<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SDO&#039;s first year in space with bonus voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289057</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289057</guid>
		<description>Lorena @ 12 -

A solar flare occurs when sudden changes in the Sun&#039;s magnetic field cause a cascade of particles (mostly electrons, I think) to accelerate violently and then, traveling along the magnetic field, smash into the surface* and ka-boom!  Almost like a hyper-intense lightning strike.  (Since the electrons are charged particles, it requires much less force for them to flow with the magnetic field than to cross it, so the currents follow the magnetic field lines.)

[*] Since the Sun is gaseous throughout, it doesn&#039;t really have a surface, but the density rapidly becomes much greater (like thousands or millions of times) as you descend through the corona (which is close to a vacuum) end enter the photosphere (which is generally considered the &quot;surface&quot; of the Sun.)   According to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sun_Atmosphere_Temperature_and_Density_SkyLab.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; graph I found &lt;/a&gt;, the photosphere is about 11 orders of magnitude denser than the corona, so the electrons act like they&#039;ve hit a solid wall when the strike it.

A prominence is a big blob of gas (actually plasma) released into the corona by an active region on the Sun&#039;s surface.  They are cooler than the corona and appear as dark filaments when seen against the background of the Sun, but as bright prominences when they are near the limb of the solar disk and rise above it.  Prominences often last for several days, versus solar flares which are all over in a few seconds.  If a prominence is particularly energetic, instead of forming a big blobby loop through the corona, it will completely separate from the Sun and become a coronal mass ejection.

Prominences and flares (and sunspots, coronal loops, and lots of other solar phenomena) are all related to active regions, which are places where kinks in the Sun&#039;s magnetic field poke up through the surface.  As I understand it (I don&#039;t think this view has been overturned in the last 30 years), during the 11 year solar cycle, differential rotation causes the magnetic field to twist up in the  Sun.  (The Sun rotates faster at the equator than at the poles.)  Like the rubber band in a balsa wood airplane, eventually it forms kinks.  Because of the twisting, the magnetic field of the kinks runs in the opposite direction of the field below the Sun&#039;s surface.  When the kinks poke through the surface, they form active regions and sunspots and produce loops, flare, prominences, and so forth.

As the differential rotation continues, more and more active regions get produced, until the total reversed field of the active regions exceeds the primary field and the whole magnetic system collapses, the Sun&#039;s magnetic field reverses polarity, and another 11-year cycle starts, this time with a reversed field.  So it is really 2 such cycles, or 22 years, to get back to the original condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorena @ 12 -</p>
<p>A solar flare occurs when sudden changes in the Sun&#8217;s magnetic field cause a cascade of particles (mostly electrons, I think) to accelerate violently and then, traveling along the magnetic field, smash into the surface* and ka-boom!  Almost like a hyper-intense lightning strike.  (Since the electrons are charged particles, it requires much less force for them to flow with the magnetic field than to cross it, so the currents follow the magnetic field lines.)</p>
<p>[*] Since the Sun is gaseous throughout, it doesn&#8217;t really have a surface, but the density rapidly becomes much greater (like thousands or millions of times) as you descend through the corona (which is close to a vacuum) end enter the photosphere (which is generally considered the &#8220;surface&#8221; of the Sun.)   According to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sun_Atmosphere_Temperature_and_Density_SkyLab.jpg" rel="nofollow"> graph I found </a>, the photosphere is about 11 orders of magnitude denser than the corona, so the electrons act like they&#8217;ve hit a solid wall when the strike it.</p>
<p>A prominence is a big blob of gas (actually plasma) released into the corona by an active region on the Sun&#8217;s surface.  They are cooler than the corona and appear as dark filaments when seen against the background of the Sun, but as bright prominences when they are near the limb of the solar disk and rise above it.  Prominences often last for several days, versus solar flares which are all over in a few seconds.  If a prominence is particularly energetic, instead of forming a big blobby loop through the corona, it will completely separate from the Sun and become a coronal mass ejection.</p>
<p>Prominences and flares (and sunspots, coronal loops, and lots of other solar phenomena) are all related to active regions, which are places where kinks in the Sun&#8217;s magnetic field poke up through the surface.  As I understand it (I don&#8217;t think this view has been overturned in the last 30 years), during the 11 year solar cycle, differential rotation causes the magnetic field to twist up in the  Sun.  (The Sun rotates faster at the equator than at the poles.)  Like the rubber band in a balsa wood airplane, eventually it forms kinks.  Because of the twisting, the magnetic field of the kinks runs in the opposite direction of the field below the Sun&#8217;s surface.  When the kinks poke through the surface, they form active regions and sunspots and produce loops, flare, prominences, and so forth.</p>
<p>As the differential rotation continues, more and more active regions get produced, until the total reversed field of the active regions exceeds the primary field and the whole magnetic system collapses, the Sun&#8217;s magnetic field reverses polarity, and another 11-year cycle starts, this time with a reversed field.  So it is really 2 such cycles, or 22 years, to get back to the original condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289056</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289056</guid>
		<description>I love coronal loops.

