DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Zach Weiner, Destroyer of Homophobes
Are We Alone, death-by-Betelgeuse edition »

BREAKING: Sofa-sized asteroid gives us a close shave

As I write this, in less than a half hour (at 19:40 UT) an asteroid 1-2 meters in size will pass about 12,000 5500 km from the Earth’s surface: less than 7500 3500 miles! The Earth itself is 13,000 km across, so this is a close shave indeed. [UPDATE: Turns out the miss distance of 12,000 km was measured from the Earth's center. Subtracting our radius of about 6400 km, the rock actually came about 5500 km from our surface -- so, even closer than I originally thought. Sorry about the error, and thanks to Emily at The Planetary Society Blog where I saw the actual number.]

Still, it will miss, and would not be dangerous even if it did hit us. Got that? Cool.

This rock, officially named 2011 CQ1, was discovered just last night! Here’s a shot of it taken using a small 0.35 meter (14″) telescope at the Tzec Maun Observatory in New Mexico:

This is a combination of 20 short exposures tracking the asteroid; the stars appear as dotted lines while the asteroid itself as the indicated dot.

Now let me be clear: this rock will miss us, and even if it had been aimed at us it would be unlikely in the extreme to do any damage. It’s way too small. Most likely were something like this to hit us, it would explode very high in the Earth’s atmosphere, releasing as much energy as perhaps a ton or so of TNT. That may sound like a lot, but it’s actually not a big deal. Some estimates have us getting hit by meter-size rocks once per month or so. The fact that you never hear about them indicates they are no danger!

It would take something far bigger to hurt us. The rock that blew up over Tunguska in 1908 was probably 30 meters or so in size; that detonated with a yield of about 15 – 20 megatons of TNT, equivalent to a pretty big nuke (though without radiation). Something metallic that size would probably hit the ground intact, leaving a hole like Arizona’s Meteor Crater, which is over a kilometer across. Happily, impacts like that are extremely rare!

Smaller ones are more common. In late 2008, a smallish rock about the same size as 2011 CQ1 came in over the Sudan and exploded, raining down small rocks which were later recovered. No one was hurt.

So the point here is that CQ1 is too small to hurt us even if it were to hit, which it won’t. And the cool thing is that it was seen at all! Two meters is dinky indeed, and this kind of discovery, far from being scary, makes me happy because it means we’re getting better all the time at detecting rocks that might actually hit and do damage.

Image credit: Giovanni Sostero & Ernesto Guido. Tip o’ the Whipple Shield to reddit.

Share

February 4th, 2011 12:21 PM Tags: 2011 CQ1, asteroid, impact
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, DeathfromtheSkies!, Pretty pictures | 40 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

40 Responses to “BREAKING: Sofa-sized asteroid gives us a close shave”

  1. 1.   D Paul Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    Are we sure someone from the ISS isn’t just chucking rocks at us?

  2. 2.   J. Major Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:30 pm

    Very cool! Although it is a LITTLE disconcerting that they just discovered it last night and it’s going to pass so close! Another hint that we need to make sure we keep on funding those NEO tracking programs….

  3. 3.   Erik R. Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    But what if it DOES???

    Oh, wait, it’s not 2012 yet…

  4. 4.   Elwood Herring Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    How much will it miss us by?

    Off-topic – what’s all this about a UFO over Jerusalem? I’ve seen the videos and I’m not convinced.

  5. 5.   Uncle Al Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    The moon-Earth barycenter orbits the sun at average 29.78 km/s, obviously slightly faster in February. 2011 CQ1 missed a hit by somewhat less than 6.7 minutes. No problem… if NASA respects the sign of the miss. NASA has had some interesting results mixing units and confabulating fore and aft.

  6. 6.   MarkW Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:49 pm

    @Elwood Herring #3: obvious CGI fake is obvious.

  7. 7.   Steve (treelobsters) Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:50 pm

    So, just for fun, is there any way to calculate the location on Earth that it passed closest to?

  8. 8.   Lugosi Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:50 pm

    Dang! I could have used a new sofa.

  9. 9.   Rob Matson Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    What’s particularly interesting about the path of 2011 CQ1 is that it will transit the sun as seen from a narrow swath across the Pacific Ocean, Chile, Argentina and the south Atlantic. Unfortunately, the transit path is south of all the big observatories in Chile, and the asteroid itself will only subtend at most a couple tenths of an arcsecond. Buenos Aires and Montevideo are on the transit path. Bill Gray has (very rapidly!) put together a transit map for South America at this link:
    http://www.projectpluto.com/cq1a.png

  10. 10.   Martha Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    I think a reading of the Mayan Calender will show that the arrival of a sofa from Nibiru was predicted to happen as a precursor to 2012.

