<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We need to increase the awesome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-448261</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-448261</guid>
		<description>Most of us aren&#039;t professional speakers so jump cuts save us from ourselves.  It&#039;s better than someone doing a monotone blah blah blah video.  At least I think so. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us aren&#8217;t professional speakers so jump cuts save us from ourselves.  It&#8217;s better than someone doing a monotone blah blah blah video.  At least I think so. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceRN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-448108</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 03:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-448108</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t you link to this months ago?  Maybe I saw it somewhere else.

It&#039;s a good message, but the kid comes off a bit psychotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t you link to this months ago?  Maybe I saw it somewhere else.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good message, but the kid comes off a bit psychotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-448050</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-448050</guid>
		<description>@#5 Arkonby: &lt;i&gt; Great message, but I really don’t like this new style of video editing that seeks to eliminate even the slightest pause between thoughts.&lt;/i&gt;
IFITDOESNTSAYMICROMACHINESITSNOTTHEREALTHING!
I like the commenter who said &quot;Max Headroom here makes some good﻿ points.&quot;

I mean, yes, cuts like that can be used to smoothly transition between the best parts of various takes, but this video seems to just pile them up for the hell of it.  Unless the speaker is stuttering and stumbling every 4 seconds, I don&#039;t understand the need for it.

EDIT: 
@#10RwFlynn: &lt;i&gt;One of the rules the vlogbrothers follow is that all their regular videos must be no longer than four minutes long (in the name of saving time). Hence the jump-cuts. &lt;/i&gt;

Ahh.  That explains a lot.  Although, that video is 4 minutes and 58 seconds long...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#5 Arkonby: <i> Great message, but I really don’t like this new style of video editing that seeks to eliminate even the slightest pause between thoughts.</i><br />
IFITDOESNTSAYMICROMACHINESITSNOTTHEREALTHING!<br />
I like the commenter who said &#8220;Max Headroom here makes some good﻿ points.&#8221;</p>
<p>I mean, yes, cuts like that can be used to smoothly transition between the best parts of various takes, but this video seems to just pile them up for the hell of it.  Unless the speaker is stuttering and stumbling every 4 seconds, I don&#8217;t understand the need for it.</p>
<p>EDIT:<br />
@#10RwFlynn: <i>One of the rules the vlogbrothers follow is that all their regular videos must be no longer than four minutes long (in the name of saving time). Hence the jump-cuts. </i></p>
<p>Ahh.  That explains a lot.  Although, that video is 4 minutes and 58 seconds long&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DFTBA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447839</link>
		<dc:creator>DFTBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447839</guid>
		<description>I love that a Vlogbrothers video has found its way to Bad Astronomy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that a Vlogbrothers video has found its way to Bad Astronomy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uudale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447802</link>
		<dc:creator>uudale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447802</guid>
		<description>We need to increase the awesomeness, and decrease the use of adjectives as nouns.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to increase the awesomeness, and decrease the use of adjectives as nouns.</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Firth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447701</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Firth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447701</guid>
		<description>Awesome :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlas V</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447635</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlas V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 04:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447635</guid>
		<description>Yes. Yes. Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Yes. Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447618</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447618</guid>
		<description>Well said - so true &amp; absolutely spot on with that message there. I couldn&#039;t agree more and I&#039;ve forwarded this on. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said &#8211; so true &amp; absolutely spot on with that message there. I couldn&#8217;t agree more and I&#8217;ve forwarded this on. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Turberville</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447567</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Turberville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447567</guid>
		<description>My apologies to Matthew Spence.  I didn&#039;t mean to steal your statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies to Matthew Spence.  I didn&#8217;t mean to steal your statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Swanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447564</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447564</guid>
		<description>I could only take 25 seconds of the video before I kind of wanted to smack him.  I think he thinks he&#039;s much more charming than I think he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could only take 25 seconds of the video before I kind of wanted to smack him.  I think he thinks he&#8217;s much more charming than I think he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RwFlynn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447563</link>
		<dc:creator>RwFlynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447563</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s rather nice to hear that the Bad Astronomer himself is, at the very least, discovering nerdfighteria.

