<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Bad Universe Episode 2 teasers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkyviewGlenn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-2/#comment-320449</link>
		<dc:creator>SkyviewGlenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-320449</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Could you explain further  your talk re long duration debilitating g-forces that an accelerating space traveler would experience even when away from Earth or other large bodies creating gravity?  Wouldn&#039;t g-forces diminish when astronauts have reached cruising speed?  A mini follow up web video would help.

Question # 4 copied below from Responses to “More Bad Universe Episode 2 teasers!” is probably widely pondered;
&quot;4.   GreyDuck Says:
October 5th, 2010 at 11:38 am

So… why would a space traveler be pulling high-Gs for long periods of time? Wouldn’t they be enjoying NO Gs for most of the journey…?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Could you explain further  your talk re long duration debilitating g-forces that an accelerating space traveler would experience even when away from Earth or other large bodies creating gravity?  Wouldn&#8217;t g-forces diminish when astronauts have reached cruising speed?  A mini follow up web video would help.</p>
<p>Question # 4 copied below from Responses to “More Bad Universe Episode 2 teasers!” is probably widely pondered;<br />
&#8220;4.   GreyDuck Says:<br />
October 5th, 2010 at 11:38 am</p>
<p>So… why would a space traveler be pulling high-Gs for long periods of time? Wouldn’t they be enjoying NO Gs for most of the journey…?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-2/#comment-320339</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-320339</guid>
		<description>How is this relevant at all to space flying astronauts? 

Obviously, some people, aka pilots, are flying under these circumstances all the time, for several years. 

If an alien astronaut would be on a ship flying across space, he would have received the proper training before take off of course. The training you didn&#039;t  go through. 

And you are also assuming that the alien tech would be restrained to our knowledge of physics and technology. Maybe they would have found a way around the G&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this relevant at all to space flying astronauts? </p>
<p>Obviously, some people, aka pilots, are flying under these circumstances all the time, for several years. </p>
<p>If an alien astronaut would be on a ship flying across space, he would have received the proper training before take off of course. The training you didn&#8217;t  go through. </p>
<p>And you are also assuming that the alien tech would be restrained to our knowledge of physics and technology. Maybe they would have found a way around the G&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Pechtel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-2/#comment-318195</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Pechtel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-318195</guid>
		<description>Another vote that this makes no sense.  The limit on interstellar travel is fuel, not acceleration (unless you have to complete your acceleration within a short distance because it&#039;s coming from some local feature--a star or a laser you leave behind or the like.)

If you can sustain 1g then the stars are easily within reach.  Higher accelerations will cut down the shipboard time but they won&#039;t really make that big a change in Earth time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another vote that this makes no sense.  The limit on interstellar travel is fuel, not acceleration (unless you have to complete your acceleration within a short distance because it&#8217;s coming from some local feature&#8211;a star or a laser you leave behind or the like.)</p>
<p>If you can sustain 1g then the stars are easily within reach.  Higher accelerations will cut down the shipboard time but they won&#8217;t really make that big a change in Earth time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Bookbinder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-2/#comment-318181</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Bookbinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-318181</guid>
		<description>I am confused. Why would an interstellar traveler have to experience high Gs? At 1 G (which I am used to) I could accelerate to an effective velocity of 1 c in 1 year (at which point it appears to me that I am traveling at 1 c due to time dilation). With just 1 G acceleration I can go to Alpha Centauri in about 4 subjective years, Sirius in about 6, clean across the galaxy in about 50. The limitation isn&#039;t the G force you can withstand, it is the energy needed to accelerate a vehicle at that rate for that long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused. Why would an interstellar traveler have to experience high Gs? At 1 G (which I am used to) I could accelerate to an effective velocity of 1 c in 1 year (at which point it appears to me that I am traveling at 1 c due to time dilation). With just 1 G acceleration I can go to Alpha Centauri in about 4 subjective years, Sirius in about 6, clean across the galaxy in about 50. The limitation isn&#8217;t the G force you can withstand, it is the energy needed to accelerate a vehicle at that rate for that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Hoehne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-2/#comment-316246</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Hoehne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-316246</guid>
		<description>I just did a quick &quot;Back of the envelope&quot; calculation.  To get a puny 1000 kg spaceship up to 99% the speed of light- so as to take advantage of a decent amount of time dilation-  would require roughly 6 x10^20 joules of energy.  That&#039;s roughly the energy equivalent of burning 600 billion barrels of oil or firing off around 6 million Hiroshima bombs.  In other words, the energy cost of getting from one star system to another in a practical amount of time is ridiculously prohibitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did a quick &#8220;Back of the envelope&#8221; calculation.  To get a puny 1000 kg spaceship up to 99% the speed of light- so as to take advantage of a decent amount of time dilation-  would require roughly 6 x10^20 joules of energy.  That&#8217;s roughly the energy equivalent of burning 600 billion barrels of oil or firing off around 6 million Hiroshima bombs.  In other words, the energy cost of getting from one star system to another in a practical amount of time is ridiculously prohibitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Hoehne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-2/#comment-316239</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Hoehne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-316239</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I had intended to come on here to quibble about the g issue being irrelevant, since even 1g of acceleration could get you up to decent relativistic speeds in a reasonable amount of time, but I find that a whole bunch of other folks have beat me to it.      My faith in humanity is increased.

