by its own gravity &#8211; more in some shots than others? </p>
<p>It makes me think it could be like a quarter of a sphere &#8211; perhaps a proto-planetary world that was split in four fragments just as it was almost formed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles J. Slavis, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282611</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles J. Slavis, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282611</guid>
		<description>Looks like an ancient Egyptian looking up to the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like an ancient Egyptian looking up to the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles J. Slavis, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282610</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles J. Slavis, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282610</guid>
		<description>I always wanted to see the Rosetta stone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wanted to see the Rosetta stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Declercq</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282480</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Declercq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282480</guid>
		<description>Funny thing about the Lutetia+Saturn image is the APOD that was available a day later:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100712.html

With a bit of imagination, it&#039;s almost as if the Lutetia image was taken with a fisheye lens, and this other shot taking from exactly the other side using a telelens.

It isn&#039;t of course, the APOD one is a Saturnian moon, and the lighting wouldn&#039;t fit, but it&#039;s still a funny coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing about the Lutetia+Saturn image is the APOD that was available a day later:</p>
<p><a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100712.html" rel="nofollow">http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100712.html</a></p>
<p>With a bit of imagination, it&#8217;s almost as if the Lutetia image was taken with a fisheye lens, and this other shot taking from exactly the other side using a telelens.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t of course, the APOD one is a Saturnian moon, and the lighting wouldn&#8217;t fit, but it&#8217;s still a funny coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282459</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282459</guid>
		<description>PS. Thanks to the &lt;i&gt;Rosetta&lt;/i&gt; team and the Bad Astronomer for this. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. Thanks to the <i>Rosetta</i> team and the Bad Astronomer for this. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282454</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282454</guid>
		<description>To answer (#3.) Justin Ogleby&#039;s question : 

&lt;i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Amazing. Does anyone know how far away Saturn is relative to Lutetia in that last photo? &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do very approximately.

Lutetia orbits from between 2.0 to 2.8 Astronomical Units or AU. 
 
Saturn orbits at 9 and a half AU. 

Now one Astronomical Unit is the distance between the Earth and our Sun which is 149,597,870 kilometers or almost 93 million miles or 499 lightseconds. (Call it 150 million km and 500 light seconds rounded up.) 


So if we say Lutetia is at 2.5 AU in the foreground with Saturn in the background at 9.5 AU then the distance between them is 7 AU or ten thousand and fifty million kilometers or 3,500 light seconds - &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;if&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; my maths &lt;i&gt;(which I warn you is poor - &amp; I didn&#039;t have my calculator handy for this!)&lt;/i&gt; is right. Feel free to cross check and let me know if I&#039;ve got it wrong or if anyone else knows it more precisely. 

I&#039;ll leave it to someone else to work out the figure in miles. ;-)

&lt;u&gt;Sources :
&lt;/u&gt; Daintith, John &amp; Gould, William, &lt;i&gt;‘Collins internet-linked Dictionary of Astronomy’&lt;/i&gt;, Collins, 2006 [figure in km &amp; light seconds] 
Maddison, Dr Robert, &lt;i&gt;&#039;A Dictionary of Astronomy&#039;&lt;/i&gt;, Hamlyn, 1980. [Figure in miles.] &amp; 
Wikipedia - 21 Lutetia page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutetia_(asteroid)

