<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sun rises again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar storms coming our way this week? &#124; Bad Astronomy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-325443</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar storms coming our way this week? &#124; Bad Astronomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-325443</guid>
		<description>[...] (sdo_4500_oct112010) [6]: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap031029.html [7]: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/ [8]: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (sdo_4500_oct112010) [6]: <a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap031029.html" rel="nofollow">http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap031029.html</a> [7]: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/</a> [8]: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mnpundit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-290110</link>
		<dc:creator>mnpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-290110</guid>
		<description>You know, in Assassin&#039;s Creed II the over-arching story is supposedly a magnetic pole shift, but given the clues I thought it would be more interesting if it was predicting a giant CME for 2012.  So I was wondering could a truly unprecedented enormous CME in a time when the Earth&#039;s magnetic field as week, lead to massive radiation hitting the living things (plants animals) on the ground?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, in Assassin&#8217;s Creed II the over-arching story is supposedly a magnetic pole shift, but given the clues I thought it would be more interesting if it was predicting a giant CME for 2012.  So I was wondering could a truly unprecedented enormous CME in a time when the Earth&#8217;s magnetic field as week, lead to massive radiation hitting the living things (plants animals) on the ground?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288903</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 08:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288903</guid>
		<description>@22.Yeebok : Yes that helps indeed. Thanks for that explaination. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@22.Yeebok : Yes that helps indeed. Thanks for that explaination. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288606</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 23:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288606</guid>
		<description>Why are these detailed pictures of the sun always so cool?  Is it something to do with a &quot;hidden in plain sight&quot; angle?  Seeing the familiar in an unfamiliar way?  New light, so to speak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are these detailed pictures of the sun always so cool?  Is it something to do with a &#8220;hidden in plain sight&#8221; angle?  Seeing the familiar in an unfamiliar way?  New light, so to speak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captn Tommy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288426</link>
		<dc:creator>Captn Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288426</guid>
		<description>I am amazed at the 3 dimensional stucture of the CME, coming from the surface toward the point of view. 

Awfull it is, in a terrible beauty
Its grasp a thousand times a thousand wide,
Reached for me.
And in my wonder, I felt the hand of God

Enjoy
Captn Tommy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed at the 3 dimensional stucture of the CME, coming from the surface toward the point of view. </p>
<p>Awfull it is, in a terrible beauty<br />
Its grasp a thousand times a thousand wide,<br />
Reached for me.<br />
And in my wonder, I felt the hand of God</p>
<p>Enjoy<br />
Captn Tommy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeebok</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288380</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeebok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288380</guid>
		<description>@messier - Yes you have the terms a bit mixed. The amplitude it&#039;s referring to is the &quot;height&quot; of the data. The cycle is the length of the period (solar cycle in this case).
I assume you know of a bell curve ? Imagine one showing sunspot quantities covering one entire solar cycle - a &#039;perfect bell curve&#039; for argument&#039;s sake. (see : http://tinyurl.com/m2gx6 - Wikipedia) The first chart on that page (here : http://tinyurl.com/yfcn7wq - also wikipedia) - the &#039;normal&#039; period would be the green line.  The incoming period would be the blue one - it is narrower but higher - a shorter cycle with higher amplitude.
Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@messier &#8211; Yes you have the terms a bit mixed. The amplitude it&#8217;s referring to is the &#8220;height&#8221; of the data. The cycle is the length of the period (solar cycle in this case).<br />
I assume you know of a bell curve ? Imagine one showing sunspot quantities covering one entire solar cycle &#8211; a &#8216;perfect bell curve&#8217; for argument&#8217;s sake. (see : <a href="http://tinyurl.com/m2gx6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/m2gx6</a> &#8211; Wikipedia) The first chart on that page (here : <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfcn7wq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfcn7wq</a> &#8211; also wikipedia) &#8211; the &#8216;normal&#8217; period would be the green line.  The incoming period would be the blue one &#8211; it is narrower but higher &#8211; a shorter cycle with higher amplitude.<br />
Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288314</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288314</guid>
		<description>Wow - that&#039;s an enormous storm.  That&#039;s got to be one of the largest I&#039;ve seen photographed over the past 50 years.

