<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We are (temporarily) vaccinated against Jenny McCarthy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joejoe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-506889</link>
		<dc:creator>joejoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-506889</guid>
		<description>The autism/vaccine link is real, there is plenty of non-pharma funded scientific evidence available to prove this.At the present time there are no studies for the cumulative effect of vaccines on the developing immune and nervous system, it seems to me that Jenny is much more informed than her critics, translation she&#039;s done her homework. I suggest you do yours before coming on here and repeating old, fabricated information by Big Pharma, nobody is buying it anymore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The autism/vaccine link is real, there is plenty of non-pharma funded scientific evidence available to prove this.At the present time there are no studies for the cumulative effect of vaccines on the developing immune and nervous system, it seems to me that Jenny is much more informed than her critics, translation she&#8217;s done her homework. I suggest you do yours before coming on here and repeating old, fabricated information by Big Pharma, nobody is buying it anymore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-477142</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-477142</guid>
		<description>The problem with Jenny McCarthy is she jumped on the my son has autism hay ride and the media didn&#039;t do their homework. Had they investigated, which good journalists do, they would&#039;ve seen her story had huge gaps. For instance, her son radically improved after given seizure medications. As many doctors believe, this is more consistent with the diagnosis of landau kleffner syndrome, a syndrome easily misdiagnosed,even by experts, as autism. It would look better for Jenny to come out and deal with the seizures being the real reason her son regressed and exhibited autistic like behaviors that led to diagnosis. Unfortunately, she was picked up by media and others who have made a lot of money off her son&#039;s misdiagnosis and they don&#039;t want to lose that money now. There are books. Endorsements. Connections. Ties. Her name is on the my child has autism payroll and it&#039;s making people in some places money. They don&#039;t care if her son really has autism. Yet, at same time, these same people will attack BIG PHARM saying all they care about is making money. Well this appears to be the pot calling the kettle black. Jenny should be a spokesperson for Landau Kleffner, not autism. Her son obviously has issues and hopefully continues to progress, but her chronic misrepresentation of autism has rightfully angered many people. It&#039;s equally disturbing that the website Age of Autism has a relationship with her that blinds them to the fact her son was never autistic. Now does she have a right to criticize vaccines? Of course she does. She&#039;s a mom and wants to be sure what is going into her son isn&#039;t poisonous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Jenny McCarthy is she jumped on the my son has autism hay ride and the media didn&#8217;t do their homework. Had they investigated, which good journalists do, they would&#8217;ve seen her story had huge gaps. For instance, her son radically improved after given seizure medications. As many doctors believe, this is more consistent with the diagnosis of landau kleffner syndrome, a syndrome easily misdiagnosed,even by experts, as autism. It would look better for Jenny to come out and deal with the seizures being the real reason her son regressed and exhibited autistic like behaviors that led to diagnosis. Unfortunately, she was picked up by media and others who have made a lot of money off her son&#8217;s misdiagnosis and they don&#8217;t want to lose that money now. There are books. Endorsements. Connections. Ties. Her name is on the my child has autism payroll and it&#8217;s making people in some places money. They don&#8217;t care if her son really has autism. Yet, at same time, these same people will attack BIG PHARM saying all they care about is making money. Well this appears to be the pot calling the kettle black. Jenny should be a spokesperson for Landau Kleffner, not autism. Her son obviously has issues and hopefully continues to progress, but her chronic misrepresentation of autism has rightfully angered many people. It&#8217;s equally disturbing that the website Age of Autism has a relationship with her that blinds them to the fact her son was never autistic. Now does she have a right to criticize vaccines? Of course she does. She&#8217;s a mom and wants to be sure what is going into her son isn&#8217;t poisonous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-421993</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 05:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-421993</guid>
		<description>@#25 Tony, #28 c, and #32 Quiet Desperation: Wow, I said that the &lt;b&gt;number&lt;/b&gt; in bra measurements has nothing to do with breast size, and you &quot;correct&quot; me that the &lt;b&gt;letter&lt;/b&gt; means something? Letters aren&#039;t numbers.

