<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NBC airs Pledge of Allegiance without &#8220;under God&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 07:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santa Claus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-448319</link>
		<dc:creator>Santa Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-448319</guid>
		<description>I still believe in Santa Claus and Peter Rabbit.  So yeah I guess I do believe in God.  Anyway separation of church and state is the law.  In god we trust was added to our coinage, and under god was addeded to the pledge, nearly 100 years after our constitution signed.  Hey lets join club god so that we can ridicule those who are not members.  Well you can keep your beliefs to yourself and out of my life and government.  I don&#039;t need another man/woman religion, or the government to teach me right from wrong.  I have my good heart and a conscience to do that.  So believe in whatever you want but don&#039;t put your beliefs on me.  But, I do like xmas, halloween, and any other religious or non-religious holiday because I like to have fun and be happy.  Oh well, I guess the stupid masses need something to keep them from stealing, cheating, fornicating, killing, each other, and if a believe of god brain washed into them through community gatherings works so be it.  But for me I don&#039;t need the BS brain washing to understand that in order for people to live together in harmony they must not steal, cheat, kill, fornicate etc. etc.  I don&#039;t need the god fairy tale as an adult to keep from doing these things, all I need is my good heart, a conscience and the law of the land. (And yes my spelling and grammar aren&#039;t the greatest)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still believe in Santa Claus and Peter Rabbit.  So yeah I guess I do believe in God.  Anyway separation of church and state is the law.  In god we trust was added to our coinage, and under god was addeded to the pledge, nearly 100 years after our constitution signed.  Hey lets join club god so that we can ridicule those who are not members.  Well you can keep your beliefs to yourself and out of my life and government.  I don&#8217;t need another man/woman religion, or the government to teach me right from wrong.  I have my good heart and a conscience to do that.  So believe in whatever you want but don&#8217;t put your beliefs on me.  But, I do like xmas, halloween, and any other religious or non-religious holiday because I like to have fun and be happy.  Oh well, I guess the stupid masses need something to keep them from stealing, cheating, fornicating, killing, each other, and if a believe of god brain washed into them through community gatherings works so be it.  But for me I don&#8217;t need the BS brain washing to understand that in order for people to live together in harmony they must not steal, cheat, kill, fornicate etc. etc.  I don&#8217;t need the god fairy tale as an adult to keep from doing these things, all I need is my good heart, a conscience and the law of the land. (And yes my spelling and grammar aren&#8217;t the greatest)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-430801</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-430801</guid>
		<description>I always find it interesting we are so fixated on the Pledge when it seems so many in this country don&#039;t even know our National Anthem. How about we have the kids in school stand up and recite our National Anthem every day - and that has no reference to god, swearing to anything, or anything else. But it is still patriotic. And would bring in music - so it would have some educational benefit. Let&#039;s get this done.