That said, I think the issues brought up in the show SHOULD have been: 

1) Space is REALLY, REALLY, REALLY big.   I get the sense sometimes that folks just don&#039;t realize how far the stars actually are and how much of an effort it would be to get there.   

2) The energy involved in getting  a spacecraft of any appreciable size to near light speed is mind-bogglingly huge.    Flying to another star system, say 1000 ly away, to take over a planet and use its resources makes about much sense as flying to Australia (from the US) to get the raw materials for a sandwich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I had intended to come on here to quibble about the g issue being irrelevant, since even 1g of acceleration could get you up to decent relativistic speeds in a reasonable amount of time, but I find that a whole bunch of other folks have beat me to it.      My faith in humanity is increased.</p>
<p>That said, I think the issues brought up in the show SHOULD have been: </p>
<p>1) Space is REALLY, REALLY, REALLY big.   I get the sense sometimes that folks just don&#8217;t realize how far the stars actually are and how much of an effort it would be to get there.   </p>
<p>2) The energy involved in getting  a spacecraft of any appreciable size to near light speed is mind-bogglingly huge.    Flying to another star system, say 1000 ly away, to take over a planet and use its resources makes about much sense as flying to Australia (from the US) to get the raw materials for a sandwich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vanderschel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315860</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vanderschel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315860</guid>
		<description>For those who don&#039;t get The Discovery Channel and wonder how they can get a chance to view the Bad Universe shows:  A friend told me that she had been able to find the first one as a torrent download.  She had missed it when it first ran and she had been frustrated for many weeks that the Discovery Channel ran it on only that one night, which I agree was strange given that such a high percentage of Discovery&#039;s shows are reruns.  I was fortunate enough to have caught that show the one night it ran, and I do recommend it.  Surely Discovery will rerun it eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who don&#8217;t get The Discovery Channel and wonder how they can get a chance to view the Bad Universe shows:  A friend told me that she had been able to find the first one as a torrent download.  She had missed it when it first ran and she had been frustrated for many weeks that the Discovery Channel ran it on only that one night, which I agree was strange given that such a high percentage of Discovery&#8217;s shows are reruns.  I was fortunate enough to have caught that show the one night it ran, and I do recommend it.  Surely Discovery will rerun it eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASFalcon13</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315853</link>
		<dc:creator>ASFalcon13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315853</guid>
		<description>@Sarah

&quot;For all those jealous of Phil’s ride: The fun quotient in about any aerobatic light aircraft is just about as high.&quot;

Sometimes, even more so.  The really high-performance aerobatic birds can perform some downright ridiculous maneuvers.  To (mis)quote Ed Hamill, &quot;You can&#039;t go Mach in a Pitts, but you can&#039;t lomcevak in an F-16.&quot;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQpnzMJRtCU&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sarah</p>
<p>&#8220;For all those jealous of Phil’s ride: The fun quotient in about any aerobatic light aircraft is just about as high.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sometimes, even more so.  The really high-performance aerobatic birds can perform some downright ridiculous maneuvers.  To (mis)quote Ed Hamill, &#8220;You can&#8217;t go Mach in a Pitts, but you can&#8217;t lomcevak in an F-16.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQpnzMJRtCU&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQpnzMJRtCU&#038;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315799</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315799</guid>
		<description>9.   ASFalcon13 Says: &quot;…it’s unlikely that a g-suit like the one you wore would be of much use to a space traveller. Yours works for fighter pilots because the acceleration you feel in a hard pull is radially outward from the center of the turn, and roughly head-to-toe, so all the blood rushes to your lower extremities. However, for a space traveler lying on their back in a rocket, the acceleration they feel will be front to back. In this case, all the blood is going to already be rushing to their torso and head anyway, so the g-suit on the lower extremities really doesn&#039;t have much to contribute to this.&quot;

While this is correct, it doesn&#039;t address the other problems with g-suits, even if the aliens decided to fly standing up. G-suits are transient helpers. The bladders inflate during a turn and then relax at normal (or at least lower) g-forces. If they were active all the time you&#039;d have no lower extremities in a really short while.

