<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Astronomy review: Terra Nova</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: udidn'tget it did you</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-509976</link>
		<dc:creator>udidn'tget it did you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-509976</guid>
		<description>I feel sorry for people who can&#039;t watch a show without looking for a reason not to like it. I thought it was awesome, it was a change of pace so sick and tired of criminal shows, tired of everything having to be about the cops and corruption. The acting was really good, no sex, no bad laugage heaven forbid we have a family show everyone can watch. IT WAS FICTION, IT DOESN&#039;T HAVE TO BE REAL OR BASED ON REALITY, IT CALLED ENTERTAINMENT....... YOU REALLY NEED TO LIGHTEN UP PEOPLE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel sorry for people who can&#8217;t watch a show without looking for a reason not to like it. I thought it was awesome, it was a change of pace so sick and tired of criminal shows, tired of everything having to be about the cops and corruption. The acting was really good, no sex, no bad laugage heaven forbid we have a family show everyone can watch. IT WAS FICTION, IT DOESN&#8217;T HAVE TO BE REAL OR BASED ON REALITY, IT CALLED ENTERTAINMENT&#8230;&#8230;. YOU REALLY NEED TO LIGHTEN UP PEOPLE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-443614</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-443614</guid>
		<description>Re: 
Gary Says: 
October 17th, 2011 at 7:40 am 
Terra Nova has kind of a ‘Jericho’ feel to it with the stereotypical character types, the menacing secret lurking behind everything, and the soap opera plotting (teenager angst, especially). With a bit of Swiss Family Robinson thrown in it’s just a jumble of pieces that might never really sort out. I expect the “science” references will get worse as it goes along.

Right on, Gary...you put your finger squarely on my problems w/this show - well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:<br />
Gary Says:<br />
October 17th, 2011 at 7:40 am<br />
Terra Nova has kind of a ‘Jericho’ feel to it with the stereotypical character types, the menacing secret lurking behind everything, and the soap opera plotting (teenager angst, especially). With a bit of Swiss Family Robinson thrown in it’s just a jumble of pieces that might never really sort out. I expect the “science” references will get worse as it goes along.</p>
<p>Right on, Gary&#8230;you put your finger squarely on my problems w/this show &#8211; well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElasticPlanet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-432495</link>
		<dc:creator>ElasticPlanet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-432495</guid>
		<description>@Jen H #121:  exactly.  Personally I think Terra Nova has some of the better effects on TV.  Comparing it to movies and that have not just more money, but also usually significantly more time for their effects seems like an unfair comparison.

And comparing it to video games is even more unfair since the typical game is in production for years.


(sorry for the late comment.  getting caught up in my RSS feeds)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jen H #121:  exactly.  Personally I think Terra Nova has some of the better effects on TV.  Comparing it to movies and that have not just more money, but also usually significantly more time for their effects seems like an unfair comparison.</p>
<p>And comparing it to video games is even more unfair since the typical game is in production for years.</p>
<p>(sorry for the late comment.  getting caught up in my RSS feeds)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Chonga</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-432156</link>
		<dc:creator>James Chonga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-432156</guid>
		<description>M-O-O-N! That spells an excellent &quot;The Stand Reference&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-O-O-N! That spells an excellent &#8220;The Stand Reference&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-431420</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-431420</guid>
		<description>Alternate timelines and effects of changes made to the past are wonderful plot devices, but I suspect if time travel ever becomes possible, the travellers wil find a disappointing (or reassuring, depending on ones point of view) lack of either. I personally think the universe is immune to paradox. Suppose that you went back intending to prevent (for example) a political assassination. You wont succeed, because it did happen and you were there at the time. The best you&#039;ll manage is to be the reason conspiracy nuts in the relative future just wont let speculation about &quot;a second gunman&quot; die. 