For those of you that have commented and claim the the US is a Christian nation, I will point you to article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli - &quot;As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion...&quot; Go ahead, look it up. It was ratified by the Senate and signed by President Adams in 1797.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always find it interesting we are so fixated on the Pledge when it seems so many in this country don&#8217;t even know our National Anthem. How about we have the kids in school stand up and recite our National Anthem every day &#8211; and that has no reference to god, swearing to anything, or anything else. But it is still patriotic. And would bring in music &#8211; so it would have some educational benefit. Let&#8217;s get this done.</p>
<p>For those of you that have commented and claim the the US is a Christian nation, I will point you to article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli &#8211; &#8220;As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion&#8230;&#8221; Go ahead, look it up. It was ratified by the Senate and signed by President Adams in 1797.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-397684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-397684</guid>
		<description>Everyone should go to YouTube and listen to Red Skelton&#039;s version of the Pledge of Allegiance.  To all who do not believe this to be a Christian nation, it most certainly is.  When in Rome, do as the Romans do etc.  If I were in another country, I would have no problem watching or listening to their customs or way of life.  We should not have to change our country and its principals because of the new immigrants coming to this country.  I will respect their right to their religions and way of life and likewise they should respect ours.  We should not have to change our Pledge of Allegiance or &quot;God Bless America&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should go to YouTube and listen to Red Skelton&#8217;s version of the Pledge of Allegiance.  To all who do not believe this to be a Christian nation, it most certainly is.  When in Rome, do as the Romans do etc.  If I were in another country, I would have no problem watching or listening to their customs or way of life.  We should not have to change our country and its principals because of the new immigrants coming to this country.  I will respect their right to their religions and way of life and likewise they should respect ours.  We should not have to change our Pledge of Allegiance or &#8220;God Bless America&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-392779</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-392779</guid>
		<description>forrest noble - I agree with you wholeheartedly that adding that small phrase to pledge of allegiance blatantly crosses the boundaries between church and state.  Contrary to what some would have us believe, the US is NOT a Christian nation, it is a nation populated by Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Naturalists, Wiccans, etc. and many others who practise no religion at all.  The US was founded as a *secular* nation - secular meaning NEUTRAL to religions, tolerant of everyone&#039;s right to find their own spiritual path, accepting of everyone and equal treatment under the law for everyone.  We so decry the nations who allow Sharia, religious laws, to govern the entire populace, well, then tell me, is that not what the christians are trying to do here? Let us remain as the founding fathers intended, accepting of all religions and one nation, united in protecting the constitutional rights of all our citizens. **stepping down from soap box now ;-) **</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forrest noble &#8211; I agree with you wholeheartedly that adding that small phrase to pledge of allegiance blatantly crosses the boundaries between church and state.  Contrary to what some would have us believe, the US is NOT a Christian nation, it is a nation populated by Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Naturalists, Wiccans, etc. and many others who practise no religion at all.  The US was founded as a *secular* nation &#8211; secular meaning NEUTRAL to religions, tolerant of everyone&#8217;s right to find their own spiritual path, accepting of everyone and equal treatment under the law for everyone.  We so decry the nations who allow Sharia, religious laws, to govern the entire populace, well, then tell me, is that not what the christians are trying to do here? Let us remain as the founding fathers intended, accepting of all religions and one nation, united in protecting the constitutional rights of all our citizens. **stepping down from soap box now <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  **</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forrest noble</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-391848</link>
		<dc:creator>forrest noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391848</guid>
		<description>I grew up in the 40&#039;s and 50&#039;s  without the &quot;under god&quot; in the pledge of allegiance. In 1952 -53 they added the &quot;under god&quot; which was during the McCarthy era. All kids said the pledge in the morning at the beginning of the school day. It didn&#039;t bother me at the time adding the &quot;under god&quot; when I was in my last year of elementary school (1952) but now I don&#039;t like it because I think it infringes on the separation of church and state precepts which I think are very important but were already weak in this country concerning separation laws to start with. Still our separation laws are more clear than many European countries. Turkey has the strongest separation of church and state laws that I know of which I think works very well in their country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up in the 40&#8242;s and 50&#8242;s  without the &#8220;under god&#8221; in the pledge of allegiance. In 1952 -53 they added the &#8220;under god&#8221; which was during the McCarthy era. All kids said the pledge in the morning at the beginning of the school day. It didn&#8217;t bother me at the time adding the &#8220;under god&#8221; when I was in my last year of elementary school (1952) but now I don&#8217;t like it because I think it infringes on the separation of church and state precepts which I think are very important but were already weak in this country concerning separation laws to start with. Still our separation laws are more clear than many European countries. Turkey has the strongest separation of church and state laws that I know of which I think works very well in their country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-391610</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391610</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think that a deeply pervasive stream of thinly vieled propaganda being issued by one of NBC&#039;s competitors (rhymes with Box Blues) is far more disturbing than airing the pledge&#039;s original content.  The very fact that so many people have been intentionally mislead to believe that our president is a Muslim Kenyan, and that it is in our best interests to give millionaires and billionaires tax cuts while we defund education, withdraw help for the needy, cancel all protections for our air and water.  How can leaving god out of a pledge be cause for so much alarm when we have politicians - the people writing our laws - actively and daily lying to us and no-one seems to notice, much less care? I grieve that our priorities as a nation have become so misplaced and that we are being dragged into another McCarthy era.  As for me, I am teaching my kids to be loyal to what is right, to place higher value on life than on patriotism, and to be responsible global citizens.  To those isolationists trolling about, let me say this - 9/11 happened because we didn&#039;t give a damn about what consequences our actions had on other nations: as long as we profitted, it was all good.  We can not afford to casually ignore our impact on our global neighbors or more 9/11 attacks will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think that a deeply pervasive stream of thinly vieled propaganda being issued by one of NBC&#8217;s competitors (rhymes with Box Blues) is far more disturbing than airing the pledge&#8217;s original content.  The very fact that so many people have been intentionally mislead to believe that our president is a Muslim Kenyan, and that it is in our best interests to give millionaires and billionaires tax cuts while we defund education, withdraw help for the needy, cancel all protections for our air and water.  How can leaving god out of a pledge be cause for so much alarm when we have politicians &#8211; the people writing our laws &#8211; actively and daily lying to us and no-one seems to notice, much less care? I grieve that our priorities as a nation have become so misplaced and that we are being dragged into another McCarthy era.  As for me, I am teaching my kids to be loyal to what is right, to place higher value on life than on patriotism, and to be responsible global citizens.  To those isolationists trolling about, let me say this &#8211; 9/11 happened because we didn&#8217;t give a damn about what consequences our actions had on other nations: as long as we profitted, it was all good.  We can not afford to casually ignore our impact on our global neighbors or more 9/11 attacks will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-391289</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391289</guid>
		<description>Indivisible?  Have you &lt;i&gt;seen&lt;/i&gt; the TV adverts they screen during presidential election campaigns?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indivisible?  Have you <i>seen</i> the TV adverts they screen during presidential election campaigns?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayasYouStargaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-4/#comment-391146</link>
		<dc:creator>PayasYouStargaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391146</guid>
		<description>@144 QD

