<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michele Bachmann needles Perry on vaccinations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-421148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-421148</guid>
		<description>Silence From Rep. Bachmann As Vaccine Challenge Expires
by KRISTOFOR HUSTED
06:09 pm
September 22, 2011
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/09/22/140714382/silence-from-rep-bachmann-as-vaccine-challenge-expires</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silence From Rep. Bachmann As Vaccine Challenge Expires<br />
by KRISTOFOR HUSTED<br />
06:09 pm<br />
September 22, 2011<br />
<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/09/22/140714382/silence-from-rep-bachmann-as-vaccine-challenge-expires" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/09/22/140714382/silence-from-rep-bachmann-as-vaccine-challenge-expires</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-421019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-421019</guid>
		<description>Nigel Depledge - my apologies;

My comment was to tie up a loose thread from 1 of many extremist media outlets which get advertisers and other supporters to pay for mass entertainment that nullifies the last 200 years of scientific advancement and destroys healthcare for current and future generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nigel Depledge &#8211; my apologies;</p>
<p>My comment was to tie up a loose thread from 1 of many extremist media outlets which get advertisers and other supporters to pay for mass entertainment that nullifies the last 200 years of scientific advancement and destroys healthcare for current and future generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-420587</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-420587</guid>
		<description>@ 105 -

What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 105 -</p>
<p>What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-420309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-420309</guid>
		<description>With gays able to openly kill in the military and then get married, I bet the following legal terrorists will really avoid public service and  share needles  - 

Honorary pilodinal cyst of 4F by Tea, “97.   PayasYouStargaze Says: September 19th, 2011 at 2:18 am I’m a bit concerned that that bot keeps going after me now. Only a bit though, it’s ramblings still make no sense.”