Bottom line is best expressed with a Discworld quote &quot;Whatever happens, stays happened.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternate timelines and effects of changes made to the past are wonderful plot devices, but I suspect if time travel ever becomes possible, the travellers wil find a disappointing (or reassuring, depending on ones point of view) lack of either. I personally think the universe is immune to paradox. Suppose that you went back intending to prevent (for example) a political assassination. You wont succeed, because it did happen and you were there at the time. The best you&#8217;ll manage is to be the reason conspiracy nuts in the relative future just wont let speculation about &#8220;a second gunman&#8221; die. </p>
<p>Bottom line is best expressed with a Discworld quote &#8220;Whatever happens, stays happened.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMForeman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-431396</link>
		<dc:creator>IMForeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-431396</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t mention the opening zoom into Earth showing satellites that were way out of scale compared to Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t mention the opening zoom into Earth showing satellites that were way out of scale compared to Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-431001</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-431001</guid>
		<description>forget the science, the most disturbing thing was money. 

no society will have a monetary system when surrounded by abundance. the cop character even points this out when he asks &quot;why would anyone steal ?&quot; everyone gets a house and all the food they want. luxuries can be traded for, like a hat for the guitar. 

that doctor didnt ask for currency to finance research for some disease. she just did it. her daughter didnt have to pay for training to become a physician. the commander didnt have to pay for fruit. yet we&#039;re supposed to believe they need a monetary system

for a utopia attempt at starting over, they failed badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forget the science, the most disturbing thing was money. </p>
<p>no society will have a monetary system when surrounded by abundance. the cop character even points this out when he asks &#8220;why would anyone steal ?&#8221; everyone gets a house and all the food they want. luxuries can be traded for, like a hat for the guitar. </p>
<p>that doctor didnt ask for currency to finance research for some disease. she just did it. her daughter didnt have to pay for training to become a physician. the commander didnt have to pay for fruit. yet we&#8217;re supposed to believe they need a monetary system</p>
<p>for a utopia attempt at starting over, they failed badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A few cheetah-speed* notes &#124; Exploring: dinosaurs, force fields and quasars.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430663</link>
		<dc:creator>A few cheetah-speed* notes &#124; Exploring: dinosaurs, force fields and quasars.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430663</guid>
		<description>[...] last episode was all about littlegirlsaurus. For those still eager, the Bad Astronomer posted his Terra Nova review. In this case the focus is, obviously, on the astronomy depicted by the show (specifically the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last episode was all about littlegirlsaurus. For those still eager, the Bad Astronomer posted his Terra Nova review. In this case the focus is, obviously, on the astronomy depicted by the show (specifically the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slw</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430504</link>
		<dc:creator>slw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430504</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s mindless entertainment, the show is so cliched and predictable that it would be foolish to even treat it as a sci-fi show. Sci-Fi is about exploration, Terra Nova is about exploitation of other stories and explosions(also dinosaurs, but I could not find a synonym for them beginning in ex-). Scientific accuracy is not expected here any more than it is expected from the A-Team.

That being said, Terra Nova is absolutely beautiful and despite, or possibly because everything I said above, very enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s mindless entertainment, the show is so cliched and predictable that it would be foolish to even treat it as a sci-fi show. Sci-Fi is about exploration, Terra Nova is about exploitation of other stories and explosions(also dinosaurs, but I could not find a synonym for them beginning in ex-). Scientific accuracy is not expected here any more than it is expected from the A-Team.</p>
<p>That being said, Terra Nova is absolutely beautiful and despite, or possibly because everything I said above, very enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess Tauber</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Tauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430470</guid>
		<description>Hubble Expansion means that point to point time travel won&#039;t ever work. We only ASSUME that as the universe has expanded the dimensions of atoms and their parts have remained the same. For all we know electrons and nucleons are shrinking, and electrons infinitesimally spiral into atomic nuclei. One can figure out the rates by recasting the Hubble Expansion rate in terms of atomic radii, Planck units, or whatever.

Our intrepid TerraNovan time travelers would have to be ballooned up a bit size-wise to travel to 85 million BP (not to mention as one earlier poster did that they would have to be pinpointed in space and time thousands of light years away relative to other matter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hubble Expansion means that point to point time travel won&#8217;t ever work. We only ASSUME that as the universe has expanded the dimensions of atoms and their parts have remained the same. For all we know electrons and nucleons are shrinking, and electrons infinitesimally spiral into atomic nuclei. One can figure out the rates by recasting the Hubble Expansion rate in terms of atomic radii, Planck units, or whatever.</p>
<p>Our intrepid TerraNovan time travelers would have to be ballooned up a bit size-wise to travel to 85 million BP (not to mention as one earlier poster did that they would have to be pinpointed in space and time thousands of light years away relative to other matter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragonchild</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430430</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragonchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430430</guid>
		<description>*cough* Planetes *cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*cough* Planetes *cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430423</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430423</guid>
		<description>Wonder if there&#039;s a deleted scene that goes as follows : 