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9.   ASFalcon13 Says: &#8220;…it’s unlikely that a g-suit like the one you wore would be of much use to a space traveller. Yours works for fighter pilots because the acceleration you feel in a hard pull is radially outward from the center of the turn, and roughly head-to-toe, so all the blood rushes to your lower extremities. However, for a space traveler lying on their back in a rocket, the acceleration they feel will be front to back. In this case, all the blood is going to already be rushing to their torso and head anyway, so the g-suit on the lower extremities really doesn&#8217;t have much to contribute to this.&#8221;</p>
<p>While this is correct, it doesn&#8217;t address the other problems with g-suits, even if the aliens decided to fly standing up. G-suits are transient helpers. The bladders inflate during a turn and then relax at normal (or at least lower) g-forces. If they were active all the time you&#8217;d have no lower extremities in a really short while.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315796</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315796</guid>
		<description>7.   Jason Says: &quot;&#039;So… why would a space traveler be pulling high-Gs for long periods of time? Wouldn&#039;t they be enjoying NO Gs for most of the journey…?&#039;  
I guess that would depend on the kind of journey, but assuming you had the energy to do it the quickest way (ship time) to get somewhere is to accelerate the entire trip (or rather accelerate half the way there and decelerate the rest of the way).&quot;

Correct. If you were, say, the Robinson family and wanted to head to Alpha Centauri, you could do the boost-and-coast method. After getting to solar escape velocity (~36,000 MPH/58.000 Km/hr) you could coast the 4.2 light years, but it would take 78,000 years to get there.  If you had a magical ship like the Jupiter 2 that can accelerate continuously at 1g, the trip is reduced to 5.8 years with a mid-flight turnaround velocity of  95%c. Those are ground years. To the crew (undergoing the accelerations) the trip would seem like 3.5 years due to relativistic effects.

BTW, I didn&#039;t just pull those numbers out of a hat. There&#039;s a new ARA Press book on the making of the &quot;Lost in Space&quot; pilot coming out in about a month. Stay tuned!

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7.   Jason Says: &#8220;&#8216;So… why would a space traveler be pulling high-Gs for long periods of time? Wouldn&#8217;t they be enjoying NO Gs for most of the journey…?&#8217;<br />
I guess that would depend on the kind of journey, but assuming you had the energy to do it the quickest way (ship time) to get somewhere is to accelerate the entire trip (or rather accelerate half the way there and decelerate the rest of the way).&#8221;</p>
<p>Correct. If you were, say, the Robinson family and wanted to head to Alpha Centauri, you could do the boost-and-coast method. After getting to solar escape velocity (~36,000 MPH/58.000 Km/hr) you could coast the 4.2 light years, but it would take 78,000 years to get there.  If you had a magical ship like the Jupiter 2 that can accelerate continuously at 1g, the trip is reduced to 5.8 years with a mid-flight turnaround velocity of  95%c. Those are ground years. To the crew (undergoing the accelerations) the trip would seem like 3.5 years due to relativistic effects.</p>
<p>BTW, I didn&#8217;t just pull those numbers out of a hat. There&#8217;s a new ARA Press book on the making of the &#8220;Lost in Space&#8221; pilot coming out in about a month. Stay tuned!</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315733</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315733</guid>
		<description>For all those jealous of Phil&#039;s ride:   The fun quotient in about any aerobatic light aircraft is just about as high.   Pitts, Christen Eagle, Starduster, the biplanes are my sentimental favorite, but there are lots of options.

True, for just a ride there will be no jet engine involved.  ( Unless you spend big $ and ride a russian Mig. )    But you can  fly (and even buy) one of these yourselves!