“The Left&#039;s Math Makes No Sense ... September 20, 2011” and then, “A Loveable Little Fuzz Ball ... September 27, 2004 ... When you talk plagiarism out there, it&#039;s hard to remember any right-winger plagiarist. I&#039;m sure there have been. I just don&#039;t remember any” (the old, ugly and evil Rush “looting” Limbaugh with Hannity/Noory how to guide of extremist Republican and Christian outlets for creating legal illnesses, murders for hire, and failed antebellum states with willing accomplices and sham brides and sex tours, another GOP human trafficker by harvesting humans like Esso-Koch whose products kill people; unable to sell - NRA gun/other erection products, hair/other plugs, winter clothing except Mittens Romney, disaster insurance, Nazi products ‘cept Exxon chemicals, crayon-ready denier college textbooks/manifestoes, spontaneous abortion office products, while conserving the flames of the new aristocracy; rushlimbaugh.com).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With gays able to openly kill in the military and then get married, I bet the following legal terrorists will really avoid public service and  share needles  &#8211; </p>
<p>Honorary pilodinal cyst of 4F by Tea, “97.   PayasYouStargaze Says: September 19th, 2011 at 2:18 am I’m a bit concerned that that bot keeps going after me now. Only a bit though, it’s ramblings still make no sense.”</p>
<p>“The Left&#8217;s Math Makes No Sense &#8230; September 20, 2011” and then, “A Loveable Little Fuzz Ball &#8230; September 27, 2004 &#8230; When you talk plagiarism out there, it&#8217;s hard to remember any right-winger plagiarist. I&#8217;m sure there have been. I just don&#8217;t remember any” (the old, ugly and evil Rush “looting” Limbaugh with Hannity/Noory how to guide of extremist Republican and Christian outlets for creating legal illnesses, murders for hire, and failed antebellum states with willing accomplices and sham brides and sex tours, another GOP human trafficker by harvesting humans like Esso-Koch whose products kill people; unable to sell &#8211; NRA gun/other erection products, hair/other plugs, winter clothing except Mittens Romney, disaster insurance, Nazi products ‘cept Exxon chemicals, crayon-ready denier college textbooks/manifestoes, spontaneous abortion office products, while conserving the flames of the new aristocracy; rushlimbaugh.com).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mundt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-420030</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mundt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-420030</guid>
		<description>Amazing....here we are at more than 100 posts, and, Godwin&#039;s Law remains dormant!   No wonder I enjoy reading the BA blog and its accompanying comments.
     Now, back to our regularly scheduled program, already in progress:
     Nigel Depledge (99) gave some good points about why American society has evolved to the current sad state of affairs.  I have ranted about this a bit in my own blog (shameless plug follows:  http://blog.beemandave.com/)  but thought I would touch base about it here.
     As to the points....Not only are the candidates allowed to spew any mindless drivel they want to in order to gain the love of the mob,  the  inability of the masses to perform even the simplest amount of analytical thought means that the candidates can only on say anything they want, they can stand before two different audiences, and say contradictory things without fear of retribution.   Other than a few commentators, apparently no one cares what the candidates say to OTHER people...only what they say to THEM.    To add to this, the federal government has given up on even doing lip service towards presenting a balanced set of views.   In 1949, the FCC implemented the &quot;Fairness Doctrine&quot;.  This rule, which applied to all broadcasters required them to  &quot; devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters&quot;.      Well, that lasted until 1989, when the FCC really stopped enforcing it as part of the licensing requirements for broadcasters, and, the rule was entirely removed in 2011.    While the Fairness Doctrine was enforced, it did a good job.  While there was nothing stopping the audience from switching channels,  many would watch simply because there were no remotes and it was easier to watch the other views than it was to get up and turn the knob (Remember Knobs for changing channels-or am I just older than dirt????)
     As a natural part of this tailoring the message to the audience, it is a very astute observation that the candidates most offer bread and circuses to their audiences, and make sure that they push the audience&#039;s hot buttons to ensure that the audience members believe that the candidate is driving their bandwagon.   Again, the increasing apathy in America helps make sure that the elected Representatives keep that 97% or so return rate.
     However, one thing that continues to puzzle me is how can an America voter  blame the current administration for the damage done to the society and economy by the previous administration.   It is as if America has become blanketed with stupid gas and the overall IQ is rapidly approaching room temperature.
      Having ranted on about THAT for a bit...I thought I would say a word about the original topic - Mandatory HPV vaccine shots.
       In general, I am very pro-vaccination.   I am perfectly ok with the school system having a list of vaccinations required to break the cycle of terrible diseases that can be communicated by casual contact, including sharing food.    Good riddance to them, too.   I am less sanguine about the HPV vaccine being included in the mix as a requirement because it smells to me of another step by the government to infiltrate itself in the lives of the citizens and keep them infantile.   I DO think it would be a great thing if every pubescent girl was inoculated, because as the posting points out cervical cancer is not a fun way to go.   However, that should be the responsibility and choice of the parents, after they have been educated about the facts about the vaccine, and the consequences for NOT getting the shot.    
     I have to say that these people that claim that getting this vaccine (or sex ed, or freely available condoms, or for that matter, legal and safe abortions)  will cause their little snowflake to turn into a raging nymphomaniac!   They obviously do not remember that time of their lives - kids of that age do not NEED help in that area, once puberty kicks in and the hormones  start surging!   I suspect that many parents might well be shocked and surprised about the sexual activity of their daughters and sons  if they were to find out the truth.   So...it seems to me that any parent with a lick of sense would want their daughter to get the jab.
      In a slight ramble....I also do not buy for a second that this (or any other vaccine) will, in itself, &quot;cause&quot; neurological issues in children.  I am willing to say that the development of the mind is a complicated thing, so, there may be an outside chance that a vaccine or mixture of vaccines MIGHT influence that development...but, until it is proven by science, I discount any theories that blame the jabs for the problems completely
Yet more to think about....
xmundt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing&#8230;.here we are at more than 100 posts, and, Godwin&#8217;s Law remains dormant!   No wonder I enjoy reading the BA blog and its accompanying comments.<br />
     Now, back to our regularly scheduled program, already in progress:<br />
     Nigel Depledge (99) gave some good points about why American society has evolved to the current sad state of affairs.  I have ranted about this a bit in my own blog (shameless plug follows:  <a href="http://blog.beemandave.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.beemandave.com/</a>)  but thought I would touch base about it here.<br />
     As to the points&#8230;.Not only are the candidates allowed to spew any mindless drivel they want to in order to gain the love of the mob,  the  inability of the masses to perform even the simplest amount of analytical thought means that the candidates can only on say anything they want, they can stand before two different audiences, and say contradictory things without fear of retribution.   Other than a few commentators, apparently no one cares what the candidates say to OTHER people&#8230;only what they say to THEM.    To add to this, the federal government has given up on even doing lip service towards presenting a balanced set of views.   In 1949, the FCC implemented the &#8220;Fairness Doctrine&#8221;.  This rule, which applied to all broadcasters required them to  &#8221; devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters&#8221;.      Well, that lasted until 1989, when the FCC really stopped enforcing it as part of the licensing requirements for broadcasters, and, the rule was entirely removed in 2011.    While the Fairness Doctrine was enforced, it did a good job.  While there was nothing stopping the audience from switching channels,  many would watch simply because there were no remotes and it was easier to watch the other views than it was to get up and turn the knob (Remember Knobs for changing channels-or am I just older than dirt????)<br />
     As a natural part of this tailoring the message to the audience, it is a very astute observation that the candidates most offer bread and circuses to their audiences, and make sure that they push the audience&#8217;s hot buttons to ensure that the audience members believe that the candidate is driving their bandwagon.   Again, the increasing apathy in America helps make sure that the elected Representatives keep that 97% or so return rate.<br />
     However, one thing that continues to puzzle me is how can an America voter  blame the current administration for the damage done to the society and economy by the previous administration.   It is as if America has become blanketed with stupid gas and the overall IQ is rapidly approaching room temperature.<br />
      Having ranted on about THAT for a bit&#8230;I thought I would say a word about the original topic &#8211; Mandatory HPV vaccine shots.<br />
       In general, I am very pro-vaccination.   I am perfectly ok with the school system having a list of vaccinations required to break the cycle of terrible diseases that can be communicated by casual contact, including sharing food.    Good riddance to them, too.   I am less sanguine about the HPV vaccine being included in the mix as a requirement because it smells to me of another step by the government to infiltrate itself in the lives of the citizens and keep them infantile.   I DO think it would be a great thing if every pubescent girl was inoculated, because as the posting points out cervical cancer is not a fun way to go.   However, that should be the responsibility and choice of the parents, after they have been educated about the facts about the vaccine, and the consequences for NOT getting the shot.<br />
     I have to say that these people that claim that getting this vaccine (or sex ed, or freely available condoms, or for that matter, legal and safe abortions)  will cause their little snowflake to turn into a raging nymphomaniac!   They obviously do not remember that time of their lives &#8211; kids of that age do not NEED help in that area, once puberty kicks in and the hormones  start surging!   I suspect that many parents might well be shocked and surprised about the sexual activity of their daughters and sons  if they were to find out the truth.   So&#8230;it seems to me that any parent with a lick of sense would want their daughter to get the jab.<br />
      In a slight ramble&#8230;.I also do not buy for a second that this (or any other vaccine) will, in itself, &#8220;cause&#8221; neurological issues in children.  I am willing to say that the development of the mind is a complicated thing, so, there may be an outside chance that a vaccine or mixture of vaccines MIGHT influence that development&#8230;but, until it is proven by science, I discount any theories that blame the jabs for the problems completely<br />
Yet more to think about&#8230;.<br />
xmundt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-419905</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419905</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;Mandating vaccinations is actually something of a difficult topic&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

