<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another interactive way to scale the Universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-499527</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-499527</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an annoying amount of empty space to the left.

You can scroll using left and right arrows. I love that they added in motion, including apparently proportional frequencies of light.

The atoms and molecules shouldbe shown with the spherical harmonic (sub)orbitals.

&quot;Betelgeuse&quot; is misspelled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an annoying amount of empty space to the left.</p>
<p>You can scroll using left and right arrows. I love that they added in motion, including apparently proportional frequencies of light.</p>
<p>The atoms and molecules shouldbe shown with the spherical harmonic (sub)orbitals.</p>
<p>&#8220;Betelgeuse&#8221; is misspelled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechyDad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481583</link>
		<dc:creator>TechyDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481583</guid>
		<description>@Eugene,

A linear version would be interesting and enlightening, but it would also be incredibly maddening.  You&#039;d have to choose between:

1) having the astronomical objects scrolling at a decent rate and having the small end of the spectrum rush by nearly-instantly
or
2) be able to see the small objects and then scroll SLLLLLLOOOOOOOWWWWLLLLYYYYY through the astronomical objects

All in all, I think that the logarithmic scale works best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eugene,</p>
<p>A linear version would be interesting and enlightening, but it would also be incredibly maddening.  You&#8217;d have to choose between:</p>
<p>1) having the astronomical objects scrolling at a decent rate and having the small end of the spectrum rush by nearly-instantly<br />
or<br />
2) be able to see the small objects and then scroll SLLLLLLOOOOOOOWWWWLLLLYYYYY through the astronomical objects</p>
<p>All in all, I think that the logarithmic scale works best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Plait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481511</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Plait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481511</guid>
		<description>TripCyclone (36): Actually, I did originally write they were brothers, but fixed it in the text. I couldn&#039;t find an elegant way to keep the error, so I simply changed it. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TripCyclone (36): Actually, I did originally write they were brothers, but fixed it in the text. I couldn&#8217;t find an elegant way to keep the error, so I simply changed it. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TripCyclone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481488</link>
		<dc:creator>TripCyclone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481488</guid>
		<description>And it appears that the genius twins behind this are 14 year old boys from California.

@Did (#2):  He didn&#039;t say that the Eames were brothers, he said that this example owes it&#039;s existence to the Powers of Ten that the Eames made.  According to this source though, I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s the Powers of Ten that this is based on.  Seems these boys inspired by a video about scale within cells.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/page/scale-universe-cary-michael-huang-california-high-school-15573968</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it appears that the genius twins behind this are 14 year old boys from California.</p>
<p>@Did (#2):  He didn&#8217;t say that the Eames were brothers, he said that this example owes it&#8217;s existence to the Powers of Ten that the Eames made.  According to this source though, I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s the Powers of Ten that this is based on.  Seems these boys inspired by a video about scale within cells.<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/page/scale-universe-cary-michael-huang-california-high-school-15573968" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/page/scale-universe-cary-michael-huang-california-high-school-15573968</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechyDad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481374</link>
		<dc:creator>TechyDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481374</guid>
		<description>@Nigel Depledge,

I think you mean this one: http://www.phrenopolis.com/perspective/solarsystem/

It&#039;s incredible how the Universe can both be awe-inspiring (for the objects contained in it) and boring (for the vast, vast, *VAST* amounts of &quot;empty space&quot; between said objects).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nigel Depledge,</p>
<p>I think you mean this one: <a href="http://www.phrenopolis.com/perspective/solarsystem/" rel="nofollow">http://www.phrenopolis.com/perspective/solarsystem/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s incredible how the Universe can both be awe-inspiring (for the objects contained in it) and boring (for the vast, vast, *VAST* amounts of &#8220;empty space&#8221; between said objects).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481264</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481264</guid>
		<description>Eugene (33) said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;You know what would be wild? Someone should do a version of this IN a linear scale. You’d have to be super creative with spacing, and the scrollbar would stretch for *ages*, but it’d be totally worth it!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Somewhere on the internet there is a linear scale model of the solar system.  I remember seeing it several years ago (maybe the BA blogged about it?).  You can spend hours scrolling through the black before you get to the next object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene (33) said:</p>
<blockquote><p>You know what would be wild? Someone should do a version of this IN a linear scale. You’d have to be super creative with spacing, and the scrollbar would stretch for *ages*, but it’d be totally worth it!</p></blockquote>
<p>Somewhere on the internet there is a linear scale model of the solar system.  I remember seeing it several years ago (maybe the BA blogged about it?).  You can spend hours scrolling through the black before you get to the next object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481215</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481215</guid>
		<description>You know what would be wild?  Someone should do a version of this IN a linear scale.  You&#039;d have to be super creative with spacing, and the scrollbar would stretch for *ages*, but it&#039;d be totally worth it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what would be wild?  Someone should do a version of this IN a linear scale.  You&#8217;d have to be super creative with spacing, and the scrollbar would stretch for *ages*, but it&#8217;d be totally worth it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Orlando</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481041</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481041</guid>
		<description>One thing I miss compared to the first version was the juxtaposition of &quot;Largest virus&quot; against &quot;Smallest particle blocked by a surgical mask&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I miss compared to the first version was the juxtaposition of &#8220;Largest virus&#8221; against &#8220;Smallest particle blocked by a surgical mask&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug McLachlan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481015</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug McLachlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481015</guid>
		<description>Loved it but I am wondering if I am the unwitting victem of the scale problem you discuss Phil.

