<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Shuttles, nose to nose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-406324</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-406324</guid>
		<description>@20 stjobe: Re: SR71 - always a purposeful looking beast.  But my vote for most beautiful goes to the North American XB-70 Valkyrie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_XB-70_Valkyrie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20 stjobe: Re: SR71 &#8211; always a purposeful looking beast.  But my vote for most beautiful goes to the North American XB-70 Valkyrie: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_XB-70_Valkyrie" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_XB-70_Valkyrie</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-406025</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-406025</guid>
		<description>To those who made  or thought comments like &quot; NASA needs to invest in some touch-up paint and Turtle Wax&quot; or &quot; Is it just me or do they need a good washing?&quot; you are nuts. The discoloration on some of the areas are badges of honor.  Evidence that these crafts were workhorses traveling through some of most difficult areas you can imagine. The wear marks should be displayed proudly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who made  or thought comments like &#8221; NASA needs to invest in some touch-up paint and Turtle Wax&#8221; or &#8221; Is it just me or do they need a good washing?&#8221; you are nuts. The discoloration on some of the areas are badges of honor.  Evidence that these crafts were workhorses traveling through some of most difficult areas you can imagine. The wear marks should be displayed proudly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405947</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405947</guid>
		<description>Better to see and remember &lt;i&gt;Discovery&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Endeavour&lt;/i&gt; like this than like &lt;i&gt;Challenger&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;Columbia&lt;/i&gt;, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better to see and remember <i>Discovery</i> and <i>Endeavour</i> like this than like <i>Challenger</i> or <i>Columbia</i>, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405888</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405888</guid>
		<description>Just seeing them with their manuevering rockets and OMS pods removed really drives home that they are never going back up again.  Sad sad day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just seeing them with their manuevering rockets and OMS pods removed really drives home that they are never going back up again.  Sad sad day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405838</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405838</guid>
		<description>They don&#039;t look run down.  They look like what a well used and broken-in tool looks like, you know the kind of tool that after a while fits your hand perfectly.  They&#039;ve been through quite a few toasty re-entries, and they should be allowed to continue to wear that experience.  The discolored tiles?  Why, those are badges of honor.  Making them look all new and shiny would be like giving them plastic surgery:  it&#039;d be a fake look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t look run down.  They look like what a well used and broken-in tool looks like, you know the kind of tool that after a while fits your hand perfectly.  They&#8217;ve been through quite a few toasty re-entries, and they should be allowed to continue to wear that experience.  The discolored tiles?  Why, those are badges of honor.  Making them look all new and shiny would be like giving them plastic surgery:  it&#8217;d be a fake look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Jaguar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405804</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Jaguar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405804</guid>
		<description>Those things sure look run down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those things sure look run down&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405668</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405668</guid>
		<description>Sweet!  I&#039;ll have to pay a visit to &lt;i&gt;Discovery&lt;/i&gt; when she gets here!  Any idea if the Udvar Hazy Center will be keeping &lt;i&gt;Enterprise&lt;/i&gt;?

edit: Google answered my question.  Nope, &lt;i&gt;Enterprise&lt;/i&gt; will be going to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Enterprise&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum in New York City&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet!  I&#8217;ll have to pay a visit to <i>Discovery</i> when she gets here!  Any idea if the Udvar Hazy Center will be keeping <i>Enterprise</i>?</p>
<p>edit: Google answered my question.  Nope, <i>Enterprise</i> will be going to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Enterprise" rel="nofollow"> Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum in New York City</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Iron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405645</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Iron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405645</guid>
		<description>What I hope (but seriously doubt) is that we will get to walk through at least ONE of the shuttles when they go on display. I mean what harm could be done since they won&#039;t be using them anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I hope (but seriously doubt) is that we will get to walk through at least ONE of the shuttles when they go on display. I mean what harm could be done since they won&#8217;t be using them anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405595</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 05:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405595</guid>
		<description>@25.   Calli Arcale : 

I had kinda figured that much - the Shuttles being flown inactive atop jumbo jets - but thanks for the extra details and info. there. Thanks. :-)


Yeah, I guess technically they&#039;re being &quot;flown&quot; alright but it&#039;s not the same as them being *flown* under their own steam with pilots at their controls which is what the word conjures up in my mind. Wonder if they could at least do an &lt;i&gt;Enterprise&lt;/i&gt; flight test style drop and glide back to their destinations with them? ;-) 

Guess not. 

