<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An observatory that&#8217;s bigger on the inside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 07:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 11 Functional Homemade TARDISes - Sopaipleto &#187; Sopaipleto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-450551</link>
		<dc:creator>11 Functional Homemade TARDISes - Sopaipleto &#187; Sopaipleto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-450551</guid>
		<description>[...] large telescope that’s too big to easily take inside and back out often. So he built a TARDIS as a telescope shed! One side comes off, and the rest rolls away on wheels. When Kitchin is through with the telescope, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] large telescope that’s too big to easily take inside and back out often. So he built a TARDIS as a telescope shed! One side comes off, and the rest rolls away on wheels. When Kitchin is through with the telescope, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An observatory that’s bigger on the inside &#171; Madarame&#039;s Blog of Daily routines and Pivs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-407175</link>
		<dc:creator>An observatory that’s bigger on the inside &#171; Madarame&#039;s Blog of Daily routines and Pivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-407175</guid>
		<description>[...] An observatory that’s bigger on the inside.  Seems like The Good Dr. has taken up gardening and well as searching the stars these days rather than transversing them. I have to admit This Tardis is quite well crafted. I&#8217;d love to do something like that for one of my girls who&#8217;s into star gazing and how knows maybe I might once I get caught up with things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An observatory that’s bigger on the inside.  Seems like The Good Dr. has taken up gardening and well as searching the stars these days rather than transversing them. I have to admit This Tardis is quite well crafted. I&#8217;d love to do something like that for one of my girls who&#8217;s into star gazing and how knows maybe I might once I get caught up with things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TARDIS Observatory &#124; Absurdly Nerdly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-402362</link>
		<dc:creator>TARDIS Observatory &#124; Absurdly Nerdly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-402362</guid>
		<description>[...] This is has be in awe! First I wish I had a back yard, second I wish I had a telescope, third I wish I had a TARDIS shed to cover said telescope. ::SIGH:: [via Hello, I&#039;m the Doctor and Discover Magazine] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is has be in awe! First I wish I had a back yard, second I wish I had a telescope, third I wish I had a TARDIS shed to cover said telescope. ::SIGH:: [via Hello, I&#039;m the Doctor and Discover Magazine] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delores</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-392535</link>
		<dc:creator>Delores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-392535</guid>
		<description>Wonderful !  Can I have the blueprints for your Tardis ?  I would love a Tardis?  

Your neighbor up in WA state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful !  Can I have the blueprints for your Tardis ?  I would love a Tardis?  </p>
<p>Your neighbor up in WA state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An observatory that’s bigger on the inside &#124; External Brain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391892</link>
		<dc:creator>An observatory that’s bigger on the inside &#124; External Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391892</guid>
		<description>[...] then make yourself a protective shell around the whole thing… shaped like the TARDIS! &#8212; via Bad Astronomy    This entry was posted in Design, Entertainment. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Gangly Yellow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then make yourself a protective shell around the whole thing… shaped like the TARDIS! &#8212; via Bad Astronomy    This entry was posted in Design, Entertainment. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Gangly Yellow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobin Dax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391447</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobin Dax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391447</guid>
		<description>@Simon (#38)  Darn it, I was going to say that!  I scrolled all the way to the bottom to find that I&#039;m two posts too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon (#38)  Darn it, I was going to say that!  I scrolled all the way to the bottom to find that I&#8217;m two posts too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Who: TARDIS Shaped Observatory For Seeing the Universe &#124; Anglotopia - For People That Love Britain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391309</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Who: TARDIS Shaped Observatory For Seeing the Universe &#124; Anglotopia - For People That Love Britain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391309</guid>
		<description>[...] tip to the Bad Astronomy Blog for discovering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tip to the Bad Astronomy Blog for discovering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391267</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391267</guid>
		<description>And you pull to open - The Tardis will be pleased!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you pull to open &#8211; The Tardis will be pleased!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391255</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391255</guid>
		<description>I would have added rails to pull away the shell - that should make the housing last much longer (although it would make mowing the lawn a nuisance and some would complain about how ugly the rails are).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have added rails to pull away the shell &#8211; that should make the housing last much longer (although it would make mowing the lawn a nuisance and some would complain about how ugly the rails are).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391221</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391221</guid>
		<description>Classic! Love it! :-D

