<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top o&#039; the orbit to ya!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centrifugal Forces and Trojan Horses &#171; Galileo&#039;s Pendulum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295956</link>
		<dc:creator>Centrifugal Forces and Trojan Horses &#171; Galileo&#039;s Pendulum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295956</guid>
		<description>[...] is moving. At the farthest point from the Sun where the force of gravity is weakest (the aphelion, which was a little over a month ago), Earth is moving more slowly and feels a smaller centrifugal force. At the closest point (the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is moving. At the farthest point from the Sun where the force of gravity is weakest (the aphelion, which was a little over a month ago), Earth is moving more slowly and feels a smaller centrifugal force. At the closest point (the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Haggath</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295955</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Haggath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295955</guid>
		<description>#50 Finlay et al:
&quot;App-helion&quot; is correct. The P and H are definitely &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; pronounced as an F; they are two separate consonants, belonging to two separate syllables. The &quot;ap&quot; is a separate syllable, as is obvious if you consider the composition of the word.
The opposite term, for the closest point in the Earth&#039;s orbit, is &quot;perihelion&quot;. &quot;Helion&quot; comes from Helios, the Greek word for the Sun, &quot;peri&quot; and &quot;ap&quot; are prefixes appended to it. Similarly, the closest and furthest points of the Moon&#039;s orbit around the Earth are called perigee and apogee; for the orbit of a satellite of Jupiter, the words are perijove and apojove; for the orbit of the secondary around the primary in a binary star system, they are periastron and apastron. There are even a pair of generic words - periapsis and apoapsis - which can be applied to any orbit.
So we see that &quot;ap&quot; is a prefix appended to a whole range of words; so the pronunciation is &quot;app-helion&quot;. QED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#50 Finlay et al:<br />
&#8220;App-helion&#8221; is correct. The P and H are definitely <i>not</i> pronounced as an F; they are two separate consonants, belonging to two separate syllables. The &#8220;ap&#8221; is a separate syllable, as is obvious if you consider the composition of the word.<br />
The opposite term, for the closest point in the Earth&#8217;s orbit, is &#8220;perihelion&#8221;. &#8220;Helion&#8221; comes from Helios, the Greek word for the Sun, &#8220;peri&#8221; and &#8220;ap&#8221; are prefixes appended to it. Similarly, the closest and furthest points of the Moon&#8217;s orbit around the Earth are called perigee and apogee; for the orbit of a satellite of Jupiter, the words are perijove and apojove; for the orbit of the secondary around the primary in a binary star system, they are periastron and apastron. There are even a pair of generic words &#8211; periapsis and apoapsis &#8211; which can be applied to any orbit.<br />
So we see that &#8220;ap&#8221; is a prefix appended to a whole range of words; so the pronunciation is &#8220;app-helion&#8221;. QED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finlay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295954</link>
		<dc:creator>Finlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295954</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;I pronounce it app-HEEL-eeyun, if you care.
I recently read the wikipedia article that said it should be pronounced like afelion. I now feel less alone for having always pronounced it ap-helion like you. Hooray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;I pronounce it app-HEEL-eeyun, if you care.<br />
I recently read the wikipedia article that said it should be pronounced like afelion. I now feel less alone for having always pronounced it ap-helion like you. Hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Haggath</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295953</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Haggath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295953</guid>
		<description>#47 Scarlet:
Please, &lt;i&gt;please&lt;/i&gt; tell me that was a joke...!