Dang, I&#039;m not in the North so I guess I&#039;ll miss the light  show (unless I&#039;m lucky enough to see one this far north in the S.  hemisphere - I could see one if I traveled much further south).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; that&#8217;s an enormous storm.  That&#8217;s got to be one of the largest I&#8217;ve seen photographed over the past 50 years.</p>
<p>Dang, I&#8217;m not in the North so I guess I&#8217;ll miss the light  show (unless I&#8217;m lucky enough to see one this far north in the S.  hemisphere &#8211; I could see one if I traveled much further south).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288285</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 01:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288285</guid>
		<description>@13. Joseph,

Hey, all we need to do to protect all those satellites is to build a giant Faraday cage around the Earth!

Oh, I&#039;ve got it.  First, we make it magnetic, not metallic.  Saves material, money and energy.  OK, the best way to do that is... to make the Earth a magnet, yeah, that&#039;s it!  So we put a magnet at the Earth&#039;s core and envelope the entire planet in a protective magnetic field.  We could name the field structure after someone like, I don&#039;t know, Ann Vallen or something.

What&#039;s that?  Been there, done that??  Oh man...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@13. Joseph,</p>
<p>Hey, all we need to do to protect all those satellites is to build a giant Faraday cage around the Earth!</p>
<p>Oh, I&#8217;ve got it.  First, we make it magnetic, not metallic.  Saves material, money and energy.  OK, the best way to do that is&#8230; to make the Earth a magnet, yeah, that&#8217;s it!  So we put a magnet at the Earth&#8217;s core and envelope the entire planet in a protective magnetic field.  We could name the field structure after someone like, I don&#8217;t know, Ann Vallen or something.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that?  Been there, done that??  Oh man&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tribeca Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribeca Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288282</guid>
		<description>That thing has got to be stopped!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That thing has got to be stopped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288087</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288087</guid>
		<description>@9. Yeebok : Thanks. :-) 

The :

&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;&lt;b&gt;larger&lt;/b&gt; than average amplitude ...&quot; &lt;/i&gt;vs&lt;i&gt; &quot;its delayed start and low minimum strongly suggest a much &lt;b&gt;smaller&lt;/b&gt; cycle&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

bit still sounds a touch contradictory &amp; confusing to my ears although I&#039;m possibly misunderstanding and confusing two separate things - am I? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@9. Yeebok : Thanks. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>The :</p>
<blockquote><p> <i>&#8220;<b>larger</b> than average amplitude &#8230;&#8221; </i>vs<i> &#8220;its delayed start and low minimum strongly suggest a much <b>smaller</b> cycle&#8221;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>bit still sounds a touch contradictory &#038; confusing to my ears although I&#8217;m possibly misunderstanding and confusing two separate things &#8211; am I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288085</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288085</guid>
		<description>How do I put this thing into shameless-plug mode?  ;-)
I recently released an application called Solaris for Android phones – Solaris will notify you when geomagnetic storm level increases, or when the aurora might be overhead at your location (based on your phone’s GPS position). My phone buzzed a few times yesterday when the CME hit! The app displays electron and proton particle flux into the upper atmosphere, projected onto a 3D Earth globe (ala “Google Earth”). Also includes UV images of the Sun from STEREO and SDO spacecraft. You can download Solaris for free from the Android Market. Also see http://www.androidzoom.com/android_applications/entertainment/solaris_gbnv.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I put this thing into shameless-plug mode?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I recently released an application called Solaris for Android phones – Solaris will notify you when geomagnetic storm level increases, or when the aurora might be overhead at your location (based on your phone’s GPS position). My phone buzzed a few times yesterday when the CME hit! The app displays electron and proton particle flux into the upper atmosphere, projected onto a 3D Earth globe (ala “Google Earth”). Also includes UV images of the Sun from STEREO and SDO spacecraft. You can download Solaris for free from the Android Market. Also see <a href="http://www.androidzoom.com/android_applications/entertainment/solaris_gbnv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.androidzoom.com/android_applications/entertainment/solaris_gbnv.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288079</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288079</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous! Watching videos of CMEs always give me tingling feeling down my back as I think of the energy required to lobby these billions of tons of matter into outer space. A paltry human arm can hardly lift up a few pounds of iron, toss it up a few feet in the air, much less hurl it all the way into orbit.

