DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Kiss and tell
Creationists still can’t seem to evolve »

Tiny rock to buzz Earth Tuesday

Artist drawing of an asteroid entering Earth's atmosphereUniverse Today is reporting that an SUV-sized asteroid will pass by the Earth tomorrow at a distance of about 45,500 km (28,000 miles). That’s close, but quite safe! The Earth is about 13,000 km (8000 miles) in diameter, for comparison. The rock will pass around the same height above the Earth’s surface as orbiting weather and communication satellites.

The danger from this asteroid is, for all intents and purposes, essentially zero. The orbit has been nailed down enough to know it won’t hit us (and even if it did, it would almost certainly not reach the ground; rocks that size make it down very rarely, instead exploding high in the atmosphere), and the odds of it hitting a satellite are roughly similar to two dust motes randomly colliding inside a football stadium.

2010td54_orbit

The asteroid, named 2010 TD54, was discovered on Saturday, and will make its closest approach at 11:25 UT (07:25 Eastern US time). It would be a very tough observation for amateur astronomers, though not out of the question. It’ll briefly reach about magnitude 14, within easy reach of a small telescope with a good camera, but it’ll be screaming across the sky at high speed, making it a very rapidly moving target. If anyone can get images or video of it, please let me know!

This rock is interesting. The orbit takes it from 100 million km (60 million miles) from the Sun out to about 430 million km (250 million miles). That means it crosses the orbits of Venus, Earth, and Mars*! Not only that, the orbit is not tilted by very much compared to Earth’s (about 5°), meaning it passes those three planets fairly often — it orbits the Sun roughly every 2.5 years. I suspect this object hasn’t been in this orbit very long. If it had been, it would’ve long ago smacked into a planet. If I had to guess, I’d say in the past it was on a different orbit and got nudged into this one by a gravitational interaction with a planet fairly recently. You can look at the orbit as well on the JPL Near Earth Object browser.

Given its odd orbit and the fact that it’ll make such a close pass, I hope some big telescopes get good data on this flyby. I’m very curious about the origins of this little rock!

[Update (Oct 11, 13:30 Mountain time): A little more info can be found at >the JPL Asteroid Watch site.]


* To be fair, it doesn’t get all that close to Mars, but it does get close to Venus, and obviously the Earth!

Related posts:

- 30 years, a half million asteroids
- Armageddon delayed by at least a century… this time
- A good look at a near-Earth visitor
- 2007 TU24 miss distance update



Share

October 11th, 2010 9:57 AM Tags: 2010 TD54, asteroid, NEA, Universe Today
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff | 35 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

35 Responses to “Tiny rock to buzz Earth Tuesday”

  1. 1.   Ira Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:03 am

    Why are we not trying to capture and harvest data (or rare ores) from it?

  2. 2.   Oli Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:08 am

    What do you mean by “it doesn’t get all that close to Mars”? Wouldn’t it have close encounters with Mars at least sometimes? Or is their an orbital resonance between the two? (would be strange considering Jupiter and the Earth are much heavier than Mars)

  3. 3.   Grand Lunar Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:12 am

    The fact that we’ve detected an SUV sized object is encouraging to me.
    At least we can spot the small stuff.
    The big stuff ought to be little trouble. I hope….

  4. 4.   Ateapotist Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Looking at the orbit shown for this object, I wonder if it stands a chance of being captured by a planet. It would be interesting to have a “new” moon in the inner solar system.

  5. 5.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:21 am

    SUV SIZED!?!?!?!?! AHHHHHH! Panic!

    Now if it had been Prius sized, that would be a different sotry.

    :D

    Sorry, wired on too much coffee I think.

  6. 6.   ASFalcon13 Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:22 am

    “the odds of it hitting a satellite are roughly similar to two dust motes randomly colliding inside a football stadium.”

    I clearly remember the last time I heard an analogy like this. It was during a weeklong orientation course at work, and part of the course involved orbital dynamics. The instructor compared the likelihood of two satellites colliding to a pair of Volkswagen Beetles driving randomly around the state of Texas and hitting each other.

    Coincidentally, he was giving that lecture at roughly the same time that this happened: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision

    No point really, just an interesting story.

  7. 7.   AJKamper Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:22 am

    Phil or anyone else:

    Have we figured out to what extent the asteroid’s orbit will be affected by this pass? It seems to me that two Earth radii would still be close enough to significantly perturb the orbit of such a small object, but what do I know?