I really just came by to compare comment systems, since Discoblog (and presumably all the Discover magazine blogs) had switched to Disqus, and I thought it might be informative to check up on a post that I had commented on that I knew hadn&#039;t been using Disqus at the time, but was after posts on Discoblog that used Disqus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#25 Tony, #28 c, and #32 Quiet Desperation: Wow, I said that the <b>number</b> in bra measurements has nothing to do with breast size, and you &#8220;correct&#8221; me that the <b>letter</b> means something? Letters aren&#8217;t numbers.</p>
<p>I really just came by to compare comment systems, since Discoblog (and presumably all the Discover magazine blogs) had switched to Disqus, and I thought it might be informative to check up on a post that I had commented on that I knew hadn&#8217;t been using Disqus at the time, but was after posts on Discoblog that used Disqus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbmcrae</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-416135</link>
		<dc:creator>bbmcrae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-416135</guid>
		<description>Wow, Elder. I definitely agree it&#039;s important to spew defensive accusations and paranoia when trying to convince people that you&#039;re right and they&#039;re wrong.

I saw the Bionaid site. Its poor design is only surpassed by its poor grammar. I salute you, sir, and your snake oil!

(Btw, can you accuse someone of shilling and then shill for your own thing? Just curious.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Elder. I definitely agree it&#8217;s important to spew defensive accusations and paranoia when trying to convince people that you&#8217;re right and they&#8217;re wrong.</p>
<p>I saw the Bionaid site. Its poor design is only surpassed by its poor grammar. I salute you, sir, and your snake oil!</p>
<p>(Btw, can you accuse someone of shilling and then shill for your own thing? Just curious.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-410092</link>
		<dc:creator>Elder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-410092</guid>
		<description>Sure...keep running that mouth, Phil. Why don&#039;t you just go ahead and call Jenny a terrorist, you know you want too.  It is so sickeningly typical of all the pro-vaccine activists to attack the messenger and dismiss the message or outright choke and spew over it.

But you fools all clam-up at the $10 Million Reward that has gone UNCHALLENGED/UNCLAIMED for THREE YEARS. You&#039;re not vaccinated against that and never will be.

VACCINES ARE OBSOLETE...Wake up. Got Bionaid and ZeoHeal? This  blog advertises for vaccines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure&#8230;keep running that mouth, Phil. Why don&#8217;t you just go ahead and call Jenny a terrorist, you know you want too.  It is so sickeningly typical of all the pro-vaccine activists to attack the messenger and dismiss the message or outright choke and spew over it.</p>
<p>But you fools all clam-up at the $10 Million Reward that has gone UNCHALLENGED/UNCLAIMED for THREE YEARS. You&#8217;re not vaccinated against that and never will be.</p>
<p>VACCINES ARE OBSOLETE&#8230;Wake up. Got Bionaid and ZeoHeal? This  blog advertises for vaccines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerebral Magpie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-403737</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerebral Magpie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403737</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to make a really basic point: attack the words, not the person.

It&#039;s sexist to slam a person because they have breasts or certain arbitrary standards of beauty, and use them for their career. Jenny McCarthy&#039;s breasts do not talk anti-vax nonsense, Jenny McCarthy does. 

You might be angry right now thinking &quot;I&#039;m not sexist, I love the women in my life&quot; (even if you&#039;re a woman yourself!), but these are socialized ideas hammered into us from birth, hard habits to break. Don&#039;t be angry, just recognize it for the privilege it is, and try harder.

I am not defending Jenny McCarthy. I believe her anti-vax nonsense is wrong. But I am defending a woman&#039;s right to air her opinions, right or wrong, without the debate being turned against her gender or sexuality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to make a really basic point: attack the words, not the person.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sexist to slam a person because they have breasts or certain arbitrary standards of beauty, and use them for their career. Jenny McCarthy&#8217;s breasts do not talk anti-vax nonsense, Jenny McCarthy does. </p>
<p>You might be angry right now thinking &#8220;I&#8217;m not sexist, I love the women in my life&#8221; (even if you&#8217;re a woman yourself!), but these are socialized ideas hammered into us from birth, hard habits to break. Don&#8217;t be angry, just recognize it for the privilege it is, and try harder.</p>
<p>I am not defending Jenny McCarthy. I believe her anti-vax nonsense is wrong. But I am defending a woman&#8217;s right to air her opinions, right or wrong, without the debate being turned against her gender or sexuality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-403477</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 23:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403477</guid>
		<description>@QuietDesperation , #53.