I&#039;m happy to leave it at that too. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@144 QD</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to leave it at that too. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike burkhart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-391139</link>
		<dc:creator>mike burkhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391139</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve have said it before , the right wing Christain Extremists are looking for any thing to use in there propaganda to covince everyone that there is this big athiest conspiracy  agaist religon, and I hate to say this but as long as this stuff happens they get more and more ammo. I want to kindly ask people to stop giving the right the ammo. As a moderent Chirstian I don&#039;t think there is a athiest conspiracy agaist religon, but when some (not all) athiests write books and put up ads bashing religon all you are doing is feeding the monster of religous extremism and it grows bigger. Look if you don&#039;t wish to beleve in God or have any kind of faith thats fine with me. But all I and other moderent Chistrains ask is that you respect our right to beleve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve have said it before , the right wing Christain Extremists are looking for any thing to use in there propaganda to covince everyone that there is this big athiest conspiracy  agaist religon, and I hate to say this but as long as this stuff happens they get more and more ammo. I want to kindly ask people to stop giving the right the ammo. As a moderent Chirstian I don&#8217;t think there is a athiest conspiracy agaist religon, but when some (not all) athiests write books and put up ads bashing religon all you are doing is feeding the monster of religous extremism and it grows bigger. Look if you don&#8217;t wish to beleve in God or have any kind of faith thats fine with me. But all I and other moderent Chistrains ask is that you respect our right to beleve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wzrd1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-391095</link>
		<dc:creator>Wzrd1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391095</guid>
		<description>First, NBC followed their statement on what happened with mention that a small group of employees edited out that content and that it was being addressed internally.
That such a small part of the pledge was edited out hints at some personal activism by an immature employee or two, thinking it would go unnoticed.
While many disagree with the two word addition, it IS the law. Under section 7 of the Flag Code, the pledge is delineated by act of congress. While there are no enforcement measures or penalties included in that section of code, it IS the law of the land.
As such, it is to be obeyed and ALL words or none read or played back. If one does not want those two words included, take it up with your elected representatives in Washington, D.C., that&#039;s WHY they are there. 
I&#039;ll even join in that effort!
Second, I was made to realize how our education has slipped in this nation by one comment by Phil. The lack of education on the pledge that he was forced to memorize.
When I was in school, the teacher went over the pledge, section by section and discussed its meaning, defining words (it prevented the word indivisible from becoming invisible) and gave us a framework to define that pledge.
Without that knowledge, the pledge is merely a bunch of words strung together and meaningless to those reciting it.
If there is one thing that anyone who knows me will say, it&#039;s that I&#039;m VERY, VERY big on education.
I&#039;m as big on education as I am on obedience to our constitution and public health.
With quality education, there is no need to trumpet the cause of science, the interest will already be there. The same is true regarding our laws, customs and constitution. Equally true is, with quality education, the need for public health is apparent, to include universal health care, as science and the reality that we are the ONLY industrialized nation in the entire world to NOT have universal health care is shocking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, NBC followed their statement on what happened with mention that a small group of employees edited out that content and that it was being addressed internally.<br />
That such a small part of the pledge was edited out hints at some personal activism by an immature employee or two, thinking it would go unnoticed.<br />
While many disagree with the two word addition, it IS the law. Under section 7 of the Flag Code, the pledge is delineated by act of congress. While there are no enforcement measures or penalties included in that section of code, it IS the law of the land.<br />
As such, it is to be obeyed and ALL words or none read or played back. If one does not want those two words included, take it up with your elected representatives in Washington, D.C., that&#8217;s WHY they are there.<br />
I&#8217;ll even join in that effort!<br />
Second, I was made to realize how our education has slipped in this nation by one comment by Phil. The lack of education on the pledge that he was forced to memorize.<br />
When I was in school, the teacher went over the pledge, section by section and discussed its meaning, defining words (it prevented the word indivisible from becoming invisible) and gave us a framework to define that pledge.<br />
Without that knowledge, the pledge is merely a bunch of words strung together and meaningless to those reciting it.<br />
If there is one thing that anyone who knows me will say, it&#8217;s that I&#8217;m VERY, VERY big on education.<br />
I&#8217;m as big on education as I am on obedience to our constitution and public health.<br />
With quality education, there is no need to trumpet the cause of science, the interest will already be there. The same is true regarding our laws, customs and constitution. Equally true is, with quality education, the need for public health is apparent, to include universal health care, as science and the reality that we are the ONLY industrialized nation in the entire world to NOT have universal health care is shocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sourdough</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-391027</link>
		<dc:creator>Sourdough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391027</guid>
		<description>I was born in 1934 and so I learned the pledge of allegiance before those two words were added.  I attend public meetings from time to time when the pledge is made as part of the opening ceremony, and when that happens I just pause and skip over them.  I&#039;m an agnostic, and I don&#039;t think it should be required that a person who disbelieves in God, or had doubts about his (or her, or its, as the case may be) existance should be required to pretend to believe something he does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was born in 1934 and so I learned the pledge of allegiance before those two words were added.  I attend public meetings from time to time when the pledge is made as part of the opening ceremony, and when that happens I just pause and skip over them.  I&#8217;m an agnostic, and I don&#8217;t think it should be required that a person who disbelieves in God, or had doubts about his (or her, or its, as the case may be) existance should be required to pretend to believe something he does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indivisible left off pledge! &#124; Steel City Skeptics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-391014</link>
		<dc:creator>Indivisible left off pledge! &#124; Steel City Skeptics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391014</guid>
		<description>[...] the Pledge, here is the one of with Porky Pig reciting it circa 1939, which fits me just fine.   As Phil Plait said this week: I’ve always found it the height of irony that the words [Under God] were added between the words [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Pledge, here is the one of with Porky Pig reciting it circa 1939, which fits me just fine.   As Phil Plait said this week: I’ve always found it the height of irony that the words [Under God] were added between the words [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinetingler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-391013</link>
		<dc:creator>spinetingler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-391013</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Jeff Przybyla Says: . The Pledge is what it is and is not subject to change.&lt;/i&gt;

yeah! 


