<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congressional funding disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-449457</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-449457</guid>
		<description>Well, I would neither call the U.S. &quot;great&quot; nor an &quot;empire&quot;, but that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I would neither call the U.S. &#8220;great&#8221; nor an &#8220;empire&#8221;, but that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaDeR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-449277</link>
		<dc:creator>MaDeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-449277</guid>
		<description>Oh, USA will indeed fall. Not in year or decade. Great empires always fall either fast (like ZSRR) or in many hundred years, like Rome itself. And about other things: well, perpetual two-party duopol, legalized corruption (so-called lobbyism), trying to estabilish supersitious crap instead of science...

Nowadays, I consider USA as corrupted as China or Russia. Good luck with changing something - anything that happens with USA will affect entire world, including my place to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, USA will indeed fall. Not in year or decade. Great empires always fall either fast (like ZSRR) or in many hundred years, like Rome itself. And about other things: well, perpetual two-party duopol, legalized corruption (so-called lobbyism), trying to estabilish supersitious crap instead of science&#8230;</p>
<p>Nowadays, I consider USA as corrupted as China or Russia. Good luck with changing something &#8211; anything that happens with USA will affect entire world, including my place to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448927</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448927</guid>
		<description>@43 Albert J Hock Jr.:  At the risk of earning Phil&#039;s ire for cluttering up his in-box, I think that comments like that would be more effectively e-mailed directly to him, especially on older threads like this that he is less likely to check, and which (in this case) are topically unrelated, anyway.

Dr. Plait&#039;s e-mail address can be found on the right side of the page next to his picture (it&#039;s spelled out in an odd way to avoid spambots, but you can figure it out).  In my experience he&#039;s very good about answering any inquiry (or at least those, like yours, that are highly relevant to his blog).

PS: I don&#039;t suppose there are any references to that article online, are there?  If so, you might want to include links in your query. 
I wouldn&#039;t mind &#039;em, either :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@43 Albert J Hock Jr.:  At the risk of earning Phil&#8217;s ire for cluttering up his in-box, I think that comments like that would be more effectively e-mailed directly to him, especially on older threads like this that he is less likely to check, and which (in this case) are topically unrelated, anyway.</p>
<p>Dr. Plait&#8217;s e-mail address can be found on the right side of the page next to his picture (it&#8217;s spelled out in an odd way to avoid spambots, but you can figure it out).  In my experience he&#8217;s very good about answering any inquiry (or at least those, like yours, that are highly relevant to his blog).</p>
<p>PS: I don&#8217;t suppose there are any references to that article online, are there?  If so, you might want to include links in your query.<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t mind &#8216;em, either <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert J. Hoch Jr.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448775</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert J. Hoch Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448775</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Plait,
My recent issue of “Sky and Telescope” shows an astonishing image of a “binary asteroid” as shadows cast by the light a single star.  Can you comment on this interesting application of stellar occultation?  How accurate is the resulting image?  Since the light rays from a distant star are nearly parallel, the size of the shadow should just about match that of the asteroid!  It would seem to me that the precision is almost entirely dependent on the astronomers clocks.  (and, of course the number of observation locations)  So we should be able to “see”  any occulting object regardless of distance.  Perhaps groups of stars could be used as a kind of “telescope”?  Note: This last would require special camera software to assign timing to each star imaged on the camera chip! (A cute trick.  Scanning won&#039;t do it, well . . . maybe super fast scanning.)

Here&#039;s a great opportunity for another organization of amateur and pro astronomers.  

