<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cassini&#039;s pentaverate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292426</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292426</guid>
		<description>It should be &quot;pentav&lt;b&gt;i&lt;/b&gt;rate&quot;, with an &lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;, like &quot;triumvirate&quot; (&quot;vir&quot; being Latin for &quot;man&quot;). Of course, the word really should have been &quot;quinquevirate&quot;, using a Latin prefix on a Latin suffix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be &#8220;pentav<b>i</b>rate&#8221;, with an <i>i</i>, like &#8220;triumvirate&#8221; (&#8220;vir&#8221; being Latin for &#8220;man&#8221;). Of course, the word really should have been &#8220;quinquevirate&#8221;, using a Latin prefix on a Latin suffix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292425</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292425</guid>
		<description>Absolutely stunning!

Thanks for sharing this with us. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely stunning!</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this with us. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292424</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292424</guid>
		<description>Would a pentaverate be a plural of Titans? ;-)

Oh wait, that&#039;s not among that particular quintuple of Saturnian moons. Drat. Neta new word though.

My personal top five &quot;pentaverate&quot; of Saturn&#039;s moons would have to be :

Titan, Enceladus, Iapetus, Mimas &amp; Hyperion.  (Or maybe Phoebe?)

@1.   Ken B : &lt;i&gt;&quot;That’s a bit ironic, as I always thought it was Prometheus Unbound.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Well, if it helps it is Prometheus that is *doing* the binding in this case! ;-)




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a pentaverate be a plural of Titans? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Oh wait, that&#8217;s not among that particular quintuple of Saturnian moons. Drat. Neta new word though.</p>
<p>My personal top five &#8220;pentaverate&#8221; of Saturn&#8217;s moons would have to be :</p>
<p>Titan, Enceladus, Iapetus, Mimas &amp; Hyperion.  (Or maybe Phoebe?)</p>
<p>@1.   Ken B : <i>&#8220;That’s a bit ironic, as I always thought it was Prometheus Unbound.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Well, if it helps it is Prometheus that is *doing* the binding in this case! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Czeck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292423</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Czeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292423</guid>
		<description>Nigel (13) said:

          The absence of an atmosphere (combined with the absence of any familiar
          objects) on the moon made it very hard for the Apollo astronauts to judge
          distances.

That reminds me of some Apollo footage that I&#039;ve seen (can&#039;t remember where now) where one of the astronauts is bouncing over to a boulder.  From the initial shot, it looks to be about the size of a car or so, but when he gets to it, it is the size of a house.  Very confusing at first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nigel (13) said:</p>
<p>          The absence of an atmosphere (combined with the absence of any familiar<br />
          objects) on the moon made it very hard for the Apollo astronauts to judge<br />
          distances.</p>
<p>That reminds me of some Apollo footage that I&#8217;ve seen (can&#8217;t remember where now) where one of the astronauts is bouncing over to a boulder.  From the initial shot, it looks to be about the size of a car or so, but when he gets to it, it is the size of a house.  Very confusing at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292422</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292422</guid>
		<description>Sam H (6) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt; If we were actually there, floating amongst their orbits in a windowed spacecraft with a wider view angle, would the human eye be able to deduce at least some kind of distance perception?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In short, no.

Human binocular vision is only effective out to about 100 m or so.  Beyond that, we must rely on other clues for relative distances of objects (such as knowledge we already have of them, haziness due to atmospheric dust and so on).

The absence of an atmosphere (combined with the absence of any familiar objects) on the moon made it very hard for the Apollo astronauts to judge distances.  However, when they were heading towards the LM (i.e. an object with whose size they were familiar), they found it easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam H (6) said:</p>
<blockquote><p> If we were actually there, floating amongst their orbits in a windowed spacecraft with a wider view angle, would the human eye be able to deduce at least some kind of distance perception?</p></blockquote>
<p>In short, no.</p>
<p>Human binocular vision is only effective out to about 100 m or so.  Beyond that, we must rely on other clues for relative distances of objects (such as knowledge we already have of them, haziness due to atmospheric dust and so on).</p>
<p>The absence of an atmosphere (combined with the absence of any familiar objects) on the moon made it very hard for the Apollo astronauts to judge distances.  However, when they were heading towards the LM (i.e. an object with whose size they were familiar), they found it easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292421</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292421</guid>
		<description>Wonderful shot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful shot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292420</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292420</guid>
		<description>Enchronosate? Shouldn&#039;t it be enchronos&lt;b&gt;en&lt;/b&gt;ate? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enchronosate? Shouldn&#8217;t it be enchronos<b>en</b>ate? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contraposición: el fin de Spirit contra la energía de Cassini : vooLive.net</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292419</link>
		<dc:creator>Contraposición: el fin de Spirit contra la energía de Cassini : vooLive.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292419</guid>
		<description>[...] imágenes han sido recogidas de Bad Astronomy y de Gizmodo ES   Tweet  [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] imágenes han sido recogidas de Bad Astronomy y de Gizmodo ES   Tweet  [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thea</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292418</link>
		<dc:creator>Thea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292418</guid>
		<description>The rings are so insubstantial. In other photos taken of Saturn, the rings look so huge, but they only contain enough material to make a sphere 100 kilometres in diameter. The Universe is an amazing place.

&#039;Penta-&#039; means five. What does &#039;verate&#039; refer to? Moons? Spheres?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rings are so insubstantial. In other photos taken of Saturn, the rings look so huge, but they only contain enough material to make a sphere 100 kilometres in diameter. The Universe is an amazing place.</p>
<p>&#8216;Penta-&#8217; means five. What does &#8216;verate&#8217; refer to? Moons? Spheres?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohai</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/02/cassinis-pentaverate/#comment-292417</link>
		<dc:creator>ohai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=32693#comment-292417</guid>
		<description>This is officially the second time in my life that I have heard the word &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI_0-kz4lR0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pentaverate&lt;/a&gt;&quot;. Just fyi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is officially the second time in my life that I have heard the word &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI_0-kz4lR0" rel="nofollow">pentaverate</a>&#8220;. Just fyi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-18 23:59:03 -->