Except in 1954. And a couple of times before that.
But. Yeah! What he said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Jeff Przybyla Says: . The Pledge is what it is and is not subject to change.</i></p>
<p>yeah! </p>
<p>Except in 1954. And a couple of times before that.<br />
But. Yeah! What he said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390995</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390995</guid>
		<description>@139.   Bob_In_Wales : 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;@136 Messier Tidy Upper – I’m not American so maybe I should stay out of this debate. But I’m not going to. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hah! The same thing applies to me. I&#039;m an Aussie. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your questions are highly leading and conflate many issues. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I completely disagree on that.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your country has evolved. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Of course. All nations and cultures evolve constantly. Some get better, others seem to get worse.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;At one point there was no pledge. Then there was the original pledge. Then the pledge was modified. At each point a majority, I’m assuming in your government, thought things were not “good enough” and instituted these changes. Are you saying they did not believe in American values? Are you saying they were unpatriotic? etc.&lt;/i&gt;
 &lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Not at all. I&#039;m talking about a lot more than just the pledge here. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Loving your country and thinking it and its values are the best does not imply you think it is perfect, should remain static and should never change. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Naturally. When have I said otherwise? But I *am* saying you should love your country and believe in its values and be at least a bit patriotic. This is NOT incompatible with saying we can&#039;t improve or should never change - which is an impossibility anyhow.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The argument here is between different stands of patriotic americanism debating how they want the US to continue to develop, legally and culturally. If western style freedom is about anything in a democracy it is about the right to debate how the future will be different from the past, how things are improved.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is it? Maybe it is, maybe it ain&#039;t. What does seem to be the case here is that NBC have taken a symbolic patriotic pledge and edited it to reflect their own political and ideological preferences which is disrespectful and, predictably, has upset lots of people. 

Playing Leftwing &quot;liberal&quot; politics, making reasoned and reasonable arguments is one thing, but playing Leftwing &quot;liberal&quot; politics to annoy and hurt the feelings of the majority of a population is something else. It&#039;s being petty, disrespectful and insulting.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;A separate debate is how you bring about that change. Do you restrict your actions to the strictly legal, obeying what you think are bad laws until through the democratic process you get them changed and/or abolished, or do you engage in acts of civil disobediance until you get the law changed, disobeying laws you think are iniquitous? Now that is a whole other can of worms!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Indeed it is and one I&#039;m not opening. Another separate story.

 &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Actually that is a question. &lt;b&gt;Possibly,&lt;/b&gt; in the context of what it was showing and the audience it was likely to attract, &lt;b&gt;NBC was insensitive&lt;/b&gt; in dropping the god bit of the pledge. &lt;b&gt;Perhaps&lt;/b&gt; it had an agenda. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh it had  agenda alright that much seems clear. There&#039;s not much &quot;possibly&quot; about it - or about the fact that NBC *was* insensitive there.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;b&gt;Perhaps&lt;/b&gt; it was part of a patriotic campaign to improve the US and move it to what many would see as a better future that many wnat (i.e. a god free one). But was what it did illegal? &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
Not illegal - just stupid, disrespectful and counter-productive. It&#039;s created a minor storm in a teacup, upset some people and probably lost some viewers and aggravated those who disagree. Not a big deal but not something that reflects at all well on them or those who support what they did.  

Whether or not you think the pledge should include &quot;Under God&quot;, whether or not you think the pledge should be said at all, I think you should respect those who *do* have that view and not behave like jerks to them which NBC in this case did. Its about basic manners and courtesy in my view. 

Campaign to change the pledge, say it how you prefer it or not at all - fine. Your choice and your responsibility. But when other people say it as *they* please, then please don&#039;t mutiliate and alter *their* words with the express intention of cheesing them off to make some minor ideological point of your own. 
 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Personally I’m left wing and liberal. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, personally, I&#039;m apolitical and use my own mind considering the evidence and thinking for myself rather than following &lt;b&gt;*any*&lt;/b&gt; political ideology. I think the Right-wing gets it right on some issues and the Left wing gets it right on others and both &quot;wings&quot; are very often badly, damagingly wrong.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt; And I think that western culture has much to recommend it. But I don’t think it is perfect and I think it has a long way to go before it will truly be what I’d like it to be or even what it often pretends it already is! And I also think that we can learn from the rest of the world and from history&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On that we agree. :-)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;In short, even if our current states are the best place in the world and in history to live lets get off our high horses, get our heads out of our arses, adopt some humility and be prepared to learn, to grow and to change.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can do all that and still have pride inyour country, still be patriotic and still actually answer those questions I asked. 