In a recent UK survey into education standards, one of the &quot;general knowledge&quot; questions which a sample of adults were asked was, &quot;Does the Earth go around the Sun, or the Sun around the Earth?&quot; The number who answered correctly was... wait for this... &lt;i&gt;67%&lt;/i&gt;!!!!! 19% actually got it wrong, and 14% said they didn&#039;t know!
Head, meet wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#47 Scarlet:<br />
Please, <i>please</i> tell me that was a joke&#8230;!</p>
<p>In a recent UK survey into education standards, one of the &#8220;general knowledge&#8221; questions which a sample of adults were asked was, &#8220;Does the Earth go around the Sun, or the Sun around the Earth?&#8221; The number who answered correctly was&#8230; wait for this&#8230; <i>67%</i>!!!!! 19% actually got it wrong, and 14% said they didn&#8217;t know!<br />
Head, meet wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hhEb09'1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295952</link>
		<dc:creator>hhEb09'1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295952</guid>
		<description>@Nigel
That sentence is exactly correct, by itself.  If there were no other change but precession, the dates would change, because the precession has caused us to use a calendar that is not tied to the stars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nigel<br />
That sentence is exactly correct, by itself.  If there were no other change but precession, the dates would change, because the precession has caused us to use a calendar that is not tied to the stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295951</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295951</guid>
		<description>@Neil Haggath: Yes, that is rather disheartening! Just as sad is an experience I once had in an introductory college astronomy class. After completing the unit on the Sun and discussing the telescopes on campus, one student inquired, &quot;So, how do you take pictures of it? At night, when it&#039;s far away?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neil Haggath: Yes, that is rather disheartening! Just as sad is an experience I once had in an introductory college astronomy class. After completing the unit on the Sun and discussing the telescopes on campus, one student inquired, &#8220;So, how do you take pictures of it? At night, when it&#8217;s far away?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMathSkeptic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295950</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMathSkeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295950</guid>
		<description>39.   Mike Says:
July 5th, 2011 at 5:33 am
Astrology is more than 2200 years old, which means it’s just over one constellation off by now. Somehow that doesn’t seem to bother astrologers.
------
Apparently you missed the horoscopes in The Onion from earlier this year when Ophiuchus was being discussed as the &quot;13th sign&quot;: http://www.theonion.com/articles/your-horoscopes-week-of-january-18-2011,18855/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>39.   Mike Says:<br />
July 5th, 2011 at 5:33 am<br />
Astrology is more than 2200 years old, which means it’s just over one constellation off by now. Somehow that doesn’t seem to bother astrologers.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Apparently you missed the horoscopes in The Onion from earlier this year when Ophiuchus was being discussed as the &#8220;13th sign&#8221;: <a href="http://www.theonion.com/articles/your-horoscopes-week-of-january-18-2011,18855/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/articles/your-horoscopes-week-of-january-18-2011,18855/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295949</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295949</guid>
		<description>@ Mike (42) -
Yes, it looks like you&#039;re right about those numbers.  The wikipedia page I found seems to have got its figures confused.

However, that does not change that your earlier post (27) seemed to conflate two of the different types of precession.  I refer in particular to this sentence:
&lt;blockquote&gt;However the Earth precesses (the north pole wobbles around the perpendicular to our orbit once every 26,000 years) so the date of the aphelion will change.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is what I initially thought wasn&#039;t right.  Then I found the wiki page on Apsis and got a different set of numbers from yours as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike (42) -<br />
Yes, it looks like you&#8217;re right about those numbers.  The wikipedia page I found seems to have got its figures confused.</p>
<p>However, that does not change that your earlier post (27) seemed to conflate two of the different types of precession.  I refer in particular to this sentence:</p>
<blockquote><p>However the Earth precesses (the north pole wobbles around the perpendicular to our orbit once every 26,000 years) so the date of the aphelion will change.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is what I initially thought wasn&#8217;t right.  Then I found the wiki page on Apsis and got a different set of numbers from yours as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makoto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295948</link>
		<dc:creator>Makoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295948</guid>
		<description>37.   Messier Tidy Upper:
&quot;So the tallest humans – the basketballers and circus giants – that are 7 or 8 feet high are
going to be in a lot of trouble when they jump then? Oh &amp; mountaineers and divers. What .. The ..!!! *Facepalm*&quot;

Exactly.. exactly.  It really makes one wonder about people sometimes, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>37.   Messier Tidy Upper:<br />
&#8220;So the tallest humans – the basketballers and circus giants – that are 7 or 8 feet high are<br />
going to be in a lot of trouble when they jump then? Oh &amp; mountaineers and divers. What .. The ..!!! *Facepalm*&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly.. exactly.  It really makes one wonder about people sometimes, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/04/top-o-the-orbit-to-ya/#comment-295947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34119#comment-295947</guid>
		<description>And now for something completely different.

When greeting your fellow astronomers today, use the old hippy standby:
&quot;Far out!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now for something completely different.</p>
<p>When greeting your fellow astronomers today, use the old hippy standby:<br />
&#8220;Far out!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-22 18:08:02 -->