Good point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@QuietDesperation , #53.</p>
<p>Good point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abadidea</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-403393</link>
		<dc:creator>abadidea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403393</guid>
		<description>Elmar_M: I know you meant it in jest, and I know you will probably never see this comment, but that sort of stereotype is *genuinely harmful* to women like me. I have ACTUALLY been told that since I am (no joke - got measured at Victoria&#039;s Secret and they told me they didn&#039;t have anything appropriate in stock) a DDD, I can&#039;t actually be as smart as I &quot;pretend&quot; to be. Computer science degree and academic honors be darned. Effort be darned. People joke that women get job offers based on their good looks, but I have the opposite problem... I can see the &quot;take them seriously&quot; factor vanish from the faces of industry contacts when they lay eyes on me, even though they knew I was a woman in our phone or email conversation and seemed totally cool with it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elmar_M: I know you meant it in jest, and I know you will probably never see this comment, but that sort of stereotype is *genuinely harmful* to women like me. I have ACTUALLY been told that since I am (no joke &#8211; got measured at Victoria&#8217;s Secret and they told me they didn&#8217;t have anything appropriate in stock) a DDD, I can&#8217;t actually be as smart as I &#8220;pretend&#8221; to be. Computer science degree and academic honors be darned. Effort be darned. People joke that women get job offers based on their good looks, but I have the opposite problem&#8230; I can see the &#8220;take them seriously&#8221; factor vanish from the faces of industry contacts when they lay eyes on me, even though they knew I was a woman in our phone or email conversation and seemed totally cool with it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-403237</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403237</guid>
		<description>@QD: Did you hear that Jenny McCarthy was just hospitalized for heat exhaustion?  She accidentally locked her keys out of the car.  

What&#039;s the definition of gross ignorance?  
144 Jenny McCarthys!

Did you know that Jenny McCarthy is missing 90% of her brain matter?  It&#039;s true - Jim Carrey is on a trip overseas at the moment.

*crickets*
Sorry, I thought we were doing jokes now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@QD: Did you hear that Jenny McCarthy was just hospitalized for heat exhaustion?  She accidentally locked her keys out of the car.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s the definition of gross ignorance?<br />
144 Jenny McCarthys!</p>
<p>Did you know that Jenny McCarthy is missing 90% of her brain matter?  It&#8217;s true &#8211; Jim Carrey is on a trip overseas at the moment.</p>
<p>*crickets*<br />
Sorry, I thought we were doing jokes now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-403218</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403218</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I wonder if Jenny McCarthy ever reads&lt;/i&gt;

You could have stopped the wondering right about there.

(rimshot)

Hey-yo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I wonder if Jenny McCarthy ever reads</i></p>
<p>You could have stopped the wondering right about there.</p>
<p>(rimshot)</p>
<p>Hey-yo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-403116</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403116</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Jenny McCarthy ever reads this blog or is even aware of it.  It might be amusing to see her try to respond to the comments here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Jenny McCarthy ever reads this blog or is even aware of it.  It might be amusing to see her try to respond to the comments here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-2/#comment-403115</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 08:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403115</guid>
		<description>Lars (40) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Why not stick to astronomy, what you know, and leave the other fluff alone! There’s enough interesting stuff in space without commenting on this crap.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Erm ... because Phil promotes critical thinking in all things.

See here:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/15/politics-science-me-and-thee/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lars (40) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Why not stick to astronomy, what you know, and leave the other fluff alone! There’s enough interesting stuff in space without commenting on this crap.</p></blockquote>
<p>Erm &#8230; because Phil promotes critical thinking in all things.</p>
<p>See here:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/15/politics-science-me-and-thee/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/15/politics-science-me-and-thee/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katwagner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403083</link>
		<dc:creator>katwagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 04:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403083</guid>
		<description>No, #35 DanVeteran, Jenny doesn&#039;t either belong on Comedy Central. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert are really sarcastic and smart. Jenny is a dumbbell and her drivel doesn&#039;t even belong on the air, not anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, #35 DanVeteran, Jenny doesn&#8217;t either belong on Comedy Central. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert are really sarcastic and smart. Jenny is a dumbbell and her drivel doesn&#8217;t even belong on the air, not anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403080</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 03:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403080</guid>
		<description>Er. Some posters are obviously new here and have not been following or keeping up with the times. Yes, we have the option of if we want to get a shot or not.