Yes, its fair enough to have humility and be willing to learn and grow and change. Its another to be constantly bashing your own culture and nation and supporting its enemies and their cultures which too many people on the Leftwing side appear to be doing in my view. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@139.   Bob_In_Wales : </p>
<blockquote><p><i>@136 Messier Tidy Upper – I’m not American so maybe I should stay out of this debate. But I’m not going to. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Hah! The same thing applies to me. I&#8217;m an Aussie. </p>
<blockquote><p><i>Your questions are highly leading and conflate many issues. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>I completely disagree on that.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Your country has evolved. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Of course. All nations and cultures evolve constantly. Some get better, others seem to get worse.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>At one point there was no pledge. Then there was the original pledge. Then the pledge was modified. At each point a majority, I’m assuming in your government, thought things were not “good enough” and instituted these changes. Are you saying they did not believe in American values? Are you saying they were unpatriotic? etc.</i>
 </p></blockquote>
<p>Not at all. I&#8217;m talking about a lot more than just the pledge here. </p>
<blockquote><p><i>Loving your country and thinking it and its values are the best does not imply you think it is perfect, should remain static and should never change. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Naturally. When have I said otherwise? But I *am* saying you should love your country and believe in its values and be at least a bit patriotic. This is NOT incompatible with saying we can&#8217;t improve or should never change &#8211; which is an impossibility anyhow.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>The argument here is between different stands of patriotic americanism debating how they want the US to continue to develop, legally and culturally. If western style freedom is about anything in a democracy it is about the right to debate how the future will be different from the past, how things are improved.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Is it? Maybe it is, maybe it ain&#8217;t. What does seem to be the case here is that NBC have taken a symbolic patriotic pledge and edited it to reflect their own political and ideological preferences which is disrespectful and, predictably, has upset lots of people. </p>
<p>Playing Leftwing &#8220;liberal&#8221; politics, making reasoned and reasonable arguments is one thing, but playing Leftwing &#8220;liberal&#8221; politics to annoy and hurt the feelings of the majority of a population is something else. It&#8217;s being petty, disrespectful and insulting.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>A separate debate is how you bring about that change. Do you restrict your actions to the strictly legal, obeying what you think are bad laws until through the democratic process you get them changed and/or abolished, or do you engage in acts of civil disobediance until you get the law changed, disobeying laws you think are iniquitous? Now that is a whole other can of worms!</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed it is and one I&#8217;m not opening. Another separate story.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Actually that is a question. <b>Possibly,</b> in the context of what it was showing and the audience it was likely to attract, <b>NBC was insensitive</b> in dropping the god bit of the pledge. <b>Perhaps</b> it had an agenda. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Oh it had  agenda alright that much seems clear. There&#8217;s not much &#8220;possibly&#8221; about it &#8211; or about the fact that NBC *was* insensitive there.</p>
<blockquote><p><i> <b>Perhaps</b> it was part of a patriotic campaign to improve the US and move it to what many would see as a better future that many wnat (i.e. a god free one). But was what it did illegal? </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Not illegal &#8211; just stupid, disrespectful and counter-productive. It&#8217;s created a minor storm in a teacup, upset some people and probably lost some viewers and aggravated those who disagree. Not a big deal but not something that reflects at all well on them or those who support what they did.  </p>
<p>Whether or not you think the pledge should include &#8220;Under God&#8221;, whether or not you think the pledge should be said at all, I think you should respect those who *do* have that view and not behave like jerks to them which NBC in this case did. Its about basic manners and courtesy in my view. </p>
<p>Campaign to change the pledge, say it how you prefer it or not at all &#8211; fine. Your choice and your responsibility. But when other people say it as *they* please, then please don&#8217;t mutiliate and alter *their* words with the express intention of cheesing them off to make some minor ideological point of your own. </p>
<blockquote><p><i>Personally I’m left wing and liberal. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Well, personally, I&#8217;m apolitical and use my own mind considering the evidence and thinking for myself rather than following <b>*any*</b> political ideology. I think the Right-wing gets it right on some issues and the Left wing gets it right on others and both &#8220;wings&#8221; are very often badly, damagingly wrong.</p>
<blockquote><p><i> And I think that western culture has much to recommend it. But I don’t think it is perfect and I think it has a long way to go before it will truly be what I’d like it to be or even what it often pretends it already is! And I also think that we can learn from the rest of the world and from history</i></p></blockquote>
<p>On that we agree. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p><i>In short, even if our current states are the best place in the world and in history to live lets get off our high horses, get our heads out of our arses, adopt some humility and be prepared to learn, to grow and to change.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>You can do all that and still have pride inyour country, still be patriotic and still actually answer those questions I asked. </p>
<p>Yes, its fair enough to have humility and be willing to learn and grow and change. Its another to be constantly bashing your own culture and nation and supporting its enemies and their cultures which too many people on the Leftwing side appear to be doing in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390984</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390984</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Just don’t complain when someone compares your tradition to other similar ones.&lt;/i&gt;

No. I do grok what you are saying, but I have to stand firm that going from the pledge of allegiance to shadows of Nazi Germany is silly. We just have to disagree on that. Peace out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Just don’t complain when someone compares your tradition to other similar ones.</i></p>
<p>No. I do grok what you are saying, but I have to stand firm that going from the pledge of allegiance to shadows of Nazi Germany is silly. We just have to disagree on that. Peace out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PO'd in Ohio</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390978</link>
		<dc:creator>PO'd in Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390978</guid>
		<description>NBC is a disgrace.  An apology does not mean anything since this was intentional.  I am not a huge religious person, but I do believe in God.  Every state in the USA was founded on the principals of God.  For NBC to do this was a disgrace to EVERY veteran who has ever defended this nation.  90% of people agree with the principals of God, but society keeps trying to please the other 10% who are other than Christian.  Our society is on a downward spiral.  Financially, spiritually and morally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC is a disgrace.  An apology does not mean anything since this was intentional.  I am not a huge religious person, but I do believe in God.  Every state in the USA was founded on the principals of God.  For NBC to do this was a disgrace to EVERY veteran who has ever defended this nation.  90% of people agree with the principals of God, but society keeps trying to please the other 10% who are other than Christian.  Our society is on a downward spiral.  Financially, spiritually and morally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayasYouStargaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390942</link>
		<dc:creator>PayasYouStargaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390942</guid>
		<description>@141 QD

It seems a valid thing to bring to the discussion, if only as an indication of how your tradition appears to those outside the USA. You seem to be just as sensitive to the comparison of the behaviour (which is valid, unlike the fear I suggested we may have) as you claim we are being to the pledge itself.