Midway through, we are shown the size of the Ort cloud and the distance from the Sun to Proxima Centari.  To my eye it looks to me that the distances are surprisingly close.  If the Centari stars have their versions of Ort clouds, do they overlap with each other?  Do they overlap with the Sun&#039;s?

I had always understood that comets might be disturbed from their Ort cloud slumber by the gravitational tugs and pushes of other stars as we danced around the galaxy but hadn&#039;t considered that the comets might come from a neighbouring star&#039;s Ort cloud or that the interaction of the two might be responsible for the dive towards the sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved it but I am wondering if I am the unwitting victem of the scale problem you discuss Phil.</p>
<p>Midway through, we are shown the size of the Ort cloud and the distance from the Sun to Proxima Centari.  To my eye it looks to me that the distances are surprisingly close.  If the Centari stars have their versions of Ort clouds, do they overlap with each other?  Do they overlap with the Sun&#8217;s?</p>
<p>I had always understood that comets might be disturbed from their Ort cloud slumber by the gravitational tugs and pushes of other stars as we danced around the galaxy but hadn&#8217;t considered that the comets might come from a neighbouring star&#8217;s Ort cloud or that the interaction of the two might be responsible for the dive towards the sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jearley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-481003</link>
		<dc:creator>jearley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-481003</guid>
		<description>OK-
Results:  my astronomy class says that they like it.  &#039;amazing, fricken sick, bitchin&#039;  (they are watching me post this) in other words they liked it, and were able to get a good idea of the size differences.  I did explain the scale before hand.  They told me say &#039;Good job&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK-<br />
Results:  my astronomy class says that they like it.  &#8216;amazing, fricken sick, bitchin&#8217;  (they are watching me post this) in other words they liked it, and were able to get a good idea of the size differences.  I did explain the scale before hand.  They told me say &#8216;Good job&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480962</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480962</guid>
		<description>Awesome! My only nit-pick is the representation of carbon, water, cesium as Bohr models with 10,000 X oversize protons and neutrons. I would have preferred some kind of fuzzy electron cloud representation at this scale. Aside from this, way cool and a great teaching aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! My only nit-pick is the representation of carbon, water, cesium as Bohr models with 10,000 X oversize protons and neutrons. I would have preferred some kind of fuzzy electron cloud representation at this scale. Aside from this, way cool and a great teaching aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffersonian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480932</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffersonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480932</guid>
		<description>The scale of VY CMa gave me a mindblown moment/google flurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scale of VY CMa gave me a mindblown moment/google flurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480912</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480912</guid>
		<description>How to kill a discussion thread using atomic orbital theory:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/12/28/why-are-atoms-mostly-empty-space/#comment-463276</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to kill a discussion thread using atomic orbital theory:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/12/28/why-are-atoms-mostly-empty-space/#comment-463276" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/12/28/why-are-atoms-mostly-empty-space/#comment-463276</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480903</guid>
		<description>@ One Eyed Jack -
Heh!  I kinda get where you&#039;re coming from there.

When I got to uni and started learning about atomic and molecular orbital theories, it blew my mind.  I think this was largely because all preceding presentations of electron orbitals had been circular /  spherical.

The same could be said of the nuclei - they, too, are not spherical.

Most of this stuff has been known for 20+ years.  We should stop teaching a 1950s understanding of the atom and bring the educational tools up to date.