Sincerely
Albert J. Hoch Jr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Plait,<br />
My recent issue of “Sky and Telescope” shows an astonishing image of a “binary asteroid” as shadows cast by the light a single star.  Can you comment on this interesting application of stellar occultation?  How accurate is the resulting image?  Since the light rays from a distant star are nearly parallel, the size of the shadow should just about match that of the asteroid!  It would seem to me that the precision is almost entirely dependent on the astronomers clocks.  (and, of course the number of observation locations)  So we should be able to “see”  any occulting object regardless of distance.  Perhaps groups of stars could be used as a kind of “telescope”?  Note: This last would require special camera software to assign timing to each star imaged on the camera chip! (A cute trick.  Scanning won&#8217;t do it, well . . . maybe super fast scanning.)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a great opportunity for another organization of amateur and pro astronomers.  </p>
<p>Sincerely<br />
Albert J. Hoch Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448521</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448521</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;@40 MTU: I’d argue that the parallels are stronger than we might want to believe.
For instance, in ancient Rome, only wealthy property owners could vote. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
That is how things were originally in the U.S., but it was later changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>@40 MTU: I’d argue that the parallels are stronger than we might want to believe.<br />
For instance, in ancient Rome, only wealthy property owners could vote. </p></blockquote>
<p>That is how things were originally in the U.S., but it was later changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448166</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448166</guid>
		<description>@40 MTU:  I&#039;d argue that the parallels are stronger than we might want to believe.
For instance, in ancient Rome, only wealthy property owners could vote.  Technically, everyone in the US can vote, but something like 95% of the time, the candidate that gets the most money wins.  That and this funding idiocy are pretty much proof that the rich and corporations run the whole damn country. 

I could also point to how TV shows get more public and media attention then politics, or incidents of people going ape**** because (insert fast food chain) ran out of (insert junk food).
Bread and circuses, man!  Bread and circuses. 

/Scuze me, I need to go take my daily dose of Cynicol™.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@40 MTU:  I&#8217;d argue that the parallels are stronger than we might want to believe.<br />
For instance, in ancient Rome, only wealthy property owners could vote.  Technically, everyone in the US can vote, but something like 95% of the time, the candidate that gets the most money wins.  That and this funding idiocy are pretty much proof that the rich and corporations run the whole damn country. </p>
<p>I could also point to how TV shows get more public and media attention then politics, or incidents of people going ape**** because (insert fast food chain) ran out of (insert junk food).<br />
Bread and circuses, man!  Bread and circuses. </p>
<p>/Scuze me, I need to go take my daily dose of Cynicol™.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448144</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 05:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448144</guid>
		<description>@ ^ To Seek :  Wasn&#039;t there a major hurricane that threatened New York and did quite a bit of damage further north than usual fairly recently - only a few months or so ago?

@38.   ToSeek :  

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Someone asked, what’s wrong with the current climate service? Short answer: there isn’t one – the responsibility is spread across the organization. This just brings it together into a unified organization.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Thanks. :-)

 That was me and that now makes sense - the use of the word &#039;new&#039; threw me as it implied there was already an &#039;old&#039; one. 

@ 36.   JMW : &lt;i&gt; &quot;.. Your [USA&#039;s] society is exactly like that of Rome before its fall ..&quot; &lt;/i&gt; 

&lt;b&gt;Exactly?&lt;/b&gt; [Looks around at the States for toga clad Emperors, gladiators and Christians being fed to the lions and an aqueduct building industry.  ;-) ]

Hmm .. there may be just a few differences. No slavery, women can vote, chariots have come a long way etc .. ;-) 

That Presidents get elected out by the voters not assassinated out by their bodyguards is possibly a good sign? Whether these differences are enough to make the USA&#039;s fate a bit better and less likely to fall or not - who knows. I hope so. 

