<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Side view of the Moon!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:55:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patti Romo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-2/#comment-361189</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti Romo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 05:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-361189</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no scientist,just a lifetime wanna&#039;be astronaught…but I just had to say WOW!!!! Thank you for showing us this marvelous picture(and info)!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no scientist,just a lifetime wanna&#8217;be astronaught…but I just had to say WOW!!!! Thank you for showing us this marvelous picture(and info)!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-2/#comment-316888</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-316888</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait till they do this on Mars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait till they do this on Mars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osmo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-2/#comment-304251</link>
		<dc:creator>Osmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-304251</guid>
		<description>@fluffy #10:

Are you sure that the far side gets more light in total because of the eclipses?
What about the sunlight reflected from earth to the near side?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fluffy #10:</p>
<p>Are you sure that the far side gets more light in total because of the eclipses?<br />
What about the sunlight reflected from earth to the near side?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-2/#comment-304040</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-304040</guid>
		<description>@48: the Manicouagan crater: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manicouagan_crater</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@48: the Manicouagan crater: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manicouagan_crater" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manicouagan_crater</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaDeR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-2/#comment-303912</link>
		<dc:creator>MaDeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303912</guid>
		<description>Hey Messier Tidy Upper, anyone told ya you are troll and spammer? Go to some political blogs, you will feel in home with other rightwing xenophobic nutjobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Messier Tidy Upper, anyone told ya you are troll and spammer? Go to some political blogs, you will feel in home with other rightwing xenophobic nutjobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NelC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-2/#comment-303852</link>
		<dc:creator>NelC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 05:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303852</guid>
		<description>Curt @49: from the point of view of Earth, that&#039;s apparently so, but the situation is complicated by the fact that the Earth orbits around the Sun while the Moon orbits around the Earth. From the point of view of an observer on the Sun or from the (almost) unmoving stars, if the Moon spun at exactly the same rate as its orbit around Earth, after six months it would have turned completely around and would be showing the opposite face to Earth. So (if I&#039;ve got it the right way around) it must spin a little faster than it orbits to maintain the same face to the Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt @49: from the point of view of Earth, that&#8217;s apparently so, but the situation is complicated by the fact that the Earth orbits around the Sun while the Moon orbits around the Earth. From the point of view of an observer on the Sun or from the (almost) unmoving stars, if the Moon spun at exactly the same rate as its orbit around Earth, after six months it would have turned completely around and would be showing the opposite face to Earth. So (if I&#8217;ve got it the right way around) it must spin a little faster than it orbits to maintain the same face to the Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hanford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303647</guid>
		<description>@6@22@48, That unusual crater you&#039;re commenting on is Tsiolkovskiy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovskiy_%28crater%29


Interesting Tsiolkovskiy trivia: &quot; Apollo 17 Astronaut Harrison &quot;Jack&quot; Schmitt  and other scientists (Schmitt was the only trained scientist, a geologist, to walk on the moon) strongly advocated Tsiolkovskiy as the Apollo 17&#039;s, or a later flight&#039;s (which were all canceled), landing site, using small communications satellites deployed from the Command/Service Module for communication from the far side of the moon. NASA vetoed the idea as too risky, and Apollo 17 instead landed in the Taurus-Littrow valley on December 11, 1972.&quot; - wiki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@6@22@48, That unusual crater you&#8217;re commenting on is Tsiolkovskiy: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovskiy_%28crater%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovskiy_%28crater%29</a></p>
<p>Interesting Tsiolkovskiy trivia: &#8221; Apollo 17 Astronaut Harrison &#8220;Jack&#8221; Schmitt  and other scientists (Schmitt was the only trained scientist, a geologist, to walk on the moon) strongly advocated Tsiolkovskiy as the Apollo 17&#8242;s, or a later flight&#8217;s (which were all canceled), landing site, using small communications satellites deployed from the Command/Service Module for communication from the far side of the moon. NASA vetoed the idea as too risky, and Apollo 17 instead landed in the Taurus-Littrow valley on December 11, 1972.&#8221; &#8211; wiki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303478</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 05:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303478</guid>
		<description>@robbak (or anyone else) ... A clarification please.

Phil wrote: &quot;The Moon spins almost exactly once for every time it orbits the Earth.&quot; 

Why &quot;almost&quot;?

I understand the orbital speed variations due to the eccentricity of the orbit.  But ultimately (because of &quot;tidal lock&quot;), as the Moon completes exactly one orbit, hasn&#039;t it also rotated exactly one time?

