<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final: ROSAT came down in the Bay of Bengal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doomed Russian Mars probe seen from the ground &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-464296</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomed Russian Mars probe seen from the ground &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-464296</guid>
		<description>[...] UARS and ROSAT last year, Phobos-Grunt is making an uncontrolled re-entry, and it&#8217;s not entirely clear where [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UARS and ROSAT last year, Phobos-Grunt is making an uncontrolled re-entry, and it&#8217;s not entirely clear where [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-433610</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-433610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always curious whenever someone makes that distinction of &quot;it&#039;s not friction&quot; because really, IT IS.

Friction is a force that resists relative motion between solids or fluids. 

&quot;Air Friction&quot; is more correctly known as &quot;Drag&quot; which comes in three forms: Parasitic, Lift-induced and Wave drag.

And wave drag is the result of, you guessed it, compression shock

So IT IS friction... unless you are in this case referring to a specific form of friction that I am unfamiliar with</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always curious whenever someone makes that distinction of &#8220;it&#8217;s not friction&#8221; because really, IT IS.</p>
<p>Friction is a force that resists relative motion between solids or fluids. </p>
<p>&#8220;Air Friction&#8221; is more correctly known as &#8220;Drag&#8221; which comes in three forms: Parasitic, Lift-induced and Wave drag.</p>
<p>And wave drag is the result of, you guessed it, compression shock</p>
<p>So IT IS friction&#8230; unless you are in this case referring to a specific form of friction that I am unfamiliar with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi in NY</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-433266</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi in NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-433266</guid>
		<description>How amazingly ironic would it be if it had crashed on North Sentinel Island? Looks like it was really close.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sentinel_Island</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How amazingly ironic would it be if it had crashed on North Sentinel Island? Looks like it was really close.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sentinel_Island" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sentinel_Island</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-433224</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-433224</guid>
		<description>PS. I&#039;d thought Tara Li thought that ROSAT was a spy satellite from what she&#039;d written. In case that wasn&#039;t already crystal clear.

As for spy satellites tracking ROSAT&#039;s descent, I&#039;d expect most of them would be focused on other things and that wouldn&#039;t exactly be top priority for them as they&#039;d be looking elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. I&#8217;d thought Tara Li thought that ROSAT was a spy satellite from what she&#8217;d written. In case that wasn&#8217;t already crystal clear.</p>
<p>As for spy satellites tracking ROSAT&#8217;s descent, I&#8217;d expect most of them would be focused on other things and that wouldn&#8217;t exactly be top priority for them as they&#8217;d be looking elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-433121</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-433121</guid>
		<description>@11.   George : Okay, that interpretation of what Tara Li was saying does make sense I guess when you put it like that - although I was kinda hoping (&amp; still am) to hear from her directly on that. Thanks. :-)

PS. Yeah, I always have been a lousy typer. Mea culpa. What&#039;s &quot;center&quot; in deutsch anyhow? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@11.   George : Okay, that interpretation of what Tara Li was saying does make sense I guess when you put it like that &#8211; although I was kinda hoping (&amp; still am) to hear from her directly on that. Thanks. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PS. Yeah, I always have been a lousy typer. Mea culpa. What&#8217;s &#8220;center&#8221; in deutsch anyhow? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Langbroek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-433012</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Langbroek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-433012</guid>
		<description>DLR is exactly repeating what Strategic Space Command already published in their final TIP half a day after the reentry: 1:50 UTC (SSC adds: +/- 7 minutes, DLR omits this), above the Bay of Bengal.

 I know it is their satellite and all that, but I really think they just copied SSC&#039;s report with very little own input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLR is exactly repeating what Strategic Space Command already published in their final TIP half a day after the reentry: 1:50 UTC (SSC adds: +/- 7 minutes, DLR omits this), above the Bay of Bengal.</p>
<p> I know it is their satellite and all that, but I really think they just copied SSC&#8217;s report with very little own input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-433007</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-433007</guid>
		<description>@ Messier Tidy Upper:

I am not a native English speaker but I can very easily understand what Tara Li said. I&#039;ll ty to re-phrase it for you, as you got her statemets completely wrong:

TL: &quot;There’s enough of the bloody spy sats, …&quot;

= &quot;There are plenty of US owned military reconnaissance / early warning satellites in orbit that were able to trace the heat signature of the re-entering ROSAT...&quot;

TL: &quot;…and the signature of a significant re-entry is going to be so different from a missile launch, they could post when &amp; where with no real impact on security.&quot;

= &quot;...so the USG knew withing almost real-time when and where ROSAT re-entered but refuses to let the rest of the world know as they are paranoid about disclosing their capabilities - which everybody already knows they have&quot;

By the way, it&#039;s officially the &quot;German Aerospace Center&quot;, not &quot;Centre&quot; ;)  I worked there for 10 years.

You&#039;re welcome :)

George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Messier Tidy Upper:</p>
<p>I am not a native English speaker but I can very easily understand what Tara Li said. I&#8217;ll ty to re-phrase it for you, as you got her statemets completely wrong:</p>
<p>TL: &#8220;There’s enough of the bloody spy sats, …&#8221;</p>
<p>= &#8220;There are plenty of US owned military reconnaissance / early warning satellites in orbit that were able to trace the heat signature of the re-entering ROSAT&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>TL: &#8220;…and the signature of a significant re-entry is going to be so different from a missile launch, they could post when &amp; where with no real impact on security.&#8221;</p>
<p>= &#8220;&#8230;so the USG knew withing almost real-time when and where ROSAT re-entered but refuses to let the rest of the world know as they are paranoid about disclosing their capabilities &#8211; which everybody already knows they have&#8221;</p>
<p>By the way, it&#8217;s officially the &#8220;German Aerospace Center&#8221;, not &#8220;Centre&#8221; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I worked there for 10 years.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432960</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432960</guid>
		<description>@1.   Pete Jackson : &lt;i&gt;&quot;What do ROSAT and Osama Bin Laden now have in common?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Burial at sea in the Indian ocean I presume?

@4.   Chris : &lt;i&gt;&quot;But were any fish hit? No one ever cares about the fish.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Unlikely any fish were hit unless they were especially unlucky flying fish! ;-) 

Once ROSAT hit the ocean it&#039;s momentum would, I&#039;d expect, have been much slower and gentler as it sank and the fish would probably have been easily able to move out the way. 

Jellyfish aside. ;-)

@7.   Tara Li : 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;There’s enough of the bloody spy sats, ... &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For Your Information, ROSAT (short name for ROentgen SATellite) was an astronomical scientific research satellite not a spy satellite. It was a mission designed and run by the German Aerospace Centre to study the sky in X-rays, a space telescope. Click on my name for a link to their website.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;I&gt;...and the signature of a significant re-entry is going to be so different from a missile launch, they could post when &amp; where with no real impact on security.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please can you rephrase, expand upon or otherwise clarify that last part of your  sentence there because I honestly can&#039;t understand what you are trying to say or what point you are presumably trying to make. You are not making sense there - to me at least - at all. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1.   Pete Jackson : <i>&#8220;What do ROSAT and Osama Bin Laden now have in common?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Burial at sea in the Indian ocean I presume?</p>
<p>@4.   Chris : <i>&#8220;But were any fish hit? No one ever cares about the fish.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Unlikely any fish were hit unless they were especially unlucky flying fish! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Once ROSAT hit the ocean it&#8217;s momentum would, I&#8217;d expect, have been much slower and gentler as it sank and the fish would probably have been easily able to move out the way. </p>
<p>Jellyfish aside. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@7.   Tara Li : </p>
<blockquote><p><i>There’s enough of the bloody spy sats, &#8230; </i></p></blockquote>
<p>For Your Information, ROSAT (short name for ROentgen SATellite) was an astronomical scientific research satellite not a spy satellite. It was a mission designed and run by the German Aerospace Centre to study the sky in X-rays, a space telescope. Click on my name for a link to their website.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&#8230;and the signature of a significant re-entry is going to be so different from a missile launch, they could post when &amp; where with no real impact on security.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Please can you rephrase, expand upon or otherwise clarify that last part of your  sentence there because I honestly can&#8217;t understand what you are trying to say or what point you are presumably trying to make. You are not making sense there &#8211; to me at least &#8211; at all. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t-storm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432907</link>
		<dc:creator>t-storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432907</guid>
		<description>#6 true. The defining coefficient is a function of area divided by mass I believe.
The acceleration should be .5 * Drag Coefficient * V * V * Area / mass