Things cannot be sustained as they are and will have to change in a variety of ways. There&#039;s a lot of serious economic social and environmental issues to address &lt;i&gt;(HIRGO, social inequality and soon Peak Oil to name a few.)&lt;/i&gt;  but there&#039;s also a lot of highly intelligent, good people trying to work on them too. The same Science and Industry that got us into this situation still remains, in my view, our best means of getting out of it again. I hope  the States can recover from the present mess and don&#039;t think that&#039;s impossible to imagine. At least not yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ^ To Seek :  Wasn&#8217;t there a major hurricane that threatened New York and did quite a bit of damage further north than usual fairly recently &#8211; only a few months or so ago?</p>
<p>@38.   ToSeek :  </p>
<blockquote><p><i>Someone asked, what’s wrong with the current climate service? Short answer: there isn’t one – the responsibility is spread across the organization. This just brings it together into a unified organization.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p> That was me and that now makes sense &#8211; the use of the word &#8216;new&#8217; threw me as it implied there was already an &#8216;old&#8217; one. </p>
<p>@ 36.   JMW : <i> &#8220;.. Your [USA's] society is exactly like that of Rome before its fall ..&#8221; </i> </p>
<p><b>Exactly?</b> [Looks around at the States for toga clad Emperors, gladiators and Christians being fed to the lions and an aqueduct building industry.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ]</p>
<p>Hmm .. there may be just a few differences. No slavery, women can vote, chariots have come a long way etc .. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>That Presidents get elected out by the voters not assassinated out by their bodyguards is possibly a good sign? Whether these differences are enough to make the USA&#8217;s fate a bit better and less likely to fall or not &#8211; who knows. I hope so. </p>
<p>Things cannot be sustained as they are and will have to change in a variety of ways. There&#8217;s a lot of serious economic social and environmental issues to address <i>(HIRGO, social inequality and soon Peak Oil to name a few.)</i>  but there&#8217;s also a lot of highly intelligent, good people trying to work on them too. The same Science and Industry that got us into this situation still remains, in my view, our best means of getting out of it again. I hope  the States can recover from the present mess and don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s impossible to imagine. At least not yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToSeek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448074</link>
		<dc:creator>ToSeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448074</guid>
		<description>@22: &quot;Hey, mr Phil Plait, quiz question: when has the last hurricane (cat 3 and above) landfall ocurred?
Answer: 2232 days and counting, and we will obviously surpass the record.&quot;

Wrong. That&#039;s the last cat. 3 to make US landfall. Are you really that parochial? I suggest you do some actual research and count the number of people (not just Americans) who died from Atlantic hurricanes during those 2232 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@22: &#8220;Hey, mr Phil Plait, quiz question: when has the last hurricane (cat 3 and above) landfall ocurred?<br />
Answer: 2232 days and counting, and we will obviously surpass the record.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wrong. That&#8217;s the last cat. 3 to make US landfall. Are you really that parochial? I suggest you do some actual research and count the number of people (not just Americans) who died from Atlantic hurricanes during those 2232 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToSeek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448070</link>
		<dc:creator>ToSeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448070</guid>
		<description>It should be noted that the press release was written by a Republican-controlled committee with a vested interest in appearing to be cost-conscious. Meanwhile, NOAA itself says ( http://www.noaa.gov/climateresources/resources/QA_ClimateService_Feb15.pdf ): 

&lt;blockquote&gt;This is a reorganization of existing assets to coordinate and integrate NOAA’s existing climate capabilities for greater effectiveness, cohesiveness, and to improve service relevance and delivery. It will be accomplished through a zero sum realignment of funds within the current NOAA budget and will (1) neither increase or decrease the NOAA Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) or billet allocation, or require any relocation of employees, (2) not require any physical relocation of programs or labs, or require any new facilities to accommodate this reorganization, (3) result in a zero sum realignment of funds within the current NOAA budget, or (4) not increase the size of NOAA overhead. The Climate Service headquarters will be located in Silver Spring, MD, consistent with all other line offices.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Someone asked, what&#039;s wrong with the current climate service? Short answer: there isn&#039;t one - the responsibility is spread across the organization. This just brings it together into a unified organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that the press release was written by a Republican-controlled committee with a vested interest in appearing to be cost-conscious. Meanwhile, NOAA itself says ( <a href="http://www.noaa.gov/climateresources/resources/QA_ClimateService_Feb15.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.noaa.gov/climateresources/resources/QA_ClimateService_Feb15.pdf</a> ): </p>
<blockquote><p>This is a reorganization of existing assets to coordinate and integrate NOAA’s existing climate capabilities for greater effectiveness, cohesiveness, and to improve service relevance and delivery. It will be accomplished through a zero sum realignment of funds within the current NOAA budget and will (1) neither increase or decrease the NOAA Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) or billet allocation, or require any relocation of employees, (2) not require any physical relocation of programs or labs, or require any new facilities to accommodate this reorganization, (3) result in a zero sum realignment of funds within the current NOAA budget, or (4) not increase the size of NOAA overhead. The Climate Service headquarters will be located in Silver Spring, MD, consistent with all other line offices.</p></blockquote>
<p>Someone asked, what&#8217;s wrong with the current climate service? Short answer: there isn&#8217;t one &#8211; the responsibility is spread across the organization. This just brings it together into a unified organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448049</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448049</guid>
		<description>@JMW:  As an American who is (justifiably, I think) scared s**tless by all this, from where you&#039;re standing, do you think that there&#039;s anything we can do?  Or are we just plain Doomed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JMW:  As an American who is (justifiably, I think) scared s**tless by all this, from where you&#8217;re standing, do you think that there&#8217;s anything we can do?  Or are we just plain Doomed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-448030</link>
		<dc:creator>JMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-448030</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m Canadian, so I think I benefit from being outside the forest, and can see some individual trees.