*****

Girl genius enters the room later sheepishly and says; &lt;i&gt;&quot;Mom, Dad? Y&#039;know how I said the Moon was bigger here than in our world. I made a mistake, I&#039;ve just calculated it and it&#039;s not enough to make any noticeable difference after all. I&#039;m sorry.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 

And the parents go &lt;i&gt;&quot;That&#039;s okay, we still love you anyhow and everyone makes mistakes sometimes. Even the greatest scientists have get some things wrong.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

*****
It would add a bit more to the characterisation and correct the science but not advance the plot much. Guess we&#039;ll have to wait till its out on DVD release for someone to tell us if there&#039;s such a deleted scene (not)present or not. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if there&#8217;s a deleted scene that goes as follows : </p>
<p>*****</p>
<p>Girl genius enters the room later sheepishly and says; <i>&#8220;Mom, Dad? Y&#8217;know how I said the Moon was bigger here than in our world. I made a mistake, I&#8217;ve just calculated it and it&#8217;s not enough to make any noticeable difference after all. I&#8217;m sorry.&#8221;</i> </p>
<p>And the parents go <i>&#8220;That&#8217;s okay, we still love you anyhow and everyone makes mistakes sometimes. Even the greatest scientists have get some things wrong.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>*****<br />
It would add a bit more to the characterisation and correct the science but not advance the plot much. Guess we&#8217;ll have to wait till its out on DVD release for someone to tell us if there&#8217;s such a deleted scene (not)present or not. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430377</guid>
		<description>I thought the same about the Moon explanation when I watched the pilot (even calculating it out and being unimpressed with the difference) as well as wondering why she used the universe&#039;s expansion to explain why the stars looked different. 

But then I thought of my own childhood. 

I absolutely *loved* science, especially astronomy, in elementary school, and probably knew more random and trivial facts than my teachers or parents. But I didn&#039;t quite know how to put them all together just yet. So, knowing the universe was expanding (and thinking how super-cool that was!) but maybe not knowing about galactic rotation, I might have used that to try to explain to the adults why the stars looked different. Same for the moon issue. 

I wonder if the writers know how kids and teenagers think, especially science nerds, and are actually playing into that. If we see the young lady learn some new fact and put 2+2 together about a previous explanation, that would confirm it. Or they may just be playing into what most adults still think are believable enough, if not very accurate, explanations for astronomical changes over the past 85  millions year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the same about the Moon explanation when I watched the pilot (even calculating it out and being unimpressed with the difference) as well as wondering why she used the universe&#8217;s expansion to explain why the stars looked different. </p>
<p>But then I thought of my own childhood. </p>
<p>I absolutely *loved* science, especially astronomy, in elementary school, and probably knew more random and trivial facts than my teachers or parents. But I didn&#8217;t quite know how to put them all together just yet. So, knowing the universe was expanding (and thinking how super-cool that was!) but maybe not knowing about galactic rotation, I might have used that to try to explain to the adults why the stars looked different. Same for the moon issue. </p>
<p>I wonder if the writers know how kids and teenagers think, especially science nerds, and are actually playing into that. If we see the young lady learn some new fact and put 2+2 together about a previous explanation, that would confirm it. Or they may just be playing into what most adults still think are believable enough, if not very accurate, explanations for astronomical changes over the past 85  millions year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronster666</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430314</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronster666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430314</guid>
		<description>I was hoping, in vain as it turns out, for a show that focuses on how civilization would survive in the distant past.  How do they decide what is safe to eat, where are they located, what animals and plants are there that we know nothing about now.  We probably know of only a very small percentage of the animal and plant species that were present 85M years ago.  That leaves a lot of latitude for creating new flora and fauna.  Unfortunately the producers felt it necessary to formulate an enemy group so they could have a war going on.  We have enough violence on TV now.  How about something that stimulates thought and imagination.