What is it that I&#039;m not understanding?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@robbak (or anyone else) &#8230; A clarification please.</p>
<p>Phil wrote: &#8220;The Moon spins almost exactly once for every time it orbits the Earth.&#8221; </p>
<p>Why &#8220;almost&#8221;?</p>
<p>I understand the orbital speed variations due to the eccentricity of the orbit.  But ultimately (because of &#8220;tidal lock&#8221;), as the Moon completes exactly one orbit, hasn&#8217;t it also rotated exactly one time?</p>
<p>What is it that I&#8217;m not understanding?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WJM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303416</link>
		<dc:creator>WJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303416</guid>
		<description>@6 &amp; @22, that crater has a very close, if smaller, analog on Earth, in the Mistastin crater-lake in northern Labrador. Check it out on the internets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@6 &#038; @22, that crater has a very close, if smaller, analog on Earth, in the Mistastin crater-lake in northern Labrador. Check it out on the internets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tribeca Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303288</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribeca Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303288</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t ask why, but the photo reminds me of the time the Irish writer Samuel Beckett was  interviewed while shooting pool on his home table in Paris (he was known to be a wicked billiards hound). The interviewer asked what went through his mind when he played -- perhaps the spinning spheres of the cosmos or the inexorable collisions of inevitable fate, free will and primal existence?

&quot;No,&quot; he replied, &quot;I play to win.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t ask why, but the photo reminds me of the time the Irish writer Samuel Beckett was  interviewed while shooting pool on his home table in Paris (he was known to be a wicked billiards hound). The interviewer asked what went through his mind when he played &#8212; perhaps the spinning spheres of the cosmos or the inexorable collisions of inevitable fate, free will and primal existence?</p>
<p>&#8220;No,&#8221; he replied, &#8220;I play to win.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303246</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303246</guid>
		<description>Hey, I think I can see my property from here. All 4900 acres of it.

Too bad I&#039;d actually have to BE there for the claim to stick(as in, possession is nine points of the law).

I REALLY need to get my nuc rocket built. Anybody here have access to plutonium rods?

Cool pics. I never knew we could actually see 52 % of the lunar surface from earth. It just never occurred to me that the moon REALLY rocks..

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I think I can see my property from here. All 4900 acres of it.</p>
<p>Too bad I&#8217;d actually have to BE there for the claim to stick(as in, possession is nine points of the law).</p>
<p>I REALLY need to get my nuc rocket built. Anybody here have access to plutonium rods?</p>
<p>Cool pics. I never knew we could actually see 52 % of the lunar surface from earth. It just never occurred to me that the moon REALLY rocks..</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303196</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303196</guid>
		<description>Nice work LRO team! Though I&#039;ve seen many amateur images that achieve higher resolution than this map; perhaps even the downloadable TIF file is also downsampled. Have a look at Wes Higgin&#039;s amazing lunar images:
http://higginsandsons.com/astro/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work LRO team! Though I&#8217;ve seen many amateur images that achieve higher resolution than this map; perhaps even the downloadable TIF file is also downsampled. Have a look at Wes Higgin&#8217;s amazing lunar images:<br />
<a href="http://higginsandsons.com/astro/" rel="nofollow">http://higginsandsons.com/astro/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303193</guid>
		<description>EricH:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Earth does appear to move east to west and back in the Moon’s sky, over the course of the lunar cycle. This happens because of the eccentricity of the Moon’s orbit, which means that it moves around the Earth slightly faster than it rotates, for part of the month, and slightly slower the rest of the month.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Perhaps this video of a series of images over the course of a month would help?

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap051113.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libration

Of course, that&#039;s the Moon from the Earth.  I wonder if any of the cameras left on the Moon have taken such a series of images of the Earth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EricH:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Earth does appear to move east to west and back in the Moon’s sky, over the course of the lunar cycle. This happens because of the eccentricity of the Moon’s orbit, which means that it moves around the Earth slightly faster than it rotates, for part of the month, and slightly slower the rest of the month.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps this video of a series of images over the course of a month would help?</p>
<p><a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap051113.html" rel="nofollow">http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap051113.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libration" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libration</a></p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s the Moon from the Earth.  I wonder if any of the cameras left on the Moon have taken such a series of images of the Earth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy L Mason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303171</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy L Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303171</guid>
		<description>Behold the arrow slits of the Moonenites which PROVE the moon landings were hoaxes :P Our puny space capsules could never repel firepower of that magnitude!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold the arrow slits of the Moonenites which PROVE the moon landings were hoaxes <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Our puny space capsules could never repel firepower of that magnitude!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zippy the Pinhead</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303167</link>
		<dc:creator>Zippy the Pinhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303167</guid>
		<description>The question is, what is NASA?  Is it space science or human transport?  For the price of human exploration to the Moon, we could fund 10-100 robotic probes.  To Mars, it&#039;s easily over 100 science missions.  Human space travel means loss of science missions.  You can&#039;t have both at a reasonable price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, what is NASA?  Is it space science or human transport?  For the price of human exploration to the Moon, we could fund 10-100 robotic probes.  To Mars, it&#8217;s easily over 100 science missions.  Human space travel means loss of science missions.  You can&#8217;t have both at a reasonable price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303164</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303164</guid>
		<description>@ Eric H (34) -