--Airplane nut</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all those jealous of Phil&#8217;s ride:   The fun quotient in about any aerobatic light aircraft is just about as high.   Pitts, Christen Eagle, Starduster, the biplanes are my sentimental favorite, but there are lots of options.</p>
<p>True, for just a ride there will be no jet engine involved.  ( Unless you spend big $ and ride a russian Mig. )    But you can  fly (and even buy) one of these yourselves!</p>
<p>&#8211;Airplane nut</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315726</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315726</guid>
		<description>Your NAME is on the PLANE! :)

When is Bad Universe coming to Europe (specifically the Netherlands)? Can&#039;t wait to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your NAME is on the PLANE! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When is Bad Universe coming to Europe (specifically the Netherlands)? Can&#8217;t wait to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315572</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315572</guid>
		<description>What no &quot;Holy Haleakala&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What no &#8220;Holy Haleakala&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASFalcon13</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315503</link>
		<dc:creator>ASFalcon13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315503</guid>
		<description>@Rory Kent

&quot;That was some really great footage. I felt a visceral reaction; I could actually imagine what it’d be like (but I’m sure my conception of it is still rather weak)&quot;

I&#039;ve pulled 4-5g unassisted (no g-suit) in light airplanes before (I&#039;ve experienced aerobatic flight in both a Bellance Decathlon and a Cessna 150 Aerobat).  To get an even better idea of how it feels, imagine this.  Imagine that you&#039;re sitting in a chair, and someone comes along and attaches tethers to your face and body.  Then, all of a sudden, he quickly attaches half a ton of weights to the other end of the tethers.  Everything suddenly feels like it weighs 5 times as much as it usually does - you&#039;re body&#039;s trying to squish itself into your seat cushion, and it takes a lot of effort to even attempt to lift up an arm or your head.  That&#039;s the best way I can describe the sensation, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rory Kent</p>
<p>&#8220;That was some really great footage. I felt a visceral reaction; I could actually imagine what it’d be like (but I’m sure my conception of it is still rather weak)&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve pulled 4-5g unassisted (no g-suit) in light airplanes before (I&#8217;ve experienced aerobatic flight in both a Bellance Decathlon and a Cessna 150 Aerobat).  To get an even better idea of how it feels, imagine this.  Imagine that you&#8217;re sitting in a chair, and someone comes along and attaches tethers to your face and body.  Then, all of a sudden, he quickly attaches half a ton of weights to the other end of the tethers.  Everything suddenly feels like it weighs 5 times as much as it usually does &#8211; you&#8217;re body&#8217;s trying to squish itself into your seat cushion, and it takes a lot of effort to even attempt to lift up an arm or your head.  That&#8217;s the best way I can describe the sensation, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315435</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315435</guid>
		<description>Very curious to see why passengers on an interstellar spacecraft would have to endure high G-forces for so long... 
But my main question is- does the oxygen mask have to stay on while you&#039;re in the air? Because you sure as hell wouldn&#039;t want to puke in to that thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very curious to see why passengers on an interstellar spacecraft would have to endure high G-forces for so long&#8230;<br />
But my main question is- does the oxygen mask have to stay on while you&#8217;re in the air? Because you sure as hell wouldn&#8217;t want to puke in to that thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechyDad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315397</link>
		<dc:creator>TechyDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315397</guid>
		<description>I am both jealous that you got to take this flight and (considering my fear of falling which would be triggered big time by that plane) relieved that it wasn&#039;t me.  I look forward to seeing more Bad Universe tonight.  Going to try to watch it live, but will be DVRing it just in case.  (Also useful for watching it again and again and again.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am both jealous that you got to take this flight and (considering my fear of falling which would be triggered big time by that plane) relieved that it wasn&#8217;t me.  I look forward to seeing more Bad Universe tonight.  Going to try to watch it live, but will be DVRing it just in case.  (Also useful for watching it again and again and again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomovie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315382</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomovie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315382</guid>
		<description>Woww, that looks so cooool!! I once took a flight in an old four-seat wobbly airplane and it already made me throw-up, but nevertheless I definitely would like to try this!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woww, that looks so cooool!! I once took a flight in an old four-seat wobbly airplane and it already made me throw-up, but nevertheless I definitely would like to try this!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Jackson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315364</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315364</guid>
		<description>And keep beating on Discovery Channel UK to run Bad Astronomy over there in Lizzies Queendom:

http://www.yourdiscovery.com/uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And keep beating on Discovery Channel UK to run Bad Astronomy over there in Lizzies Queendom:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yourdiscovery.com/uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yourdiscovery.com/uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315277</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315277</guid>
		<description>Wow. Oh my FSM that looks like fun. :-) 

Did you have the right stuff? :-) 

Of course, an interplanetary or interstellar flight need not be pulling so many gee&#039;s constantly methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Oh my FSM that looks like fun. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Did you have the right stuff? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Of course, an interplanetary or interstellar flight need not be pulling so many gee&#8217;s constantly methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315251</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 02:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315251</guid>
		<description>Phil&#039;s flight was as useful as most Mythbusters&#039; explosions. I approve it, nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil&#8217;s flight was as useful as most Mythbusters&#8217; explosions. I approve it, nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyesoars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315237</link>
		<dc:creator>eyesoars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 02:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315237</guid>
		<description>James@28:

  That&#039;s also called the &#039;grunt&#039; maneuver, and it&#039;s notionally just like straining on the pot.  It helps, even with the flight suit, and the flight suit helps more.  Most people black out at 4-6 Gs w/o a flight suit, and the flight suit adds maybe a g or two to that.