**** 

PS. I tried to post this comment earlier with the wiki-link to Lutetia under my &quot;website&quot; box in the form so that folks could click on my name for the link &amp; NOT have it go into moderation but that hasn&#039;t come through. Why?! That technique has worked before - why this time, has something changed &amp; why does the BA&#039;s spam filter seem to give me grief? Sorry if this comes through twice.  :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer (#3.) Justin Ogleby&#8217;s question : </p>
<p><i>Amazing. Does anyone know how far away Saturn is relative to Lutetia in that last photo? </i></p>
<p>I do very approximately.</p>
<p>Lutetia orbits from between 2.0 to 2.8 Astronomical Units or AU. </p>
<p>Saturn orbits at 9 and a half AU. </p>
<p>Now one Astronomical Unit is the distance between the Earth and our Sun which is 149,597,870 kilometers or almost 93 million miles or 499 lightseconds. (Call it 150 million km and 500 light seconds rounded up.) </p>
<p>So if we say Lutetia is at 2.5 AU in the foreground with Saturn in the background at 9.5 AU then the distance between them is 7 AU or ten thousand and fifty million kilometers or 3,500 light seconds &#8211; <i><b>if</b></i> my maths <i>(which I warn you is poor &#8211; &#038; I didn&#8217;t have my calculator handy for this!)</i> is right. Feel free to cross check and let me know if I&#8217;ve got it wrong or if anyone else knows it more precisely. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave it to someone else to work out the figure in miles. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><u>Sources :<br />
</u> Daintith, John &#038; Gould, William, <i>‘Collins internet-linked Dictionary of Astronomy’</i>, Collins, 2006 [figure in km &#038; light seconds]<br />
Maddison, Dr Robert, <i>&#8216;A Dictionary of Astronomy&#8217;</i>, Hamlyn, 1980. [Figure in miles.] &#038;<br />
Wikipedia &#8211; 21 Lutetia page : <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutetia_(asteroid)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutetia_(asteroid)</a></p>
<p>**** </p>
<p>PS. I tried to post this comment earlier with the wiki-link to Lutetia under my &#8220;website&#8221; box in the form so that folks could click on my name for the link &#038; NOT have it go into moderation but that hasn&#8217;t come through. Why?! That technique has worked before &#8211; why this time, has something changed &#038; why does the BA&#8217;s spam filter seem to give me grief? Sorry if this comes through twice.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282445</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282445</guid>
		<description>Excellent. :-)

This is the largest asteroid and earliest numbered &lt;i&gt;(I think)&lt;/i&gt; we&#039;ve seen so far. Always fantastic and fascinating to a see a new world - even a minor planet -  up close for the first time.  :-) 

Wonder if humans will ever land on, perhaps even settle on this rock? I hope so. 

@31.   ByJove Says: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The grooves are a puzzle, aren’t they? When it was just Phobos, I thought they might have somehow resulted from tidal stresses. Now I’m left scratching my noggin.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, just because Lutetia is &lt;b&gt;*currently*&lt;/b&gt; alone in middle of the asteroid belt doesn&#039;t mean it has &lt;b&gt;*always*&lt;/b&gt; been orbiting there and maybe in Lutetia&#039;s distant past it passed close to a planet or protoplanet? 

That might&#039;ve happened even in the region that is now the asteroid belt - Ceres was forming into a planet before its formation was disrupted by Jupiter and so were Vesta and some of the other larger worlds. Maybe even Lutetia itself was a much more major planet before being broken apart and turned into a minor planet &lt;i&gt;(albeit a fairly major minor planet! &lt;/i&gt; ;-) ) in collisions with other asteroids? 

Or perhaps the groovy features arise through impact? Just a few thoughts. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This is the largest asteroid and earliest numbered <i>(I think)</i> we&#8217;ve seen so far. Always fantastic and fascinating to a see a new world &#8211; even a minor planet &#8211;  up close for the first time.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Wonder if humans will ever land on, perhaps even settle on this rock? I hope so. </p>
<p>@31.   ByJove Says: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>The grooves are a puzzle, aren’t they? When it was just Phobos, I thought they might have somehow resulted from tidal stresses. Now I’m left scratching my noggin.</i> </p></blockquote>
<p>Well, just because Lutetia is <b>*currently*</b> alone in middle of the asteroid belt doesn&#8217;t mean it has <b>*always*</b> been orbiting there and maybe in Lutetia&#8217;s distant past it passed close to a planet or protoplanet? </p>
<p>That might&#8217;ve happened even in the region that is now the asteroid belt &#8211; Ceres was forming into a planet before its formation was disrupted by Jupiter and so were Vesta and some of the other larger worlds. Maybe even Lutetia itself was a much more major planet before being broken apart and turned into a minor planet <i>(albeit a fairly major minor planet! </i> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) in collisions with other asteroids? </p>
<p>Or perhaps the groovy features arise through impact? Just a few thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282404</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282404</guid>
		<description>Yay!  At home so I can see the pix.  Gorgeous!  I love looking at the awesome pictures Phil posts!