That was a really clear and concise explanation.  I always knew that the moon (as observed from Earth) rocked about a bit so we see about 52% of the surface over time, but I didn&#039;t really understand why.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Eric H (34) -</p>
<p>That was a really clear and concise explanation.  I always knew that the moon (as observed from Earth) rocked about a bit so we see about 52% of the surface over time, but I didn&#8217;t really understand why.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303162</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303162</guid>
		<description>Dr Flimmer (36) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;@ Messier Tidy Upper

Just by posting THAT over and over again and again doesn’t make the statement more convincing. We all know how you feel about it! But repeating it ALL the time makes it look like trolling! Would you mind stopping it? Thanks!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Seconded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Flimmer (36) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>@ Messier Tidy Upper</p>
<p>Just by posting THAT over and over again and again doesn’t make the statement more convincing. We all know how you feel about it! But repeating it ALL the time makes it look like trolling! Would you mind stopping it? Thanks!</p></blockquote>
<p>Seconded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303158</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303158</guid>
		<description>@Messier Tidy Upper

&quot;for killing off human space exploration&quot;

When did that happen?  The Russians and Chinese are still going to be flying right?  So human exploration continues.  If you mourn because the guys heading for the Moon won&#039;t be your own citizens, join the club - my countrymen never went there in the first place.  My only concern about the forthcoming return to the Moon is that the Chinese are (I&#039;m assuming) likely to be less open, less inclusive about sharing the results with armchair astronauts like me who can&#039;t get enough of it.  Plus when would I get the chance to visit their launch sites and hardware museums like we do in Florida?  Unlikely.

My understanding of the cancellation was, (and BA wrote extensively on this) that it would allow NASA to focus on deeper (allbeit non manned) exploration, while private concerns, (and the Russians and ESA) took care of LEO missions.

NASA not returning to the Moon is a wrench.  We were looking forward to that.  But if the Chinese are willing to breech the political/cultural divide then just maybe we can engage with their manned Moon missions too.

BigBob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Messier Tidy Upper</p>
<p>&#8220;for killing off human space exploration&#8221;</p>
<p>When did that happen?  The Russians and Chinese are still going to be flying right?  So human exploration continues.  If you mourn because the guys heading for the Moon won&#8217;t be your own citizens, join the club &#8211; my countrymen never went there in the first place.  My only concern about the forthcoming return to the Moon is that the Chinese are (I&#8217;m assuming) likely to be less open, less inclusive about sharing the results with armchair astronauts like me who can&#8217;t get enough of it.  Plus when would I get the chance to visit their launch sites and hardware museums like we do in Florida?  Unlikely.</p>
<p>My understanding of the cancellation was, (and BA wrote extensively on this) that it would allow NASA to focus on deeper (allbeit non manned) exploration, while private concerns, (and the Russians and ESA) took care of LEO missions.</p>
<p>NASA not returning to the Moon is a wrench.  We were looking forward to that.  But if the Chinese are willing to breech the political/cultural divide then just maybe we can engage with their manned Moon missions too.</p>
<p>BigBob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303153</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303153</guid>
		<description>WTF does Islam and Obama&#039;s skin colour have to do with NASA?

Or am I just feeding the troll?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF does Islam and Obama&#8217;s skin colour have to do with NASA?</p>
<p>Or am I just feeding the troll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303151</link>
		<dc:creator>Markle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303151</guid>
		<description>Stop with the trolling MTU.  Why don&#039;t you ask Gillard to give your country a manned spaceflight program, period?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop with the trolling MTU.  Why don&#8217;t you ask Gillard to give your country a manned spaceflight program, period?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFlimmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303141</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFlimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303141</guid>
		<description>@ Messier Tidy Upper

Just by posting THAT over and over again and again doesn&#039;t make the statement more convincing. We all know how you feel about it! But repeating it ALL the time makes it look like trolling! Would you mind stopping it? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Messier Tidy Upper</p>
<p>Just by posting THAT over and over again and again doesn&#8217;t make the statement more convincing. We all know how you feel about it! But repeating it ALL the time makes it look like trolling! Would you mind stopping it? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303138</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303138</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sometimes being stuck on Earth is a bummer. We miss a lot of stuff! Like, f’rinstance, this view of the Moon which is literally impossible to get from the surface of the Earth. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes - and you know who&#039;s responsible for &lt;u&gt;that&lt;/u&gt; don&#039;t you? 