@ 6.   Thomas Siefert
One of the rules the vlogbrothers follow is that all their regular videos must be no longer than four minutes long (in the name of saving time). Hence the jump-cuts. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s rather nice to hear that the Bad Astronomer himself is, at the very least, discovering nerdfighteria.</p>
<p>@ 6.   Thomas Siefert<br />
One of the rules the vlogbrothers follow is that all their regular videos must be no longer than four minutes long (in the name of saving time). Hence the jump-cuts. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Turberville</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447541</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Turberville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447541</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to beat around the bush.  I&#039;m a small government-minded person.  I don&#039;t mind NASA; in fact, I approve of much of what they do.  I just have a problem with its government-funding as a matter of principle.

The guy in the video says that he can&#039;t wait to give his money to NASA.  Well, according to this link, he doesn&#039;t have to wait.  NASA accepts monetary gifts.

http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PD_1210_001G_/N_PD_1210_001G__main.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to beat around the bush.  I&#8217;m a small government-minded person.  I don&#8217;t mind NASA; in fact, I approve of much of what they do.  I just have a problem with its government-funding as a matter of principle.</p>
<p>The guy in the video says that he can&#8217;t wait to give his money to NASA.  Well, according to this link, he doesn&#8217;t have to wait.  NASA accepts monetary gifts.</p>
<p><a href="http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PD_1210_001G_/N_PD_1210_001G__main.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PD_1210_001G_/N_PD_1210_001G__main.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Li</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447526</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447526</guid>
		<description>But ... ok, we&#039;ve got &quot;the awesome&quot; for scientists, and engineers - and we need more of both - but I suspect the average person really doesn&#039;t feel they get anything out of it for *themselves*.

Perhaps we should look to the Casinos.

No, not the flashing lights and loud annoying bells ringing and stuff like that - but the basic technique they use to get people excited to go there - excited to participate.

1) Big payoffs - these are good - these are what everyone going there hopes for.  But if it were *ONLY* the big payouts - the casinos would end up pretty empty, pretty fast.

2) The little payouts - the payoffs of 1-5x the risked amount - the kind the player immediately puts right back into the machine, to try some more.  These are important - these are what makes casinos able to claim they pay out 99% of what they take in - while yet sending players back out the door with empty pockets.  These keep the players playing - but they&#039;re *NOT* the big draw.

3) The medium payouts - 100x, 1000x the money put in...  AH, *NOW* we&#039;re looking at why players flock to casinos like flamingos.  These payouts happen often enough a player has a reasonable chance of getting one - and if they&#039;re passably intent on it - it *WILL* happen.  You don&#039;t have to play 24/7, putting every dollar you have into a one-arm bandit - if you play an hour or two every weekend, putting perhaps as much as you would for a movie or good dinner - you will get one of these every two.  Meanwhile, you&#039;re building up comp points and every 3 or 4 months, you end up with enough comp points to get that good dinner free.

We&#039;ll see how it goes.  $200,000 a ticket for the payoff of 6 mins freefall doesn&#039;t quite seem enough to me, to really get things rolling - but maybe it&#039;s enough to build what *IS* needed to get that down to where things really get rolling.

