<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy birthday, Neptune!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Neptune turns one year old today! A Word For Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298961</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Neptune turns one year old today! A Word For Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298961</guid>
		<description>[...] Plait, of course, has a detailed analysis of the astronomical gymnastics involved in establishing the precise moment Neptune returned to the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plait, of course, has a detailed analysis of the astronomical gymnastics involved in establishing the precise moment Neptune returned to the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298960</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298960</guid>
		<description>If we&#039;d been able to send a probe to Neptune on the day it was discovered, it would be done with its parallax survey now, in which a &quot;parsec&quot; equals 99.91 (~100) c-yrs.

And since Uranus takes half as long to orbit the Sun, it should also be in approximately the same place it was when Neptune was discovered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we&#8217;d been able to send a probe to Neptune on the day it was discovered, it would be done with its parallax survey now, in which a &#8220;parsec&#8221; equals 99.91 (~100) c-yrs.</p>
<p>And since Uranus takes half as long to orbit the Sun, it should also be in approximately the same place it was when Neptune was discovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodcarver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298959</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodcarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298959</guid>
		<description>Beautiful!  So much so that it has become my Desktop background for the present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful!  So much so that it has become my Desktop background for the present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smitty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298958</link>
		<dc:creator>smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298958</guid>
		<description>&quot;On Neptune, I’d only be a little over 3 months old. &quot;

But a Neptunian &quot;month&quot; would be based on Triton&#039;s orbit!  More math needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On Neptune, I’d only be a little over 3 months old. &#8221;</p>
<p>But a Neptunian &#8220;month&#8221; would be based on Triton&#8217;s orbit!  More math needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalAxis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298957</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalAxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298957</guid>
		<description>@KenB:

5.9 days, and BACKWARDS.  I love Triton, the cantaloupe world.  We really need to send a Cassini-style orbiter out there.  We really need something more powerful than a radiothermal generator to power it, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KenB:</p>
<p>5.9 days, and BACKWARDS.  I love Triton, the cantaloupe world.  We really need to send a Cassini-style orbiter out there.  We really need something more powerful than a radiothermal generator to power it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captn Tommy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298956</link>
		<dc:creator>Captn Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298956</guid>
		<description>Who is Bary? And what does he have to do with the center of mass?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is Bary? And what does he have to do with the center of mass?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svlad Cjelli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298955</link>
		<dc:creator>Svlad Cjelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298955</guid>
		<description>Happy new year! =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy new year! =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298954</guid>
		<description>You say &quot;Neptune was discovered on September 23, 1846 by astronomer Johann Galle using star charts by Johann Encke, and they are generally given credit for it.&quot;

The version I know is that Urbain Le Verrier of France and John Couch Adams of England, who were mathematicians and astronomers, independently predicted the location of the planet by measuring how the gravity of a hypothetical unseen object could affect Uranus&#039;s path.

Le Verrier sent a note describing his predicted location of the new planet to the German astronomer Johann Gottfried Galle at the Berlin Observatory. Over the course of two nights in 1846, Galle found and identified Neptune as a planet, less than a degree from Le Verrier&#039;s predicted position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;Neptune was discovered on September 23, 1846 by astronomer Johann Galle using star charts by Johann Encke, and they are generally given credit for it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The version I know is that Urbain Le Verrier of France and John Couch Adams of England, who were mathematicians and astronomers, independently predicted the location of the planet by measuring how the gravity of a hypothetical unseen object could affect Uranus&#8217;s path.</p>
<p>Le Verrier sent a note describing his predicted location of the new planet to the German astronomer Johann Gottfried Galle at the Berlin Observatory. Over the course of two nights in 1846, Galle found and identified Neptune as a planet, less than a degree from Le Verrier&#8217;s predicted position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298953</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298953</guid>
		<description>@31. Ken B :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Gwif: &quot;So when do we get to celebrate Pluto’s birthday?&quot;
I don’t know. I’ll have to ask Mickey. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

GDRFC = ??? [Puzzled &amp; curious.]