It&#039;s millions of nuclear bombs going off at once!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous! Watching videos of CMEs always give me tingling feeling down my back as I think of the energy required to lobby these billions of tons of matter into outer space. A paltry human arm can hardly lift up a few pounds of iron, toss it up a few feet in the air, much less hurl it all the way into orbit.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s millions of nuclear bombs going off at once!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288062</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288062</guid>
		<description>NASA has assured ISS FUBAR asstronaughts that they will not be fried like pork skins in boiling lard by the first active sun cycle in 12.5 years.  OTOH, we don&#039;t see any NASA management volunteering to rise above a yard-equivalent thickness of lead radiation shielding (without pair formation!) to earn their &lt;I&gt;chicharrónes&lt;/I&gt; certificate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA has assured ISS FUBAR asstronaughts that they will not be fried like pork skins in boiling lard by the first active sun cycle in 12.5 years.  OTOH, we don&#8217;t see any NASA management volunteering to rise above a yard-equivalent thickness of lead radiation shielding (without pair formation!) to earn their <i>chicharrónes</i> certificate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrispy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288041</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrispy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288041</guid>
		<description>Will this have any affect on global temperatures? I had read a while back (probably on this very forum) that because of the lack of sun activity over the past years it has actually reduced some of the effects of AGW. 

What I am worried about (besides the warming thing!) is that this will just give the deniers another excuse to ignore/deny for a few more years. They will now say that the reason the temps are rising is because of sun activity. Well, yeah, I guess many of them have always been saying that. But the difference now would be that the rest of us won&#039;t be able to just say that they are dead wrong. . we&#039;d need to explain that the upswing in the sun cycle AND greenhouse gases are increasing the global temperatures. Nuance doesn&#039;t play well with denialists. 

Anyway, is it true that the sun cycle can affect global temperatures? I want to be able to explain it correctly if it comes up.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this have any affect on global temperatures? I had read a while back (probably on this very forum) that because of the lack of sun activity over the past years it has actually reduced some of the effects of AGW. </p>
<p>What I am worried about (besides the warming thing!) is that this will just give the deniers another excuse to ignore/deny for a few more years. They will now say that the reason the temps are rising is because of sun activity. Well, yeah, I guess many of them have always been saying that. But the difference now would be that the rest of us won&#8217;t be able to just say that they are dead wrong. . we&#8217;d need to explain that the upswing in the sun cycle AND greenhouse gases are increasing the global temperatures. Nuance doesn&#8217;t play well with denialists. </p>
<p>Anyway, is it true that the sun cycle can affect global temperatures? I want to be able to explain it correctly if it comes up.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288026</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288026</guid>
		<description>Start building your Faraday cages to store all your delicate electronics in. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start building your Faraday cages to store all your delicate electronics in. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian The Coyote</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288025</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian The Coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288025</guid>
		<description>I live at about 53 degrees N. and I can testify that it was a nice light show Tuesday night / Wednesday morning.  It&#039;s been a while since we had some good Aurora.  These were far from the best ever but they were the strongest in some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live at about 53 degrees N. and I can testify that it was a nice light show Tuesday night / Wednesday morning.  It&#8217;s been a while since we had some good Aurora.  These were far from the best ever but they were the strongest in some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFlimmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288023</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFlimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288023</guid>
		<description>@ Dan Fisher