  8. 8.   RatPunk Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:25 am

    As Grand Lunar says, the fact that we could detect it is encouraging. The fact that we didn’t detect it until two days before it passed is the troubling part.

  9. 9.   scibuff Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:33 am

    @Ateapotist (#4) The object’s relative v = 17.53km/s is much much greater than the escape velocity at ~45,000km (geosynchronous satellite move at about 3km/s and the escape velocity at that altitude is about 4.33km/s). Besides, my guess is that any captured object wouldn’t stay captured for long probably a few dozens of revolutions at most.

    @Grand well, the question is really how much we miss. The surveys capable of detecting objects of this size at the distance where it was first seen, observe a tiny fraction of the sky just a few degrees around the ecliptic

  10. 10.   Ben Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:34 am

    The best thing we can do from here is to hire a team of oil drillers to embed a nuclear device on the asteroid in hopes of splitting it in two.

  11. 11.   ChH Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:46 am

    So … the odds of this asteroid hitting a satellite are approximately eight orders of magnitude less than something like this happening:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXXSe1YQkRE&feature=related

  12. 12.   Sparky Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:46 am

    Is there any chance that this is a man-made object?

  13. 13.   TechBear Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 10:55 am

    Discovered two days ago? I’m curious: was it its small size that kept it hidden, or is it coming from a region not normally under surveillance?

  14. 14.   Phil Plait Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 11:26 am

    ChH (#11): actually, that’s a good point. How many pitches are thrown in a game? Around 50 minimum, and more likely 100. There are 162 games per season, and 30 teams. I suspect there are roughly 100,000 pitches every season, and the game’s been played for a century… and a bird got hit once.

    So yeah, pretty unlikely.

  15. 15.   24601 Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 11:54 am

    Could this event be used to help get additional funding for NEO sky surveys? It sounds like a good wake-up-call to government folks and layperson folks alike.

  16. 16.   ChH Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 11:58 am

    I didn’t get specific in the interest of brevity … but I was thinking on a per-pitch basis rather than all of baseball history, and the 8 orders were just based on a ball and a bird being so much bigger than the dust motes in your analogy.

    I did find two other videos of birds getting hit by pitches.

    This bird was spectacularly unfortunate by the way – it got hit by the hardest-throwing starting pitcher since ball speeds became accurately measurable.

    Anyway … like you said twice … our satellites are safe.

  17. 17.   Adam Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    “… a gravitational interaction with a planet fairly recently”

    Out of interest, how recent is “recently”? Years? Decades? Centuries? How long would an object in this kind of orbit typically last?

  18. 18.   johno Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    Everyone knows that 1 in a million chances happen 9 times out of 10

  19. 19.   Gamercow Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    This is a great example of a story with heavy underlying tones. The takeaway from this article is not that the object was discovered, or that it will be buzzing us, or that it’s too small to do any damage, but that it was only discovered on SATURDAY. If that thing was bigger, and on a direct course, we’d be screwed, you can’t do anything in 2 days.

  20. 20.   Oli Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    @19. Gamercow: True, but then it would have been discovered earlier.

  21. 21.   all4tookie Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    As an avid baseball statistician, I can tell you your estimates for number of pitches per game is quite low. The average team throws about 146 per game these days. That equates to about 700,000 per (modern) season.

    www(dot)baseball-reference(dot)com/blog/archives/7533

    However, I don’t think we can be sure a bird was never before hit by a pitch in a game, particularly in the pre-youtube era…

  22. 22.   scibuff Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    @Oli #20. Not necessarily. Sky Surveys capable of detecting objects as bright as this was when first seen, i.e. beyond 20th mag. (Catalina & Mt. Lemmon, Spacewatch), cover only a tiny fraction of the night sky, just a few degrees around the ecliptic in a single lunation (LINEAR covers quite a lot but doesn’t see beyond V20). There are plenty objects passing us by we don’t see. Also, there’s a possibility that an object’s coming from the direction of the sun (i.e. with elongation <60 degrees) in which case, no ground based sky survey can see it.

    There are plenty of objects tens of meters across discovered within just a few days of passing the perigee, and some only after.

  23. 23.   Navneeth Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    Gamecrow, for me a couple of days are enough to prepare for the show. You must be slow. :P

  24. 24.   zAmboni Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    Doesn’t look like a chance for imaging for me tonight. Weather will not cooperate

  25. 25.   loonatic112358 Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    at least it’s not a Hot Fudge Sundae falling Tuesdae

    /supports recycling of bad jokes

  26. 26.   GumbyTheCat Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    #1 Ida

    Why are we not trying to capture and harvest data (or rare ores) from it?