Phil, you keep saying this, and when pressed say that usually there is good reason for it.  Can&#039;t you just break free?  When libertarianism and science clash, science wins, every time.  Get over it.

What is difficult about it?  Way up the pros and cons, like with anything else.  It is actually not very difficult as decisions go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Mandating vaccinations is actually something of a difficult topic&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Phil, you keep saying this, and when pressed say that usually there is good reason for it.  Can&#8217;t you just break free?  When libertarianism and science clash, science wins, every time.  Get over it.</p>
<p>What is difficult about it?  Way up the pros and cons, like with anything else.  It is actually not very difficult as decisions go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-419367</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419367</guid>
		<description>Daffy (62) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Say what you like QD, at least that was a time of big ideas (some of which actually succeeded, like stopping a war), as opposed to today’s world of tiny, self absorbed ideas; blind obedience; and shiny gadgets.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, maybe so, but . . . 

Oooh !!!  Shiny Gadgets !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daffy (62) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Say what you like QD, at least that was a time of big ideas (some of which actually succeeded, like stopping a war), as opposed to today’s world of tiny, self absorbed ideas; blind obedience; and shiny gadgets.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, maybe so, but . . . </p>
<p>Oooh !!!  Shiny Gadgets !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-3/#comment-419363</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419363</guid>
		<description>Daffy (51) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;This hatred of hippies always astounds me. Wow, a group of people who tried to make the world a more tolerant, even loving place. They failed, of course, but even so, we certainly have no room for evil goals like that. 

More power to the uber rich, I say!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, and if anyone tries to tell you how great it would be to be nice to people for a change, nail them to a tree.  Just like that last one, about 2000 years ago.

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daffy (51) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>This hatred of hippies always astounds me. Wow, a group of people who tried to make the world a more tolerant, even loving place. They failed, of course, but even so, we certainly have no room for evil goals like that. </p>
<p>More power to the uber rich, I say!</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, and if anyone tries to tell you how great it would be to be nice to people for a change, nail them to a tree.  Just like that last one, about 2000 years ago.</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419269</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419269</guid>
		<description>MArk Wilden (25) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t see how an HPV vaccine is any different from a herpes or syphilis vaccine. They protect against diseases contracted via sexual intercourse. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think you need to specify that you are referring to genital herpes as effected by the Type II Herpes Simplex Virus, not herpes keratitis that is caused by the Type I Herpes Simplex Virus (incidentally, most of us carry HSV-I anyway but we are usually asymptomatic.  Occasionally, one can get herpetic ulcers in the mouth, particularly when on a course of antibiotics, or one can get the cold sores which are the commonest symptom of herpes keratitis).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MArk Wilden (25) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I don’t see how an HPV vaccine is any different from a herpes or syphilis vaccine. They protect against diseases contracted via sexual intercourse. </p></blockquote>
<p>I think you need to specify that you are referring to genital herpes as effected by the Type II Herpes Simplex Virus, not herpes keratitis that is caused by the Type I Herpes Simplex Virus (incidentally, most of us carry HSV-I anyway but we are usually asymptomatic.  Occasionally, one can get herpetic ulcers in the mouth, particularly when on a course of antibiotics, or one can get the cold sores which are the commonest symptom of herpes keratitis).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419268</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419268</guid>
		<description>Mick (14) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;How did things get so bad in the US?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, I&#039;m sure the full reasons are quite complex and contain many subtle factors, but I&#039;ve a couple of guesses:

(1) TV commercials (and televised debates).  Because parties are allowed to screen any old crap on TV with (IIUC) the only limits being the amount of airtime they can buy, every major election is turned into a lowest-common-denominator popularity contest.

(2) Every democratic system in the world whose culture is focussed on personal gratification will always end up with the election winners being the ones who promise to deliver the most to the broadest range of people.  Even if they repeatedly fail to deliver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick (14) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>How did things get so bad in the US?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m sure the full reasons are quite complex and contain many subtle factors, but I&#8217;ve a couple of guesses:</p>
<p>(1) TV commercials (and televised debates).  Because parties are allowed to screen any old crap on TV with (IIUC) the only limits being the amount of airtime they can buy, every major election is turned into a lowest-common-denominator popularity contest.</p>
<p>(2) Every democratic system in the world whose culture is focussed on personal gratification will always end up with the election winners being the ones who promise to deliver the most to the broadest range of people.  Even if they repeatedly fail to deliver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419267</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419267</guid>
		<description>Peter Darben (11) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Here in Oz fundamentalist Christian churches (apparently taking the lead from their parent organisations in the US) have organised boycotts of the vaccination program offered to year 8 girls on that grounds that removing the fear of contracting cancer later in life will lead to girls being more promiscuous.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I tried to get my head around this statement.  Does this mean that those churches actually believe that fear of cancer is what prevents girls from being promiscuous in any way?  Seriously?