I have the same problem with the Survivor series.  At first it showed much more of the ingenuity of surviving, but now it is 99% interpersonal relationships.  The show has survived a long time, so I&#039;m probably in the minority feeling this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping, in vain as it turns out, for a show that focuses on how civilization would survive in the distant past.  How do they decide what is safe to eat, where are they located, what animals and plants are there that we know nothing about now.  We probably know of only a very small percentage of the animal and plant species that were present 85M years ago.  That leaves a lot of latitude for creating new flora and fauna.  Unfortunately the producers felt it necessary to formulate an enemy group so they could have a war going on.  We have enough violence on TV now.  How about something that stimulates thought and imagination.</p>
<p>I have the same problem with the Survivor series.  At first it showed much more of the ingenuity of surviving, but now it is 99% interpersonal relationships.  The show has survived a long time, so I&#8217;m probably in the minority feeling this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arik Rice</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430296</link>
		<dc:creator>Arik Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430296</guid>
		<description>What bugs me about this show is how they stole my idea (well, ok, they didn&#039;t really STEAL it, they just came up with a similar idea at the same time).

My idea was a group of people who became stranded in the past with dinosaurs (65 million years ago instead of 85 million, and, as it turns out, about 430 years before the asteroid impact), and they have to survive and end up building a human civilization in the Cretaceous.

Of course, mine was a bit more realistic. In fact the whole Moon thing was in my story too, but because it is about the same apparent size at today, the characters don&#039;t initially think they&#039;re in the distant past. They also use the length of the day (they have wristwatches and after a few days realize the Sun in setting about 20 minutes earlier each day), to calculate how far back in time they really are.

Also, the main conflict was not over being chased by dinosaurs (Jurassic Park has been done, guys!), but over the issue of survival and over possible temporal paradoxes. Over the centuries, the issue of temporal paradox divides the civilization between those who think that they need to be careful or else they might inadvertently wipe out future human civilization (and thus their subjective past), and those who think they don&#039;t need to be because it&#039;s really a parallel universe or maybe predestination timeline where everything they do only fulfills the past.

Eventually they discover the asteroid is heading towards Earth and have to decide what to do about it (no spoilers).

So yeah, a bit miffed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What bugs me about this show is how they stole my idea (well, ok, they didn&#8217;t really STEAL it, they just came up with a similar idea at the same time).</p>
<p>My idea was a group of people who became stranded in the past with dinosaurs (65 million years ago instead of 85 million, and, as it turns out, about 430 years before the asteroid impact), and they have to survive and end up building a human civilization in the Cretaceous.</p>
<p>Of course, mine was a bit more realistic. In fact the whole Moon thing was in my story too, but because it is about the same apparent size at today, the characters don&#8217;t initially think they&#8217;re in the distant past. They also use the length of the day (they have wristwatches and after a few days realize the Sun in setting about 20 minutes earlier each day), to calculate how far back in time they really are.</p>
<p>Also, the main conflict was not over being chased by dinosaurs (Jurassic Park has been done, guys!), but over the issue of survival and over possible temporal paradoxes. Over the centuries, the issue of temporal paradox divides the civilization between those who think that they need to be careful or else they might inadvertently wipe out future human civilization (and thus their subjective past), and those who think they don&#8217;t need to be because it&#8217;s really a parallel universe or maybe predestination timeline where everything they do only fulfills the past.</p>
<p>Eventually they discover the asteroid is heading towards Earth and have to decide what to do about it (no spoilers).</p>
<p>So yeah, a bit miffed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terra Nova &#8211; The Runaway &#171; patrickehlers.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430240</link>
		<dc:creator>Terra Nova &#8211; The Runaway &#171; patrickehlers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430240</guid>
		<description>[...] Turdball McStupid won the night with 11 points) &#8211; directed me to this article about the shaky astronomy in the Terra Nova pilot.  Quick show of hands &#8211; anyone surprised they don&#8217;t have fact-checkers on staff?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Turdball McStupid won the night with 11 points) &#8211; directed me to this article about the shaky astronomy in the Terra Nova pilot.  Quick show of hands &#8211; anyone surprised they don&#8217;t have fact-checkers on staff?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430226</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430226</guid>
		<description>Bren (108) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;geez! it’s called “fiction” for a reason.
Can’t we just be entertained by a new show that isn’t CSI or Law and Order.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You obviously don&#039;t get it.

Where they use fiction, then fine, whatever.