  11. 11.   AliCali Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    Sofa-sized, eh? If it was also sofa-shaped, maybe it fell out of the alternative Millennium Falcon (from Family Guy)?

  12. 12.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    You said sofa, and I instantly thought of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. You sure that’s not Arthur Dent chucked out a Vogon airlock? I’m sure Ford knows exactly how he feels.

    Or is that a Chesterfield sofa?

  13. 13.   Levi in NY Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    I would *love* to see the fireball from something like that exploding in the upper atmosphere!

  14. 14.   Number 6 Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    After reading the comments….I’m confused….Is it a comfort that it’s sofa-sized or a sofa that just whistled by us? I guess we’ll be able to verify this based upon whether small, interstellar rocks rain down or whether moldy, Cheetos, loose change, and a missing universal remote pelt the earth.

  15. 15.   Joseph G Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    Was it the size of a king-sized sofa? Was it sofa king close? :)

  16. 16.   Harold Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    Larian @12, I was also wondering if this might be a velvet paisley-covered Chesterfied.

    Arthur looked. Much to his surprise, there was a velvet paisley-covered Chesterfield sofa in the field in front of them. He boggled intelligently at it. Shrewd questions sprang into his mind.

    “Why,” he said, “is there a sofa in that field?”

    “I told you!” shouted Ford, leaping to his feet. “Eddies in the space-time continuum!”

    “And this is his sofa, is it?” asked Arthur, struggling to his feet and, he hoped, though not very optimistically, to his senses.

    - Douglas Adams, “Life, the Universe, and Everything”

  17. 17.   Andrew W Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    “Most likely were something like this to hit us, it would explode very high in the Earth’s atmosphere, releasing as much energy as perhaps a ton or so of TNT. ”

    More like a hundred tons of TNT. (yep, I’m being pedantic!)

  18. 18.   Magrathea Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 3:01 pm

    @Larian LeQuella: do you know where your towel is?

    @Levi in NY you’d be disappointed I imagine unless it was made of more metals and made it in the lower atmosphere ;)

  19. 19.   Robert S-R Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    @J Major: If it was larger, we probably would have seen it earlier, and if it were going to hit, and do damage, it would certainly be large enough to see from further away. Rocks this size come close (and hit) all the time; they’re hardly a priority from a national security standpoint. The ones to watch out for are being watched out for, and I believe most of them are accounted for.

    Right, Phil? We know where all the bigger-than-a-sofa-sized ones are, right? Oh god oh god oh god…
    ;)

  20. 20.   Pete Jackson Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    Phil, you must have been tired when you wrote this. If you had been hungry, you would have called it the size of a refrigerator; if you were ready to go somewhere, you would have called it the size of a motorcycle…

  21. 21.   sofista Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    #9 Hey, just over my head!

  22. 22.   BreadFred Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    I wasn’t aware of this measure of mass. But I approve :)

  23. 23.   KEA Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    And where was our trillion dollar defense department? …can’t it defend us against anything?

  24. 24.   Bill Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    @Rob (#9)

    > Bill Gray has (very rapidly!) put together a transit map for South America…

    And I bet Thierry Legault got there in time to get a stunning shot of the silly thing transiting the sun.

    :)

  25. 25.   reidh Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 5:19 pm

    How big to hurt us, how too small to detect, does one have to be?

  26. 26.   reidh Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 5:22 pm

    How big does one have to be to hurt us, and how small to be undetectable till its too late, does one of those puppies have to be? like whats the threat range?

  27. 27.   Thameron Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 7:51 pm

    It missed us? Well so-fa so good then. It must have missed because it was so-fa away, or perhaps I should couch that in other terms. Hmmm.

  28. 28.   Hammill Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 9:18 pm

    Incredibly cool!

  29. 29.   » News Esoteric and godless musings from a locked away sage. Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 9:40 pm

    [...] Sofa sized asteroids gave us a close shave (link) [...]

  30. 30.   JupiterIsBig Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 10:19 pm

    12 & 16 – I too thought that Eddie must be around.