But we have been shown that those who have not gotten a shot put those who are not old enough yet to be done, at serious risk and yes, death. I would not want to put any one in this situation where you have to face this tragic situation.

There is no way to sugar coat this and spreading the truth to prevent a proven preventable illness by a simple shot are words well said.  I am glad I was born after the major breakouts of polio and wouldn&#039;t want to see it come back. I&#039;m sure a lot of those young pups questioning the whys and wherefores of shots have never seen a iron lung. (Or a child in one.....)

As for the Autism link, forget it, I have friends who have a teenager who has it and they do a very good job with the care and training. And of course don&#039;t think beans about the link to vaccinations and the cause of Autism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er. Some posters are obviously new here and have not been following or keeping up with the times. Yes, we have the option of if we want to get a shot or not.</p>
<p>But we have been shown that those who have not gotten a shot put those who are not old enough yet to be done, at serious risk and yes, death. I would not want to put any one in this situation where you have to face this tragic situation.</p>
<p>There is no way to sugar coat this and spreading the truth to prevent a proven preventable illness by a simple shot are words well said.  I am glad I was born after the major breakouts of polio and wouldn&#8217;t want to see it come back. I&#8217;m sure a lot of those young pups questioning the whys and wherefores of shots have never seen a iron lung. (Or a child in one&#8230;..)</p>
<p>As for the Autism link, forget it, I have friends who have a teenager who has it and they do a very good job with the care and training. And of course don&#8217;t think beans about the link to vaccinations and the cause of Autism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403075</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403075</guid>
		<description>At the risk of sounding like a brown-noser here, I don&#039;t understand even a little bit why some readers would think that Phil&#039;s post here isn&#039;t absolutely relevant to his other writings.  After all, even before this blog existed at Discovery, Phil was writing about the moon landing hoax conspiracy nuts and the ridiculousness of astrology, and refuting the &quot;OMG killer asteroid!!!111&quot; doomsayers du jour. In other words, he gained readership in the first place by &lt;i&gt;educating the public about common misrepresentations of science&lt;/i&gt;.  And misrepresenting science to the public is &lt;i&gt;exactly&lt;/i&gt; what Jenny McCarthy is doing.

Look, I love astronomy, and I certainly don&#039;t mean to sound like I&#039;m trying to diminish Phil&#039;s contributions to it both as a scientist and writer, but I would argue that countering the dangerous misconceptions that people like McCarthy are spreading is about as high a calling as there is.  And yes, I&#039;d argue that it is in some ways even more important than astronomy.  

It would be so easy for anyone, astronomer or not, to ignore events on earth entirely and take refuge from human idiocy in the stars.  In many ways, science, skepticism, and even critical thinking itself are all under attack from all sides, ranging from religious fundamentalists to &quot;feeelings-based&quot; new-agey mush-heads.  The &quot;candle in the dark,&quot; as Carl Sagan beautifully put it, seems to be flickering in the gusting winds of capricious public opinion, and I for one am thankful that Dr. Plait is doing his part to help  protect that flame.  I say, if that means that we readers get one or two fewer nifty astronomy posts, it&#039;s a miniscule price to pay.