Oh, wait.  I get it.  They&#039;ll say any old stuff to support their bid for notoriety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Darben (11) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here in Oz fundamentalist Christian churches (apparently taking the lead from their parent organisations in the US) have organised boycotts of the vaccination program offered to year 8 girls on that grounds that removing the fear of contracting cancer later in life will lead to girls being more promiscuous.</p></blockquote>
<p>I tried to get my head around this statement.  Does this mean that those churches actually believe that fear of cancer is what prevents girls from being promiscuous in any way?  Seriously?</p>
<p>Oh, wait.  I get it.  They&#8217;ll say any old stuff to support their bid for notoriety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayasYouStargaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419244</link>
		<dc:creator>PayasYouStargaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419244</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit concerned that that bot keeps going after me now. Only a bit though, it&#039;s ramblings still make no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit concerned that that bot keeps going after me now. Only a bit though, it&#8217;s ramblings still make no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419117</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419117</guid>
		<description>@86 Joseph G. &amp; Dave Mundt

@84 dave mundt: Many people who are against universal care say that they do not want a faceless bureaucrat at a governmental desk, deciding what treatment they can receive. They do not seem to realize that right now, even with their insurance, they already HAVE a faceless bureaucrat making that sort of decision about their health care. 

EXACTLY. I hear that argument all the time, and it bugs the crap out of me. Given the choice between a faceless bureaucrat who’s under pressure to make money without regard to my circumstances, and a faceless bureaucrat who’s at least theoretically supposed to be representing me, I know which one I’ll pick…

Amen to both of you!  It is a complete mystery to me why anyone would think that an employee of a private, commercial insurance company whose job security probably depends on minimizing the amount of money his company has to pay out could be more trusted to do the right thing than a government bureaucrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@86 Joseph G. &amp; Dave Mundt</p>
<p>@84 dave mundt: Many people who are against universal care say that they do not want a faceless bureaucrat at a governmental desk, deciding what treatment they can receive. They do not seem to realize that right now, even with their insurance, they already HAVE a faceless bureaucrat making that sort of decision about their health care. </p>
<p>EXACTLY. I hear that argument all the time, and it bugs the crap out of me. Given the choice between a faceless bureaucrat who’s under pressure to make money without regard to my circumstances, and a faceless bureaucrat who’s at least theoretically supposed to be representing me, I know which one I’ll pick…</p>
<p>Amen to both of you!  It is a complete mystery to me why anyone would think that an employee of a private, commercial insurance company whose job security probably depends on minimizing the amount of money his company has to pay out could be more trusted to do the right thing than a government bureaucrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419106</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419106</guid>
		<description>@Fred Edison #92:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;If you believe that than you may as well believe that seat belts serve no useful purpose, and are only installed in vehicles to make the vehicle and seat belt manufacturers more money. No one in their right mind would entertain such a ridiculous notion, unless perhaps you’re someone who thinks like Michelle Bachmann.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I agree.  Equally foolish is Senator Imhofe&#039;s contention that the main (or even sole) motivation for promoting green technologies, conservation, and the development of renewable energy sources is a selfish desire to enrich the executives of recycling companies and the companies that manufacture wind and solar solar power generation equipment, and appease wealthy lobbyists who represent them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred Edison #92:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;If you believe that than you may as well believe that seat belts serve no useful purpose, and are only installed in vehicles to make the vehicle and seat belt manufacturers more money. No one in their right mind would entertain such a ridiculous notion, unless perhaps you’re someone who thinks like Michelle Bachmann.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I agree.  Equally foolish is Senator Imhofe&#8217;s contention that the main (or even sole) motivation for promoting green technologies, conservation, and the development of renewable energy sources is a selfish desire to enrich the executives of recycling companies and the companies that manufacture wind and solar solar power generation equipment, and appease wealthy lobbyists who represent them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419099</guid>
		<description>Poor “PayasYouStargaze” - you owe the skeptic tanks money at this point in your tired distractions.

“Heartland Institute ... a science-free zone where cigarette smoke harms nobody and the earth is cooling. ... offered $1,000 plus travel costs and expenses and placement of the speech in a book for a short speech at an anti-global warming conference in NYC. The American Enterprise Institute (a conservative think tank) offered $10,000 to anyone who could write something to undermine an IPCC report on climate change. Both organizations are backed by big oil. Big time. ... These payments are aypical for legitimate scientific conferences” (“Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Who Resigned Over Global Warming Had a Motive”; By Over_L; my.auburnjournal.com, 9/15/11).

