<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMBC gets it right, as usual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rum and Reason &#187; Save yourself, mammal! &#124; Bad Astronomy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255427</link>
		<dc:creator>Rum and Reason &#187; Save yourself, mammal! &#124; Bad Astronomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255427</guid>
		<description>[...] hey &#8211; I&#8217;m saying all this even though there is not a single, solitary instance in the book of his using one of his cartoons featuring a beloved red-bearded balding [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hey &#8211; I&#8217;m saying all this even though there is not a single, solitary instance in the book of his using one of his cartoons featuring a beloved red-bearded balding [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255426</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255426</guid>
		<description>“Cosmology also tells us that there are perhaps 100 billion galaxies in the universe and that each contains roughly 100 billion stars. By a curious co-incidence, 100 billion is also the approximate number of cells in a human brain.”
- Page 237, &lt;i&gt;‘StarGazer’&lt;/i&gt;, Dr Fred Watson, Allen &amp; Unwin, 2004.

&amp;

“…about 40 supernovae are exploding somewhere in the universe every second. However, light from most of these events won’t reach Earth for billions of years, if ever.”
- Page 73, &lt;i&gt;“Ask Astro”&lt;/i&gt; column  in &lt;i&gt;‘Astronomy&#039;&lt;/i&gt; magazine October 2008.

But still :

&quot;If you put three grains of sand inside a vast cathedral, that cathedral will be more densely packed with grains of sand than stars are found apart in space.&quot;
- Page 28, &lt;i&gt;&#039;Skywatching&#039;&lt;/i&gt;, David H. Levy, Ken Fin Books, 1995.


***

Just on the off-chance that somebody is still reading this &amp; is interested. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Cosmology also tells us that there are perhaps 100 billion galaxies in the universe and that each contains roughly 100 billion stars. By a curious co-incidence, 100 billion is also the approximate number of cells in a human brain.”<br />
- Page 237, <i>‘StarGazer’</i>, Dr Fred Watson, Allen &amp; Unwin, 2004.</p>
<p>&amp;</p>
<p>“…about 40 supernovae are exploding somewhere in the universe every second. However, light from most of these events won’t reach Earth for billions of years, if ever.”<br />
- Page 73, <i>“Ask Astro”</i> column  in <i>‘Astronomy&#8217;</i> magazine October 2008.</p>
<p>But still :</p>
<p>&#8220;If you put three grains of sand inside a vast cathedral, that cathedral will be more densely packed with grains of sand than stars are found apart in space.&#8221;<br />
- Page 28, <i>&#8216;Skywatching&#8217;</i>, David H. Levy, Ken Fin Books, 1995.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Just on the off-chance that somebody is still reading this &amp; is interested. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris A.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255425</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255425</guid>
		<description>@mike burkhart (#30):
&quot;I once read :The number of stars in the universe is equal to the number of sand grainds (sic) on every beach and desert on Earth&quot;

Depending on who&#039;s making the estimates, it&#039;s usually stated that the number of stars is comparable to the number of grains of sand on every beach (deserts excluded).  When you throw the deserts in, it&#039;s harder to get a number that&#039;s similar to the estimates for the number of stars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike burkhart (#30):<br />
&#8220;I once read :The number of stars in the universe is equal to the number of sand grainds (sic) on every beach and desert on Earth&#8221;</p>
<p>Depending on who&#8217;s making the estimates, it&#8217;s usually stated that the number of stars is comparable to the number of grains of sand on every beach (deserts excluded).  When you throw the deserts in, it&#8217;s harder to get a number that&#8217;s similar to the estimates for the number of stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike burkhart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255424</link>
		<dc:creator>mike burkhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255424</guid>
		<description>To figure the number of stars in the universe we would need to:1know the number of galaxys in the universe 2the number of stars in each galaxy including globular clusters witch lie just outside galaxys ,this number varys 3number of protostars forming in each galaxy again varys after caculating all that you have the number of stars in the universe. Or think of something I once read :The number of stars in the universe is equal to the number of sand grainds on every beach and desert on Earth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To figure the number of stars in the universe we would need to:1know the number of galaxys in the universe 2the number of stars in each galaxy including globular clusters witch lie just outside galaxys ,this number varys 3number of protostars forming in each galaxy again varys after caculating all that you have the number of stars in the universe. Or think of something I once read :The number of stars in the universe is equal to the number of sand grainds on every beach and desert on Earth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike burkhart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255423</link>
		<dc:creator>mike burkhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 04:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255423</guid>
		<description>How about a prize to whoever can figure out how many stars there are in the universe.My guess the number is infinte Also I like War of the worlds I have a copy   that has War of the worlds and the Time Machine in the same book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a prize to whoever can figure out how many stars there are in the universe.My guess the number is infinte Also I like War of the worlds I have a copy   that has War of the worlds and the Time Machine in the same book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255422</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255422</guid>
		<description>@26. Bipedal Tetrapod : Thanks. :-)

&lt;i&gt;&#039;The War of the Worlds&#039;&lt;/i&gt; is one of my favourite novels - I&#039;ve got a copy of my own too but I did first learn about it via audio tape cassette version of the Jeff Wayne&#039;s Musical version back in high school.