Nice pictures!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dan Fisher</p>
<p>Nice pictures!! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeebok</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288014</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeebok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288014</guid>
		<description>But we won&#039;t be here in 2013!! (lol)
Without looking at the page, and trying to &#039;mentally round some of it&#039; - the methods they refer to would be some form of predicting how lively things will be in the current cycle which I presume is 22 years..
A larger than average amplitude means there&#039;ll be more sunspots &#039;this 22 years&#039; than on average.
The smoothed aa index I assume means a method used to average the values (when doing a line chart, you&#039;d have the odd spike - say an aberrant day where you had 20 bonus spots) so if you average the next, current and previous figures into a &quot;rolling average&quot; and chart that instead you can sometimes remove spikes in the data.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But we won&#8217;t be here in 2013!! (lol)<br />
Without looking at the page, and trying to &#8216;mentally round some of it&#8217; &#8211; the methods they refer to would be some form of predicting how lively things will be in the current cycle which I presume is 22 years..<br />
A larger than average amplitude means there&#8217;ll be more sunspots &#8216;this 22 years&#8217; than on average.<br />
The smoothed aa index I assume means a method used to average the values (when doing a line chart, you&#8217;d have the odd spike &#8211; say an aberrant day where you had 20 bonus spots) so if you average the next, current and previous figures into a &#8220;rolling average&#8221; and chart that instead you can sometimes remove spikes in the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-288001</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-288001</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the link to the material I quoted above : 

http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml 

&amp; this link &lt;i&gt;(from the Marshall Centre also)&lt;/i&gt; has some interesting background info on solar cycles and sunspot numbers too : 

http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml 

Including these graphs of previous cycles : 

http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg 

If that&#039;s helpful or interesting for folks here. 

******* 

PS. A suggestion for the Marshall centre and a few other such sites - it might be a good idea to have a glossary and perhaps even a separate &lt;i&gt;&quot;For the non-scientist&quot;&lt;/i&gt; page version available there to help members of the public who find some of the technical stuff really hard to comprehend.

I love science and astronomy, I read widely in the area &lt;i&gt;(I even write astronomy articles myself!)&lt;/i&gt; but some of the specialised items and jargon can get very hard to follow and off-putting at times. :-(

One of the best things about Phil&#039;s blog is how accessible he makes the science and how he shares the wonder of it in a way non-scientific people can easily follow and enjoy. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the link to the material I quoted above : </p>
<p><a href="http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml</a> </p>
<p>&#038; this link <i>(from the Marshall Centre also)</i> has some interesting background info on solar cycles and sunspot numbers too : </p>
<p><a href="http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml</a> </p>
<p>Including these graphs of previous cycles : </p>
<p><a href="http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg</a> </p>
<p>If that&#8217;s helpful or interesting for folks here. </p>
<p>******* </p>
<p>PS. A suggestion for the Marshall centre and a few other such sites &#8211; it might be a good idea to have a glossary and perhaps even a separate <i>&#8220;For the non-scientist&#8221;</i> page version available there to help members of the public who find some of the technical stuff really hard to comprehend.</p>
<p>I love science and astronomy, I read widely in the area <i>(I even write astronomy articles myself!)</i> but some of the specialised items and jargon can get very hard to follow and off-putting at times. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One of the best things about Phil&#8217;s blog is how accessible he makes the science and how he shares the wonder of it in a way non-scientific people can easily follow and enjoy. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-287999</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-287999</guid>
		<description>I gather the last solar minima was unusually prolonged and the current cycle slow to get going. I&#039;m wondering how the overall current solar cycle is going &amp; whether predictions are for it to be a low quiet one or whether its going to start really building up now and how typical of past patterns the current cycle 24 is being. 

This : 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Both methods give larger than average amplitude to Cycle 24 while its delayed start and low minimum strongly suggest a much smaller cycle. Ohl&#039;s method now indicates an amplitude of about 70 for Cycle 24. The smoothed aa index has reached its minimum (a record low) of 8.4 in September of 2009. Using Ohl&#039;s method indicates a maximum sunspot number of about 70 ± 18 or less for cycle 24.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

From &lt;i&gt;&quot;Solar Cycle Prediction&quot;&lt;/i&gt; from the NASA Marshall SpaceFlight Center &lt;i&gt;(link will be given in a separate comment below to avoid a long &quot;awaiting moderation&quot; hold up for this comment)&lt;/i&gt; sounds interesting but very technical. 

Can somebody please &quot;translate&quot; that into plain english for the scientific layperson &amp; put this in a bit of context? I&#039;m struggling to grasp what it actually means relative to past solar cycles &amp; I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;m grokking it correctly.