The 1 step sciency method of von Bachmann of claiming a vaccine causes retardation (in someone else) was pioneered by Big Tobacco  which was taken it beyond by none other than Dr. Roy ‘d-rage’ Spencer - a public fund-sucker at UAB.  “Jul 17, 2010 ... My Global Warming Skepticism, for Dummies ... By Dr. Roy Spencer  ... here’s a list of basic climate change questions, and brief answers ... it only takes one of us to be right for the IPCC’s anthropogenic global warming (AGW) house of cards to collapse. ... the way the researcher community used to operate, before politics, policy outcomes, and billions of dollars got involved” (reality abuse by Joseph ‘EIB coli cocktail wiener’ D’Aleo, CCM, IUD, IED, BMF, STD, H1N1, SIDs, failed state free lunch predictor, laundering t-GOP via paypal, HIV, and ExxonKoch approved TV weather presenter aka another pseudo-scientist, denier, and corporate whore; new web crimes against humanity, nature, and big oil &amp; small snake wrestling with Joe Bastardi since March 11, 2011; icecap.us).  Roy’d has the genderless, ubiquitous gandmotherly headshot while on the boards of the Cornwall Alliance and the George C. Marshall Institute to funnel extremist Republican and Christian payola to the Looter Limbaughs for paid endorsements of an “official climatologist” supporting investments in global destruction via the Exxon-Kochs - neither has yet to predict anything but a free lunch nor offer free fertility/STD drugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor “PayasYouStargaze” &#8211; you owe the skeptic tanks money at this point in your tired distractions.</p>
<p>“Heartland Institute &#8230; a science-free zone where cigarette smoke harms nobody and the earth is cooling. &#8230; offered $1,000 plus travel costs and expenses and placement of the speech in a book for a short speech at an anti-global warming conference in NYC. The American Enterprise Institute (a conservative think tank) offered $10,000 to anyone who could write something to undermine an IPCC report on climate change. Both organizations are backed by big oil. Big time. &#8230; These payments are aypical for legitimate scientific conferences” (“Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Who Resigned Over Global Warming Had a Motive”; By Over_L; my.auburnjournal.com, 9/15/11).</p>
<p>The 1 step sciency method of von Bachmann of claiming a vaccine causes retardation (in someone else) was pioneered by Big Tobacco  which was taken it beyond by none other than Dr. Roy ‘d-rage’ Spencer &#8211; a public fund-sucker at UAB.  “Jul 17, 2010 &#8230; My Global Warming Skepticism, for Dummies &#8230; By Dr. Roy Spencer  &#8230; here’s a list of basic climate change questions, and brief answers &#8230; it only takes one of us to be right for the IPCC’s anthropogenic global warming (AGW) house of cards to collapse. &#8230; the way the researcher community used to operate, before politics, policy outcomes, and billions of dollars got involved” (reality abuse by Joseph ‘EIB coli cocktail wiener’ D’Aleo, CCM, IUD, IED, BMF, STD, H1N1, SIDs, failed state free lunch predictor, laundering t-GOP via paypal, HIV, and ExxonKoch approved TV weather presenter aka another pseudo-scientist, denier, and corporate whore; new web crimes against humanity, nature, and big oil &amp; small snake wrestling with Joe Bastardi since March 11, 2011; icecap.us).  Roy’d has the genderless, ubiquitous gandmotherly headshot while on the boards of the Cornwall Alliance and the George C. Marshall Institute to funnel extremist Republican and Christian payola to the Looter Limbaughs for paid endorsements of an “official climatologist” supporting investments in global destruction via the Exxon-Kochs &#8211; neither has yet to predict anything but a free lunch nor offer free fertility/STD drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayasYouStargaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419089</link>
		<dc:creator>PayasYouStargaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419089</guid>
		<description>@91:

What does it mean when it says that I&#039;m not big on medical prevention? Is that prevention of medicine or the medical prevention of something? Clearly posted timelines? Those seem like a good thing. I&#039;d take that as an attempt to strawman my position, but it doesn&#039;t really say anything and I never said anything about my position.

I don&#039;t know if the rest of that before the PS to neon is aimed at me, but that&#039;s probably because it makes no sense at all. It&#039;s like a bad anagram of some sort. Well the first word makes sense. &quot;Crazy!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@91:</p>
<p>What does it mean when it says that I&#8217;m not big on medical prevention? Is that prevention of medicine or the medical prevention of something? Clearly posted timelines? Those seem like a good thing. I&#8217;d take that as an attempt to strawman my position, but it doesn&#8217;t really say anything and I never said anything about my position.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if the rest of that before the PS to neon is aimed at me, but that&#8217;s probably because it makes no sense at all. It&#8217;s like a bad anagram of some sort. Well the first word makes sense. &#8220;Crazy!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred edison</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419088</link>
		<dc:creator>fred edison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419088</guid>
		<description>Once more, as with global warming/climate change, the Right has deceitfully managed to relegate the critical, human issues of disease preventing vaccines into a petty political issue to garner voter support.  The word &#039;despicable&#039; comes to mind, as it often does when discussing the nonsensical ramblings of those who refuse reality.

During the last Republican debate on CNN, did you notice how Perry weaseled out of his responsibility to protect young people from developing cancer, by essentially agreeing that his executive order was a mistake?  Instead of standing up for helping to prevent disease, and thereby saving lives through the application of vaccinations such as the HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine, he tucked his tail between his legs and obediently sat down to chastise vaccines along with those who accused him of doing it solely for campaign contributions.