@ND.  Death to IE6 indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!  At home so I can see the pix.  Gorgeous!  I love looking at the awesome pictures Phil posts!</p>
<p>@ND.  Death to IE6 indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arik Rice</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282399</link>
		<dc:creator>Arik Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282399</guid>
		<description>In the last photo Saturn&#039;s like &quot;hey guys, what&#039;s up?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last photo Saturn&#8217;s like &#8220;hey guys, what&#8217;s up?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ByJove</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282380</link>
		<dc:creator>ByJove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282380</guid>
		<description>The grooves are a puzzle, aren&#039;t they?  When it was just Phobos, I thought they might have somehow resulted from tidal stresses.  Now I&#039;m left scratching my noggin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The grooves are a puzzle, aren&#8217;t they?  When it was just Phobos, I thought they might have somehow resulted from tidal stresses.  Now I&#8217;m left scratching my noggin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282378</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282378</guid>
		<description>Thanks Regner, after a few google searches on that, I understand it much better now.
cheers,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Regner, after a few google searches on that, I understand it much better now.<br />
cheers,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regner Trampedach</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282377</link>
		<dc:creator>Regner Trampedach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282377</guid>
		<description>Chris @ 25: I think you expect &quot;jaggedness&quot; because you think a big lump of rock. If instead you think a barely-held-together pile of regolith and fines, then you would expect quite smooth features - in somewhat contrast to what was &quot;predicted&quot;/&quot;envisioned&quot; by Armageddon... Phil, your review of Ar$*&quot;ged&amp;#n is number 7 in a Google search...
      Cheers,   Regner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris @ 25: I think you expect &#8220;jaggedness&#8221; because you think a big lump of rock. If instead you think a barely-held-together pile of regolith and fines, then you would expect quite smooth features &#8211; in somewhat contrast to what was &#8220;predicted&#8221;/&#8221;envisioned&#8221; by Armageddon&#8230; Phil, your review of Ar$*&#8221;ged&#n is number 7 in a Google search&#8230;<br />
      Cheers,   Regner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ND</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282373</link>
		<dc:creator>ND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282373</guid>
		<description>Dawn,

That&#039;s an ongoing problem with customers and their IT department. An entrenched IE6 install base that needs to be supported. I think there should be a surcharge for supporting IE6 in products. Some sort of IE6 tax. If it&#039;s feasible that might do the trick.

IE6. The passion of the hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an ongoing problem with customers and their IT department. An entrenched IE6 install base that needs to be supported. I think there should be a surcharge for supporting IE6 in products. Some sort of IE6 tax. If it&#8217;s feasible that might do the trick.</p>
<p>IE6. The passion of the hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282363</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282363</guid>
		<description>Great stuff - congrats to the Rosetta Team and ESA! You guys rock!...er Asteroid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff &#8211; congrats to the Rosetta Team and ESA! You guys rock!&#8230;er Asteroid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282350</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282350</guid>
		<description>@ND (21): I would love to kill IE6 (I use Firefox at home) but our IT guys at work like it.  Don&#039;t know if it&#039;s a cost/licensing issue or just the desire to not have to deal with pushing out the update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ND (21): I would love to kill IE6 (I use Firefox at home) but our IT guys at work like it.  Don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s a cost/licensing issue or just the desire to not have to deal with pushing out the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282346</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282346</guid>
		<description>Phil, why is it (and asteroids in general) so smooth? I would have expected jaggedness from the impacts. Does the constant barrage of impacts smooth out the edges?  For the large scale smoothness (lumpiness rather than jaggedness) is that from high heat collisions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, why is it (and asteroids in general) so smooth? I would have expected jaggedness from the impacts. Does the constant barrage of impacts smooth out the edges?  For the large scale smoothness (lumpiness rather than jaggedness) is that from high heat collisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282337</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282337</guid>
		<description>&quot;Note the elongated crater near the bottom (left of center); was that from a nearly horizontal impact? It&#039;s curious that it points almost directly to the crater to the left. That may just be coincidence&quot;