To answer the original question as asked by (# 25.) Gwif : Pluto was discovered by Clyde Tombaugh in 1930 - Feb. 18th - and takes 248.09 years to complete one orbit. So rounding that figure up to 249 earth years &lt;i&gt;[taps away on calculator]&lt;/i&gt; that would be about the year 2179. :-)

EDIT : Ah, I see (#29.) MattF has given a similar answer too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@31. Ken B :</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Gwif: &#8220;So when do we get to celebrate Pluto’s birthday?&#8221;<br />
I don’t know. I’ll have to ask Mickey. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>GDRFC = ??? [Puzzled &amp; curious.]</p>
<p>To answer the original question as asked by (# 25.) Gwif : Pluto was discovered by Clyde Tombaugh in 1930 &#8211; Feb. 18th &#8211; and takes 248.09 years to complete one orbit. So rounding that figure up to 249 earth years <i>[taps away on calculator]</i> that would be about the year 2179. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>EDIT : Ah, I see (#29.) MattF has given a similar answer too. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/12/happy-birthday-neptune/#comment-298952</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=34483#comment-298952</guid>
		<description>@14. Sean :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Messier Tidy Upper: spacecraft have not yet captured a “true” or “natural” image of Neptune. Voyager’s camera was only sensitive out to the orange end of the spectrum, and used orange filters in lieu of red. So it’s color is an approximation on those famous images like at the top of this fine article. Hubble shoots Neptune in near-infrared light where some cloud features become visible. In an eyepiece on a large telescope, the planet often appears dusky-blue to me; not very colorful, but blue nonetheless. Definitely not the vivid blue in the voyager photos.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks I didn&#039;t realise that. Must admit I always thought those were pretty much true colour, as we&#039;d see them unaided eye images. :-)

@ 21.   Rebecca Harbison :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt; MTU:

Also, albedo is subjective when measured by our eyes ..[Snip] .. Neptune also gets less Sun than Uranus does, by virtue of it being further out, so there’s less to reflect — it doesn’t affect the actual albedo, but would affect a brightness measurement. (If a human were out at Neptune, though, his or her eyes would probably adapt.) Google tells me that Neptune’s albedo is about 0.4, which is comparable to Earth’s. Mercury’s is 0.14, so it would be much darker, if you could somehow place them side-by-side. Uranus’s is a bit more reflective (at 0.5), though. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&amp;

@20. Doug :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;@Messier Tidy Upper: Wikipedia has the albedo for the planets, both Bond albedo and Geometric .. [snip] .. Neptune and Uranus are somewhat similar, compared to other objects in the solar system. However, Neptune does have the lowest albedo of the gas giants. Mercury, Earth, and Mars have even lower albedo. But it also seems that Neptune’s albedo changes significantly with time.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My thanks go to both of you as well. Much appreciated. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@14. Sean :</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Messier Tidy Upper: spacecraft have not yet captured a “true” or “natural” image of Neptune. Voyager’s camera was only sensitive out to the orange end of the spectrum, and used orange filters in lieu of red. So it’s color is an approximation on those famous images like at the top of this fine article. Hubble shoots Neptune in near-infrared light where some cloud features become visible. In an eyepiece on a large telescope, the planet often appears dusky-blue to me; not very colorful, but blue nonetheless. Definitely not the vivid blue in the voyager photos.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks I didn&#8217;t realise that. Must admit I always thought those were pretty much true colour, as we&#8217;d see them unaided eye images. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@ 21.   Rebecca Harbison :</p>
<blockquote><p><i> MTU:</p>
<p>Also, albedo is subjective when measured by our eyes ..[Snip] .. Neptune also gets less Sun than Uranus does, by virtue of it being further out, so there’s less to reflect — it doesn’t affect the actual albedo, but would affect a brightness measurement. (If a human were out at Neptune, though, his or her eyes would probably adapt.) Google tells me that Neptune’s albedo is about 0.4, which is comparable to Earth’s. Mercury’s is 0.14, so it would be much darker, if you could somehow place them side-by-side. Uranus’s is a bit more reflective (at 0.5), though. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>&amp;</p>
<p>@20. Doug :</p>
<blockquote><p><i>@Messier Tidy Upper: Wikipedia has the albedo for the planets, both Bond albedo and Geometric .. [snip] .. Neptune and Uranus are somewhat similar, compared to other objects in the solar system. However, Neptune does have the lowest albedo of the gas giants. Mercury, Earth, and Mars have even lower albedo. But it also seems that Neptune’s albedo changes significantly with time.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>My thanks go to both of you as well. Much appreciated. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-24 01:38:18 -->