Thankyou for killing off human space exploration Barack Hussein Obama - NOT. 

Obama&#039;s NASA policy means we&#039;re going to be grounded and confined to Earth, stuck going nowhere for decades. The bi-racial pro-Muslim current US president has set us back a very long way indeed and has utterly betrayed space flight supporters, scientists generally, future generations and the legacy of past &lt;i&gt;Apollo&lt;/i&gt; glories. 

I cannot and will not forget or forgive Obama for this. But, hey, the Muslims are happy .. Oh wait no, they still hate us and always will - until we become Muslim ourselves and end our free way of life. :-(  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Sometimes being stuck on Earth is a bummer. We miss a lot of stuff! Like, f’rinstance, this view of the Moon which is literally impossible to get from the surface of the Earth. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Yes &#8211; and you know who&#8217;s responsible for <u>that</u> don&#8217;t you? </p>
<p>Thankyou for killing off human space exploration Barack Hussein Obama &#8211; NOT. </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s NASA policy means we&#8217;re going to be grounded and confined to Earth, stuck going nowhere for decades. The bi-racial pro-Muslim current US president has set us back a very long way indeed and has utterly betrayed space flight supporters, scientists generally, future generations and the legacy of past <i>Apollo</i> glories. </p>
<p>I cannot and will not forget or forgive Obama for this. But, hey, the Muslims are happy .. Oh wait no, they still hate us and always will &#8211; until we become Muslim ourselves and end our free way of life. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303130</link>
		<dc:creator>EricH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303130</guid>
		<description>@robbak: The Earth does appear to move east to west and back in the Moon&#039;s sky, over the course of the lunar cycle. This happens because of the eccentricity of the Moon&#039;s orbit, which means that it moves around the Earth slightly faster than it rotates, for part of the month, and slightly slower the rest of the month. (There is also north-south motion, because of the Moon&#039;s axial tilt.) IIRC, neither component amounts to more than 12 degrees of angle, so the Earth will always be found in the Moon&#039;s sky within a box 12 degrees on a side. (And it&#039;s probably less than that, but I&#039;m having trouble quickly locating any references with hard numbers, so I&#039;m relying on my memory.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@robbak: The Earth does appear to move east to west and back in the Moon&#8217;s sky, over the course of the lunar cycle. This happens because of the eccentricity of the Moon&#8217;s orbit, which means that it moves around the Earth slightly faster than it rotates, for part of the month, and slightly slower the rest of the month. (There is also north-south motion, because of the Moon&#8217;s axial tilt.) IIRC, neither component amounts to more than 12 degrees of angle, so the Earth will always be found in the Moon&#8217;s sky within a box 12 degrees on a side. (And it&#8217;s probably less than that, but I&#8217;m having trouble quickly locating any references with hard numbers, so I&#8217;m relying on my memory.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robbak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303121</link>
		<dc:creator>robbak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303121</guid>
		<description>@Aputsiaq: No. The same side of the moon will always face earth, baring a large impact that makes it spin.
The moon&#039;s spin is &#039;tidally locked&#039; - meaning that the moon, for many eons, was spinning with respect to the earth, but that spin was slowed down by &#039;tides&#039; in the moons rocks: Earth&#039;s gravity was enough to squash, squeeze and even liquefy the moons rocks. When the moon stopped spinning, it would have &#039;rocked&#039; back and forth until it&#039;s heavier side pointed to earth. 
There should be a remnant of that rocking motion remaining. I don&#039;t know how much it is, or if it is measurable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aputsiaq: No. The same side of the moon will always face earth, baring a large impact that makes it spin.<br />
The moon&#8217;s spin is &#8216;tidally locked&#8217; &#8211; meaning that the moon, for many eons, was spinning with respect to the earth, but that spin was slowed down by &#8216;tides&#8217; in the moons rocks: Earth&#8217;s gravity was enough to squash, squeeze and even liquefy the moons rocks. When the moon stopped spinning, it would have &#8216;rocked&#8217; back and forth until it&#8217;s heavier side pointed to earth.<br />
There should be a remnant of that rocking motion remaining. I don&#8217;t know how much it is, or if it is measurable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amapola</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/09/side-view-of-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-303089</link>
		<dc:creator>Amapola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=20675#comment-303089</guid>
		<description>@Gavin Flower, #31: &quot;A moon by any name is just as awesome.&quot; :D 

Fabulous photo of a not-generally-seen side of the Moon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gavin Flower, #31: &#8220;A moon by any name is just as awesome.&#8221; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Fabulous photo of a not-generally-seen side of the Moon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 23:09:59 -->