@17 Sam H &lt;i&gt;...then America will fall. If people with influence really say this, then it kinda becomes inevitable.&lt;/i&gt;
and
@16 DanVeteran &lt;i&gt;...The days of spending and spending MUST come to an end before we have a total economic collapse.&lt;/i&gt;

I think American has already fallen.  And has suffered an economic collapse.  The country is just tottering along before the actual collapse.

The economy is addicted to military spending.  If Obama ever cut the military budget, the United States would suffer through a depression.  And in the meantime, you have collectively anesthestitized yourselves and are now incapable of forming coherent, sensible national policy.

Your society is exactly like that of Rome before its fall - addicted to spectacle and ignorant of reality.

And while I have made snide comments about Americans before, please rest assured that I find this painful to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Canadian, so I think I benefit from being outside the forest, and can see some individual trees.</p>
<p>@17 Sam H <i>&#8230;then America will fall. If people with influence really say this, then it kinda becomes inevitable.</i><br />
and<br />
@16 DanVeteran <i>&#8230;The days of spending and spending MUST come to an end before we have a total economic collapse.</i></p>
<p>I think American has already fallen.  And has suffered an economic collapse.  The country is just tottering along before the actual collapse.</p>
<p>The economy is addicted to military spending.  If Obama ever cut the military budget, the United States would suffer through a depression.  And in the meantime, you have collectively anesthestitized yourselves and are now incapable of forming coherent, sensible national policy.</p>
<p>Your society is exactly like that of Rome before its fall &#8211; addicted to spectacle and ignorant of reality.</p>
<p>And while I have made snide comments about Americans before, please rest assured that I find this painful to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447871</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447871</guid>
		<description>Politicians understand that people can see/touch/taste the results of disaster relief, but disaster planning and mitigation are harder to sell as their results aren&#039;t as immediate or visceral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians understand that people can see/touch/taste the results of disaster relief, but disaster planning and mitigation are harder to sell as their results aren&#8217;t as immediate or visceral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceRN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447642</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447642</guid>
		<description>By all means increase NOAAs funding.  When I am elected dictator for life the first thing I will do (after following the advice of Dick the Butcher of course) is double the budgets of both NASA and NOAA.

However, do we need a new layer of bureaucracy withing NOAA to do what is all ready NOAAs primary function?  Couldn&#039;t they just muddle along with the extra money infused into. The bloated bureaucracy they already have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all means increase NOAAs funding.  When I am elected dictator for life the first thing I will do (after following the advice of Dick the Butcher of course) is double the budgets of both NASA and NOAA.</p>
<p>However, do we need a new layer of bureaucracy withing NOAA to do what is all ready NOAAs primary function?  Couldn&#8217;t they just muddle along with the extra money infused into. The bloated bureaucracy they already have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447641</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447641</guid>
		<description>@25.   Grand Lunar &amp; 19.   QuietDesperation &amp; 16.   DanVeteran : 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;@#10 – Phil’s post clearly states “The Administration requested $322 million to establish this new entity within NOAA.” To me it sounds like they want more money. Where are you getting your information that the new service would not cost taxpayers any additional money?
With the budgets the way they are, we need to ask ourselves; Where is this money coming from? What gets cut so we can fund this new project? The days of spending and spending MUST come to an end before we have a total economic collapse. We need responsible leadership in D.C.; something we haven’t seen in many decades.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From the linked DeSMog Blog article :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;At a time when Congress is fiercely debating federal spending, it would seemingly make financial sense to deny additional funding to NOAA to create their new branch. But, in a rare occurrence on Capitol Hill, &lt;b&gt;the new agency wouldn’t have cost anything,&lt;/b&gt; and NOAA &lt;b&gt;didn’t ask for a single dime&lt;/b&gt; to fund their new venture, completely nullifying any financial argument against this common sense proposal.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Emphasis added. Not sure yet where DeSmogBlog gets the &quot;no money asked&quot; bit from but see no reason to disbelieve it. OTOH, it&#039;s hard to see the creation of a new  group being entirely free either. So, yeah, I dunno &#039;bout that part.