Having said that, there was a previous thread here that I killed by introducing just a tiny bit of atomic orbital theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ One Eyed Jack -<br />
Heh!  I kinda get where you&#8217;re coming from there.</p>
<p>When I got to uni and started learning about atomic and molecular orbital theories, it blew my mind.  I think this was largely because all preceding presentations of electron orbitals had been circular /  spherical.</p>
<p>The same could be said of the nuclei &#8211; they, too, are not spherical.</p>
<p>Most of this stuff has been known for 20+ years.  We should stop teaching a 1950s understanding of the atom and bring the educational tools up to date.</p>
<p>Having said that, there was a previous thread here that I killed by introducing just a tiny bit of atomic orbital theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Eyed Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480891</link>
		<dc:creator>One Eyed Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480891</guid>
		<description>Nice, but like other I have my bones to pick. 

The depiction of the atom is horrid.  This is a video about relative size, yet we see helium, hydrogen, carbon, and water with orbits that are completely out of scale relative to the size of the particles. The way it is presented, you miss that the vast majority of an atom is completely empty space (sorta).

And don&#039;t even get me started about the use of classic circular models.

Overall, it&#039;s a good tool, but if you&#039;re going to make a tool for science education, you shouldn&#039;t ignore simple science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, but like other I have my bones to pick. </p>
<p>The depiction of the atom is horrid.  This is a video about relative size, yet we see helium, hydrogen, carbon, and water with orbits that are completely out of scale relative to the size of the particles. The way it is presented, you miss that the vast majority of an atom is completely empty space (sorta).</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t even get me started about the use of classic circular models.</p>
<p>Overall, it&#8217;s a good tool, but if you&#8217;re going to make a tool for science education, you shouldn&#8217;t ignore simple science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480797</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480797</guid>
		<description>Love this work! :-D 

It gets bonus credit for me by including Pluto&#039;s moons and so many of the ice dwarf planets too. :-) 

Plus I&#039;ve learnt  a few things too such as the existence of Amphilicoelias Fragilimus, yoctometers and the Minecraft World. :-) 

Is it just me though or does the string - presumably quantum / cosmological variety not hardware store type -  look &lt;i&gt;(impossibly?)&lt;/i&gt; smaller than the Planck length? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this work! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>It gets bonus credit for me by including Pluto&#8217;s moons and so many of the ice dwarf planets too. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Plus I&#8217;ve learnt  a few things too such as the existence of Amphilicoelias Fragilimus, yoctometers and the Minecraft World. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Is it just me though or does the string &#8211; presumably quantum / cosmological variety not hardware store type &#8211;  look <i>(impossibly?)</i> smaller than the Planck length?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceRN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480724</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480724</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Gisselbeck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480705</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Gisselbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480705</guid>
		<description>Can we really appreciate how far it is to anything we haven&#039;t seen and walked to? On earth anything farther is just a given time spent traveling. In space it is just so many zeroes in a number.  Even to a scientist the universe is smaller than it was 200 years ago. Then it took months to travel around the world. We&#039;ve gone to the moon in a few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we really appreciate how far it is to anything we haven&#8217;t seen and walked to? On earth anything farther is just a given time spent traveling. In space it is just so many zeroes in a number.  Even to a scientist the universe is smaller than it was 200 years ago. Then it took months to travel around the world. We&#8217;ve gone to the moon in a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480704</link>
		<dc:creator>KAE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480704</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice that you can use the scrollwheel on your mouse! Needs to have Ringworld or a Dyson sphere though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice that you can use the scrollwheel on your mouse! Needs to have Ringworld or a Dyson sphere though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amphiox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480679</link>
		<dc:creator>amphiox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480679</guid>
		<description>Anon @18;

Oh, you want to multitask your listening?

Kids these days.... Grumble grumble....

....Why, back in MY day......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon @18;</p>
<p>Oh, you want to multitask your listening?</p>
<p>Kids these days&#8230;. Grumble grumble&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;.Why, back in MY day&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Bonacci</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480671</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Bonacci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480671</guid>
		<description>They forgot the Phoenix Asteroids...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They forgot the Phoenix Asteroids&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480655</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480655</guid>
		<description>@16. Amphiox: What if you want to listen to something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@16. Amphiox: What if you want to listen to something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480651</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480651</guid>
		<description>Anyone know the basis for the elementary particle &quot;sizes&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know the basis for the elementary particle &#8220;sizes&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amphiox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480650</link>
		<dc:creator>amphiox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480650</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Vagueofgodalming, to turn off the music, click on the two musical notes at the upper right corner.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

One can also hit the off switch on one&#039;s speakers, too....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Vagueofgodalming, to turn off the music, click on the two musical notes at the upper right corner.</p></blockquote>
<p>One can also hit the off switch on one&#8217;s speakers, too&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.Rose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/12/another-interactive-way-to-scale-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-480649</link>
		<dc:creator>D.Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=44386#comment-480649</guid>
		<description>Minecraft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minecraft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 11:42:00 -->