In the end, if the pledge is as harmless as you say it is, then that&#039;s fine. In fact you said so earlier that is was just a tradition. Just don&#039;t complain when someone compares your tradition to other similar ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@141 QD</p>
<p>It seems a valid thing to bring to the discussion, if only as an indication of how your tradition appears to those outside the USA. You seem to be just as sensitive to the comparison of the behaviour (which is valid, unlike the fear I suggested we may have) as you claim we are being to the pledge itself.</p>
<p>In the end, if the pledge is as harmless as you say it is, then that&#8217;s fine. In fact you said so earlier that is was just a tradition. Just don&#8217;t complain when someone compares your tradition to other similar ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390926</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390926</guid>
		<description>@Gus Snarp: *You* brought Stalin into this. End of line.

-----------------

&lt;i&gt;PayasYouStargaze: Even though we know it’s an irrational fear, those can be very difficult to rid yourself of.&lt;/i&gt;

Fine. That doesn&#039;t make it a valid thing to dump into this discussion, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gus Snarp: *You* brought Stalin into this. End of line.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><i>PayasYouStargaze: Even though we know it’s an irrational fear, those can be very difficult to rid yourself of.</i></p>
<p>Fine. That doesn&#8217;t make it a valid thing to dump into this discussion, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390906</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390906</guid>
		<description>BTW:

@Mike #28:

&lt;blockquote&gt;As an agnostic&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Liar.

@ScottL #46:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I am an atheist&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW:</p>
<p>@Mike #28:</p>
<blockquote><p>As an agnostic</p></blockquote>
<p>Liar.</p>
<p>@ScottL #46:</p>
<blockquote><p>I am an atheist</p></blockquote>
<p>Liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_In_Wales</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390896</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob_In_Wales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390896</guid>
		<description>@136 Messier Tidy Upper - I&#039;m not American so maybe I should stay out of this debate. But I&#039;m not going to. Your questions are highly leading and conflate many issues. Your country has evolved. At one point there was no pledge. Then there was the original pledge. Then the pledge was modified. At each point a majority, I&#039;m assuming in your government, thought things were not &quot;good enough&quot; and instituted these changes. Are you saying they did not believe in American values? Are you saying they were unpatriotic? etc. Loving your country and thinking it and its values are the best does not imply you think it is perfect, should remain static and should never change. The argument  here is between different stands of patriotic americanism debating how they want the US to continue to develop, legally and culturally. If western style freedom is about anything in a democracy it is about the right to debate how the future will be different from the past, how things are improved.

A separate debate is how you bring about that change. Do you restrict your actions to the strictly legal, obeying what you think are bad laws until through the democratic process you get them changed and/or abolished, or do you engage in acts of civil disobediance until you get the law changed, disobeying laws you think are iniquitous? Now that is a whole other can of worms!

Actually that is a question. Possibly, in the context of what it was showing and the audience it was likely to attract, NBC was insensitive in dropping the god bit of the pledge. Perhaps it had an agenda. Perhaps it was part of a patriotic campaign to improve the US and move it to what many would see as a better future that many wnat (i.e. a god free one). But was what it did illegal? 

Personally I&#039;m left wing and liberal. And I think that western culture has much to recommend it. But I don&#039;t think it is perfect and I think it has a long way to go before it will truly be what I&#039;d like it to be or even what it often pretends it already is! And I also think that we can learn from the rest of the world and from history

In short, even if our current states are the best place in the world and in history to live lets get off our high horses, get our heads out of our arses, adopt some humility and be prepared to learn, to grow and to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@136 Messier Tidy Upper &#8211; I&#8217;m not American so maybe I should stay out of this debate. But I&#8217;m not going to. Your questions are highly leading and conflate many issues. Your country has evolved. At one point there was no pledge. Then there was the original pledge. Then the pledge was modified. At each point a majority, I&#8217;m assuming in your government, thought things were not &#8220;good enough&#8221; and instituted these changes. Are you saying they did not believe in American values? Are you saying they were unpatriotic? etc. Loving your country and thinking it and its values are the best does not imply you think it is perfect, should remain static and should never change. The argument  here is between different stands of patriotic americanism debating how they want the US to continue to develop, legally and culturally. If western style freedom is about anything in a democracy it is about the right to debate how the future will be different from the past, how things are improved.</p>
<p>A separate debate is how you bring about that change. Do you restrict your actions to the strictly legal, obeying what you think are bad laws until through the democratic process you get them changed and/or abolished, or do you engage in acts of civil disobediance until you get the law changed, disobeying laws you think are iniquitous? Now that is a whole other can of worms!</p>
<p>Actually that is a question. Possibly, in the context of what it was showing and the audience it was likely to attract, NBC was insensitive in dropping the god bit of the pledge. Perhaps it had an agenda. Perhaps it was part of a patriotic campaign to improve the US and move it to what many would see as a better future that many wnat (i.e. a god free one). But was what it did illegal? </p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m left wing and liberal. And I think that western culture has much to recommend it. But I don&#8217;t think it is perfect and I think it has a long way to go before it will truly be what I&#8217;d like it to be or even what it often pretends it already is! And I also think that we can learn from the rest of the world and from history</p>
<p>In short, even if our current states are the best place in the world and in history to live lets get off our high horses, get our heads out of our arses, adopt some humility and be prepared to learn, to grow and to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayasYouStargaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390887</link>
		<dc:creator>PayasYouStargaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390887</guid>
		<description>@134 QD