---

  You don&#039;t really need to go terribly fast to get big Gs.  You just need to be able to turn tight circles.  Most any aircraft can manage that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James@28:</p>
<p>  That&#8217;s also called the &#8216;grunt&#8217; maneuver, and it&#8217;s notionally just like straining on the pot.  It helps, even with the flight suit, and the flight suit helps more.  Most people black out at 4-6 Gs w/o a flight suit, and the flight suit adds maybe a g or two to that.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>  You don&#8217;t really need to go terribly fast to get big Gs.  You just need to be able to turn tight circles.  Most any aircraft can manage that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315163</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315163</guid>
		<description>Just figure our how to accelerate to within 95% the speed of light - (without turning people into chunky salsa) - then &quot;cruise&quot; at that stable sub-light speed in comfortable micro-gravity without pulling any Gs for a while. You&#039;ll get to planets within this half of the galaxy in pretty good time.  

Since space is extremely tenuous yet for a spacecraft dust and gas will seem compressed at that speed, your ship will be akin to an ice breaker. You&#039;ll have to precede your ship&#039;s arrival in a given area with electromagnetic pulses (allowable at light speed) to push aside molecules or even pebbles and forge a vacuum tunnel.  

Then you&#039;ll have to figure out how to slow down relative to the frame of the destination. And there&#039;s also maintaining life support, air, food, water, power, systems...or...relax and watch it all solved on Star Trek reruns.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just figure our how to accelerate to within 95% the speed of light &#8211; (without turning people into chunky salsa) &#8211; then &#8220;cruise&#8221; at that stable sub-light speed in comfortable micro-gravity without pulling any Gs for a while. You&#8217;ll get to planets within this half of the galaxy in pretty good time.  </p>
<p>Since space is extremely tenuous yet for a spacecraft dust and gas will seem compressed at that speed, your ship will be akin to an ice breaker. You&#8217;ll have to precede your ship&#8217;s arrival in a given area with electromagnetic pulses (allowable at light speed) to push aside molecules or even pebbles and forge a vacuum tunnel.  </p>
<p>Then you&#8217;ll have to figure out how to slow down relative to the frame of the destination. And there&#8217;s also maintaining life support, air, food, water, power, systems&#8230;or&#8230;relax and watch it all solved on Star Trek reruns.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bipedal Tetrapod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315152</link>
		<dc:creator>Bipedal Tetrapod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315152</guid>
		<description>Saw episode 1 on Sunday - I am very pleased we in the Great White North didn&#039;t have to wait 6 months!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw episode 1 on Sunday &#8211; I am very pleased we in the Great White North didn&#8217;t have to wait 6 months!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Miller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315120</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315120</guid>
		<description>Come on Phil. You know that there is no interplanetary spacecraft that is capable of producing 3G of linear acceleration for minutes let alone weeks or months.

29.4m/s^2 is 3g acceleration. At that rate you would reach 1c in just under 4 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Phil. You know that there is no interplanetary spacecraft that is capable of producing 3G of linear acceleration for minutes let alone weeks or months.</p>
<p>29.4m/s^2 is 3g acceleration. At that rate you would reach 1c in just under 4 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory Kent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/05/more-bad-universe-episode-2-teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-315117</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=21918#comment-315117</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do a barrel roll! Press Z or R twice.&quot;

That was some really great footage. I felt a visceral reaction; I could actually imagine what it&#039;d be like (but I&#039;m sure my conception of it is still rather weak). 

I really want to watch this series, but Discovery UK doesn&#039;t have any plans to air it, to my knowledge. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do a barrel roll! Press Z or R twice.&#8221;</p>
<p>That was some really great footage. I felt a visceral reaction; I could actually imagine what it&#8217;d be like (but I&#8217;m sure my conception of it is still rather weak). </p>
<p>I really want to watch this series, but Discovery UK doesn&#8217;t have any plans to air it, to my knowledge. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 23:40:44 -->
