<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS denies mobile phone lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-473254</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-473254</guid>
		<description>Wow - you guys really think that cancer is the only disease that cell phones can cause? thats pretty narrow minded. autoimmune diseases have increased exponentially in recent years. doctors say they dont know what causes them - maybe the answer is no farther away than the cell phone in our hands. just because they dont cause cancer dosnt make them safe. autoimmune diseases are terrible diseases and can be life threatening. we need to look at the effects of radiation beyond its ability to cause cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; you guys really think that cancer is the only disease that cell phones can cause? thats pretty narrow minded. autoimmune diseases have increased exponentially in recent years. doctors say they dont know what causes them &#8211; maybe the answer is no farther away than the cell phone in our hands. just because they dont cause cancer dosnt make them safe. autoimmune diseases are terrible diseases and can be life threatening. we need to look at the effects of radiation beyond its ability to cause cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jafar hussain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425807</link>
		<dc:creator>jafar hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425807</guid>
		<description>thanks to all scientist who work 4 the huminity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks to all scientist who work 4 the huminity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425775</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425775</guid>
		<description>Elmar_M (11) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Look at the statistics for adult glioma (brain cancer) and you wll see that there has been no, or lamost no real measureable increase in brain cancer since the 1977s. However, since then, the use of cell phones has increased almost exponentially.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think mobile phone use has increased by an infinite proportion since the 1970s.

IIUC, cellphones were not available at all until the early &#039;80s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elmar_M (11) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Look at the statistics for adult glioma (brain cancer) and you wll see that there has been no, or lamost no real measureable increase in brain cancer since the 1977s. However, since then, the use of cell phones has increased almost exponentially.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think mobile phone use has increased by an infinite proportion since the 1970s.</p>
<p>IIUC, cellphones were not available at all until the early &#8217;80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425774</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425774</guid>
		<description>Daniel J Andrews (9) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Health Canada gets a little proactive in encouraging parents to limit cell phone use for their children just in case.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I kind-of support ideas klike this, but for kids&#039; mental, not physical, health (and social development).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel J Andrews (9) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Health Canada gets a little proactive in encouraging parents to limit cell phone use for their children just in case.</p></blockquote>
<p>I kind-of support ideas klike this, but for kids&#8217; mental, not physical, health (and social development).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425773</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425773</guid>
		<description>@ Ben (5) -
Hah.  You beat me to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ben (5) -<br />
Hah.  You beat me to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceRN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425727</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 04:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425727</guid>
		<description>They were asked to decide a technicality, and they did so.  It is not the job of the judiciary to say &quot;cell phones do not cause cancer&quot;.  The executive branch, specifically the FCC figured that out long ago.  SCOTUS just had to say that the FCC superceded the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were asked to decide a technicality, and they did so.  It is not the job of the judiciary to say &#8220;cell phones do not cause cancer&#8221;.  The executive branch, specifically the FCC figured that out long ago.  SCOTUS just had to say that the FCC superceded the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425725</link>
		<dc:creator>flip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 04:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425725</guid>
		<description>One thing that keeps bugging me is a family commenting that they text so much they&#039;ll get thumb cancer. ... Sigh... And then they say that texting is better than sticking the phone next to your head because of cancer worries. Double sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that keeps bugging me is a family commenting that they text so much they&#8217;ll get thumb cancer. &#8230; Sigh&#8230; And then they say that texting is better than sticking the phone next to your head because of cancer worries. Double sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elmar_M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425676</link>
		<dc:creator>Elmar_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425676</guid>
		<description>Look at the statistics for adult glioma (brain cancer) and you wll see that there has been no, or lamost no real measureable increase in brain cancer since the 1977s. However, since then, the use of cell phones has increased almost exponentially.
Actually the incidence of some types of glioma has gone down.
Those that showed an increase were only in elderly, which until recently did usually not use cell- phones. Also the increase in elderly can be explained by other facts such as:
- they dont die of other things anymore, so they get old enough to get cancer...
- better detection methods and diagnoses and as such more reports. 
- slightly changed classification