Hope its either not quite to (outside) scale or it is really bigger on the inside than out though or it&#039;ll be rather cramped. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic! Love it! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hope its either not quite to (outside) scale or it is really bigger on the inside than out though or it&#8217;ll be rather cramped. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World&#8217;s Strangest &#124; TARDIS Telescope Cover</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391216</link>
		<dc:creator>World&#8217;s Strangest &#124; TARDIS Telescope Cover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391216</guid>
		<description>[...] Duncan Kitchin is a stargazer and a Doctor Who fan. He also has a rather large telescope that&#8217;s too big to easily take inside and back out often. So he built a TARDIS box as a telescope shed! One side comes off, and the rest rolls away on wheels. When Kitchin is through with the telescope, just cover it up again and the instrument is protected from the weather. See more pictures at Astro Imaging Blog. Link -via Bad Astronomy Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Duncan Kitchin is a stargazer and a Doctor Who fan. He also has a rather large telescope that&#8217;s too big to easily take inside and back out often. So he built a TARDIS box as a telescope shed! One side comes off, and the rest rolls away on wheels. When Kitchin is through with the telescope, just cover it up again and the instrument is protected from the weather. See more pictures at Astro Imaging Blog. Link -via Bad Astronomy Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Man Sedgwick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391215</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Man Sedgwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391215</guid>
		<description>Sam H: -

Woof is right.  &#039;IFOS&#039; is shorthand for &#039;It&#039;s Full of Stars!&#039; - a &#039;2001: A Space Odyssey&#039; reference.  Rather apt, in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam H: -</p>
<p>Woof is right.  &#8216;IFOS&#8217; is shorthand for &#8216;It&#8217;s Full of Stars!&#8217; &#8211; a &#8217;2001: A Space Odyssey&#8217; reference.  Rather apt, in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom K.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391212</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391212</guid>
		<description>3/4 ton! wow! Thank you for the reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3/4 ton! wow! Thank you for the reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woof</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391210</link>
		<dc:creator>Woof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391210</guid>
		<description>My guess:  IFOS = It&#039;s Full Of Stars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess:  IFOS = It&#8217;s Full Of Stars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crux Australis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391203</link>
		<dc:creator>Crux Australis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391203</guid>
		<description>Pffft! One of my friends built his *telescope* to look like the TARDIS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pffft! One of my friends built his *telescope* to look like the TARDIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Kitchin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391190</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Kitchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391190</guid>
		<description>One more thing I should have mentioned - the footing is much wider than the above ground part - about two feet square - there&#039;s actually about 3/4 ton of concrete in the pier, and almost all of it is below ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing I should have mentioned &#8211; the footing is much wider than the above ground part &#8211; about two feet square &#8211; there&#8217;s actually about 3/4 ton of concrete in the pier, and almost all of it is below ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Kitchin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391188</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Kitchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391188</guid>
		<description>Tom,
the brass plate has the latitude and longitude engraved on it - it&#039;s kind of handy when I need to type it in to the hand controller...

As for the footing depth, it depends on where you live. You need to find out how deep the frost line is in your area, and then dig 6 - 12 inches below that to prevent &quot;frost heave&quot;. In my case, the frost line is only 12 inches deep, so I didn&#039;t have to go down very far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
the brass plate has the latitude and longitude engraved on it &#8211; it&#8217;s kind of handy when I need to type it in to the hand controller&#8230;</p>
<p>As for the footing depth, it depends on where you live. You need to find out how deep the frost line is in your area, and then dig 6 &#8211; 12 inches below that to prevent &#8220;frost heave&#8221;. In my case, the frost line is only 12 inches deep, so I didn&#8217;t have to go down very far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom K.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391181</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391181</guid>
		<description>Nice! What does the brass plate say on the front of it? How deep in the ground would the base have to be to stay level?  Great job! Always wanted to knock a hole in the roof and put in  a spiral staircase to a platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! What does the brass plate say on the front of it? How deep in the ground would the base have to be to stay level?  Great job! Always wanted to knock a hole in the roof and put in  a spiral staircase to a platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calli Arcale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391180</link>
		<dc:creator>Calli Arcale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391180</guid>
		<description>Keith Bowden:
&lt;blockquote&gt;[Hmph, I haven&#039;t seen &quot;The Doctor&#039;s Wife&quot; and so I didn&#039;t know the pool is gone.]&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to worry; it&#039;s not a major spoiler.  (Short version: they find themselves needing extra thrust.  If you&#039;ve seen &quot;Logopolis&quot; or &quot;Castrovalva&quot;, you can guess how they get it.  &quot;The Doctors&#039; Wife&quot; is entirely watchable for new viewers, but it has  LOT of candy for old fans.)  And anyway, the TARDIS interior is reconfigurable; the Doctor can always program up a new one.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith Bowden:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Hmph, I haven't seen "The Doctor's Wife" and so I didn't know the pool is gone.]</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to worry; it&#8217;s not a major spoiler.  (Short version: they find themselves needing extra thrust.  If you&#8217;ve seen &#8220;Logopolis&#8221; or &#8220;Castrovalva&#8221;, you can guess how they get it.  &#8220;The Doctors&#8217; Wife&#8221; is entirely watchable for new viewers, but it has  LOT of candy for old fans.)  And anyway, the TARDIS interior is reconfigurable; the Doctor can always program up a new one.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391171</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391171</guid>
		<description>It really is bigger on the inside. You can put the entire visible universe in there.