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@26. Bipedal Tetrapod : Thanks. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i>&#8216;The War of the Worlds&#8217;</i> is one of my favourite novels &#8211; I&#8217;ve got a copy of my own too but I did first learn about it via audio tape cassette version of the Jeff Wayne&#8217;s Musical version back in high school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris A.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255421</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255421</guid>
		<description>@Gary Ansorge (#9):
&quot;Old joke from my days as a computer field engineer with Univac(you know, the company that actually built the first electronic computers).&quot;

OT, I&#039;m afraid, but as an alumni of Iowa State University I am compelled to point out that Univac (founded by Eckert and Mauchly, the inventors of the ENIAC computer) did NOT build the first electronic computers!  By a 1973 ruling of a U.S. District judge, that honor belongs to John Atanasoff and Cliff Berry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atanasoff–Berry_Computer

Said ruling stated that &quot;ENIAC derived many basic ideas from the Atanasoff–Berry Computer&quot; and &quot;Eckert and Mauchly did not themselves first invent the automatic electronic digital computer, but instead derived that subject matter from one Dr. John Vincent Atanasoff.&quot;

As someone whose grad student office sat adjacent to the damp corner of the physics building basement where the ABC once stood (hallowed ground for computer geeks), I had to represent, yo!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gary Ansorge (#9):<br />
&#8220;Old joke from my days as a computer field engineer with Univac(you know, the company that actually built the first electronic computers).&#8221;</p>
<p>OT, I&#8217;m afraid, but as an alumni of Iowa State University I am compelled to point out that Univac (founded by Eckert and Mauchly, the inventors of the ENIAC computer) did NOT build the first electronic computers!  By a 1973 ruling of a U.S. District judge, that honor belongs to John Atanasoff and Cliff Berry:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atanasoff–Berry_Computer" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atanasoff–Berry_Computer</a></p>
<p>Said ruling stated that &#8220;ENIAC derived many basic ideas from the Atanasoff–Berry Computer&#8221; and &#8220;Eckert and Mauchly did not themselves first invent the automatic electronic digital computer, but instead derived that subject matter from one Dr. John Vincent Atanasoff.&#8221;</p>
<p>As someone whose grad student office sat adjacent to the damp corner of the physics building basement where the ABC once stood (hallowed ground for computer geeks), I had to represent, yo!  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bipedal Tetrapod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255420</link>
		<dc:creator>Bipedal Tetrapod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255420</guid>
		<description>The line from the book is: &quot;...that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.&quot;
( http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/warworlds/b1c1.html )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The line from the book is: &#8220;&#8230;that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.&#8221;<br />
( <a href="http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/warworlds/b1c1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/warworlds/b1c1.html</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255419</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255419</guid>
		<description>@11.   Trebuchet Says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;@ #5 MTU: “Buffy”??? Surely you meant “Xena”.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oops! Er .. yes. I did indeed.

Although there is &lt;b&gt;also&lt;/b&gt; an ice dwarf planet nick-named &#039;Buffy&#039; too :

****

&lt;blockquote&gt; &quot;Buffy&quot; or 2004 XR190 – the ice dwarf with the most “tilted” or highly inclined object travelling more “up &amp; down” than “left to right” with its inclination of 47 degrees – but in an unusually circular orbit. A scattered or detached disk object discovered in  Dec. 2004 “Buffy” is the 6th most distant object so far known after Eris, Sedna and some unnamed TNO’s with an orbital range of 52 -62 AU  currently its about 58 AU from our Sun.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Source : Wikipedia, various old astronomy magazine news items.

***

@18.   Neil Haggath Says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;#5 MTU: Unfortunately, many star names are a lot less “romantic”, when you consider their translations – especially the Arabic ones, which are often just descriptions of their positions in the constellation figures. e.g. Betelgeuse means “The giant’s armpit”! &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know - although they still sound good. Also, I gather the names have evolved and &quot;been corrupted&quot; chinese whisper style over time so literal meanings they aren&#039;t really anymore.

@21. Bipedal Tetrapod :

One phrase that springs to mind here is the evocative line from the HG Wells &lt;i&gt;&#039;War of the Worlds&#039;&lt;/i&gt; or at least the musical version of it :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot; .. like all the creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The number of those would be, well, astronomical! ;-) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@11.   Trebuchet Says:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>@ #5 MTU: “Buffy”??? Surely you meant “Xena”.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Oops! Er .. yes. I did indeed.</p>
<p>Although there is <b>also</b> an ice dwarf planet nick-named &#8216;Buffy&#8217; too :</p>
<p>****</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;Buffy&#8221; or 2004 XR190 – the ice dwarf with the most “tilted” or highly inclined object travelling more “up &amp; down” than “left to right” with its inclination of 47 degrees – but in an unusually circular orbit. A scattered or detached disk object discovered in  Dec. 2004 “Buffy” is the 6th most distant object so far known after Eris, Sedna and some unnamed TNO’s with an orbital range of 52 -62 AU  currently its about 58 AU from our Sun.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source : Wikipedia, various old astronomy magazine news items.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>@18.   Neil Haggath Says:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>#5 MTU: Unfortunately, many star names are a lot less “romantic”, when you consider their translations – especially the Arabic ones, which are often just descriptions of their positions in the constellation figures. e.g. Betelgeuse means “The giant’s armpit”! </i></p></blockquote>
<p>I know &#8211; although they still sound good. Also, I gather the names have evolved and &#8220;been corrupted&#8221; chinese whisper style over time so literal meanings they aren&#8217;t really anymore.</p>
<p>@21. Bipedal Tetrapod :</p>
<p>One phrase that springs to mind here is the evocative line from the HG Wells <i>&#8216;War of the Worlds&#8217;</i> or at least the musical version of it :</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8221; .. like all the creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>The number of those would be, well, astronomical! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Jackson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/26/smbc-gets-it-right-as-usual/#comment-255418</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21440#comment-255418</guid>
		<description>Are the second and third panels also well-known scientists in the media, along with their wives? I don&#039;t recognize them, but maybe some of you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the second and third panels also well-known scientists in the media, along with their wives? I don&#8217;t recognize them, but maybe some of you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-22 23:08:35 -->