What I &lt;b&gt;*do*&lt;/b&gt; know is that it has been scientifically established that Human Induced Rapid Global Overheating (HIRGO) is real and is going to have increasingly bad effects including more natural disasters such as heatwaves, fires, floods, storms, droughts, etc. 

We could if we wanted stick our heads in the sand and pretend it ain&#039;t happening - but that will NOT make it all go away. That approach leads to more human suffering, property damage and deaths.

Or we could start taking some reasonable measures - including undertaking further studies and organising specialist groups within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrarion - to tackle the problem. That won&#039;t make it go away either but it will give us a lot of useful knowledge and lead to the problem being less severe and less costly in the longer run. That leads to less human suffering, property damage and deaths.

PS. Another video on the US esp. Texas drought &amp; heatwave and HIRGO link now attached to my name here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@25.   Grand Lunar &amp; 19.   QuietDesperation &amp; 16.   DanVeteran : </p>
<blockquote><p><i>@#10 – Phil’s post clearly states “The Administration requested $322 million to establish this new entity within NOAA.” To me it sounds like they want more money. Where are you getting your information that the new service would not cost taxpayers any additional money?<br />
With the budgets the way they are, we need to ask ourselves; Where is this money coming from? What gets cut so we can fund this new project? The days of spending and spending MUST come to an end before we have a total economic collapse. We need responsible leadership in D.C.; something we haven’t seen in many decades.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>From the linked DeSMog Blog article :</p>
<blockquote><p><i>At a time when Congress is fiercely debating federal spending, it would seemingly make financial sense to deny additional funding to NOAA to create their new branch. But, in a rare occurrence on Capitol Hill, <b>the new agency wouldn’t have cost anything,</b> and NOAA <b>didn’t ask for a single dime</b> to fund their new venture, completely nullifying any financial argument against this common sense proposal.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Emphasis added. Not sure yet where DeSmogBlog gets the &#8220;no money asked&#8221; bit from but see no reason to disbelieve it. OTOH, it&#8217;s hard to see the creation of a new  group being entirely free either. So, yeah, I dunno &#8217;bout that part.</p>
<p>What I <b>*do*</b> know is that it has been scientifically established that Human Induced Rapid Global Overheating (HIRGO) is real and is going to have increasingly bad effects including more natural disasters such as heatwaves, fires, floods, storms, droughts, etc. </p>
<p>We could if we wanted stick our heads in the sand and pretend it ain&#8217;t happening &#8211; but that will NOT make it all go away. That approach leads to more human suffering, property damage and deaths.</p>
<p>Or we could start taking some reasonable measures &#8211; including undertaking further studies and organising specialist groups within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrarion &#8211; to tackle the problem. That won&#8217;t make it go away either but it will give us a lot of useful knowledge and lead to the problem being less severe and less costly in the longer run. That leads to less human suffering, property damage and deaths.</p>
<p>PS. Another video on the US esp. Texas drought &amp; heatwave and HIRGO link now attached to my name here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447623</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 04:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447623</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of a quote from Rick Perry too : 

&lt;blockquote&gt;“You just don’t understand how quickly this can get out out of hand and put people’s lives or their property in jeopardy.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Indeed not, Guv’nor! He was talking about the recent devastating bushfires - or as you in the States call &#039;em wildfires - but his words apply equally aptly to Human Induced Rapid Global Overheating (HIRGO) as well. Even though &lt;strike&gt;sadly&lt;/strike&gt; stupidly Governor Perry denies that whole climatology problem is even real and has, so I gather, cut the number of firefighters whilst insisting on Texans praying for rain as his preferred solution. 

That was seen on SBS World News (Australian TV) Tuesday 6th Sept. 2011 6.30 pm. The news segued from reporting on those Texan wildfires into a story about an ominous new hurricane off the US eastern coast  and followed mention of the drought* and heatwave that helped the wildfires get so severe. Go figure. :-(

Actually I don&#039;t understand how more folks including even the likes of Rick Perry cannot seem to make the rather obvious connections here.