Duncan:
Well done, sir. A Tak on an Atlas! Schweet!
Ravell:
It looks like the scope stays indoors until the Tardis is rolled back.
Sam:
Try doing some outreach with kids. That should restore your sense of wonder.

What could be more appropriate than this to cover an honest-to-FSM time machine? 
Telescopes -ARE- time machines after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is bigger on the inside. You can put the entire visible universe in there.</p>
<p>Duncan:<br />
Well done, sir. A Tak on an Atlas! Schweet!<br />
Ravell:<br />
It looks like the scope stays indoors until the Tardis is rolled back.<br />
Sam:<br />
Try doing some outreach with kids. That should restore your sense of wonder.</p>
<p>What could be more appropriate than this to cover an honest-to-FSM time machine?<br />
Telescopes -ARE- time machines after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Furious Llama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391167</link>
		<dc:creator>One Furious Llama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391167</guid>
		<description>So much awesome. One day I will also own a garden large enough for my telescope....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much awesome. One day I will also own a garden large enough for my telescope&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean H.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391159</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391159</guid>
		<description>WANT! I couldn&#039;t, on my meager income, afford the telescope (but a boy can dream, right?), but I think I could build a TARDIS to house my less impressive telescope. Or maybe I should buy a big Dobsonian just to have an excuse to build one of these. Oh, I would have to make some fancy electronic lock that is opened with a sonic screwdriver. And, of course, my Tom Baker-era Doctor Who costume would keep me warm in those fall and spring months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WANT! I couldn&#8217;t, on my meager income, afford the telescope (but a boy can dream, right?), but I think I could build a TARDIS to house my less impressive telescope. Or maybe I should buy a big Dobsonian just to have an excuse to build one of these. Oh, I would have to make some fancy electronic lock that is opened with a sonic screwdriver. And, of course, my Tom Baker-era Doctor Who costume would keep me warm in those fall and spring months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391150</link>
		<dc:creator>Georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391150</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t there a story about a girls stolen Tardis recently?

http://io9.com/5811584/little-girls-tardis-stolen-from-her-front-yard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there a story about a girls stolen Tardis recently?</p>
<p><a href="http://io9.com/5811584/little-girls-tardis-stolen-from-her-front-yard" rel="nofollow">http://io9.com/5811584/little-girls-tardis-stolen-from-her-front-yard</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam H</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391136</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391136</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s quite geekily sweet, but kunniget: what does &quot;IFOS&quot; mean exactly?

Anyway, living in light polluted Calgary (the added proximity to the mountains that can breed MAJOR weather screw-ups notwithstanding) is kind of a drag for this young space fanatic - and while I have managed to identify a very suitable stargazing site south of city limits it&#039;s still over 100 km away, and even there a prominent dome of light to the north easily identified the city&#039;s location. Because of this, plus the facts that a) I still haven&#039;t practiced driving at all, and b) our whole family is VERY hard pressed on time constantly, we&#039;ve only ever been able to go on out-of-city stargazing about once a year, during the summer (for the past few years it&#039;s been around the date of the Perseids, although I&#039;ve never seen the actual shower). This scheme has it&#039;s benefits of course, but it&#039;s drawbacks as well - what I&#039;d give to see the winter sky from such a dark location... But still, last summer&#039;s trip was absolutely amazing - you have know idea how much fun it was being able to see the nebulae in Sagittarius &lt;i&gt;with your naked eye&lt;/i&gt;, seeing objects you thought you wouldn&#039;t see with just a cheap 8-inch dob (which hopefully isn&#039;t irreparably damaged after I made the mistake of trying to GENTLY clean its primary with a Swiffer duster), and seeing our galaxy spread across the sky literally clear as day. 