Even disregarding all of the above, the increase would be ever so slight that it is almost non existent and then only in the elderly. So again you cant make a direct connection to cell phones at all.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.20621/pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the statistics for adult glioma (brain cancer) and you wll see that there has been no, or lamost no real measureable increase in brain cancer since the 1977s. However, since then, the use of cell phones has increased almost exponentially.<br />
Actually the incidence of some types of glioma has gone down.<br />
Those that showed an increase were only in elderly, which until recently did usually not use cell- phones. Also the increase in elderly can be explained by other facts such as:<br />
- they dont die of other things anymore, so they get old enough to get cancer&#8230;<br />
- better detection methods and diagnoses and as such more reports.<br />
- slightly changed classification</p>
<p>Even disregarding all of the above, the increase would be ever so slight that it is almost non existent and then only in the elderly. So again you cant make a direct connection to cell phones at all.</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.20621/pdf" rel="nofollow">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.20621/pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraterJoe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425666</link>
		<dc:creator>CraterJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425666</guid>
		<description>I think cellphone usages way exceed the dangers. Consider these uses (some requiring serious adjustments and may void warrenty):
GPS Navigation
Faux Light Saber
Handy Gaming Device
Phone (wait, people still talk on them?)
Portible Art Studio
Camera
Video Camera
IED timer or detonator
Personal Massager
UFO spotter
Telescope
Credit Card theft device 
Microscope
Television
Web Browser
Motion Detector
Night Vision Device
TV/DVD Remote
Flashlight
Accelerometer
Photo Meter
Compass
Navigation unit for a remote piloted drone
Something to pretend you are talking to avoid a social situation.
Lie Detector
Paper Weight
Source of revenue for telecom companies
Recipe Book
Photo Album
Hoax Generator (for those times when you need to toss together a quick UFO sighting)
Gamma Ray Detector
Door Stop
Audio Recorder
Finger Trap (slide phones only)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cellphone usages way exceed the dangers. Consider these uses (some requiring serious adjustments and may void warrenty):<br />
GPS Navigation<br />
Faux Light Saber<br />
Handy Gaming Device<br />
Phone (wait, people still talk on them?)<br />
Portible Art Studio<br />
Camera<br />
Video Camera<br />
IED timer or detonator<br />
Personal Massager<br />
UFO spotter<br />
Telescope<br />
Credit Card theft device<br />
Microscope<br />
Television<br />
Web Browser<br />
Motion Detector<br />
Night Vision Device<br />
TV/DVD Remote<br />
Flashlight<br />
Accelerometer<br />
Photo Meter<br />
Compass<br />
Navigation unit for a remote piloted drone<br />
Something to pretend you are talking to avoid a social situation.<br />
Lie Detector<br />
Paper Weight<br />
Source of revenue for telecom companies<br />
Recipe Book<br />
Photo Album<br />
Hoax Generator (for those times when you need to toss together a quick UFO sighting)<br />
Gamma Ray Detector<br />
Door Stop<br />
Audio Recorder<br />
Finger Trap (slide phones only)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425650</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425650</guid>
		<description>Health Canada gets a little proactive in encouraging parents to limit cell phone use for their children just in case.

www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2011/10/04/cellphone-calls.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health Canada gets a little proactive in encouraging parents to limit cell phone use for their children just in case.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2011/10/04/cellphone-calls.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2011/10/04/cellphone-calls.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Maruyama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425643</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Maruyama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425643</guid>
		<description>@ mike burkhart

BA wrote the following on the day of the faster-than-light neutrino release:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/22/faster-than-light-travel-discovered-slow-down-folks/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ mike burkhart</p>
<p>BA wrote the following on the day of the faster-than-light neutrino release:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/22/faster-than-light-travel-discovered-slow-down-folks/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/22/faster-than-light-travel-discovered-slow-down-folks/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in Austin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425641</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425641</guid>
		<description>@mike burkhart,

You can find Phil&#039;s first post about the FTL nutrino findings here:
blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/22/faster-than-light-travel-discovered-slow-down-folks/