My view on this is as follows. We&#039;re not here thinking &quot;look at those brainwashed Americans, soon they&#039;ll be starting a world war&quot;. I have no doubt that there are some out there who think that, but the commenters I&#039;ve seen here don&#039;t appear to do so.

No. It is just an uncomfortable reminder of terrible stuff that has shaped our history. Living history because there is still a large percentage of out population that experienced it first hand. It&#039;s not just the Nazis, our neighbours had this much more recently under Franco, for example.

Even though we know it&#039;s an irrational fear, those can be very difficult to rid yourself of. Even then, the pledge doesn&#039;t bother me that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@134 QD</p>
<p>My view on this is as follows. We&#8217;re not here thinking &#8220;look at those brainwashed Americans, soon they&#8217;ll be starting a world war&#8221;. I have no doubt that there are some out there who think that, but the commenters I&#8217;ve seen here don&#8217;t appear to do so.</p>
<p>No. It is just an uncomfortable reminder of terrible stuff that has shaped our history. Living history because there is still a large percentage of out population that experienced it first hand. It&#8217;s not just the Nazis, our neighbours had this much more recently under Franco, for example.</p>
<p>Even though we know it&#8217;s an irrational fear, those can be very difficult to rid yourself of. Even then, the pledge doesn&#8217;t bother me that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halcyon Dayz, FCD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390878</link>
		<dc:creator>Halcyon Dayz, FCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390878</guid>
		<description>#5 &lt;i&gt;&quot;My European acquaintances tell me that American children reciting the pledge every day in school frightens them&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s because it reminds them of something.

Why should citizens pledge allegiance to a Republic in the first place?
States exist to service the interests of its citizens, NOT the other way around.
Pressing &lt;i&gt;children&lt;/i&gt; into doing it it is nothing short of attempted indoctrination.
It doesn&#039;t matter what it is trying to indoctrinate, governments should not do that.
It is inherently evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 <i>&#8220;My European acquaintances tell me that American children reciting the pledge every day in school frightens them&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s because it reminds them of something.</p>
<p>Why should citizens pledge allegiance to a Republic in the first place?<br />
States exist to service the interests of its citizens, NOT the other way around.<br />
Pressing <i>children</i> into doing it it is nothing short of attempted indoctrination.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter what it is trying to indoctrinate, governments should not do that.<br />
It is inherently evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390868</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390868</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;We evaluate the validity of scientific ideas based on their results and the evidence - why then would we do otherwise when it comes to cultures?&lt;/b&gt; 

That&#039;s what I&#039;d really like to know.

People are people but cultures are just ideas about varying customs and ways of thinking. 

All  individual human &lt;b&gt;people&lt;/b&gt; deserve the same respect, inalienable human rights and basic decent treatment - all &lt;b&gt;*ideas*&lt;/b&gt; do NOT. 

Some cultural ideas are just plain wrong. Such as the idea widely held in some worse cultures of treating some people eg. women and gays and other ethic groups as deserving less respect, less rights, less say.

Is what I&#039;m saying really that hard to grasp? 

&lt;b&gt;Questions I&#039;d really like those who identify themselves as Left-wing and Liberal to answer, please&lt;/b&gt; :

1. Do you believe  the American way, the Western way, is the best in the world; that our values &amp; ideas are better than others - or not? 

2. Do  you support your country and your nation&#039;s values  -  are you patriotic - or not?

3.  Do you really think that a nation or culture  that represses, oppresses and even murders many of its people &lt;i&gt;(&amp; other people too)&lt;/i&gt; deserves to be held in equal esteem and regard to one that listens to and respects all of its people and allows them (the people) to choose its leader and be treated equally?

A &#039;&#039;Yes&#039; or a &#039;No&#039;  to each please.

---- 

On that note, I&#039;m going to bed, I&#039;m tired and drunk enough - and, no, I can&#039;t believe I&#039;m talking about this again either. Except I do  think it matters and I do feel this strongly. Oh &amp; I do think I&#039;m a good person and I dont give  a fig about skin colour or genetics or what-not else. &lt;b&gt;It is what folks *think* and how they act that matters,&lt;/b&gt; IMHON. 