/end long-winded, self-righteous rant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding like a brown-noser here, I don&#8217;t understand even a little bit why some readers would think that Phil&#8217;s post here isn&#8217;t absolutely relevant to his other writings.  After all, even before this blog existed at Discovery, Phil was writing about the moon landing hoax conspiracy nuts and the ridiculousness of astrology, and refuting the &#8220;OMG killer asteroid!!!111&#8243; doomsayers du jour. In other words, he gained readership in the first place by <i>educating the public about common misrepresentations of science</i>.  And misrepresenting science to the public is <i>exactly</i> what Jenny McCarthy is doing.</p>
<p>Look, I love astronomy, and I certainly don&#8217;t mean to sound like I&#8217;m trying to diminish Phil&#8217;s contributions to it both as a scientist and writer, but I would argue that countering the dangerous misconceptions that people like McCarthy are spreading is about as high a calling as there is.  And yes, I&#8217;d argue that it is in some ways even more important than astronomy.  </p>
<p>It would be so easy for anyone, astronomer or not, to ignore events on earth entirely and take refuge from human idiocy in the stars.  In many ways, science, skepticism, and even critical thinking itself are all under attack from all sides, ranging from religious fundamentalists to &#8220;feeelings-based&#8221; new-agey mush-heads.  The &#8220;candle in the dark,&#8221; as Carl Sagan beautifully put it, seems to be flickering in the gusting winds of capricious public opinion, and I for one am thankful that Dr. Plait is doing his part to help  protect that flame.  I say, if that means that we readers get one or two fewer nifty astronomy posts, it&#8217;s a miniscule price to pay.</p>
<p>/end long-winded, self-righteous rant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hansen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403069</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403069</guid>
		<description>Chrissy and Lars, of the 8 topics prior to this one, 7 were about astronomy related subjects and 1 was about global warming. On those 7 you both posted... nothing. For 2 people that are so concerned that the blog is drifting away from astronomy, that seems a startling lack of interest.

Oh, and what BA said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrissy and Lars, of the 8 topics prior to this one, 7 were about astronomy related subjects and 1 was about global warming. On those 7 you both posted&#8230; nothing. For 2 people that are so concerned that the blog is drifting away from astronomy, that seems a startling lack of interest.</p>
<p>Oh, and what BA said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayn Rant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403059</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayn Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403059</guid>
		<description>Seriously? Jenny is all and just by herself a medical authority. At least she better be recognized as such. Just looking at her improves many heart-conditions blood-pressure-issues and some severe cases of ED. Much better than that flimsy stuff I should buy when checking my email. But again, seriously? All vaccinations are cool? Well, apparently I am not all for what is allegedly connected to anti-vaxing, but then there is nothing like the real thing. A real infection usually gives you better protection for the next round at almost no money; if you survive the first without repercussions. Now that is a really big if, but then not all vaccinations are created equal. And that is what I do not really like about the anti-Jenny sentiment that I feel is conveyed here. Some vaxes are incredibly safe and beneficial, some have side-effects not so easily dismissed, some have severe side-effects, questionable benefits and massive costs attached to them. Usually a balanced view is what is most favored and usually quite practically not every available vaccination is used all the time and everywhere. There is a reason for that I cannot find in all your posts pro-vax. I am pro-vax, generally. Small- and chickenpox, measles you know. Some make so much sense, it would be crazy to argue against the principle. But you seem to be overzealous in your wording. Dialectical, Marxist-Leninist, US-Republican. An Extremist. In a way, well, like, sort-of. I better try to excuse myself by now, but you get the point, anyway. Risk-cost-benefit should be determined individually for each vax in question. I like watching Jenny, because of my heart-condition. No one said listening to her is what the doctor ordered, or even having the sound above 0. Seriously.
I wanted to comment on astronomy and all I got to was this fantasy about anatomy. Of an argument. It was nice anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? Jenny is all and just by herself a medical authority. At least she better be recognized as such. Just looking at her improves many heart-conditions blood-pressure-issues and some severe cases of ED. Much better than that flimsy stuff I should buy when checking my email. But again, seriously? All vaccinations are cool? Well, apparently I am not all for what is allegedly connected to anti-vaxing, but then there is nothing like the real thing. A real infection usually gives you better protection for the next round at almost no money; if you survive the first without repercussions. Now that is a really big if, but then not all vaccinations are created equal. And that is what I do not really like about the anti-Jenny sentiment that I feel is conveyed here. Some vaxes are incredibly safe and beneficial, some have side-effects not so easily dismissed, some have severe side-effects, questionable benefits and massive costs attached to them. Usually a balanced view is what is most favored and usually quite practically not every available vaccination is used all the time and everywhere. There is a reason for that I cannot find in all your posts pro-vax. I am pro-vax, generally. Small- and chickenpox, measles you know. Some make so much sense, it would be crazy to argue against the principle. But you seem to be overzealous in your wording. Dialectical, Marxist-Leninist, US-Republican. An Extremist. In a way, well, like, sort-of. I better try to excuse myself by now, but you get the point, anyway. Risk-cost-benefit should be determined individually for each vax in question. I like watching Jenny, because of my heart-condition. No one said listening to her is what the doctor ordered, or even having the sound above 0. Seriously.<br />
I wanted to comment on astronomy and all I got to was this fantasy about anatomy. Of an argument. It was nice anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Metzler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403018</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Metzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403018</guid>
		<description>Phil, hi,