8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike burkhart,</p>
<p>You can find Phil&#8217;s first post about the FTL nutrino findings here:<br />
blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/09/22/faster-than-light-travel-discovered-slow-down-folks/</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in Austin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425640</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425640</guid>
		<description>@mile burkhart,

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;but if some are still woried ,may I sugest buying a BlueTooth head set , most phones work with one and all you have to do is put it over your ear and you can talk on the phone with out holding the phone to your head&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m sure cellphones don&#039;t cause brain tumors, but even if they did, wouldn&#039;t putting a wireless device even CLOSER to your brain (i.e. inside your ear instead of outside your ear) be even more dangerous? After all, the cellphones transmit and receive radio frequencies between 800 and 2700 MHz, and the bluetooth devices tx/rx from 2400-2480MHz . So, what would be the difference?

Seems like we would expect a rise instances of ear cancer from all these bluetooth devices!

8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mile burkhart,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;but if some are still woried ,may I sugest buying a BlueTooth head set , most phones work with one and all you have to do is put it over your ear and you can talk on the phone with out holding the phone to your head&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure cellphones don&#8217;t cause brain tumors, but even if they did, wouldn&#8217;t putting a wireless device even CLOSER to your brain (i.e. inside your ear instead of outside your ear) be even more dangerous? After all, the cellphones transmit and receive radio frequencies between 800 and 2700 MHz, and the bluetooth devices tx/rx from 2400-2480MHz . So, what would be the difference?</p>
<p>Seems like we would expect a rise instances of ear cancer from all these bluetooth devices!</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425639</guid>
		<description>PP:&gt;&gt; &quot;So you can use your phone and not worry about brain damage… as long as you use it intelligently&quot;

But that would exclude out about 85% of the American public!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PP:&gt;&gt; &#8220;So you can use your phone and not worry about brain damage… as long as you use it intelligently&#8221;</p>
<p>But that would exclude out about 85% of the American public!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike burkhart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425635</link>
		<dc:creator>mike burkhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425635</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that cell phones cause brain cancer I use mine a lot (in fact some of my comments come from the internet conection my phone has, I like getting Bad Astronomy no matter where I go) but if some are still woried ,may I sugest buying a BlueTooth head set , most phones work with one and all you have to do is put it over your ear and you can talk on the phone with out holding the phone to your head. Off Topic; Phil I like to know what you think about a discovery in a particle acclerator of a neutrino that apperently went faster then light speed. I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t put any thing about it on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that cell phones cause brain cancer I use mine a lot (in fact some of my comments come from the internet conection my phone has, I like getting Bad Astronomy no matter where I go) but if some are still woried ,may I sugest buying a BlueTooth head set , most phones work with one and all you have to do is put it over your ear and you can talk on the phone with out holding the phone to your head. Off Topic; Phil I like to know what you think about a discovery in a particle acclerator of a neutrino that apperently went faster then light speed. I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t put any thing about it on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larian LeQuella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425628</link>
		<dc:creator>Larian LeQuella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425628</guid>
		<description>Considering the makeup of the SCOTUS, it&#039;s proably &lt;I&gt;better&lt;/I&gt; that they went in on a legal technicality!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the makeup of the SCOTUS, it&#8217;s proably <i>better</i> that they went in on a legal technicality!  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkyGazer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425625</link>
		<dc:creator>SkyGazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425625</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the old caveat emptor.

@1
That and deathcalls...  urbanlegends.about.com/od/medical/a/death_calls.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the old caveat emptor.</p>
<p>@1<br />
That and deathcalls&#8230;  urbanlegends.about.com/od/medical/a/death_calls.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/05/scotus-denies-mobile-phone-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-425620</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=38778#comment-425620</guid>
		<description>The real danger of cell phones is getting calls from idiots. The stupid will be injected DIRECTLY INTO YOUR BRAAAAIIIIN! AAAAAAA!!1!!&#165;!2!!&#190;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real danger of cell phones is getting calls from idiots. The stupid will be injected DIRECTLY INTO YOUR BRAAAAIIIIN! AAAAAAA!!1!!&#165;!2!!&#190;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 05:28:47 -->