We need to make an important distinction here.  Yes, he accepted money from Merck (and either lied or forgot the amounts received) and I understand the implications of his doing so.  BUT let&#039;s not unthinkingly agree with Bachmann&#039;s anti-science/anti-reality stance by saying that this is a plan to needlessly vaccinate kids for no other reason other than monetary gain.  If you believe that than you may as well believe that seat belts serve no useful purpose, and are only installed in vehicles to make the vehicle and seat belt manufacturers more money.  No one in their right mind would entertain such a ridiculous notion, unless perhaps you&#039;re someone who thinks like Michelle Bachmann.

Please allow me to bring up one more subject I&#039;ve heard discussed on Fox News and read on Right leaning blog posts/comments.  Repeatedly, despicable keeps coming to mind.  Because a young person is given the HPV vaccine it won&#039;t cause them to run out and have sex with everyone in their neighborhood.  There are a number of other sexually transmitted diseases such as herpes, hepatitis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, bacterial vaginosis, HIV/AIDS, pelvic inflammatory disease, syphilis, trichomoniasis, and other STDs that they should be worrying about before thinking they are invincible porn stars because they had one vaccine.  The &#039;promiscuity license&#039; is a preposterous idea raised with the intent to push the emotional hot buttons of those who think (or want YOU to think) a disease preventing vaccine is solely designed to encourage teenage promiscuity and irresponsibility for one&#039;s actions.  Nothing could be further from the truth or from reality.  Give your kids (that you as parents fed good and helpful information, hopefully) more credit and faith for choosing intelligent decisions for themselves that can also directly affect the health of other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once more, as with global warming/climate change, the Right has deceitfully managed to relegate the critical, human issues of disease preventing vaccines into a petty political issue to garner voter support.  The word &#8216;despicable&#8217; comes to mind, as it often does when discussing the nonsensical ramblings of those who refuse reality.</p>
<p>During the last Republican debate on CNN, did you notice how Perry weaseled out of his responsibility to protect young people from developing cancer, by essentially agreeing that his executive order was a mistake?  Instead of standing up for helping to prevent disease, and thereby saving lives through the application of vaccinations such as the HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine, he tucked his tail between his legs and obediently sat down to chastise vaccines along with those who accused him of doing it solely for campaign contributions.</p>
<p>We need to make an important distinction here.  Yes, he accepted money from Merck (and either lied or forgot the amounts received) and I understand the implications of his doing so.  BUT let&#8217;s not unthinkingly agree with Bachmann&#8217;s anti-science/anti-reality stance by saying that this is a plan to needlessly vaccinate kids for no other reason other than monetary gain.  If you believe that than you may as well believe that seat belts serve no useful purpose, and are only installed in vehicles to make the vehicle and seat belt manufacturers more money.  No one in their right mind would entertain such a ridiculous notion, unless perhaps you&#8217;re someone who thinks like Michelle Bachmann.</p>
<p>Please allow me to bring up one more subject I&#8217;ve heard discussed on Fox News and read on Right leaning blog posts/comments.  Repeatedly, despicable keeps coming to mind.  Because a young person is given the HPV vaccine it won&#8217;t cause them to run out and have sex with everyone in their neighborhood.  There are a number of other sexually transmitted diseases such as herpes, hepatitis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, bacterial vaginosis, HIV/AIDS, pelvic inflammatory disease, syphilis, trichomoniasis, and other STDs that they should be worrying about before thinking they are invincible porn stars because they had one vaccine.  The &#8216;promiscuity license&#8217; is a preposterous idea raised with the intent to push the emotional hot buttons of those who think (or want YOU to think) a disease preventing vaccine is solely designed to encourage teenage promiscuity and irresponsibility for one&#8217;s actions.  Nothing could be further from the truth or from reality.  Give your kids (that you as parents fed good and helpful information, hopefully) more credit and faith for choosing intelligent decisions for themselves that can also directly affect the health of other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-419060</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozonator aka Robert Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-419060</guid>
		<description>I see “PayasYouStargaze” is not big on medical prevention nor clearly posted timelines.

Crazy is a typical extremist distraction much like using server farms to posting similar names to mine with mug- shots on search engine images.  Whereas, noting simple dates on a calendar and counting on fingers (and toes if from LSU) is basic science that precedes the scientific method.  Environmental racism includes withholding medical care and providing unlimited AGW.  Predicting AGW quakes is the quickest way to prove what extremist Republicans and Christians claims is a hoax.  Especially since, “Why Earthquakes Are Still Impossible to Predict” (Lars Ceranna, German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources; editor: Thilo Kunzemann; knowledge.allianz.com, 4/7/09).