* Click on my name for the latest &lt;i&gt;&#039;Climate Crock&#039;&lt;/i&gt; youtube clip that discusses the Texas drought and climatic implications on it in more detail. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of a quote from Rick Perry too : </p>
<blockquote><p>“You just don’t understand how quickly this can get out out of hand and put people’s lives or their property in jeopardy.” </p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed not, Guv’nor! He was talking about the recent devastating bushfires &#8211; or as you in the States call &#8216;em wildfires &#8211; but his words apply equally aptly to Human Induced Rapid Global Overheating (HIRGO) as well. Even though <strike>sadly</strike> stupidly Governor Perry denies that whole climatology problem is even real and has, so I gather, cut the number of firefighters whilst insisting on Texans praying for rain as his preferred solution. </p>
<p>That was seen on SBS World News (Australian TV) Tuesday 6th Sept. 2011 6.30 pm. The news segued from reporting on those Texan wildfires into a story about an ominous new hurricane off the US eastern coast  and followed mention of the drought* and heatwave that helped the wildfires get so severe. Go figure. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Actually I don&#8217;t understand how more folks including even the likes of Rick Perry cannot seem to make the rather obvious connections here.</p>
<p>* Click on my name for the latest <i>&#8216;Climate Crock&#8217;</i> youtube clip that discusses the Texas drought and climatic implications on it in more detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447615</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447615</guid>
		<description>Never mind...the desmogblog link has the same info I had just posted (now deleted my comment).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind&#8230;the desmogblog link has the same info I had just posted (now deleted my comment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447612</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447612</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Perhaps I’m the only one who sees irony in a bullet point saying Congress won’t appropriate $322M for an NOAA climate change service, while then immediately below it noting how the natural disasters that have befallen this country have required &quot; historic levels of relief and recovery assistance&quot;, necessitating $2.3 billion in relief funds. Hmmm.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There&#039;s that certainly. But what struck me was the call for a &lt;b&gt;*new*&lt;/b&gt; NOAA Climate Service. It leaves me wondering why do they need a new one - what&#039;s wrong the &quot;old&quot; NOAA Climate Service?! ;-) 

Plus too that &quot;Climate Service&quot; name sounds odd to me - a bit like they are providing the climate to everyone and taking orders on what the climate does, which, yeah, not-so-much. ;-) 

Maybe worth changing to Climate Research Organisation or Climate Studies Sector or suchlike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Perhaps I’m the only one who sees irony in a bullet point saying Congress won’t appropriate $322M for an NOAA climate change service, while then immediately below it noting how the natural disasters that have befallen this country have required &#8221; historic levels of relief and recovery assistance&#8221;, necessitating $2.3 billion in relief funds. Hmmm.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s that certainly. But what struck me was the call for a <b>*new*</b> NOAA Climate Service. It leaves me wondering why do they need a new one &#8211; what&#8217;s wrong the &#8220;old&#8221; NOAA Climate Service?! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Plus too that &#8220;Climate Service&#8221; name sounds odd to me &#8211; a bit like they are providing the climate to everyone and taking orders on what the climate does, which, yeah, not-so-much. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Maybe worth changing to Climate Research Organisation or Climate Studies Sector or suchlike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447554</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447554</guid>
		<description>Oof!  I&#039;ve never had an irony gland explosion before.  It hurts!

@#11 Jamesonian:  &lt;i&gt;Why are people so resistant to scientific evidence? Global warming. Vaccination. Stem cell. Why? Why do so many people reject evidence when presented with it?&lt;/i&gt;

Because nobody gets taught how to think critically anymore?  Because people confuse &quot;Everyone has a right to an opinion&quot; with &quot;Everyone&#039;s opinion should be given equal consideration, no matter what their credentials are.&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oof!  I&#8217;ve never had an irony gland explosion before.  It hurts!</p>
<p>@#11 Jamesonian:  <i>Why are people so resistant to scientific evidence? Global warming. Vaccination. Stem cell. Why? Why do so many people reject evidence when presented with it?</i></p>
<p>Because nobody gets taught how to think critically anymore?  Because people confuse &#8220;Everyone has a right to an opinion&#8221; with &#8220;Everyone&#8217;s opinion should be given equal consideration, no matter what their credentials are.&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffersonian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffersonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447545</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the irony is very, erm, republican. 
What&#039;s the term, again, for the ability to simultaneously hold a belief in conflicting facts ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the irony is very, erm, republican.<br />
What&#8217;s the term, again, for the ability to simultaneously hold a belief in conflicting facts ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmac57</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447542</link>
		<dc:creator>tmac57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447542</guid>
		<description>&quot;To be fair, the NOAA Climate Service sounds like a longer-term, strategic monitoring entity. Given the fiscal climate it can be argued that this can wait a couple of years.&quot;

