<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fermi at 2: still rocking the high-energy sky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Winter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-418770</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-418770</guid>
		<description>Chris wrote (#2): &lt;i&gt;&quot;I always wondered if some of the gamma ray bursts we see are actually due to a distant alien war.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I had the same thought, back before it was settled that GRBs are way distant, like millions of light years out.

I think it&#039;s important to note that this post is not about bursters, but steady (AIUI) gamma-ray sources &#8212; at least steady on the time scale of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris wrote (#2): <i>&#8220;I always wondered if some of the gamma ray bursts we see are actually due to a distant alien war.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I had the same thought, back before it was settled that GRBs are way distant, like millions of light years out.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s important to note that this post is not about bursters, but steady (AIUI) gamma-ray sources &mdash; at least steady on the time scale of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infinite123Lifer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-418748</link>
		<dc:creator>Infinite123Lifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-418748</guid>
		<description>@katwagner

I was there when Mount St. Helen&#039;s blew.  It seems like a dreamy memory.  Raining ash, ash and more ash. It was a crazy ash time, and a crazy ash memory.

@#5.   42</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@katwagner</p>
<p>I was there when Mount St. Helen&#8217;s blew.  It seems like a dreamy memory.  Raining ash, ash and more ash. It was a crazy ash time, and a crazy ash memory.</p>
<p>@#5.   42</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WJM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-417846</link>
		<dc:creator>WJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-417846</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who says &quot;gurb&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who says &#8220;gurb&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-417772</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-417772</guid>
		<description>There have been a lot of all sky surveys recently:
* Planck
* Wise
* Updated Fermi all sky map

Would be ideal candidates for chromoscope.net unfortunately they are not included (Wise, Fermi (only the old all sky map)) or only in low resolution (Planck).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been a lot of all sky surveys recently:<br />
* Planck<br />
* Wise<br />
* Updated Fermi all sky map</p>
<p>Would be ideal candidates for chromoscope.net unfortunately they are not included (Wise, Fermi (only the old all sky map)) or only in low resolution (Planck).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Bowden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-417753</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Bowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-417753</guid>
		<description>&quot;Space... is big. Really big. You just won&#039;t believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it&#039;s a long way down the road to the chemist&#039;s, but that&#039;s just peanuts to space...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Space&#8230; is big. Really big. You just won&#8217;t believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it&#8217;s a long way down the road to the chemist&#8217;s, but that&#8217;s just peanuts to space&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katwagner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-417739</link>
		<dc:creator>katwagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-417739</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a word in the dictionary that can describe how farking bad these GRBs are. I mean I got stuck in the Mount St. Helens ashcloud and I thought that was really big and bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a word in the dictionary that can describe how farking bad these GRBs are. I mean I got stuck in the Mount St. Helens ashcloud and I thought that was really big and bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-417682</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-417682</guid>
		<description>@ ^ Chris : Given the staggeringly huge amount of energy* released in GRBs that would have to be &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;some&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; war indeed! :-o 

------------- 

* From the BA blog item linked to my name : 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Let me put this in perspective for you. Imagine a one megaton nuclear weapon detonating. That’s roughly 50 times the explosive yield of the bomb dropped on Nagasaki. Devastating. The Sun, every second of every day of every year, gives off 100 billion times this much energy. That’s every second. A star is a terrifying object. In the few seconds that a gamma-ray burst lasts, it packs a million million million times that much energy into its beams. In other words, for those few ticks of a clock the GRB is sending out more energy than the Sun will in its entire lifetime. There is, quite simply, no way to exaggerate the devastation of a gamma-ray burst.
- Phil Plait, &lt;i&gt;&#039;Naked eye visible GRB!&#039;&lt;/i&gt; [GRB 080319B] posted online 2008 March 20th, 9:41 AM.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A Gamma Ray Burst can be described as &quot;energetic&quot; in much the same way that our universe is describable as &quot;big&quot; - inadequately! ;-)

PS. Perspective providing, hopefully : 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;1 million seconds is about 12 days.One billion seconds is about 31 years.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 
- Stephen Jones writing in the &lt;i&gt;&#039;Weekend Australian&#039;&lt;/i&gt; newspaper, 2011 April 9th-10th.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ^ Chris : Given the staggeringly huge amount of energy* released in GRBs that would have to be <b><i>some</i></b> war indeed! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':-o' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- </p>
<p>* From the BA blog item linked to my name : </p>
<blockquote><p>Let me put this in perspective for you. Imagine a one megaton nuclear weapon detonating. That’s roughly 50 times the explosive yield of the bomb dropped on Nagasaki. Devastating. The Sun, every second of every day of every year, gives off 100 billion times this much energy. That’s every second. A star is a terrifying object. In the few seconds that a gamma-ray burst lasts, it packs a million million million times that much energy into its beams. In other words, for those few ticks of a clock the GRB is sending out more energy than the Sun will in its entire lifetime. There is, quite simply, no way to exaggerate the devastation of a gamma-ray burst.<br />
- Phil Plait, <i>&#8216;Naked eye visible GRB!&#8217;</i> [GRB 080319B] posted online 2008 March 20th, 9:41 AM.</p></blockquote>
<p>A Gamma Ray Burst can be described as &#8220;energetic&#8221; in much the same way that our universe is describable as &#8220;big&#8221; &#8211; inadequately! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PS. Perspective providing, hopefully : </p>
<p><i>&#8220;1 million seconds is about 12 days.One billion seconds is about 31 years.&#8221;</i><br />
- Stephen Jones writing in the <i>&#8216;Weekend Australian&#8217;</i> newspaper, 2011 April 9th-10th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-417659</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-417659</guid>
		<description>I always wondered if some of the gamma ray bursts we see are actually due to a distant alien war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered if some of the gamma ray bursts we see are actually due to a distant alien war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/fermi-at-2-still-rocking-the-high-energy-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-417646</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37444#comment-417646</guid>
		<description>So now we&#039;re getting a Fermi-er grasp of understanding the Gamma--ray sky and the objects that light it up? ;-) 

Marvellous! :-) 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;black holes are sloppy eaters. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well sphaghetti&lt;i&gt;(~fied stars &amp; who knows what else)&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;*is*&lt;/b&gt; one of the harder foods to eat cleanly. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now we&#8217;re getting a Fermi-er grasp of understanding the Gamma&#8211;ray sky and the objects that light it up? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Marvellous! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<blockquote><p><i>black holes are sloppy eaters. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Well sphaghetti<i>(~fied stars &amp; who knows what else)</i> <b>*is*</b> one of the harder foods to eat cleanly. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 04:55:22 -->