BTW. Could be wrong I suppose, but surely the Space Shuttle &lt;i&gt;Enterprise&lt;/i&gt; would have to hold the world record for largest, heaviest and most technologically sophisticated glider ever? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@25.   Calli Arcale : </p>
<p>I had kinda figured that much &#8211; the Shuttles being flown inactive atop jumbo jets &#8211; but thanks for the extra details and info. there. Thanks. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yeah, I guess technically they&#8217;re being &#8220;flown&#8221; alright but it&#8217;s not the same as them being *flown* under their own steam with pilots at their controls which is what the word conjures up in my mind. Wonder if they could at least do an <i>Enterprise</i> flight test style drop and glide back to their destinations with them? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Guess not. </p>
<p>BTW. Could be wrong I suppose, but surely the Space Shuttle <i>Enterprise</i> would have to hold the world record for largest, heaviest and most technologically sophisticated glider ever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 04:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405586</guid>
		<description>#24 Tom: They are employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 Tom: They are employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405585</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 04:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405585</guid>
		<description>#11 Michael: Unless there is a day such as this when they are being moved, they are always kept indoors so you won&#039;t see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#11 Michael: Unless there is a day such as this when they are being moved, they are always kept indoors so you won&#8217;t see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calli Arcale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405518</link>
		<dc:creator>Calli Arcale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405518</guid>
		<description>Messier Tidy Upper:
&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;i&gt;The two Orbiters, Discovery and Endeavour, are seen here outside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. Both are being cleaned up and prepped to be shipped (or, more properly, flown) to museums&lt;/i&gt;

Flown? If only! &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, they will be flown, on the back of one of the two modified 747s that have served the Shuttle program since the 1970s.  As opposed to being shipped on a barge or something, which I believe was the point of that comment.  They will fly as they always did when moving between facilities.

And it&#039;s fair to describe them as flying, even if they aren&#039;t wiggling their control surfaces at all.  They are inactive while being ferried (sorry, &lt;i&gt;Moonraker&lt;/i&gt;) but they have wings which do actually provide lift during the flight.  SCA pilots have been known to describe the combined vehicle as &quot;the most sophisticated biplane ever flown&quot;.

icewings -- the Orbiters have been safed following flight; they are not yet prepped for conservation purposes.  I think the idea is to preserve a flight-like appearance, so scorching and such will still be there when they&#039;re done.  But their appearance will be much improved from the current appearance; in particular, those mylar-covered gaps will be filled with the forward RCS compartment and the OMS pods, all cleaned of hazardous hypergolic residue.  And the white circles on the back will be removed and fake SSMEs put in their places.  (The real SSMEs aren&#039;t going on display, but are hanging around for engineering use.  They&#039;re incredibly valuable engines.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Messier Tidy Upper:</p>
<blockquote><p> <i>The two Orbiters, Discovery and Endeavour, are seen here outside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. Both are being cleaned up and prepped to be shipped (or, more properly, flown) to museums</i></p>
<p>Flown? If only! </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, they will be flown, on the back of one of the two modified 747s that have served the Shuttle program since the 1970s.  As opposed to being shipped on a barge or something, which I believe was the point of that comment.  They will fly as they always did when moving between facilities.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s fair to describe them as flying, even if they aren&#8217;t wiggling their control surfaces at all.  They are inactive while being ferried (sorry, <i>Moonraker</i>) but they have wings which do actually provide lift during the flight.  SCA pilots have been known to describe the combined vehicle as &#8220;the most sophisticated biplane ever flown&#8221;.</p>
<p>icewings &#8212; the Orbiters have been safed following flight; they are not yet prepped for conservation purposes.  I think the idea is to preserve a flight-like appearance, so scorching and such will still be there when they&#8217;re done.  But their appearance will be much improved from the current appearance; in particular, those mylar-covered gaps will be filled with the forward RCS compartment and the OMS pods, all cleaned of hazardous hypergolic residue.  And the white circles on the back will be removed and fake SSMEs put in their places.  (The real SSMEs aren&#8217;t going on display, but are hanging around for engineering use.  They&#8217;re incredibly valuable engines.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Callahan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405481</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Callahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405481</guid>
		<description>So who are the lucky people who get to park their cars next to a space shuttle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who are the lucky people who get to park their cars next to a space shuttle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icewings</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405475</link>
		<dc:creator>icewings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405475</guid>
		<description>NASA needs to invest in some touch-up paint and Turtle Wax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA needs to invest in some touch-up paint and Turtle Wax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405471</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405471</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t let one start sniffing the other&#039;s exhaust. Before you know it we&#039;ll have a whole bunch of little shuttles to feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t let one start sniffing the other&#8217;s exhaust. Before you know it we&#8217;ll have a whole bunch of little shuttles to feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405462</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405462</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or do they need a good washing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or do they need a good washing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stjobe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405419</link>
		<dc:creator>stjobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405419</guid>
		<description>Slightly off-topic, but while you&#039;re there at the Udvar-Hazy Center, don&#039;t miss the other good stuff they have on display. I made a trip there especially to see their SR-71 Blackbird (the most beautiful aircraft in the world, in my humble opinion), and was impressed with the quality of their displays. I have to admit it was kind of a strange feeling to see Enola Gay in real life, though. Mixed emotions.

