<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA shoots the Moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Mayhem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255637</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Mayhem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255637</guid>
		<description>TAKE THAT, MOON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAKE THAT, MOON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl lafonge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255636</link>
		<dc:creator>carl lafonge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255636</guid>
		<description>@Mapnut. From the angle that the picture was taken the laser appears to reach all the way to the moon. As you move away from the source, it becomes more faint and the fact that the laser stops short of the moon is obvious.  It really does look like this. In person you would be able to see the pulsing. In this picture it looks like a beam.

The green laser light is visible as long as there is something for it to bounce off of. In this case it&#039;s molecules in the atmosphere (Rayleigh/Raman backscatter ). Above 100 km or so there isn&#039;t anything for the laser to bounce off of until it hits the moon (or the LRO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mapnut. From the angle that the picture was taken the laser appears to reach all the way to the moon. As you move away from the source, it becomes more faint and the fact that the laser stops short of the moon is obvious.  It really does look like this. In person you would be able to see the pulsing. In this picture it looks like a beam.</p>
<p>The green laser light is visible as long as there is something for it to bounce off of. In this case it&#8217;s molecules in the atmosphere (Rayleigh/Raman backscatter ). Above 100 km or so there isn&#8217;t anything for the laser to bounce off of until it hits the moon (or the LRO).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forrest noble</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255635</link>
		<dc:creator>forrest noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255635</guid>
		<description>&quot;Shooting the moon&quot; more than 60 years ago (before the laser was invented) was rather easy,  so I&#039;ve heard :)

But seriously, this picture is too cool. I&#039;ll take their word for it that it isn&#039;t doctored. As already stated, however, they&#039;ve been shooting lasers at the moon on a regular basis since we first put the reflectors there about 1970.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shooting the moon&#8221; more than 60 years ago (before the laser was invented) was rather easy,  so I&#8217;ve heard <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But seriously, this picture is too cool. I&#8217;ll take their word for it that it isn&#8217;t doctored. As already stated, however, they&#8217;ve been shooting lasers at the moon on a regular basis since we first put the reflectors there about 1970.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beaton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255634</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255634</guid>
		<description>Yeah, sure, go ahead and laugh. I checked the moon last night and half of it had been COMPLETELY BLOWN AWAY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sure, go ahead and laugh. I checked the moon last night and half of it had been COMPLETELY BLOWN AWAY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mapnut</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mapnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255633</guid>
		<description>As with the Milky way photo, I don&#039;t see how those beams can actually be aimed at the moon.  How high up does the part of the beam go that we can actually see?  Surely the photo isn&#039;t showing the actual beam just before it contacts the moon, 240,000 miles away.  If the beams we see are only visible, say, 100 miles up, then they must cross each other and continue in different directions, going nowhere near the moon.  Is it a doctored photo?  Or did they temporarily aim the lasers so it would look like they&#039;re hitting the moon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with the Milky way photo, I don&#8217;t see how those beams can actually be aimed at the moon.  How high up does the part of the beam go that we can actually see?  Surely the photo isn&#8217;t showing the actual beam just before it contacts the moon, 240,000 miles away.  If the beams we see are only visible, say, 100 miles up, then they must cross each other and continue in different directions, going nowhere near the moon.  Is it a doctored photo?  Or did they temporarily aim the lasers so it would look like they&#8217;re hitting the moon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisha Sterling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255632</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisha Sterling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255632</guid>
		<description>Hey, do they have one of these things at UC Berkeley, too? I remember seeing something that looked just like this green laser coming up on the hill, it looked like somewhere near the Lawrence Lab, at Berkeley when I was a student there in the late 90&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, do they have one of these things at UC Berkeley, too? I remember seeing something that looked just like this green laser coming up on the hill, it looked like somewhere near the Lawrence Lab, at Berkeley when I was a student there in the late 90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ma</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255631</link>
		<dc:creator>ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255631</guid>
		<description>woww this is great following this blog now, love astronomy :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woww this is great following this blog now, love astronomy <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moon Town by Steve Ogden - Real Life VBL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255630</link>
		<dc:creator>Moon Town by Steve Ogden - Real Life VBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255630</guid>
		<description>[...] Town&#8217;s VBL, but lookit NASA GO! The huge nerds extremely cool guys at NASA can be seen at the Bad Astronomy blog using lasers to measure the distance between Earth and things that are very far away. And [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Town&#8217;s VBL, but lookit NASA GO! The huge nerds extremely cool guys at NASA can be seen at the Bad Astronomy blog using lasers to measure the distance between Earth and things that are very far away. And [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonçalo Aguiar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255629</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonçalo Aguiar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255629</guid>
		<description>When I first saw this picture I thought that the first laser was being reflected back from the moon! How silly am I!? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first saw this picture I thought that the first laser was being reflected back from the moon! How silly am I!? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/29/nasa-shoots-the-moon/#comment-255628</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21617#comment-255628</guid>
		<description>I love my green laser for pointing out constellations at public star parties, helping others locate specific objects, using instead of a finder scope on my telescopes....