We&#039;re forever pointing first time readers of BA at that &#039;Politics, science, me and thee&#039; post. Perhaps you need to place a prominent link to it in the right-hand side bar?

Cheers,
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, hi,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re forever pointing first time readers of BA at that &#8216;Politics, science, me and thee&#8217; post. Perhaps you need to place a prominent link to it in the right-hand side bar?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elmar_M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403015</link>
		<dc:creator>Elmar_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403015</guid>
		<description>@21.   QuietDesperation and TechDad

It was just meant as a joke, no offense intended and even if my hypothesis was true, there are always exceptions to the rule ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@21.   QuietDesperation and TechDad</p>
<p>It was just meant as a joke, no offense intended and even if my hypothesis was true, there are always exceptions to the rule <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Plait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403007</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Plait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403007</guid>
		<description>Chrissy (38) and Lars (40): I have a better idea: why not &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/15/politics-science-me-and-thee/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read this&lt;/a&gt; and then reconsider telling me what I can and cannot write about on my own blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrissy (38) and Lars (40): I have a better idea: why not <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/07/15/politics-science-me-and-thee/" rel="nofollow">read this</a> and then reconsider telling me what I can and cannot write about on my own blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-403005</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-403005</guid>
		<description>I recently watched the episodes of Two and a Half Men and some of the episodes had her in them.  The part was basically about her scamming someone. Sounds like art imitating life eh.

Who ever does offer her a slot on their network, think of the beginning of the Futurama &quot;movie&quot; called &quot;Bender&#039;s Big Score&quot; and the FOX sequence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently watched the episodes of Two and a Half Men and some of the episodes had her in them.  The part was basically about her scamming someone. Sounds like art imitating life eh.</p>
<p>Who ever does offer her a slot on their network, think of the beginning of the Futurama &#8220;movie&#8221; called &#8220;Bender&#8217;s Big Score&#8221; and the FOX sequence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-402995</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-402995</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;what does this have to do with astronomy?&lt;/i&gt;

The possible TV show or the breast size talk?

To answer: Thanks to the interconnectedness of all things, it has EVERYTHING to do with astronomy!1!2!!! (shakes fist)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>what does this have to do with astronomy?</i></p>
<p>The possible TV show or the breast size talk?</p>
<p>To answer: Thanks to the interconnectedness of all things, it has EVERYTHING to do with astronomy!1!2!!! (shakes fist)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-402994</link>
		<dc:creator>lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-402994</guid>
		<description>Why not stick to astronomy, what you know, and leave the other fluff alone! There&#039;s enough interesting stuff in space without commenting on this crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not stick to astronomy, what you know, and leave the other fluff alone! There&#8217;s enough interesting stuff in space without commenting on this crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Bowden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-402983</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Bowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-402983</guid>
		<description>One thing about Jenny - she has never, ever been afraid to look like a complete idiot.
Sadly, she&#039;s really succeeding these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing about Jenny &#8211; she has never, ever been afraid to look like a complete idiot.<br />
Sadly, she&#8217;s really succeeding these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrissy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/07/31/we-are-temporarily-vaccinated-against-jenny-mccarthy/comment-page-1/#comment-402981</link>
		<dc:creator>chrissy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35208#comment-402981</guid>
		<description>what does this have to do with astronomy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what does this have to do with astronomy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 09:52:48 -->