As for spacey stuff, they have - among a lot of other cool stuff - the Gemini VII capsule, and an engineering prototype of the Mars Pathfinder Lander.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly off-topic, but while you&#8217;re there at the Udvar-Hazy Center, don&#8217;t miss the other good stuff they have on display. I made a trip there especially to see their SR-71 Blackbird (the most beautiful aircraft in the world, in my humble opinion), and was impressed with the quality of their displays. I have to admit it was kind of a strange feeling to see Enola Gay in real life, though. Mixed emotions.</p>
<p>As for spacey stuff, they have &#8211; among a lot of other cool stuff &#8211; the Gemini VII capsule, and an engineering prototype of the Mars Pathfinder Lander.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405388</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405388</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t remember all the details provided for the museums/displays where the shuttles will end up, but hopefully they will be inside so they won&#039;t weather and deteriorate like some Saturns and Skylab mockups elsewhere.  These should be housed in places with a commitment toward respecting their history and accomplishments and a commitment toward aggressive long term preservation.  The Saturn V museum at KSC is an example of that idea.  Imagine a museum that has indoors not only a Shuttle but also an external fuel tank and two SRB&#039;s.  Such a display would give a proper sense of the size, power, and complexity of what it required to get a shuttle to orbit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember all the details provided for the museums/displays where the shuttles will end up, but hopefully they will be inside so they won&#8217;t weather and deteriorate like some Saturns and Skylab mockups elsewhere.  These should be housed in places with a commitment toward respecting their history and accomplishments and a commitment toward aggressive long term preservation.  The Saturn V museum at KSC is an example of that idea.  Imagine a museum that has indoors not only a Shuttle but also an external fuel tank and two SRB&#8217;s.  Such a display would give a proper sense of the size, power, and complexity of what it required to get a shuttle to orbit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405385</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405385</guid>
		<description>they look so battered. oh well, a museum is more dignified than a glue factory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they look so battered. oh well, a museum is more dignified than a glue factory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405381</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405381</guid>
		<description>The Space Shuttles have provided us all with so much joy, so much science, so much over 135 missions all but two landing safely and successfully and delivering what they promised.
 
This : 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kayCLca1YMc&amp;feature=related

&amp; this : 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II7QBLt36xo&amp;feature=player_embedded

&amp; this : 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5w-6o76rW0&amp;feature=relmfu 

is how I&#039;ll remember them. How I think we can best remember these technological marvels. :-)

Not that sorrowful image of them being retired on the tarmac and grounded forever. :-(
 
Perhaps in ten or twenty or thirty years time we can get all the retired orbiters together somewhere for an anniversary reunion. ;-)

Wonder where we&#039;ll be by then  and whether any progress will have been made in human space exploration and development then? Also who will have made such progress?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Space Shuttles have provided us all with so much joy, so much science, so much over 135 missions all but two landing safely and successfully and delivering what they promised.</p>
<p>This : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kayCLca1YMc&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kayCLca1YMc&#038;feature=related</a></p>
<p>&amp; this : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II7QBLt36xo&#038;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II7QBLt36xo&#038;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
<p>&amp; this : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5w-6o76rW0&#038;feature=relmfu" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5w-6o76rW0&#038;feature=relmfu</a> </p>
<p>is how I&#8217;ll remember them. How I think we can best remember these technological marvels. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Not that sorrowful image of them being retired on the tarmac and grounded forever. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Perhaps in ten or twenty or thirty years time we can get all the retired orbiters together somewhere for an anniversary reunion. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Wonder where we&#8217;ll be by then  and whether any progress will have been made in human space exploration and development then? Also who will have made such progress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405378</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405378</guid>
		<description>Seeing this reminds me of when I was in grade school- I thought having a double shuttle mission would be the coolest thing ever. Actually- I still do, that would have been awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing this reminds me of when I was in grade school- I thought having a double shuttle mission would be the coolest thing ever. Actually- I still do, that would have been awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405374</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405374</guid>
		<description>Sad sight really - remarkable though. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The two Orbiters, Discovery and Endeavour, are seen here outside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. Both are being cleaned up and prepped to be shipped (or, more properly, &lt;b&gt;flown&lt;/b&gt;) to museums&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Flown? If only! 

Imagines these orbiters launching, flying on their own and landing at their final destinations one last time. If only they could. 

