<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coincidental spirals for your Monday pleasure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312396</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312396</guid>
		<description>Wow! Splendidly magnificent indeed. :-)

Thanks BA - for this new desktop background &amp; a great write up too. :-)

Mind you I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t save this for easter, with the easter-egg nestled inside an easter egg appearance of Messier 96 here. Surprised but not unhappy! Course easter is a lo-oong time away yet. ;-)

@ 13. jennyxyzzy : I think our Moon would be a wee bit too bright for the VLT to look at it - same as it is with the &lt;i&gt;Hubble&lt;/i&gt; space observatory.

@11.   Jon Hanford : Thanks. Cheers to (#10.) siravan &amp; (#8) Peter (@polarisdotca) for their contrubutions here too.   :-)

@ 9. Chris A. : &lt;i&gt;&quot;Kudos to ESO – My initial assumption was that it was a Hubble shot.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yep, mine too. ;-)

@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Splendidly magnificent indeed. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks BA &#8211; for this new desktop background &amp; a great write up too. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mind you I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t save this for easter, with the easter-egg nestled inside an easter egg appearance of Messier 96 here. Surprised but not unhappy! Course easter is a lo-oong time away yet. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@ 13. jennyxyzzy : I think our Moon would be a wee bit too bright for the VLT to look at it &#8211; same as it is with the <i>Hubble</i> space observatory.</p>
<p>@11.   Jon Hanford : Thanks. Cheers to (#10.) siravan &amp; (#8) Peter (@polarisdotca) for their contrubutions here too.   <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@ 9. Chris A. : <i>&#8220;Kudos to ESO – My initial assumption was that it was a Hubble shot.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yep, mine too. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Straton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Straton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312395</guid>
		<description>@ 13,
In theory I suppose it would, however pointing an 8m mirror at the moon would fry the ccd on the recieving end so there would be no way to take a picture... putting your eye to it probably wouldn&#039;t be a great idea either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 13,<br />
In theory I suppose it would, however pointing an 8m mirror at the moon would fry the ccd on the recieving end so there would be no way to take a picture&#8230; putting your eye to it probably wouldn&#8217;t be a great idea either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennyxyzzy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312394</link>
		<dc:creator>jennyxyzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312394</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I was surprised when Phil explained that this photo was taken by an earth-bound telescope, so I went scuttling off to the VLT&#039;s webpage, where I found this little nugget on the front page:

&quot;With this kind of precision the VLTI can reconstruct images with an angular resolution of milliarcseconds, equivalent to distinguishing the two headlights of a car at the distance of the Moon.&quot;

Wouldn&#039;t that mean that the VLT is capable of seeing the moon landers/rovers?  I thought we could only do that from the spacecraft that are orbiting the Moon???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I was surprised when Phil explained that this photo was taken by an earth-bound telescope, so I went scuttling off to the VLT&#8217;s webpage, where I found this little nugget on the front page:</p>
<p>&#8220;With this kind of precision the VLTI can reconstruct images with an angular resolution of milliarcseconds, equivalent to distinguishing the two headlights of a car at the distance of the Moon.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t that mean that the VLT is capable of seeing the moon landers/rovers?  I thought we could only do that from the spacecraft that are orbiting the Moon???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk_2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312393</link>
		<dc:creator>bk_2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312393</guid>
		<description>It looks to me as though the outer ring is on different plane to the inner spiral. The top is above the spiral plane, the bottom of it below. It is roughly in a plane which is tilted twenty odd degrees to the spiral&#039;s plane. But maybe it&#039;s just an artifact of the geometry of the outer irregular arcs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks to me as though the outer ring is on different plane to the inner spiral. The top is above the spiral plane, the bottom of it below. It is roughly in a plane which is tilted twenty odd degrees to the spiral&#8217;s plane. But maybe it&#8217;s just an artifact of the geometry of the outer irregular arcs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hanford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312392</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312392</guid>
		<description>M 96 has been implicated in the formation of the Leo Ring, a huge annulus of cold hydrogen gas found nearby: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1005/1005.4208v2.pdf

An accompanying video shows the proposed head-on collision of M 96 with another galaxy, NGC 3384, that may have occurred over a billion years ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Seb2ZNqC1TY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M 96 has been implicated in the formation of the Leo Ring, a huge annulus of cold hydrogen gas found nearby: <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1005/1005.4208v2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1005/1005.4208v2.pdf</a></p>
<p>An accompanying video shows the proposed head-on collision of M 96 with another galaxy, NGC 3384, that may have occurred over a billion years ago: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Seb2ZNqC1TY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Seb2ZNqC1TY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siravan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312391</link>
		<dc:creator>siravan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312391</guid>
		<description>The reddish edge-on galaxy is  2MFGC 08391 (also called 2MASX J10465229+1150201).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reddish edge-on galaxy is  2MFGC 08391 (also called 2MASX J10465229+1150201).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris A.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312390</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312390</guid>
		<description>Kudos to ESO--My initial assumption was that it was a Hubble shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to ESO&#8211;My initial assumption was that it was a Hubble shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter (@polarisdotca)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312389</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter (@polarisdotca)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312389</guid>
		<description>Remember when NASA unveiled &quot;The Mice&quot;, one of the first pix from the new Hubble ACS

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap020506.html

One of my colleagues said, &quot;Nice picture, except for those big spirals in the way...&quot; No surprise, he&#039;s a cosmologist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when NASA unveiled &#8220;The Mice&#8221;, one of the first pix from the new Hubble ACS</p>
<p><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap020506.html" rel="nofollow">http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap020506.html</a></p>
<p>One of my colleagues said, &#8220;Nice picture, except for those big spirals in the way&#8230;&#8221; No surprise, he&#8217;s a cosmologist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stargazer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312388</link>
		<dc:creator>Stargazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312388</guid>
		<description>Beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris j.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/24/coincidental-spirals-for-your-monday-pleasure/#comment-312387</link>
		<dc:creator>chris j.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39750#comment-312387</guid>
		<description>spiral? that inner ring looks pretty darn ring-like to me. and the irregular outer arms seem consistent with transitory arcs seen around ring galaxies as artifacts of the interaction with the other (unseen here) galaxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spiral? that inner ring looks pretty darn ring-like to me. and the irregular outer arms seem consistent with transitory arcs seen around ring galaxies as artifacts of the interaction with the other (unseen here) galaxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-22 05:45:00 -->