Sad thing is that, even though &lt;i&gt;I know&lt;/i&gt; all those points of light are suns vastly bigger and brighter than our own, all those dim gaseous wisps are really distant nebulas that are so huge and rich they could form &lt;i&gt;thousands&lt;/i&gt; of these suns, and all those fainter ovoid smudges are really cities of stars, often bigger than the one that encompasses the whole night and so much more I can&#039;t see even with magnification; galaxies so utterly far away that I&#039;m seeing them as they were since long before humanity even breathed and could barely reason its way around the simple tool - even though I know all of these things and they&#039;re all hugely awesome facts, I&#039;ve know it since early childhood. I&#039;ve seen all the pictures, and while they&#039;re all very beautiful I&#039;m not truly wowed by them anymore. And it breaks my heart to think that I&#039;ve looked at those &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; galaxies with my &lt;b&gt;own&lt;/b&gt; eyes, but never truly felt even a hint of their real size and existence - they&#039;re just images and mental facts. Like all things, I once felt the wonder and &lt;i&gt;newness&lt;/i&gt; of these awesome facts, but now they&#039;re just facts - they no longer impact my soul as they used to. That&#039;s the fear - all the things that were at first unknown and stirred our souls and passions seem to become less impacting and stirring as I learn more about them. I&#039;ve lost the wonder, and I hate that I have. However, it&#039;s probably just because I don&#039;t get outdoors and see the REAL universe that often - all my time is spent reading these blogs and contemplating the universe without really SEEING it. I can say that I felt a pleasantly simple, refreshing joy being able to see what I did and relish in my childhood-and-lifelong love (space and all things related!!), and I want to feel it again as soon as possible :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s quite geekily sweet, but kunniget: what does &#8220;IFOS&#8221; mean exactly?</p>
<p>Anyway, living in light polluted Calgary (the added proximity to the mountains that can breed MAJOR weather screw-ups notwithstanding) is kind of a drag for this young space fanatic &#8211; and while I have managed to identify a very suitable stargazing site south of city limits it&#8217;s still over 100 km away, and even there a prominent dome of light to the north easily identified the city&#8217;s location. Because of this, plus the facts that a) I still haven&#8217;t practiced driving at all, and b) our whole family is VERY hard pressed on time constantly, we&#8217;ve only ever been able to go on out-of-city stargazing about once a year, during the summer (for the past few years it&#8217;s been around the date of the Perseids, although I&#8217;ve never seen the actual shower). This scheme has it&#8217;s benefits of course, but it&#8217;s drawbacks as well &#8211; what I&#8217;d give to see the winter sky from such a dark location&#8230; But still, last summer&#8217;s trip was absolutely amazing &#8211; you have know idea how much fun it was being able to see the nebulae in Sagittarius <i>with your naked eye</i>, seeing objects you thought you wouldn&#8217;t see with just a cheap 8-inch dob (which hopefully isn&#8217;t irreparably damaged after I made the mistake of trying to GENTLY clean its primary with a Swiffer duster), and seeing our galaxy spread across the sky literally clear as day. </p>
<p>Sad thing is that, even though <i>I know</i> all those points of light are suns vastly bigger and brighter than our own, all those dim gaseous wisps are really distant nebulas that are so huge and rich they could form <i>thousands</i> of these suns, and all those fainter ovoid smudges are really cities of stars, often bigger than the one that encompasses the whole night and so much more I can&#8217;t see even with magnification; galaxies so utterly far away that I&#8217;m seeing them as they were since long before humanity even breathed and could barely reason its way around the simple tool &#8211; even though I know all of these things and they&#8217;re all hugely awesome facts, I&#8217;ve know it since early childhood. I&#8217;ve seen all the pictures, and while they&#8217;re all very beautiful I&#8217;m not truly wowed by them anymore. And it breaks my heart to think that I&#8217;ve looked at those <i>real</i> galaxies with my <b>own</b> eyes, but never truly felt even a hint of their real size and existence &#8211; they&#8217;re just images and mental facts. Like all things, I once felt the wonder and <i>newness</i> of these awesome facts, but now they&#8217;re just facts &#8211; they no longer impact my soul as they used to. That&#8217;s the fear &#8211; all the things that were at first unknown and stirred our souls and passions seem to become less impacting and stirring as I learn more about them. I&#8217;ve lost the wonder, and I hate that I have. However, it&#8217;s probably just because I don&#8217;t get outdoors and see the REAL universe that often &#8211; all my time is spent reading these blogs and contemplating the universe without really SEEING it. I can say that I felt a pleasantly simple, refreshing joy being able to see what I did and relish in my childhood-and-lifelong love (space and all things related!!), and I want to feel it again as soon as possible <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/06/22/an-observatory-thats-bigger-on-the-inside/comment-page-1/#comment-391134</link>
		<dc:creator>David G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=33607#comment-391134</guid>
		<description>Good for storing a telescope!  I wonder if it&#039;s difficult to get at the telescope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for storing a telescope!  I wonder if it&#8217;s difficult to get at the telescope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 08:53:50 -->