... Evidence of Lutetians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Note the elongated crater near the bottom (left of center); was that from a nearly horizontal impact? It&#8217;s curious that it points almost directly to the crater to the left. That may just be coincidence&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; Evidence of Lutetians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282331</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282331</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t see any stars in the background. This is clearly a hoax.  Just like the &quot;moon landing&quot; and &quot;evolution&quot; and &quot;round earth&quot;

Totally kidding, of course. :-p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t see any stars in the background. This is clearly a hoax.  Just like the &#8220;moon landing&#8221; and &#8220;evolution&#8221; and &#8220;round earth&#8221;</p>
<p>Totally kidding, of course. :-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tribeca Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribeca Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282327</guid>
		<description>The last two in particular are absolutely mind blowing.  I&#039;m going to make an animated .gif from that &quot;contact sheet.&quot; Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last two in particular are absolutely mind blowing.  I&#8217;m going to make an animated .gif from that &#8220;contact sheet.&#8221; Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ND</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282326</link>
		<dc:creator>ND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282326</guid>
		<description>That saturn shot is just awesome. The things you can do with photoshop ;-)

Death to IE6!!! The bastard child of the browser wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That saturn shot is just awesome. The things you can do with photoshop <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Death to IE6!!! The bastard child of the browser wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282325</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282325</guid>
		<description>There any consensus out there about these grooves we&#039;re seeing on asteroids?  It seems like the majority (all?) of the asteroids we&#039;ve taken high res photos of have them.  These photos would suggest whatever caused them came after the impact crater which probably means it&#039;s not related to their formation process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There any consensus out there about these grooves we&#8217;re seeing on asteroids?  It seems like the majority (all?) of the asteroids we&#8217;ve taken high res photos of have them.  These photos would suggest whatever caused them came after the impact crater which probably means it&#8217;s not related to their formation process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magetoo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282324</link>
		<dc:creator>magetoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282324</guid>
		<description>Amos: That was quick!  Thanks for the response.

I just wanted to add that in this case, perhaps the longer texts should go in the page itself, below the images, rather than as mouseover popups (or that&#039;s how it seems to be intended to me anyway, with the links and all).  Don&#039;t know who to blame, in other words.  :&lt;em&gt;-&lt;/em&gt;)

Okay, threadjack over.  (Sorry, folks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amos: That was quick!  Thanks for the response.</p>
<p>I just wanted to add that in this case, perhaps the longer texts should go in the page itself, below the images, rather than as mouseover popups (or that&#8217;s how it seems to be intended to me anyway, with the links and all).  Don&#8217;t know who to blame, in other words.  :<em>-</em>)</p>
<p>Okay, threadjack over.  (Sorry, folks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magetoo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282322</link>
		<dc:creator>magetoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282322</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, &lt;a href=&quot;http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/1022/babadhtml.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is what it looks like for someone who doesn&#039;t load images. (which is who would normally see the alt text, remember)  The in-alt-text &lt;em&gt;links&lt;/em&gt; are especially challenging...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, <a href="http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/1022/babadhtml.png" rel="nofollow">this</a> is what it looks like for someone who doesn&#8217;t load images. (which is who would normally see the alt text, remember)  The in-alt-text <em>links</em> are especially challenging&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos Zeeberg (Discover Web Editor)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282321</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos Zeeberg (Discover Web Editor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282321</guid>
		<description>@magetoo: Thanks for the heads-up. We&#039;ll look into that. The gallery is backwards-compatible with old IE versions through 7.0, not 6.x. The &quot;alt&quot; and &quot;title&quot; tags should be working the standard way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@magetoo: Thanks for the heads-up. We&#8217;ll look into that. The gallery is backwards-compatible with old IE versions through 7.0, not 6.x. The &#8220;alt&#8221; and &#8220;title&#8221; tags should be working the standard way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/comment-page-1/#comment-282320</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=18589#comment-282320</guid>
		<description>@kuhnigget

totally, considering how small saturn is compared to it...i mean just look...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kuhnigget</p>
<p>totally, considering how small saturn is compared to it&#8230;i mean just look&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 22:37:03 -->