    An update is that is was 5480km from earth and it’s orbit was changed by 60 degrees !
    I read this via Spaceweather
    http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news170.html

  31. 31.   Aaron Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 11:16 pm

    Even if we were able to detect it, we surely wouldn’t be able to deflect it, for everyone knows that you can’t hit a target that’s only two meters wide!

  32. 32.   foundonmars Says:
    February 4th, 2011 at 11:49 pm

    OT

    Phil, I know you can help me. I just shared the latest pictures of the Apollo 14 landing site from LRO. http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.php?/archives/335-New-View-of-Apollo-14.html#extended and my friend commented on my post – saying the footprints were sure to become some of humanity’s most enduring artifacts as they were still looking crisp after 40 years.

    Well, of course they do, because without an atmosphere on the moon to erode them they will last… how long? I googled, and to my dismay found that the time estimates vary from just 100 years (mentioned on the bad astronomy forum) up to “millions of years.” “A very long time” seems to mean something different to everyone.

    I will trust your answer. How long will our astronaut’s footprints remain on the moon?

  33. 33.   Joseph G Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 12:48 am

    @31 Aaron: I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back home; they’re not much bigger than two meters.

    Ah, those were fun times! Flying around with my friends, blasting furry animals. Until my parents found out… To hear them tell it, you’d think I went all Sith on them. They took my damn T-16 and made me go to counseling. Sheesh. Overreact much?

  34. 34.   Kleine planetoïde scheerde gisteravond langs de aarde | Astroblogs Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 1:27 am

    [...] toen hooguit tot het neervallen van kleinere stukjes puin, welke men later terug vond. Bron: Bad Astronomy + Remanzacco Observatorium. Gerelateerde Astroblog:Aarde kort na elkaar bestookt door 3 [...]

  35. 35.   Michel Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 3:52 am

    Near misses are sooooo 2011.

  36. 36.   Messier Tidy Upper Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 7:55 am

    @ Joseph G : LOL. ;-)

    @27. Thameron : Ditto LOL. :-)

    Sitting on the sofa
    Watching asteroids go past
    The Earth is in the firing line
    But this is just a blast! :-)

  37. 37.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 10:59 am

    Ah, the panic of the masses. In todays Independent, there was this jewel; “Just discovered asteroid over a mile in diameter may impact in 2019,,,”.

    They then blew their story by naming the asteroid(2002 NT7), which says it was discovered in 2002. Nine years ago is hardly what I would call “newly discovered”.

    http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news132.html

    News media should NOT try to be profit centers. That just reduces them to breathless rumor mongerers, getting people all excited about,,,absolutely nothing.

    Gary 7

  38. 38.   Brian Too Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 2:53 pm

    I dub thee a sofaroid!

  39. 39.   Sam H Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    In September 2008 an asteroid estimated to be about the size of an office desk impacted somewhere in Saskatchewan (the pieces weren’t recovered until much later). I didn’t see it :( , but the videos and eyewitnesses showed the midnight sky lighting up like sunrise happening early over my home province of Alberta. I remember begging my Dad to take me out asteroid hunting in another province!! As for the rock itself, looking back now there were some bigger-than-expected pieces recovered, so it should have been semi-metallic and probably made quite a crater. Imagine what it would be like standing, say, 10 kilometres or so from the impact!! :o It’d be the most incredible thing you’d ever hear (and probably the last).

    If I ever do get my hands on an asteroid piece I’ll make a necklace or ornament out of it, then sell the rest.

  40. 40.   The Doctors Move Like A Library | Whimsy Speaks Says:
    February 5th, 2011 at 9:28 pm

    [...] Just missed getting hit by an asteroid:  “Now let me be clear: this rock will miss us, and even if it had been aimed at us it would be unlikely in the extreme to do any damage. It’s way too small. Most likely were something like this to hit us, it would explode very high in the Earth’s atmosphere, releasing as much energy as perhaps a ton or so of TNT.” [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS
      • Obi Wan better watch his back
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station
      • Mars craters are sublime
      • OK, one more eclipse shot
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff



       Twitter



      Follow Me on Pinterest



       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS | Bad Astronomy
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station | Bad Astronomy
      • Mars craters are sublime | Bad Astronomy
      • OK, one more eclipse shot | Bad Astronomy
      • Saturn, surreally | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • A Flu Shot For Life
      • The Vital Chain: Why Manta Rays Need Forests
      • Tapeworms in the brain: Fearfully common
      • Lost voyages to the North Pole and more: Catching up with Download the Universe


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us