PS - noen, I am looking forward to my 2nd medal in life after getting the 1st 1 for showing up to a junior high school band performance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see “PayasYouStargaze” is not big on medical prevention nor clearly posted timelines.</p>
<p>Crazy is a typical extremist distraction much like using server farms to posting similar names to mine with mug- shots on search engine images.  Whereas, noting simple dates on a calendar and counting on fingers (and toes if from LSU) is basic science that precedes the scientific method.  Environmental racism includes withholding medical care and providing unlimited AGW.  Predicting AGW quakes is the quickest way to prove what extremist Republicans and Christians claims is a hoax.  Especially since, “Why Earthquakes Are Still Impossible to Predict” (Lars Ceranna, German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources; editor: Thilo Kunzemann; knowledge.allianz.com, 4/7/09).</p>
<p>PS &#8211; noen, I am looking forward to my 2nd medal in life after getting the 1st 1 for showing up to a junior high school band performance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Fredenburgh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-418947</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Fredenburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-418947</guid>
		<description>Anti-vax = Anti-facts. I, too, did not realize that most anti-vaxxers were on the far left side.  Linking the HPV vaccine to potential promiscuity is so far right wing that I assumed this was the general anti-facts approach.  As another poster said, perhaps we should be calling these folks anti-reality, rather than anti-science.  Anyone up for forming the Reality Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-vax = Anti-facts. I, too, did not realize that most anti-vaxxers were on the far left side.  Linking the HPV vaccine to potential promiscuity is so far right wing that I assumed this was the general anti-facts approach.  As another poster said, perhaps we should be calling these folks anti-reality, rather than anti-science.  Anyone up for forming the Reality Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-418942</link>
		<dc:creator>flip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-418942</guid>
		<description>@84 Dave Mundt &amp; 86, Joseph G

I will also say I don&#039;t understand that POV. I live in a country where there is universal health care. I also have private health care. At no point have I ever been denied any kind of medical attention/treatment due to any faceless bureaucrat. In fact, I&#039;ve never had to submit to any kind of questioning, application or other form of request, for any treatment that I have ever required. And I&#039;ll never get turned down for &quot;pre-existing conditions&quot;. And I don&#039;t have to worry about changing my job and losing company health cover; because my insurance isn&#039;t related to that.

Whenever I travel to the US I make sure I have travel insurance for health. I&#039;d hate to think of what would happen if I ended up needing medical attention there. No matter how bad my local experience of doctors/hospitals has been (and lately it has sucked), I just thank FSM I&#039;m not in the US. Especially because my bills are already getting high due to lots of tests/appointments, and that would bankrupt me in the US after the first couple of trips to the doctor.

I&#039;ll take &quot;faceless bureaucrat&quot; universal healthcare over &quot;insurance/treatment too expensive&quot; anytime. All I need to do is provide my healthcare number and my tests are covered (heck, for the basic ones, like blood tests, I don&#039;t even need to fill out any forms, just provide the doctor&#039;s referral); and my doctor/hospital bills are subsidised heavily, even with the expensive specialists.

Americans seem to spend too much time worrying about their own personal freedoms and not enough time actually looking at how universal healthcare has been implemeted in other places. I have *more* freedom here to choose doctors, treatments and hospitals (and change jobs) than I would in the US. And yet people in the US freak out about becoming more like us &quot;socialist&quot; countries.... I will never understand it.

(Now if I could just find some way to get my local pharmacy to get rid of all the woo natural crap and ear candles, I&#039;d be happy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@84 Dave Mundt &amp; 86, Joseph G</p>
<p>I will also say I don&#8217;t understand that POV. I live in a country where there is universal health care. I also have private health care. At no point have I ever been denied any kind of medical attention/treatment due to any faceless bureaucrat. In fact, I&#8217;ve never had to submit to any kind of questioning, application or other form of request, for any treatment that I have ever required. And I&#8217;ll never get turned down for &#8220;pre-existing conditions&#8221;. And I don&#8217;t have to worry about changing my job and losing company health cover; because my insurance isn&#8217;t related to that.</p>
<p>Whenever I travel to the US I make sure I have travel insurance for health. I&#8217;d hate to think of what would happen if I ended up needing medical attention there. No matter how bad my local experience of doctors/hospitals has been (and lately it has sucked), I just thank FSM I&#8217;m not in the US. Especially because my bills are already getting high due to lots of tests/appointments, and that would bankrupt me in the US after the first couple of trips to the doctor.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take &#8220;faceless bureaucrat&#8221; universal healthcare over &#8220;insurance/treatment too expensive&#8221; anytime. All I need to do is provide my healthcare number and my tests are covered (heck, for the basic ones, like blood tests, I don&#8217;t even need to fill out any forms, just provide the doctor&#8217;s referral); and my doctor/hospital bills are subsidised heavily, even with the expensive specialists.</p>
<p>Americans seem to spend too much time worrying about their own personal freedoms and not enough time actually looking at how universal healthcare has been implemeted in other places. I have *more* freedom here to choose doctors, treatments and hospitals (and change jobs) than I would in the US. And yet people in the US freak out about becoming more like us &#8220;socialist&#8221; countries&#8230;. I will never understand it.</p>
<p>(Now if I could just find some way to get my local pharmacy to get rid of all the woo natural crap and ear candles, I&#8217;d be happy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayasYouStargaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-418937</link>
		<dc:creator>PayasYouStargaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-418937</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll add that googling just Robert Rhodes tends to link to a number of reputable individuals, such as an architect, a historian, a barrister and a senior electronics engineer. The Ozonator bit seems to be where the crazy comes from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll add that googling just Robert Rhodes tends to link to a number of reputable individuals, such as an architect, a historian, a barrister and a senior electronics engineer. The Ozonator bit seems to be where the crazy comes from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-418902</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-418902</guid>
		<description>@85 PayAsYouStargaze:  That&#039;s good to hear.  A nonsense web bot is at least mildly amusing; whereas seeing a person suffering from the sort of psychosis that causes them to post that stuff would just be sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@85 PayAsYouStargaze:  That&#8217;s good to hear.  A nonsense web bot is at least mildly amusing; whereas seeing a person suffering from the sort of psychosis that causes them to post that stuff would just be sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-418900</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-418900</guid>
		<description>@84 dave mundt: &lt;i&gt;Many people who are against universal care say that they do not want a faceless bureaucrat at a governmental desk, deciding what treatment they can receive. They do not seem to realize that right now, even with their insurance, they already HAVE a faceless bureaucrat making that sort of decision about their health care. &lt;/i&gt;