Where they attempt to tie their fiction to known facts, they could at least make an effort to get those facts right.  It is quite obvious that they didn&#039;t even try to get the explanation for why the stars are different right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bren (108) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>geez! it’s called “fiction” for a reason.<br />
Can’t we just be entertained by a new show that isn’t CSI or Law and Order.</p></blockquote>
<p>You obviously don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>Where they use fiction, then fine, whatever.</p>
<p>Where they attempt to tie their fiction to known facts, they could at least make an effort to get those facts right.  It is quite obvious that they didn&#8217;t even try to get the explanation for why the stars are different right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430220</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430220</guid>
		<description>Chris Lindsay (5) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder if any of these folks that go back in time are at all concerned that a giant, cosmic, splat is coming down on them? Granted they have about 15-20 million years, but their descendants are going to be bummed out if they don’t have some sort of asteroid defense system in place by then.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But everyone &lt;i&gt;knows&lt;/i&gt; that the mammals survived the K-T event, right . . . ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Lindsay (5) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I wonder if any of these folks that go back in time are at all concerned that a giant, cosmic, splat is coming down on them? Granted they have about 15-20 million years, but their descendants are going to be bummed out if they don’t have some sort of asteroid defense system in place by then.</p></blockquote>
<p>But everyone <i>knows</i> that the mammals survived the K-T event, right . . . ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuietDesperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430218</link>
		<dc:creator>QuietDesperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430218</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Actually it was the Koch bros financed (and headed by Dick Army) “Freedom Works” that funded the Tea Party. &lt;/i&gt;

OK. That doesn&#039;t really go against anything I said, but, fine.

-------

&lt;i&gt;Haven’t watched it, and won’t till it is all out on DVD (hate waiting week to week&lt;/i&gt;

I watch everything on DVD or streaming now for that reason, and also to not waste my time with series that don&#039;t survive one season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Actually it was the Koch bros financed (and headed by Dick Army) “Freedom Works” that funded the Tea Party. </i></p>
<p>OK. That doesn&#8217;t really go against anything I said, but, fine.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p><i>Haven’t watched it, and won’t till it is all out on DVD (hate waiting week to week</i></p>
<p>I watch everything on DVD or streaming now for that reason, and also to not waste my time with series that don&#8217;t survive one season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen H.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430212</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430212</guid>
		<description>@Brian Too: &quot;There have been so many movies, TV shows, games and all the rest with excellent special effects, that a practical minimum bar has been set.&quot;

Movies and games have much longer production schedules for VFX. For example, there was one 16-second VFX shot for Kevin Costner&#039;s THE GUARDIAN that took nine months and over 20 people to create.

In contrast, broadcast production schedules give their crews mere days to add VFX to a shot. In that context, I think the TERRA NOVA set extensions, matte paintings, CG environments and creature FX are pretty amazing for a weekly broadcast TV show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian Too: &#8220;There have been so many movies, TV shows, games and all the rest with excellent special effects, that a practical minimum bar has been set.&#8221;</p>
<p>Movies and games have much longer production schedules for VFX. For example, there was one 16-second VFX shot for Kevin Costner&#8217;s THE GUARDIAN that took nine months and over 20 people to create.</p>
<p>In contrast, broadcast production schedules give their crews mere days to add VFX to a shot. In that context, I think the TERRA NOVA set extensions, matte paintings, CG environments and creature FX are pretty amazing for a weekly broadcast TV show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430207</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430207</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t watched it, and won&#039;t till it is all out on DVD (hate waiting week to week, then getting repeats, or other special presentations bumping it etc), but based on the still pics, why haven&#039;t they added feathers, colours, dino fuzz to some of the dinosaurs (e.g. the theropods)? Time to get the dinos up-to-date with the fossil evidence. 

Coincidentally, last night I read that the moon was receding from us at 4 cm/yr in Brian Cox&#039;s book Why Does E=mc^2? I thought that was a bit much so I did the math, and realized even if that rate had remained constant, it wouldn&#039;t have made a big difference in how the moon looked a few million years ago (which I knew because Phil&#039;s recent post on the apogee perigee mentioned how much the orbit differed). I love it when new knowledge comes together. [/chomps cigar]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t watched it, and won&#8217;t till it is all out on DVD (hate waiting week to week, then getting repeats, or other special presentations bumping it etc), but based on the still pics, why haven&#8217;t they added feathers, colours, dino fuzz to some of the dinosaurs (e.g. the theropods)? Time to get the dinos up-to-date with the fossil evidence. </p>
<p>Coincidentally, last night I read that the moon was receding from us at 4 cm/yr in Brian Cox&#8217;s book Why Does E=mc^2? I thought that was a bit much so I did the math, and realized even if that rate had remained constant, it wouldn&#8217;t have made a big difference in how the moon looked a few million years ago (which I knew because Phil&#8217;s recent post on the apogee perigee mentioned how much the orbit differed). I love it when new knowledge comes together. [/chomps cigar]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430205</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430205</guid>
		<description>Watched it. Thought it was,,,ok,,,