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To be fair, the NOAA Climate Service sounds like a longer-term, strategic monitoring entity. Given the fiscal climate it can be argued that this can wait a couple of years.&#8221;</p>
<p>For want of a nail the shoe was lost.<br />
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.<br />
For want of a horse the rider was lost.<br />
For want of a rider the battle was lost.<br />
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.<br />
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447536</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447536</guid>
		<description>To be fair, the NOAA Climate Service sounds like a longer-term, strategic monitoring entity.  Given the fiscal climate it can be argued that this can wait a couple of years.  Disaster relief is almost always short-term reactive funding.  Delays there can cost lives and lead to great suffering.

Eventually the two are linked by time and causation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, the NOAA Climate Service sounds like a longer-term, strategic monitoring entity.  Given the fiscal climate it can be argued that this can wait a couple of years.  Disaster relief is almost always short-term reactive funding.  Delays there can cost lives and lead to great suffering.</p>
<p>Eventually the two are linked by time and causation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Lunar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447522</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Lunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447522</guid>
		<description>Not surprising to see this.
Congress is trying to cut spending everywhere it can, despite how little is asked for already (relative to other things).

And all the while, items that really do eat up the budget are left relatively untouched....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprising to see this.<br />
Congress is trying to cut spending everywhere it can, despite how little is asked for already (relative to other things).</p>
<p>And all the while, items that really do eat up the budget are left relatively untouched&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447521</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447521</guid>
		<description>Why are we surprised?  Anything that might hurt BIG BUSINESS&#039; bottom line is &#039;unproven&#039; and not worthy of study, according to GOP/TP.
Folks, we really, really, really need to oust all of Congress and their staffers, and forbid ALL lobbyists from contacting ANY legislator or their staffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are we surprised?  Anything that might hurt BIG BUSINESS&#8217; bottom line is &#8216;unproven&#8217; and not worthy of study, according to GOP/TP.<br />
Folks, we really, really, really need to oust all of Congress and their staffers, and forbid ALL lobbyists from contacting ANY legislator or their staffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmac57</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447518</link>
		<dc:creator>tmac57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447518</guid>
		<description>“Our hesitation,” Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) told Lubchenco at a hearing in June, “is that the climate services could become little propaganda sources instead of a science source.”
  I guess congressional Replblicans don&#039;t want any competition with their propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Our hesitation,” Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) told Lubchenco at a hearing in June, “is that the climate services could become little propaganda sources instead of a science source.”<br />
  I guess congressional Replblicans don&#8217;t want any competition with their propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Dias</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/congressional-funding-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-447515</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Dias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=40926#comment-447515</guid>
		<description>Hey, mr Phil Plait, quiz question: when has the last hurricane (cat 3 and above) landfall ocurred?

Answer: 2232 days and counting, and we will obviously surpass the record.

Here:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--BFAoLMt-fE/TtOgHP83dTI/AAAAAAAABV8/Vkr83aO0DpQ/s1600/daysbtcat3%252Bus.hurrs.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, mr Phil Plait, quiz question: when has the last hurricane (cat 3 and above) landfall ocurred?</p>
<p>Answer: 2232 days and counting, and we will obviously surpass the record.</p>
<p>Here:</p>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--BFAoLMt-fE/TtOgHP83dTI/AAAAAAAABV8/Vkr83aO0DpQ/s1600/daysbtcat3%252Bus.hurrs.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://2.bp.blogspot.com/&#8211;BFAoLMt-fE/TtOgHP83dTI/AAAAAAAABV8/Vkr83aO0DpQ/s1600/daysbtcat3%252Bus.hurrs.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 07:05:24 -->