    Science can do some amazingly cool stuff, but the ability to catch an SUV-sized boulder whizzing by at however many thousands of miles per hour is currently not something we possess.

    However, with enough advance warning of the asteroid’s arrival, maybe it is. Not that this is practical, but I’m thinking in terms of “possible” here: It might just be possible to use a probe to “nudge” a very small asteroid headed for a near-earth encounter so that instead of whizzing by, it instead gets captured by Earth’s gravity and goes into orbit. It would be crazy expensive and crazy tough to do. and crazy dangerous if the asteroid is of sufficient size to do serious damage if we screwed up just slightly…. but it might just be possible. Maybe not though, what do I know? Fun to think about in any case. The math involved would be staggering!

  27. 27.   Keith Harwood Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 4:39 pm

    It would take rather a large nudge to bring it into earth orbit, enough to vapourise it. Easier would be to alter its orbit with a nudge and use lithobraking for the capture phase. However, this is not much better and probably not a good idea. To get a genuine capture into orbit you need a third body, say the moon. Use one nudge to make it pass close to the moon the right way, the moon takes a big chunk of its momentum leaving it in an elliptical orbit around earth, then another nudge to move its apogee away from the moon to limit the chances of later luna lithobraking.

    All we need now is a nudger.

  28. 28.   Robert Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    @Oly: Re — What do you mean by “it doesn’t get all that close to Mars”? Wouldn’t it have close encounters with Mars at least sometimes?

    It’s to do with that 5 degree tilt. By the time it gets out to Mars’ orbit, it is far above (or below) the ecliptic. So it will never get close to the orbit.

  29. 29.   Gerry Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    Just because it’s orbit is ‘nothing to worry about’ THIS time, the thought of a rock big enough to flatten a small city zipping by just over our com sats is NOT something we should be dismissing. Time to stop gaping at the nuclear-war-starters (if someone gets nervous when a city vaporizes) and start DOING something about them….

  30. 30.   reidh Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    I can say this, I will never, ever, ever, (again) worry about an asteroid accidentally colliding with another, and or falling out of sky onto the earth near me, without it having been thoroughly data based and catalogued by our eyes in,on,and of the sky.

  31. 31.   Albert J. Hoch Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    Like AJKamper I too would like to know how the object’s orbit will be changed by this close pass.

  32. 32.   Tiny rock to buzz Earth Tuesday | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine « Notes for the curious Says:
    October 11th, 2010 at 8:27 pm

    [...] Tiny rock to buzz Earth Tuesday | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine. [...]

  33. 33.   Ian Musgrave Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 5:19 am

    Images and animations of the 2010 flyby are at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mpml/message/24312

  34. 34.   Alex Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 9:31 am

    - Cdn and American astronauts want world to start getting ready for asteroids… VIDEO: Our terrifyingly crowded solar system…CBS News: Jupiter Hit by Large Object, NASA Says…Californian Congressman for Planet X Forsight – The Sky is Falling…Stephen Hawking: “Asteroid Impacts Biggest Threat to Intelligent Life in the Galaxy…Giant propeller structures seen in Saturn’s rings…NASA: Sun’s Nemesis Pelted Earth with Comets, Study Suggests:
    http://cristiannegureanu.blogspot.com/2010/09/residents-tell-of-start-of-san-bruno.html

  35. 35.   jonathan Says:
    October 12th, 2010 at 11:52 pm

    Tunguska event

    The asteroid that stuck never touched the ground the effect of the shock wave caused caused the explosion.

    So even if the asteroid doesn’t struck the ground it still may cause damage.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS
      • Obi Wan better watch his back
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station
      • Mars craters are sublime
      • OK, one more eclipse shot
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff



       Twitter



      Follow Me on Pinterest



       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station | Bad Astronomy
      • Mars craters are sublime | Bad Astronomy
      • OK, one more eclipse shot | Bad Astronomy
      • Saturn, surreally | Bad Astronomy
      • SpaceX Dragon on its way to the ISS! | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • A Flu Shot For Life
      • The Vital Chain: Why Manta Rays Need Forests
      • Tapeworms in the brain: Fearfully common
      • Lost voyages to the North Pole and more: Catching up with Download the Universe


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us