In rarefied air the drag coefficient is variable also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6 true. The defining coefficient is a function of area divided by mass I believe.<br />
The acceleration should be .5 * Drag Coefficient * V * V * Area / mass</p>
<p>In rarefied air the drag coefficient is variable also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svårt för iPhone-app visa var satellit störtar &#171; Bildrullen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432905</link>
		<dc:creator>Svårt för iPhone-app visa var satellit störtar &#171; Bildrullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432905</guid>
		<description>[...] Discover Magazine och New Scientist förklarar varför det är så svårt att förutse nedslagsplatsen utan de militära mätsystem, som kan larma om bebyggda trakter är i farozonen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Discover Magazine och New Scientist förklarar varför det är så svårt att förutse nedslagsplatsen utan de militära mätsystem, som kan larma om bebyggda trakter är i farozonen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Li</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432862</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432862</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s enough of the bloody spy sats, and the signature of a significant re-entry is going to be so different from a missile launch, they could post when &amp; where with no real impact on security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s enough of the bloody spy sats, and the signature of a significant re-entry is going to be so different from a missile launch, they could post when &amp; where with no real impact on security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432839</link>
		<dc:creator>MHS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432839</guid>
		<description>&quot;A heavy, small satellite has less drag than a light, big one.&quot;

Actually, the drag of an object is not related to its mass. It&#039;s the resulting deceleration that is a function of mass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A heavy, small satellite has less drag than a light, big one.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, the drag of an object is not related to its mass. It&#8217;s the resulting deceleration that is a function of mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final: ROSAT came down in the Bay of Bengal &#8211; DISCOVER - Thailand News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432818</link>
		<dc:creator>Final: ROSAT came down in the Bay of Bengal &#8211; DISCOVER - Thailand News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432818</guid>
		<description>[...] Full Story&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full Story&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432790</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432790</guid>
		<description>But were any fish hit?  No one ever cares about the fish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But were any fish hit?  No one ever cares about the fish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432782</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432782</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; I’ll note it’s mostly due to gas compression, not friction, that heats the satellite up. &lt;/i&gt;

Actually, it&#039;s due to passage of gas through a shock.   This compresses the gas, but most of the heat is from dissipation of kinetic energy at the shock, not from compression.   Compression (as in a bicycle pump) is a reversible process (one that does not produce entropy).   Passage of gas through a shock, on the other hand, is inherently dissipative and causes an increase in entropy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> I’ll note it’s mostly due to gas compression, not friction, that heats the satellite up. </i></p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s due to passage of gas through a shock.   This compresses the gas, but most of the heat is from dissipation of kinetic energy at the shock, not from compression.   Compression (as in a bicycle pump) is a reversible process (one that does not produce entropy).   Passage of gas through a shock, on the other hand, is inherently dissipative and causes an increase in entropy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Empyema</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432765</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Empyema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432765</guid>
		<description>Heating upon re-entry is interesting.  The object is moving about 4 miles/sec, 6440 m/s, relative to the atmosphere, and vice-versa.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html
 The science
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html#c4
 The calculation.  Air is 29 amu

Incoming sees gas at (most probable speed) 72,000 C!!!  Now add shock compression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heating upon re-entry is interesting.  The object is moving about 4 miles/sec, 6440 m/s, relative to the atmosphere, and vice-versa.</p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html" rel="nofollow">http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html</a><br />
 The science<br />
<a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html#c4" rel="nofollow">http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html#c4</a><br />
 The calculation.  Air is 29 amu</p>
<p>Incoming sees gas at (most probable speed) 72,000 C!!!  Now add shock compression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Jackson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/25/final-rosat-came-down-in-the-bay-of-bengal/comment-page-1/#comment-432753</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=39838#comment-432753</guid>
		<description>What do ROSAT and Osama Bin Laden now have in common?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do ROSAT and Osama Bin Laden now have in common?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 05:59:33 -->