We&#039;ll never see the Space Shuttles fly again. I find that sad. :-(

I find it sadder yet that better, more capable, upgraded replacements for them aren&#039;t flying already. :-(  

I grew up with the Space Shuttles. As a young boy one of my first memories is watching an early launch attempt for the very first &lt;i&gt;Columbia&lt;/i&gt; flight when this then all-white spaceplane was &lt;i&gt;The Future&lt;/i&gt; and Science Fiction coming to life. Now decades later I have seen the last launch on the news as well and then observed the &lt;/i&gt;Atlantis&lt;/i&gt; pass overhead while on its - and the Space Shuttles - final ever descent from home. With so many missions and memories in between those moments.

I never would have imagined the Space Shuttle program would end this way. For all their faults and despite not quite living up to expectations they were the one of the wonders of the modern world and - after the &lt;i&gt;Saturn V-Apollo&lt;/i&gt; spacecraft vehicles - the most remarkable thing human minds have ever designed and human hands ever built and flown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad sight really &#8211; remarkable though. </p>
<blockquote><p><i>The two Orbiters, Discovery and Endeavour, are seen here outside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. Both are being cleaned up and prepped to be shipped (or, more properly, <b>flown</b>) to museums</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Flown? If only! </p>
<p>Imagines these orbiters launching, flying on their own and landing at their final destinations one last time. If only they could. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll never see the Space Shuttles fly again. I find that sad. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I find it sadder yet that better, more capable, upgraded replacements for them aren&#8217;t flying already. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>I grew up with the Space Shuttles. As a young boy one of my first memories is watching an early launch attempt for the very first <i>Columbia</i> flight when this then all-white spaceplane was <i>The Future</i> and Science Fiction coming to life. Now decades later I have seen the last launch on the news as well and then observed the Atlantis pass overhead while on its &#8211; and the Space Shuttles &#8211; final ever descent from home. With so many missions and memories in between those moments.</p>
<p>I never would have imagined the Space Shuttle program would end this way. For all their faults and despite not quite living up to expectations they were the one of the wonders of the modern world and &#8211; after the <i>Saturn V-Apollo</i> spacecraft vehicles &#8211; the most remarkable thing human minds have ever designed and human hands ever built and flown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shuttle swap spawns nose-to-nose showdown &#8211; Spaceflight Now &#124; Tucson AZ News and Weather</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405371</link>
		<dc:creator>Shuttle swap spawns nose-to-nose showdown &#8211; Spaceflight Now &#124; Tucson AZ News and Weather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 04:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405371</guid>
		<description>[...] bring 600 jobs to KSC could get OK soonFlorida TodayOrlando Sentinel&#160;-MyFox Tampa Bay&#160;-Discover Magazine (blog)all 182 news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bring 600 jobs to KSC could get OK soonFlorida TodayOrlando Sentinel&nbsp;-MyFox Tampa Bay&nbsp;-Discover Magazine (blog)all 182 news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405368</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Drumm The Astronomy Bum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 04:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405368</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll have to have a DC tweetup when you visit Discovery!
I&#039;ll drive up! I can bring along a couple solar telescopes &amp; turn it into a star party!

Ya know what? I&#039;ll bet it&#039;ll fly right over here in April as it heads up there!
Gotta get the whole UVa astronomy community out to see that!
Keep us informed of the ferry flights, Phil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll have to have a DC tweetup when you visit Discovery!<br />
I&#8217;ll drive up! I can bring along a couple solar telescopes &amp; turn it into a star party!</p>
<p>Ya know what? I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;ll fly right over here in April as it heads up there!<br />
Gotta get the whole UVa astronomy community out to see that!<br />
Keep us informed of the ferry flights, Phil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Latimer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/08/11/two-shuttles-nose-to-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-405365</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Latimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=35777#comment-405365</guid>
		<description>I think an appropriate pilgrimage will be to see each of the Orbiters in their final homes.  I was fortunate enough to see Atlantis on her final launch -- it would be great to see her again, safely on the ground after her last successful mission.  Sure, I know she&#039;s safe -- but to really KNOW it, I think seeing her up close would do that.

My essay about witnessing the Atlantis launch can be found here, if anyone is interested.

http://www.q-a.net/mauionline/?p=3559

Thanks, as always, BA.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think an appropriate pilgrimage will be to see each of the Orbiters in their final homes.  I was fortunate enough to see Atlantis on her final launch &#8212; it would be great to see her again, safely on the ground after her last successful mission.  Sure, I know she&#8217;s safe &#8212; but to really KNOW it, I think seeing her up close would do that.</p>
<p>My essay about witnessing the Atlantis launch can be found here, if anyone is interested.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.q-a.net/mauionline/?p=3559" rel="nofollow">http://www.q-a.net/mauionline/?p=3559</a></p>
<p>Thanks, as always, BA.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 10:15:41 -->