One of my first jobs was to correlate Skylab EUV images with magnetic field observations from Kitt Peak and Sacramento Peak observatories, and compute the magnetic fields so they could be compared to the EUV images.  I got mentioned in a foot note in &lt;i&gt; Solar Physics&lt;/i&gt;, which is my scientific claim to glory.  :-)

The magnetic field lines matched up very nicely to the loops, which are generally anchored in sunspots of opposite magnetic polarities, like iron filings connecting the poles of a bar magnet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love coronal loops.</p>
<p>One of my first jobs was to correlate Skylab EUV images with magnetic field observations from Kitt Peak and Sacramento Peak observatories, and compute the magnetic fields so they could be compared to the EUV images.  I got mentioned in a foot note in <i> Solar Physics</i>, which is my scientific claim to glory.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The magnetic field lines matched up very nicely to the loops, which are generally anchored in sunspots of opposite magnetic polarities, like iron filings connecting the poles of a bar magnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289055</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289055</guid>
		<description>Mike@4 - From most of North America, if you dug straight through the center of the earth, you would come out in the southern Indian Ocean, southwest of Australia.  Since both North America and Asia are in the northern hemisphere, a straight line through the center of the earth can&#039;t intersect both of them.

From almost anywhere on land, the antipodal point is in an ocean.  You would think by chance alone about 75% would be ocean, 25% land, since the earth is 75% ocean, but in fact almost none of the opposite points are on land.   Just about the only exceptions are the southern tip of South America (Chile and Argentina) overlap with Asia, and parts of Australia overlap with Greenland, if I recall correctly.   (I once got curious about this and checked.)  This of course changes as the continents drift.  In the time of Pangea, all the land was concentrated in one hemisphere.  At other times, the continents were (or will be) more spread out and more likely to be opposite each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike@4 &#8211; From most of North America, if you dug straight through the center of the earth, you would come out in the southern Indian Ocean, southwest of Australia.  Since both North America and Asia are in the northern hemisphere, a straight line through the center of the earth can&#8217;t intersect both of them.</p>
<p>From almost anywhere on land, the antipodal point is in an ocean.  You would think by chance alone about 75% would be ocean, 25% land, since the earth is 75% ocean, but in fact almost none of the opposite points are on land.   Just about the only exceptions are the southern tip of South America (Chile and Argentina) overlap with Asia, and parts of Australia overlap with Greenland, if I recall correctly.   (I once got curious about this and checked.)  This of course changes as the continents drift.  In the time of Pangea, all the land was concentrated in one hemisphere.  At other times, the continents were (or will be) more spread out and more likely to be opposite each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorena</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289054</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289054</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t understand the difference between a solar flare and a prominence :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t understand the difference between a solar flare and a prominence :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289053</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289053</guid>
		<description>Thinking of the &lt;i&gt;Solar Dynamics Observatory&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s launch - See  :

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/17/rocket-launch-blows-away-the-sky/

Methinks, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;*that*&lt;b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;one  should have been included there - perhaps the most spectacular shot of the SDO&#039;s ever - even if it was inside its rocket at the time. How apt it blew away the Sun (&quot;dog&quot;) and is continuing to blow us away with it. May it do so for many years to come!  8) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking of the <i>Solar Dynamics Observatory</i>&#8216;s launch &#8211; See  :</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/17/rocket-launch-blows-away-the-sky/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/17/rocket-launch-blows-away-the-sky/</a></p>
<p>Methinks, <i><b>*that*</b><b></b></i>one  should have been included there &#8211; perhaps the most spectacular shot of the SDO&#8217;s ever &#8211; even if it was inside its rocket at the time. How apt it blew away the Sun (&#8220;dog&#8221;) and is continuing to blow us away with it. May it do so for many years to come!  8) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289052</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289052</guid>
		<description>Wow. That&#039;s magnificent. 8)

Thanks SDO &amp; thanks BA. I remember watching the launch of the SDO too. A year already?

What&#039;s more, I think, the best is yet to come as the solar cycle ramps up. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That&#8217;s magnificent. 8)</p>
<p>Thanks SDO &amp; thanks BA. I remember watching the launch of the SDO too. A year already?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, I think, the best is yet to come as the solar cycle ramps up. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Boulanger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289051</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Boulanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289051</guid>
		<description>I know some of these (all?)  are accelerated.   I&#039;d love to see a video put together in real time,  although they might have to extrapolate between frames.  I think the real speed might give a different, and possibly more realistic idea of the scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know some of these (all?)  are accelerated.   I&#8217;d love to see a video put together in real time,  although they might have to extrapolate between frames.  I think the real speed might give a different, and possibly more realistic idea of the scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bali</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289050</link>
		<dc:creator>Bali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289050</guid>
		<description>Cool images! But how fast are these animations compared to the real thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool images! But how fast are these animations compared to the real thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289049</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289049</guid>
		<description>Truly amazing video.  Thank you for posting this Phil.  (I&#039;ve been a fan of yours for a while.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly amazing video.  Thank you for posting this Phil.  (I&#8217;ve been a fan of yours for a while.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Young</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/04/26/sdos-first-year-in-space-with-bonus-voting/#comment-289048</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=31361#comment-289048</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so used to static images from ground based telescopes. This really gets you to look at the dynamics of the Sun. I never really even considered the rotation of the Sun until I saw these videos. I love this stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so used to static images from ground based telescopes. This really gets you to look at the dynamics of the Sun. I never really even considered the rotation of the Sun until I saw these videos. I love this stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-25 03:59:49 -->