,,,though if I wrote it, I&#039;d place it about 10,000 years before the &quot;big Impact&quot;, just to put a bit of pressure on the humans to build a civilization capable of getting the frak OFF the planet.

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched it. Thought it was,,,ok,,,</p>
<p>,,,though if I wrote it, I&#8217;d place it about 10,000 years before the &#8220;big Impact&#8221;, just to put a bit of pressure on the humans to build a civilization capable of getting the frak OFF the planet.</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430187</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430187</guid>
		<description>QuietDesperation said:
&lt;i&gt;However, IMHO, it was the GOP that co-opted the Tea Party, and not the other way around. People need to pay closer attention to what is actually happening and not what they are told is happening.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually it was the Koch bros financed (and headed by Dick Army) &quot;Freedom Works&quot; that funded the Tea Party. Going so far as to bus them in for protests. The Koch brothers are seriously nutty John Birch Society, fluoride in the water is sapping our precious bodily fluids, level crazy. They have a lot of power and money but the GOP is not monolithic. There are many who are disturbed by what they want to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QuietDesperation said:<br />
<i>However, IMHO, it was the GOP that co-opted the Tea Party, and not the other way around. People need to pay closer attention to what is actually happening and not what they are told is happening.</i></p>
<p>Actually it was the Koch bros financed (and headed by Dick Army) &#8220;Freedom Works&#8221; that funded the Tea Party. Going so far as to bus them in for protests. The Koch brothers are seriously nutty John Birch Society, fluoride in the water is sapping our precious bodily fluids, level crazy. They have a lot of power and money but the GOP is not monolithic. There are many who are disturbed by what they want to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fedos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430185</link>
		<dc:creator>Fedos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430185</guid>
		<description>@Hootie: Have you read Lies, Inc. (expanded from The Unteleported Man) by Phillip K. Dick? It uses a similar construct as the central plot element. An organization claims to have to a have a one way teleporter to a distant eden-like planet. Whether there is actually a teleporter and whether there is actually a planet on the other end is an essential question for the first half of the book, before it becomes all psychedelic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hootie: Have you read Lies, Inc. (expanded from The Unteleported Man) by Phillip K. Dick? It uses a similar construct as the central plot element. An organization claims to have to a have a one way teleporter to a distant eden-like planet. Whether there is actually a teleporter and whether there is actually a planet on the other end is an essential question for the first half of the book, before it becomes all psychedelic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VJBinCT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/17/bad-astronomy-review-terra-nova/comment-page-3/#comment-430177</link>
		<dc:creator>VJBinCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39312#comment-430177</guid>
		<description>Another thing: days were shorter then (but admittedly not that much).  Tidal friction has been slowing down the rotation of the earth.   Watches from 2149 would not be accurate.

I remember back in the 60&#039;s, from a course in solar system astrophysics,  that certain corals (I think) showed daily &#039;growth rings&#039; and annual cycles, so that it was possible to conclude that in that era the year had somewhat over 400 days.  I&#039;m guessing that would have been over 300 MA ago.

But still a detail worth mentioning in the context of lunar orbit change for the same reason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing: days were shorter then (but admittedly not that much).  Tidal friction has been slowing down the rotation of the earth.   Watches from 2149 would not be accurate.</p>
<p>I remember back in the 60&#8242;s, from a course in solar system astrophysics,  that certain corals (I think) showed daily &#8216;growth rings&#8217; and annual cycles, so that it was possible to conclude that in that era the year had somewhat over 400 days.  I&#8217;m guessing that would have been over 300 MA ago.</p>
<p>But still a detail worth mentioning in the context of lunar orbit change for the same reason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 05:45:38 -->