EXACTLY. I hear that argument all the time, and it bugs the crap out of me.  Given the choice between a faceless bureaucrat who&#039;s under pressure to make money without regard to my circumstances, and a faceless bureaucrat who&#039;s at least theoretically supposed to be representing me, I know which one I&#039;ll pick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@84 dave mundt: <i>Many people who are against universal care say that they do not want a faceless bureaucrat at a governmental desk, deciding what treatment they can receive. They do not seem to realize that right now, even with their insurance, they already HAVE a faceless bureaucrat making that sort of decision about their health care. </i></p>
<p>EXACTLY. I hear that argument all the time, and it bugs the crap out of me.  Given the choice between a faceless bureaucrat who&#8217;s under pressure to make money without regard to my circumstances, and a faceless bureaucrat who&#8217;s at least theoretically supposed to be representing me, I know which one I&#8217;ll pick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayasYouStargaze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-418891</link>
		<dc:creator>PayasYouStargaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-418891</guid>
		<description>I thought I would google Ozonator Robert Rhodes. Near as I can tell it&#039;s an online nonsense generator that just spams comments sections of blogs and stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I would google Ozonator Robert Rhodes. Near as I can tell it&#8217;s an online nonsense generator that just spams comments sections of blogs and stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mundt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/15/michele-bachmann-needles-perry-on-vaccinations/comment-page-2/#comment-418828</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mundt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=37740#comment-418828</guid>
		<description>@43 - There is a large and increasing percentage of the American public who do not have health insurance because they cannot afford it - not because they &quot;choose&quot; not to have it.   How, for example, is it a choice to not have insurance when one grosses $1600/month, and premiums would be $500/month?  There is little choice there, alas.   
     The problem began back in 1982 when health care was deregulated, and allowed to become a profit making enterprise.   Very rapidly, the focus of too many of the health care providers went from providing as much, good, care as they could to their patients to inflicting as many high-profit treatments and tests on them as they could, so as to maximize the amount of money they could collect.
     It is the matter of a few moments spent searching on the Net to be able to compare costs and levels of care available in the United States with the many other countries who provide universal health care, paid for by the government.     One of the striking facts that pops up is that health care costs in those countries providing universal care are about half what they are in the USA, and, the level of care is at least as good, and often better than is available here. 
     Many people who are against universal care say that they do not want a faceless bureaucrat at a governmental desk, deciding what treatment they can receive.   They do not seem to realize that right now, even with their insurance, they already HAVE a faceless bureaucrat making that sort of decision about their health care.   However, while a governmental bureaucrat might well be fairly neutral in their decision making, the person doing it now is employed by the insurance company and has a vested interest in denying as much care as possible, so as to minimize the checks the insurance company has to write.   It is a bit of a conflict of interest, alas, but it is the way things work now.
     As for the matter of ongoing debt and such...let us say that a person who has worked hard through their life, but, been poor at amassing wealth needs an organ transplant in middle age.  That transplant can easily cost $500,000.00 - and without insurance, is, essentially an impossible goal.  Is it a good thing that this person dies 20 or so years sooner than they might have if they had the transplant? 
     Just something to think about
     xmundt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@43 &#8211; There is a large and increasing percentage of the American public who do not have health insurance because they cannot afford it &#8211; not because they &#8220;choose&#8221; not to have it.   How, for example, is it a choice to not have insurance when one grosses $1600/month, and premiums would be $500/month?  There is little choice there, alas.<br />
     The problem began back in 1982 when health care was deregulated, and allowed to become a profit making enterprise.   Very rapidly, the focus of too many of the health care providers went from providing as much, good, care as they could to their patients to inflicting as many high-profit treatments and tests on them as they could, so as to maximize the amount of money they could collect.<br />
     It is the matter of a few moments spent searching on the Net to be able to compare costs and levels of care available in the United States with the many other countries who provide universal health care, paid for by the government.     One of the striking facts that pops up is that health care costs in those countries providing universal care are about half what they are in the USA, and, the level of care is at least as good, and often better than is available here.<br />
     Many people who are against universal care say that they do not want a faceless bureaucrat at a governmental desk, deciding what treatment they can receive.   They do not seem to realize that right now, even with their insurance, they already HAVE a faceless bureaucrat making that sort of decision about their health care.   However, while a governmental bureaucrat might well be fairly neutral in their decision making, the person doing it now is employed by the insurance company and has a vested interest in denying as much care as possible, so as to minimize the checks the insurance company has to write.   It is a bit of a conflict of interest, alas, but it is the way things work now.<br />
     As for the matter of ongoing debt and such&#8230;let us say that a person who has worked hard through their life, but, been poor at amassing wealth needs an organ transplant in middle age.  That transplant can easily cost $500,000.00 &#8211; and without insurance, is, essentially an impossible goal.  Is it a good thing that this person dies 20 or so years sooner than they might have if they had the transplant?<br />
     Just something to think about<br />
     xmundt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 04:55:43 -->