OTOH, this part from the same source : 

&lt;blockquote&gt; We find a starting time of July 2008 with minimum occurring in November or December 2008 and maximum in June 2013.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I *do* understand. We&#039;ve much more to see sunspots &amp; hence aurora~wise as things pick up towards 2013. I&#039;m looking forward to that!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gather the last solar minima was unusually prolonged and the current cycle slow to get going. I&#8217;m wondering how the overall current solar cycle is going &#038; whether predictions are for it to be a low quiet one or whether its going to start really building up now and how typical of past patterns the current cycle 24 is being. </p>
<p>This : </p>
<blockquote><p>Both methods give larger than average amplitude to Cycle 24 while its delayed start and low minimum strongly suggest a much smaller cycle. Ohl&#8217;s method now indicates an amplitude of about 70 for Cycle 24. The smoothed aa index has reached its minimum (a record low) of 8.4 in September of 2009. Using Ohl&#8217;s method indicates a maximum sunspot number of about 70 ± 18 or less for cycle 24.</p></blockquote>
<p>From <i>&#8220;Solar Cycle Prediction&#8221;</i> from the NASA Marshall SpaceFlight Center <i>(link will be given in a separate comment below to avoid a long &#8220;awaiting moderation&#8221; hold up for this comment)</i> sounds interesting but very technical. </p>
<p>Can somebody please &#8220;translate&#8221; that into plain english for the scientific layperson &#038; put this in a bit of context? I&#8217;m struggling to grasp what it actually means relative to past solar cycles &#038; I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m grokking it correctly.</p>
<p>OTOH, this part from the same source : </p>
<blockquote><p> We find a starting time of July 2008 with minimum occurring in November or December 2008 and maximum in June 2013.</p></blockquote>
<p>I *do* understand. We&#8217;ve much more to see sunspots &#038; hence aurora~wise as things pick up towards 2013. I&#8217;m looking forward to that!  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-287986</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 06:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-287986</guid>
		<description>You sound so dismissive! Here in northern Washington our air is chockfull of particulate from forest fires but it&#039;s not keeping me from a steady buzz of excitement. It&#039;s been fun watching all the dials and bar graphs at the Space Weather Prediction Center spin and gyrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sound so dismissive! Here in northern Washington our air is chockfull of particulate from forest fires but it&#8217;s not keeping me from a steady buzz of excitement. It&#8217;s been fun watching all the dials and bar graphs at the Space Weather Prediction Center spin and gyrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angrymonkey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-287969</link>
		<dc:creator>angrymonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-287969</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who sees the torso with its right hand outstretched ?  At first I thought the picture was posted as another example of human images that our brains trick us into seeing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who sees the torso with its right hand outstretched ?  At first I thought the picture was posted as another example of human images that our brains trick us into seeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pi-needles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-287965</link>
		<dc:creator>Pi-needles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-287965</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Sun rises again ...&quot; well it &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; do that wouldn&#039;t it? ;-) 

I think I can safely predict it will set again too! ;-) 

Seriously, good news and images - good to see the SDO working well. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Sun rises again &#8230;&#8221; well it <i>would</i> do that wouldn&#8217;t it? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I think I can safely predict it will set again too! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Seriously, good news and images &#8211; good to see the SDO working well. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnigget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-287964</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnigget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-287964</guid>
		<description>@ Chip:

Yeah. And then prepare to run like hell before the FBI helicopters land in your front lawn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chip:</p>
<p>Yeah. And then prepare to run like hell before the FBI helicopters land in your front lawn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/08/04/the-sun-rises-again/comment-page-1/#comment-287961</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=19340#comment-287961</guid>
		<description>I was cruising my RSS feed of the Internet Archive and came across some &quot;woo&quot; about this

URL=http://www.archive.org/details/CmeHeadedForEarth

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was cruising my RSS feed of the Internet Archive and came across some &#8220;woo&#8221; about this</p>
<p>URL=http://www.archive.org/details/CmeHeadedForEarth</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 22:47:26 -->