Mine is a 5 milliwatt.  That is the highest I will use.  From the information I have, our natural blink reflex will protect one&#039;s eyes if by some accident or stupidity it is pointed at someone.  Higher than 5mW poses increased danger of potentially permanent damage, and for me, is not worth the risk.  The 5mW does not work in a highly light plolluted area, but does work in areas that are not completely dark. Bigger and brighter, in this case, is not needed when 5mW works adequately for small groups under most conditions .   They are not to be used at star parties where someone is astro imaging nor near airports as planes are necessarily at low altitudes.  In the U.S. it is not permitted to sell lasers for pointing applications over 5 mW. I think the U.K. is limited to 1mW.  Canada, as far as I can find, has no specifc restrictions.  I actually wish there were as there have been some cases of idiots pointing green lasers at aircraft.  If there are too many foolish uses, these lasers could be banned and that would a shame.  They are something to be used with consideration and caution.  Green lasers are not toys.
 See
http://www.laserpointersafety.com/index.html
for great information on green lasers.  The section on &#039;Effects on Pilots&#039; and the &#039;this photo&#039; it links to is particularly interesting.
I paid a ridiculous high amount for my first one.  Now, they can be purchased for ridiculously low amounts.  Unfortunatley, some eBay advertisements advertise them as toys---such as showing how the high powered ones might light a match.   There are also some high powered ones for sale from other countries that do not meet North American stasndards.
They are useful educational tools with the potential to be misused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my green laser for pointing out constellations at public star parties, helping others locate specific objects, using instead of a finder scope on my telescopes&#8230;.<br />
Mine is a 5 milliwatt.  That is the highest I will use.  From the information I have, our natural blink reflex will protect one&#8217;s eyes if by some accident or stupidity it is pointed at someone.  Higher than 5mW poses increased danger of potentially permanent damage, and for me, is not worth the risk.  The 5mW does not work in a highly light plolluted area, but does work in areas that are not completely dark. Bigger and brighter, in this case, is not needed when 5mW works adequately for small groups under most conditions .   They are not to be used at star parties where someone is astro imaging nor near airports as planes are necessarily at low altitudes.  In the U.S. it is not permitted to sell lasers for pointing applications over 5 mW. I think the U.K. is limited to 1mW.  Canada, as far as I can find, has no specifc restrictions.  I actually wish there were as there have been some cases of idiots pointing green lasers at aircraft.  If there are too many foolish uses, these lasers could be banned and that would a shame.  They are something to be used with consideration and caution.  Green lasers are not toys.<br />
 See<br />
<a href="http://www.laserpointersafety.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.laserpointersafety.com/index.html</a><br />
for great information on green lasers.  The section on &#8216;Effects on Pilots&#8217; and the &#8216;this photo&#8217; it links to is particularly interesting.<br />
I paid a ridiculous high amount for my first one.  Now, they can be purchased for ridiculously low amounts.  Unfortunatley, some eBay advertisements advertise them as toys&#8212;such as showing how the high powered ones might light a match.   There are also some high powered ones for sale from other countries that do not meet North American stasndards.<br />
They are useful educational tools with the potential to be misused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-24 16:34:06 -->