Oh &amp; results and evidence obviously natch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>We evaluate the validity of scientific ideas based on their results and the evidence &#8211; why then would we do otherwise when it comes to cultures?</b> </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;d really like to know.</p>
<p>People are people but cultures are just ideas about varying customs and ways of thinking. </p>
<p>All  individual human <b>people</b> deserve the same respect, inalienable human rights and basic decent treatment &#8211; all <b>*ideas*</b> do NOT. </p>
<p>Some cultural ideas are just plain wrong. Such as the idea widely held in some worse cultures of treating some people eg. women and gays and other ethic groups as deserving less respect, less rights, less say.</p>
<p>Is what I&#8217;m saying really that hard to grasp? </p>
<p><b>Questions I&#8217;d really like those who identify themselves as Left-wing and Liberal to answer, please</b> :</p>
<p>1. Do you believe  the American way, the Western way, is the best in the world; that our values &amp; ideas are better than others &#8211; or not? </p>
<p>2. Do  you support your country and your nation&#8217;s values  &#8211;  are you patriotic &#8211; or not?</p>
<p>3.  Do you really think that a nation or culture  that represses, oppresses and even murders many of its people <i>(&amp; other people too)</i> deserves to be held in equal esteem and regard to one that listens to and respects all of its people and allows them (the people) to choose its leader and be treated equally?</p>
<p>A &#8221;Yes&#8217; or a &#8216;No&#8217;  to each please.</p>
<p>&#8212;- </p>
<p>On that note, I&#8217;m going to bed, I&#8217;m tired and drunk enough &#8211; and, no, I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m talking about this again either. Except I do  think it matters and I do feel this strongly. Oh &amp; I do think I&#8217;m a good person and I dont give  a fig about skin colour or genetics or what-not else. <b>It is what folks *think* and how they act that matters,</b> IMHON. </p>
<p>Oh &amp; results and evidence obviously natch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus Snarp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390864</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus Snarp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390864</guid>
		<description>@QuietDesperation: &lt;blockquote&gt;You are saying kids in the USA reciting a pledge is worse than a system that actively sought out and murdered talented people.&lt;/blockquote&gt;No, I&#039;m not saying anything like that. You are the one extending a symbolic act to the entirety of Soviet and Nazi evil. The hyperbole is yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@QuietDesperation:<br />
<blockquote>You are saying kids in the USA reciting a pledge is worse than a system that actively sought out and murdered talented people.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not saying anything like that. You are the one extending a symbolic act to the entirety of Soviet and Nazi evil. The hyperbole is yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/20/nbc-airs-pledge-of-allegiance-without-under-god/comment-page-3/#comment-390862</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33511#comment-390862</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Warning: thread deep in Godwin territory.&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt;abadidea: It seems like Europeans are crawling out of the woodwork in this thread to say the EXACT same thing… that mandatory oaths of loyalty from children remind them of… a certain something…. &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;PayasYouStargaze: I think we’re just rather sensitive to this sort of nationalist behaviour after what our grandparents went through.&lt;/i&gt;

Having flashbacks of Nazism because some kids snore their way through a dumb pledge in the USA is a bit more than &quot;rather sensitive&quot;. Seriously, if you see Hitler in this you need a vacation or something. This is shameful nonsense no better than what we hear from the creationists or the anti-vaxxers. You two need to turn in your skeptics badges and decoder rings.

&lt;i&gt;Gus Snarp: Doesn’t it sound more like something out of 1984 or Stalin’s Soviet Union&lt;/i&gt;

Not really, no.

&lt;i&gt;Gus Snarp: (though I don’t believe even they did something similar)&lt;/i&gt;

Are you joking? Under Stalin, a child&#039;s entire life, in school with highly censored education, and outside school via youth groups, was dedicated to being a good little nationalist and communist and adding to the manufactured glory of Stalin&#039;s personality cult. 

The talented ones probably grew up to die young in the Purges of the 1930s. You are saying kids in the USA reciting a pledge is worse than a system that actively sought out and murdered talented people.

What is it with the hyperbole in this thread? You&#039;d think it was about abortion or creationism in the schools. This is a *nothing* topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Warning: thread deep in Godwin territory.</b></p>
<p><i>abadidea: It seems like Europeans are crawling out of the woodwork in this thread to say the EXACT same thing… that mandatory oaths of loyalty from children remind them of… a certain something…. </i></p>
<p><i>PayasYouStargaze: I think we’re just rather sensitive to this sort of nationalist behaviour after what our grandparents went through.</i></p>
<p>Having flashbacks of Nazism because some kids snore their way through a dumb pledge in the USA is a bit more than &#8220;rather sensitive&#8221;. Seriously, if you see Hitler in this you need a vacation or something. This is shameful nonsense no better than what we hear from the creationists or the anti-vaxxers. You two need to turn in your skeptics badges and decoder rings.</p>
<p><i>Gus Snarp: Doesn’t it sound more like something out of 1984 or Stalin’s Soviet Union</i></p>
<p>Not really, no.</p>
<p><i>Gus Snarp: (though I don’t believe even they did something similar)</i></p>
<p>Are you joking? Under Stalin, a child&#8217;s entire life, in school with highly censored education, and outside school via youth groups, was dedicated to being a good little nationalist and communist and adding to the manufactured glory of Stalin&#8217;s personality cult. </p>
<p>The talented ones probably grew up to die young in the Purges of the 1930s. You are saying kids in the USA reciting a pledge is worse than a system that actively sought out and murdered talented people.</p>
<p>What is it with the hyperbole in this thread? You&#8217;d think it was about abortion or creationism in the schools. This is a *nothing* topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 08:52:11 -->