But at the rate we&#039;re going, it&#039;s going to be a *VERY* long time until we have the equivalent of Hank Williams singing about how his wife took his last oxygen tank, shared his acceleration couch with the ship&#039;s cabin boy, and drove his last booster engine right up his assteroid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8230; ok, we&#8217;ve got &#8220;the awesome&#8221; for scientists, and engineers &#8211; and we need more of both &#8211; but I suspect the average person really doesn&#8217;t feel they get anything out of it for *themselves*.</p>
<p>Perhaps we should look to the Casinos.</p>
<p>No, not the flashing lights and loud annoying bells ringing and stuff like that &#8211; but the basic technique they use to get people excited to go there &#8211; excited to participate.</p>
<p>1) Big payoffs &#8211; these are good &#8211; these are what everyone going there hopes for.  But if it were *ONLY* the big payouts &#8211; the casinos would end up pretty empty, pretty fast.</p>
<p>2) The little payouts &#8211; the payoffs of 1-5x the risked amount &#8211; the kind the player immediately puts right back into the machine, to try some more.  These are important &#8211; these are what makes casinos able to claim they pay out 99% of what they take in &#8211; while yet sending players back out the door with empty pockets.  These keep the players playing &#8211; but they&#8217;re *NOT* the big draw.</p>
<p>3) The medium payouts &#8211; 100x, 1000x the money put in&#8230;  AH, *NOW* we&#8217;re looking at why players flock to casinos like flamingos.  These payouts happen often enough a player has a reasonable chance of getting one &#8211; and if they&#8217;re passably intent on it &#8211; it *WILL* happen.  You don&#8217;t have to play 24/7, putting every dollar you have into a one-arm bandit &#8211; if you play an hour or two every weekend, putting perhaps as much as you would for a movie or good dinner &#8211; you will get one of these every two.  Meanwhile, you&#8217;re building up comp points and every 3 or 4 months, you end up with enough comp points to get that good dinner free.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how it goes.  $200,000 a ticket for the payoff of 6 mins freefall doesn&#8217;t quite seem enough to me, to really get things rolling &#8211; but maybe it&#8217;s enough to build what *IS* needed to get that down to where things really get rolling.</p>
<p>But at the rate we&#8217;re going, it&#8217;s going to be a *VERY* long time until we have the equivalent of Hank Williams singing about how his wife took his last oxygen tank, shared his acceleration couch with the ship&#8217;s cabin boy, and drove his last booster engine right up his assteroid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Lunar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447525</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Lunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447525</guid>
		<description>Better to hear this than to hear politicians quibble over who&#039;s in and out of the presidental race.

One way I see to reduce the &#039;suck&#039; with the ISS; use it for another 500 day Mars Mission Simulation.
I think THAT would increase the awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better to hear this than to hear politicians quibble over who&#8217;s in and out of the presidental race.</p>
<p>One way I see to reduce the &#8216;suck&#8217; with the ISS; use it for another 500 day Mars Mission Simulation.<br />
I think THAT would increase the awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447504</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447504</guid>
		<description>Finally someone who speaks as fast as the Bad Astronomer, but he had to resort to jump cuts to achieve the effect :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone who speaks as fast as the Bad Astronomer, but he had to resort to jump cuts to achieve the effect <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkonbey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447503</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkonbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447503</guid>
		<description>Great message, but I really don&#039;t like this new style of video editing that seeks to eliminate even the slightest pause between thoughts. 

Especially as the vid had about fifteen seconds of dead air at the end ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great message, but I really don&#8217;t like this new style of video editing that seeks to eliminate even the slightest pause between thoughts. </p>
<p>Especially as the vid had about fifteen seconds of dead air at the end <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447496</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447496</guid>
		<description>I have seen this before and enjoyed it.  Aside from he should probably switch to decaff, his message is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen this before and enjoyed it.  Aside from he should probably switch to decaff, his message is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Spence</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447473</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447473</guid>
		<description>Knock yourself out
http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PD_1210_001G_/N_PD_1210_001G__main.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knock yourself out<br />
<a href="http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PD_1210_001G_/N_PD_1210_001G__main.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PD_1210_001G_/N_PD_1210_001G__main.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artbot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447470</link>
		<dc:creator>artbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447470</guid>
		<description>Also in the science cheer-leading section, this Neil DeGrasse Tyson interview (by Stephen Colbert!) was just posted.  It&#039;s almost 2 years old, but this looks to be the first posting of the whole interview (though I could be mistaken).  Anyhow, enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXh9RQCvxmg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also in the science cheer-leading section, this Neil DeGrasse Tyson interview (by Stephen Colbert!) was just posted.  It&#8217;s almost 2 years old, but this looks to be the first posting of the whole interview (though I could be mistaken).  Anyhow, enjoy!<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXh9RQCvxmg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXh9RQCvxmg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blargh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/11/29/we-need-to-increase-the-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-447446</link>
		<dc:creator>Blargh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=41346#comment-447446</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Offering them patents on technologies developed for NASA&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
... that&#039;s supposed to be a &lt;i&gt;good&lt;/i&gt; thing?
My &lt;i&gt;best&lt;/i&gt; interpretation of that sentence is that it sounds like the kind of subventions that were the basis of the recent Boeing/Airbus kerfluffle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Offering them patents on technologies developed for NASA&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230; that&#8217;s supposed to be a <i>good</i> thing?<br />
My <i>best</i> interpretation of that sentence is that it sounds like the kind of subventions that were the basis of the recent Boeing/Airbus kerfluffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 07:06:03 -->
